Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Captain Manning]

“Yeah the government just came and arrested me because I’m just too fucking cool” — which is genuinely what Nick has been peddling. Part of his story is it was just too much fun partying and doing drugs, and he’s sorry for being too awesome.

In case you haven't noticed, his new audience is almost all lolberts. That argument resonates with them. People like Grifty and CGoody. They think drugs should be legal. He's going with that argument because he is a fellow traveler, but also because that is the only group that is willing to give him any modicum of sympathy now.

I like the libertarians that bitch about things like Civil Asset Forfeiture. Which isn't even really a "libertarian issue," but more of a "how the fuck is it still legal for the government to do this?" issue.

The ones that bitch about roads, and taxes, and the age of consent, and DRUGS are almost always unhinged fags. Like Nick.

(Null is generally pretty libertarian, but once said on MATI has said he can't identify as one because of all the idiocy surrounding the label, and I think that's a smart move).

 

[Potentially Criminal]

As far as I know there is no stipulation that probation is violated only if a crime is committed after sentencing.

Actually, being charged with any new crime while he is on probation is a violation of remain law abiding, even if he committed the crime before sentencing, as far as I can see.

It's a general principle that prior criminal activity getting charged doesn't trigger a Probation Violation. Not saying it doesn't happen, but it shouldn't.

I've never seen this happen, and it would be fundamentally unfair to the Defendant, especially if our goal is to change and alter future conduct and ways of thinking.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

it would be fundamentally unfair to the Defendant

I am sure we can make an exception for a particularly obnoxious non-lawyer from rural Minnesota.

 

[Melty Butter]

It's a general principle that prior criminal activity getting charged doesn't trigger a Probation Violation. Not saying it doesn't happen, but it shouldn't.

I've never seen this happen, and it would be fundamentally unfair to the Defendant, especially if our goal is to change and alter future conduct and ways of thinking.

I get that, and I know I'm reaching, but bear with me... The hacking intent was to intimidate a witness in Nick's possession case. (Nick would say otherwise, but that's easily disputed.) In an ideal world, it's hard to imagine that it couldn't topple his cushy plea for possession.

 

[Kipersonapiscesotter]

It's a general principle that prior criminal activity getting charged doesn't trigger a Probation Violation. Not saying it doesn't happen, but it shouldn't.

I've never seen this happen, and it would be fundamentally unfair to the Defendant, especially if our goal is to change and alter future conduct and ways of thinking.

That makes sense, but I couldn't find it written anywhere.

 

[Midnight Energy Drink]

I've never seen this happen, and it would be fundamentally unfair to the Defendant, especially if our goal is to change and alter future conduct and ways of thinking.

People here almost want to see law stretched as if they fear Rekieta may 'change and alter future conduct and ways of thinking'.

 

[Kipersonapiscesotter]

People here almost want to see law stretched as if they fear Rekieta may 'change and alter future conduct and ways of thinking'.

View attachment 7213905

Not really. I just couldn't find it written as a rule. I suppose that's because they'd like to reserve the right, depending on the circumstances, but I'd agree it would be generally harsh, particularly if it was say for a crime in the same ballpark.

 

[woodedbag]

Honestly prison would probably be the best thing for Nick at this point. Unlimited dudes to fuck, 3 meals a day, doesn't have to see his kids, no pressure to stream from the last of the balldo washers or to get the 5k locals gift out, and he can get fucked up every day on swish. A happy ending for everybody

 

[Midnight Energy Drink]

Honestly prison would probably be the best thing for Nick at this point. Unlimited dudes to fuck, 3 meals a day, doesn't have to see his kids, no pressure to stream from the last of the balldo washers or to get the 5k locals gift out, and he can get fucked up every day on swish. A happy ending for everybody

Also some prisoners get opportunity to study and learn law

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Honestly prison would probably be the best thing for Nick at this point. Unlimited dudes to fuck, 3 meals a day, doesn't have to see his kids, no pressure to stream from the last of the balldo washers or to get the 5k locals gift out, and he can get fucked up every day on swish. A happy ending for everybody

If it was a prison in a central European or Nordic country I would agree, because they have a much better reformation quota and actually work towards returning a convict as a healthy member of society, while the US prison system is primarily punitive. I would not wish a trip there to anyone but the worst of the worst, because it is likely they come out worse than they went in. (I know the blue collar cushy prisons are different, still not a good place to spend your forced rehab)

Nick needs to go into a close treatment facility without access to the internet and be forced to actually work on getting away from all his addictions, including his obsession with Aaron and creeping around social media and chatrooms every day.

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

The important decision would be whether to pursue it federally or at the state level (no opinion on that personally). The CFAA is federal and has civil remedies. Any judgment in such a case would probably not be dischargeable in bankruptcy because it's an intentional tort (and in fact an outright crime whether or not prosecuted as one).

Anyway, just something to talk to counsel about. They might advise seeing what happens with whatever the feds are doing.

I don't see why he doesn't at the very least file a bar complaint. It's free.

Definitely pressing more his counsel about this should be a good idea, especially since Nick is mentioning so much initiating a civil lawsuit against Aaron. I am not a lawyer, but one thinks that what their investigation finds out could be relevant to Aaron if Nick ever decides to start a lolsuit.

I am sure we can make an exception for a particularly obnoxious non-lawyer from rural Minnesota.

I know this was a joke, but if the legal becomes relative to who you are judging, the United States will become more like Brazil. And nobody wants that.

 

[Captain Manning]

I get that, and I know I'm reaching, but bear with me... The hacking intent was to intimidate a witness in Nick's possession case. (Nick would say otherwise, but that's easily disputed.) In an ideal world, it's hard to imagine that it couldn't topple his cushy plea for possession.

It could, but I dunno.

The issue here is that most judges seem to like it when parties reach a consensus. As the prosecutor and Nick seem to have in Nick's possession case.

I think the only way the deal for Nick here goes sour(er) is if the judge is a complete hardass and thinks the punishment is too lenient. That can happen, but I think it's pretty rare. It's like the classic "I consent, I consent, I don't" meme. Otherwise, if it's within the sentence range, they usually seem to go along with it.

 

[woodedbag]

If it was a prison in a central European or Nordic country I would agree, because they have a much better reformation quota and actually work towards returning a convict as a healthy member of society, while the US prison system is primarily punitive. I would not wish a trip there to anyone but the worst of the worst, because it is likely they come out worse than they went in. (I know the blue collar cushy prisons are different, still not a good place to spend your forced rehab)

Nick needs to go into a close treatment facility without access to the internet and be forced to actually work on getting away from all his addictions, including his obsession with Aaron and creeping around social media and chatrooms every day.

I don't care about Nick rehabilitating I just wanna keep laughing. That was just a joke at his expense in line with his lifestyle choices.

 

[demicolon]

Honestly prison would probably be the best thing for Nick at this point.

It would end like his rehab: opportunity to swap phone numbers with tweakers who know how to score meth.

To repeat: he's not going to a hard knocks prison, he's going to a white collar summer camp to rub elbows with other shysters, tax evaders, corrupted lolyers and such.

 

[Captain Manning]

To repeat: he's not going to a hard knocks prison, he's going to a white collar summer camp to rub elbows with other shysters, tax evaders, corrupted lolyers and such.

Possibly not even that. Don't get me wrong, it would be neat if it happened, but we should probably curb our enthusiasm a little. At least until/unless an indictment drops.

I keep seeing news stories about weirdos threatening to kill Trump (both on and off-site), so I think maybe the FBI has a lot on their plate right now.

 

[Strix454]

I dont think prison or rehab would have an effect on Nick. But it would be good for his family if he just went away for a while.

Nick is a real hardcore addict at this point. Nothing scares him and nothing matters to him. Rehab only really works if you want to change or save yourself or have something in life you care about other than yourself. He has already cooked his brain and wrecked his body through "weight loss".

Even if you put him in a tough prison, the only thing likely to happen is that he would come out of it even more gay and not scared of prison anymore.

 

[Kipersonapiscesotter]

Possibly not even that. Don't get me wrong, it would be neat if it happened, but we should probably curb our enthusiasm a little. At least until/unless an indictment drops.

I keep seeing news stories about weirdos threatening to kill Trump (both on and off-site), so I think maybe the FBI has a lot on their plate right now.

I think it is probably nailed on if the county investigated AND THEN transferred to the FBI. The investigator Aaron's lawyer hired had no doubt wrapped this with a bow.

That's cos when you commit crimes it isn't a good idea to admit them and your thought process on video.

At this stage I'd be surprised if it goes nowhere.

 

[waffle]

@Kipersonapiscesotter Excellent work on the sentencing stuff, but I think you're shooting low. From what Ive seen of federal criminal stuff they will charge anyone they can with interference with judicial process type charges. If Nick gets charged I think one of the primary motivating factors will be to hit him with some kind of 18 U.S.C. § 15[XX] (I.E I don't know exactly which one) charge about doing the CFAA stuff primarily to gain an advantage in his criminal case and to try and mess with Aaron's cases.

 

[ChromaQuack]

250000$ in fines.

Well it's a good thing he has that second house he can sell to pa---

Oh.

 

[keke]

In case you haven't noticed, his new audience is almost all lolberts. That argument resonates with them. People like Grifty and CGoody. They think drugs should be legal. He's going with that argument because he is a fellow traveler, but also because that is the only group that is willing to give him any modicum of sympathy now.

I like the libertarians that bitch about things like Civil Asset Forfeiture. Which isn't even really a "libertarian issue," but more of a "how the fuck is it still legal for the government to do this?" issue.

The ones that bitch about roads, and taxes, and the age of consent, and DRUGS are almost always unhinged fags. Like Nick.

(Null is generally pretty libertarian, but once said on MATI has said he can't identify as one because of all the idiocy surrounding the label, and I think that's a smart move).

There’s been discussion earlier in this thread that Nick is a libertine. Just reiterating that because it’s true.