UN Australia and Canada pull rape and incest game that tells players to be 'women's worst nightmare' - The following story contains reference to sexual assault, violence against women and misogyny.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
L/A
IMG_2944.webp
The computer game "No Mercy" centres around a male protagonist who is encouraged to "become every woman's worst nightmare", and "never take no for an answer.". Picture: No Mercy on Steam

By Asher McShane
A game that touts itself as an "incest and non-consensual sex' simulator has been pulled from the world's biggest PC gaming platform in Australia and Canada as pressure mounts on UK authorities to follow suit.

The computer game "No Mercy" centres around a male protagonist who is encouraged to "become every woman's worst nightmare", and "never take no for an answer."

Technology Secretary Peter Kyle, who is responsible for overseeing the government's online safety strategy, described the game as "deeply worrying" and demanded the tech giant take it down.

The game launched on Steam last month and is described by its own developers as containing violence, incest, blackmail, and what they describe as "unavoidable non-consensual sex."

After LBC revealed it was still available on Steam in the UK, it emerged that Australian and Canadian officials had swiftly made it unavailable for download.

Officials in Australia pulled it for being ‘unclassified’. A spokesman for Australia’s department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications and the Arts said: “The computer game, No Mercy, is unclassified and has now been removed from sale from the Steam platform in Australia.”

Efforts to have the game removed in Australia were spearheaded by campaign group Collective Shout who wrote to the country’s regulator as well as launching a global petition.

After a public backlash the game was also removed from Steam in Canada after less than 24 hours.

Pepe Di'Iasio, General Secretary of the Association of School of College Leaders told LBC: “Just copy Australia. Australia seems to have got a grip on this, they seem to have acted swiftly.

"They realise they have to protect young people who are at the heart of this… I think that we’ve got a game of tennis taking place between Ofcom and tech companies, what we’re seeing is people blaming one another.

"Let’s get the legislation doing what it should do and let’s make sure we can protect the young people who are most at threat from this right now.”
IMG_2945.webp
The video game has 'very positive' reviews from sick users on Steam. Picture: Steam

The game requires a card to buy, but has minimal age-verification checks, with campaigners warning it could be downloaded by children.

“Adult themes exist in video games, but I’m so shocked and surprised by this,” LBC's tech correspondent Will Guyatt said.

“There's probably about 3.5 million active Steam accounts in the UK… I just don't see how this can be openly, easily available and also importantly not removed when people like myself have reported it as unsuitable.”

LBC created a Steam account with full access to adult content by simply ticking boxes claiming to be 18+, and was able to download No Mercy for £9.99.

“Tech companies make it as easy as possible for kids to go on and put in a fake age and put in a card,” child mental health expert Nova Eden said.

She says many parents will be under the misconception that sites like Steam are “a game shop, a social network,” and therefore assume they are properly moderated.

In reality, Steam is not signed up to any age-rating frameworks like PEGI, a content rating system established to help European consumers make informed decisions when buying video games through the use of approved age recommendations and content descriptors.

Anyone can upload a game for sale on the site, which then sits alongside products developed by regulated, mainstream games studios.

LBC reported the game to Steam as inappropriate five days ago. It has still not been taken down, or subject to more stringent controls.
IMG_2946.webp
The game's presence online also raises questions about the regulator Ofcom’s ability to properly moderate content.

It began its crackdown on harmful online content last month as part of the Government’s Online Safety Act, but the regulator told LBC it “can’t investigate individual complaints.”

That’s despite chief executive Dame Melanie Dawes saying as part of LBC’s Online Safety Day last month: “Our under-18s deserve a very different experience to the one they’re getting now, so no pornography, and a significant down-ranking of things like violent content, misogyny.”

The body is due to publish its “children’s codes” which will set out requirements for sites to protect young people online. Tech firms will then have three months to carry out risk assessments.

“I'm very interested to see how [Steam’s parent-company Valve] will justify that topics like this are acceptable in a game, and if they do deem them acceptable, they should make it a hell of a lot harder for your everyday consumer to be able to find,” Guyatt said.

“It's intriguing to see where this fits under the Online Safety Bill.”

Mr Kyle, who is facing pressure over the potential watering down of the Online Safety Act, insisted that Steam should remove the game from its marketplace.

He told LBC: “We expect every one of those [tech] companies to remove content as soon as they possibly can after being made aware of it. That’s what the law requires, it is what I require as a secretary of state, and it is certainly how we expect platforms who operate and have the privilege of access to British society, and British economy, to do.”

Mr Kyle also suggested that the regulator should make a call on whether the game should remain online.

"Ofcom is the regulator," Mr Kyle said. "They are tasked with enforcing and they will make the judgment as to whether content is removed in an appropriate time."

A spokesperson for the Games Rating Authority said:"Game ratings provide parents and players information about the content of video games.

In the UK, physical game releases must carry a PEGI age rating by law. Digital games are not legally required to carry an age rating, but the majority of leading stores use the trusted PEGI age rating process to provide confidence to consumers.

Although games on Steam can optionally apply for a PEGI age rating via our classification process, it is not mandated by the platform prior to a game's release.

The Games Rating Authority has not classified this game and has not been approach to classify it since its release."

Steam did not respond to LBC's requests for comment.
 
Banning a edgy rape game is a lot easier than stopping actual cases of rape. Virtue signaling at it't most blatant.
This is the same brain dead argument lolicons make, "why don't you go after the real pedos" because you can't be against 2 things at once. What next are you going to start calling the people who don't like this game the real rapists?

Women can have 50 Shades of Grey but men can't have their little sex/rape fantasy game. The world is extremely anti-male and so much so that men can't have any kind of expression of sexual desire. Even unoffensive sexual desires. Women don't want men or at least certain men talking to them looking at them or even jerking off to things in the privacy of their own homes/dwellings. You can't have any sexy women in any forms of entertainment. If it's not safe horny it can't exist. Safe horny means anything that doesn't appeal to straight males.
Men are so oppressed because they can't play a game where you rape your own family.:'(
You know they're are women who don't like 50 shades of Grey because they're not a monolithic group just as men aren't.
Let's just keep pretending there isn't a segment of the female population that has rape fantasies.
If rape is such a female fantasy why is it pretty much entirely men getting upset by this?
 
Kids going to gay pride parades surrounded by fags dressed in bondage gear is a good thing. And having them go to drag queen story hour to sit on a sex offenders lap while being read a story about a boy and his two dads is also a good thing.
But the kids must be protected at all costs from this edgy sex game? (A game they’d have to ask their parents to buy them, can’t imagine many would be thrilled to do that lol) this is retarded

As for the moral outrage of this being so disturbing because it’s a male fantasy, women write some weird shit too but I guess calling it smut cancels out how gross it can be. There was a woman literally just arrested in Australia for writing a book called “Daddy’s Little Toy” where a girls dads friend molests her as a toddler and starts a DDLG relationship with her as soon a she turns 18 lol
 
LBC created a Steam account with full access to adult content by simply ticking boxes claiming to be 18+, and was able to download No Mercy for £9.99.
That’s despite chief executive Dame Melanie Dawes saying as part of LBC’s Online Safety Day last month: “Our under-18s deserve a very different experience to the one they’re getting now, so no pornography, and a significant down-ranking of things like violent content, misogyny.”
They get close, but they never outright state the fact that the game is a porn game and not a regular video game.
I will be interested to see if they go after Steam because it's not like this is the only pornographic game they sell and I highly doubt it's the worst one either.

I am curious how they found this and never went after say Subverse which made headlines.
 
Saw the trailer, it’s full on porn.
I'm aware I was talking about how the article never outright states the game is a porn game and tries to paint it as some edgy game that slipped through the cracks. The article should have stated it is a porn game and that Steam sells porn games.
I'm glad it's pissing off the right people, but it is pretty gross.
Don't you believe porn should be banned, I'm surprised you care?
It's been removed off Steam.
The developer themselves removed it and not Steam itself.
 
Annnd it’s gone!


Devs Behind Controversial Sexual Assault Game Defend It, But Say They're Pulling It From Steam Anyway​


His Patreon is gone too

--

Dear world,

Recently, there has been a lot of noise about the game "No Mercy."

We want to address a few issues.

False information about the content in the game was very often repeated. People created videos and spoke with great conviction about things that weren't in it, which showed that they hadn't even launched the game. Some did such extensive "research" that they presented graphics from a completely different game—I hope that game survived this ordeal. If this is what your attempts to act in good faith look like, we deeply believe that no one will ever suffer from being wrongfully accused by you. However, think twice about whether it's worth repeating everything you've heard from someone and whether the information you're passing on is actually true. Better yet, do some work yourself instead of blindly chasing views.

Secondly, many people unfortunately confuse fiction with reality, attributing fabricated stories where people who play "No Mercy" then go out on the street and commit vile acts. In general, all those who played it are mentally ill and hate their mothers and women in general. That's how it's generally presented, and we completely disagree with this. During development, we conducted hundreds, if not thousands, of conversations with people who tested the game, and everyone perfectly understood what the game was about and that it was a game. They were normal people. The same applies to the partners of all those who participated in the project. I guarantee that during production, no one was harmed, and we all consider ourselves completely normal and healthy individuals. However, we are concerned about the mental health of people who sent us emails. Some descriptions of what you would do to us were really sick compared to what could be found in "No Mercy."

About the famous kinks in the game...

Let's start with what shocked public opinion—incest. Real incest is something disgusting, and we fully agree with that. However, incest is also one of the most popular kinks worldwide when it comes to pornography, mainly because it typically portrays third parties, strangers, in no way related to the person watching it. Stepmom, stepson, stepdaughter are among the most frequently searched terms in pornography, which, for emotionally stable people, is just roleplay. I guarantee that no person who enjoys such a fetish feels sexual attraction toward their relatives. If we want to criticize someone for enjoying watching such portrayals, I believe we're intruding too deeply into their sexual sphere. Some people like feet, some like costumes, and some like this type of roleplay.

Rape. Here also, no one wants anyone to get hurt. However, it's strongly connected with blackmail and male domination, which is also a fetish. If someone plays with their partner at home pretending to be a student and teacher who demands sexual acts in exchange for a grade, should we label them as sick and call them rapists, check their computer, and lock them in prison? I fully understand that for many people such things may be disgusting, but during sex, people should really do what they want, as long as they don't harm anyone.

Can a game harm someone? According to many studies, with the emergence of the internet and pornography in the 90s, sexual crimes decreased by half. If someone is sick, dangerous, and might actually harm someone, would playing a game or watching pornography increase their desire to do so? We sincerely doubt it; rather, they'll satisfy this need at home and perhaps save someone from harm. It's somewhat similar to shootings and playing games—it has been proven many times that games reduced the amount of violence in people rather than increasing it.

It was also very inappropriate to report that the game was available to 12-year-olds. The game still required creating an account, selecting the appropriate option, connecting a credit card, and paying for it. Since so many people showed graphics from a different game, it might mean that it wasn't so easily accessible after all. In an era where such content is available online by typing one of the most popular pornography sites, we sincerely doubt that any minor would perform such actions. Nonetheless, it’s their parents' responsibility to supervise the type of content they access.

However, here we come to the last point, which is the role of media and various organizations, as well as internet content creators.

Please consider—would anyone who wasn't looking for such content hear about this game if it weren't for hundreds of articles, petitions, and statements from content creators? After all, if someone believed that this game shouldn't be available in their country, they could have handled it quietly; they could have reported the matter to the authorities. Meanwhile, websites used the trending topic for clicks, organizations placed links to fundraisers under petitions, and content creators made videos that garnered more views. The result of all this was that the game suddenly went from around 1,000 visits to 100 times more in those days. There are certainly events that need to be publicized quickly, when someone is actually being harmed and we can save someone. Was it really necessary in this case, for those few views and extra money for fundraisers?

At this point, the game has been blocked in 3 countries—Australia, Canada, and the UK. We don't intend to fight the whole world, and specifically, we don't want to cause any problems for Steam and Valve. They do a great job and are incredibly helpful.

If after reading the above, you still believe that such a game should not have been created, then we sincerely apologize to you. At the same time, we would like you to be a bit more open to human fetishes that don't harm anyone, even though they may seem disgusting to you. This is still just a game, and although many people are trying to make it into something more, it remains and will continue to be a game.

We've made the decision to withdraw "No Mercy" from Steam.

Zerat Games

PS. If you have purchased the game, you will not lose access to it.
 
Oh! Free advertisement! Nice.

Just wait till those Brits and Aussie cucks find out that groomers aren’t just targeting vulnerable kids online, but that children are also being mutilated and given powerful cross sex hormones by unscrupulous adults.
 
  • Like
Reactions: i440BX
This is the same brain dead argument lolicons make, "why don't you go after the real pedos" because you can't be against 2 things at once. What next are you going to start calling the people who don't like this game the real rapists?


Men are so oppressed because they can't play a game where you rape your own family.:'(
You know they're are women who don't like 50 shades of Grey because they're not a monolithic group just as men aren't.

If rape is such a female fantasy why is it pretty much entirely men getting upset by this?
Keep white knighting for bitches. I am pretty sure one day they will fuck you.

I will let you in on a little secret. They won't.
 
For anyone wondering why American's have such a superiority complex over every other country. This.

The founders of our country put the second most important thing being that if the goverment got out of control you could overthrow it.

Other countries, we can't trust you to see this thing so we will ban it. Treating adults like children who need the government to raise them.
 
For anyone wondering why American's have such a superiority complex over every other country. This.

The founders of our country put the second most important thing being that if the goverment got out of control you could overthrow it.

Other countries, we can't trust you to see this thing so we will ban it. Treating adults like children who need the government to raise them.
I'm sure the founding fathers were thinking about incest rape visual novels when they were drafting the Constitution
 
Ah yes, rape, the most inoffensive of all sexual desires.

The same group advocating for the game to be removed also did this:
View attachment 7205440
I'm not talking about rape being inoffensive. I am talking about just regular sexual desires of men. It's all considered bad and toxic by women these days. Just wanting to fuck is considered bad.

I don't care what group pushed for it to be banned. I am talking about the fact that the book was super popular with women. It was a top selling book. It topped the best seller lists in the UK and US. It sold 150 million copies. Women get to have their sexual desires and men are told theirs are bad and they can't have any.
 
Back