None of this will effect Aaron's case in any way, even if it theoretically could. He's already agreed to plea out and will probably just stick to that because it's the sensible option when faced with felony charges related to things that he 100% did. Just taking the damn misdemeanor is a better choice than a hail Mary shot based on allegations of cyber crimes that even if true may not have any relevance to the issues at hand.
The idea that a breach of attorney-client privilege—arguably one of the most protected rights in the justice system—would have no effect is ridiculous. Courts have overturned convictions and dismissed cases over far less. Even if a plea deal was discussed or tentatively agreed to, it's not binding until accepted by the court. And if Aaron’s attorney learned that the prosecution's case may be tainted by illicit access to privileged communications, no ethical attorney would advise a client to plead guilty under those circumstances without first pursuing a full investigation.
Aaron has been offered a plea deal of a slap on the wrist and a fine of 1.00 KNUs (Kayla Nude Units), but why should he even accept
that when the complainant and her husband has demonstrated the willingness to break federal law and his right to confidentiality with his legal representation—to bust him on a fucking titty pic?
It's not a
"hail Mary" when constitutional rights have been severely violated. If attorney-client privilege was breached and potentially exploited by the state prosecutors, the complainant or their affiliates, that's not a technicality—it’s a Sixth Amendment violation. The court may be compelled to act not just for Aaron’s sake, but to preserve the integrity of the judicial process itself. Nick's CFAA violations involved accessing Aaron’s defense legal strategy, the relevance is direct and serious. It affects everything from the fairness of prosecution to the ability of the defence to do its job. If the other side had a window into his legal arguments, witnesses, or confidential communications, how on earth is that irrelevant?
It’s not a shot in the dark, Aaron has third-party corroboration, and by his own account, the Minnesota FBI office has already completed part of their investigation. Subpoenas have likely been already issued, and data has reportedly been returned to law enforcement.
By his own words, investigators have asked Aaron to identify relevant witnesses, which strongly suggests they’ve already reviewed concrete evidence of the distribution of confidential information. Based on that, we can assume investigators are now moving toward pre-charge investigation witness summons. Federal investigators could also be moving towards a multiple subpoenas for a grand jury before arresting Nick (if the grand jury finds cause to proceed).
Here's a quick and easy tell, Nick is always eager to run his faggot mouth about how Aaron is wrong and stupid.
Ever since Elissa Clips dropped her evidence, not a single comment. He always shuts like a clam when there's actual legal considerations.
It appears Nick is taking it seriously, why aren't you?
