Argue with a Jew and an Anti-Jew about sandwitches, morality, and judaism.

ews are a people in tarry. the messiah wont come
that's according to your opinon, why would the jews care about your opinion

"there will eventually be a messiah and this is how to act to speed up his arrival
litvaks believed there was going to be a messiah regardless, the only new thing that the Baal Shem Tov did was introduce more mysticism into Eastern European Judaism and advocate for the simpler people who had to substinence farm and didnt have the time to study in the yeshiva

started the ball rolling on the start of the zionist movement "there will eventually be a messiah and this is how to act to speed up his arrival"
this is not a zionist position. Hasids are not Zionist. At the very most, they tolerate Israel existing but they do not support it. Political Zionism was an atheist movement and initially antireligious. Religious Zionism stems from Rabbi Kook who wasn't Hasidic and was from the Litvak branch.

You're misunderstanding stuff and making connections that make sense with your misunderstandings but do not reflect reality. Hasidim were extremely anti zionist to the point where many died in Germany because they refused to work with Zionists attempting to buy them out from Germany.
 
that's according to your opinon, why would the jews care about your opinion
There it is, jews don't care for anyone's opinion but jews. Yet again.

You didn't answer me though, is it because this conversation was actually just an elaborate ploy by me to get you to admit you have no problem with sticking to literal definitions for words except when it comes to jews sucking baby dicks? So you are wrong about one but which one could it be in your own mind? You are a fool like always and I am your master, yet again.

The hardest things to face are the ones we hate, and you hate for being exposed for your rampant pedophilia.
 
oh you're one of those people who views everyone who disagrees with you on anything whatsoever as the enemy and a member of whatever group you are currently upset with

that type of person typically already has their mind set on why you're wrong before you say anything, and only then thinks up a way to explain how
why is anyone arguing with this idiot?
 
oh you're one of those people who views everyone who disagrees with you on anything whatsoever as the enemy and a member of whatever group you are currently upset with
I'm glad you have no idea what you are talking about. I'm sure it's meaningful in your empty mind.
that type of person typically already has their mind set on why you're wrong before you say anything, and only then thinks up a way to explain how
why is anyone arguing with this idiot?
Why would I start an argument with the idea I'm wrong? You don't even make sense.

People argue with me because they attempt and fail to prove me wrong. Just like the 20 times they've done so in this thread or the holocaust thread or the 100 other A&N threads.

Maybe stick to not posting since you seem to be much better at that.
 
You're legitimately arguing that fried chicken is a sandwich because there are breadcrumbs in the coating?
So how small does bread have to be before it stops being bread exactly? Do individual grains start or stop being bread before or after its baked? If cooking individual grains makes it bread, how does recombination of grains and cooked also make it not bread? You create distinction where there is none because you are weak and thoughtless and scared of what the truth holds.

It's funny how you are all tacitly admitting you have zero logical basis for your thought processes. I already knew that about Catch the Pedophile, because he regularly admits to being unable to think.
 
So how small does bread have to be before it stops being bread exactly? Do individual grains start or stop being bread before or after its baked? If cooking individual grains makes it bread, how does recombination of grains and cooked also make it not bread? You create distinction where there is none because you are weak and thoughtless and scared of what the truth holds.
very talmudic way of thinking there kike. literal definition of pilpul
 
very talmudic way of thinking there kike. literal definition of pilpul
Imagine thinking logic and the Talmud go together.

You keep dodging the question though. Does sucking a baby's dick make you a pedophile? Yes or no?

As always you've been completely owned and have no recourse but to continue posting while screaming "I'm not owned". Probably from the sewer.
 
If he doesn't come by 6000 then it's our fault for miscalculating.
Just like the many people predicting apocalypses? Just dial the calculations out a bit and keep on manipulating.
This stuck out to me;
  • when all Israel repent a single day
  • when all Israel observe a single sabbath properly
  • when all Israel observe two sabbaths in a row properly
  • in a generation that is totally innocent, or totally guilty
  • in a generation that loses hope
  • in a generation where children are totally disrespectful towards their parents and elders (commonly thought to be "our generation", in every generation!)
I read this as ‘never.’ There’s several places in various religious texts where there’s a similar responses to ‘when is x going to happen?’ And the reply is something like ‘when all of the people keep all of the law for all of the day.’ I see it a bit tongue in cheek. It’s a bit like ‘how many wives can I have? - as many as you can keep happy.’ With the point being that you can’t keep two wives happy because more than one wife is, and has always been, and will always be a source of conflict.
The answer is a tongue in cheek ‘when you’re perfect.’ And humans are not and have never been perfect, so the answer is never. It’s the religious text equivalent of ‘when pigs fly.’ Or ‘when hell freezes over.’ It means never.
But of course people do like having multiple wives so that seems to have been conveniently ignored.
You’ll never have a generation totally innocent or totally guilty because we are human and flawed. You’ll never have everyone behaving themselves perfectly.
Phillip K Dick’s experience was very peculiar. You can of course write it all off as stress and colossal quantities ofdrugs but he (or he says the pink light) diagnosed his child with something that would have killed him and the doctors had missed (a type of hernia.) what’s interesting about his writing is that he kind of acknowledges that he has no idea what’s going on and it may well be a psychotic break with reality. He kind of lets that possibility sit there rather than just dismissing it or embracing it.
 
Last edited:
a cult that existed for 400 years doesnt define a religion that's over 3k years old
Judaism was founded at Javneh around 80 AD. Sabbatai Zevi founded his reformation in 1648. Jacob Frank founded his denomination of that religion in 1755. Both still exist and both very clearly still move through jewry. The easiest way I've found to describe the relationship to normies is Frankists are to jews what jews are to gentiles - parasitic, subversive, denied, and protected all at once, like a mafia within a mafia.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Kalsarikännit
A jewish sandwitch is obviously one that had the bread cut off at one end, with the meat flopping out onto the table.

It also can't be pork.
But can you pork it?

Also, this Jewish lawyerfagging over retarded word definitions and other snca is the poisonous effect Jews have on the rest of society. They literally cannot stop thinking like this
 
a cult that existed for 400 years doesnt define a religion that's over 3k years old
christianity existed as a cult for about 400 years, gaining the acceptance of multiple governments, before the council of Nicena codified christian belief into a creed that is to this day the main unifying factor across all christian faiths. it also has the distinction of re-defining judaism, because the jesus debacle was such a big deal that it caused a jewish revolt in jerusalem and got the romans to send soldiers to invade it and raze it to the ground, destroying the second temple, rendering the jewish people in a state of displacement for the next 2000 years.

you're right, a cult that existed for 400 years doesn't define a religion that's over 3k years old. It completely supercedes it on every level. so if christianity can do all of that despite the jews obviously not wanting anything to do with it, then imagine how much can be done with an ideology they actually want ownership of? How much did zionism change about the jewish faith that you aren't even aware of?
 
Last edited:
Back