US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In Jewish Billionaire Pritzker news...

Gov. JB Pritzker rips Trump tariffs on first Fox News appearance, calls them ‘taxes on working families’
Chicago Tribune (archive.ph)
By Dan Petrella
2025-04-13 21:20:10GMT
Gov. JB Pritzker on Sunday used his first-ever appearance on Fox News to take his criticisms of President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs to the network’s conservative-leaning audience, labeling the Republican administration’s levies on imports “taxes on working families.”

Pritzker, who has made frequent national media appearances since Trump retook the White House this year, is widely viewed as a potential contender for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination. And as “Fox News Sunday” host Shannon Bream noted in the morning show interview, the billionaire governor has taken a more aggressive approach to criticizing the president than other Democratic governors who are also frequently mentioned in those conversations, including Michigan’s Gretchen Whitmer and California’s Gavin Newsom.

Illinois’ two-term Democratic governor wasn’t asked directly about his presidential aspirations, and he sidestepped a question about a Fox News poll that showed majority support for GOP positions on issues such as bans on transgender athletes, deportation of immigrants in the U.S. without legal permission and increased domestic oil production.

Instead, the American people “want affordability to go up,” Pritzker said when asked whether Democrats are out of step with voters. “They want their costs to go down when they go to the grocery store. That’s the opposite of what this administration does. This administration says they’re for working families and then attacks working families with the biggest tax increase in U.S. history with these tariffs.”

Pritzker’s roughly 10-minute interview followed a week when Trump’s on-again, off-again tariffs roiled stock markets and left American investors, businesses and the nation’s trading partners perplexed about what the president is attempting to achieve. The governor’s Fox interview was immediately preceded on the TV program, which airs on Fox affiliates across the country, by a segment about support for tariffs in the shrimping industry in the South.

Pritzker said the potential for tariffs to help certain industries that face competitive disadvantages is “an argument for targeted tariffs.”

“But that’s not what President Trump has done,” the governor said. “He’s put massive tariffs across the board, and that’s going to affect not only the cost for average working families going to the grocery store, but it’s also going to affect the sales of crops that we grow in the state of Illinois and across the United States.”

Pushing the U.S. toward potential trade wars with some of its largest export markets is going to make it harder for highly productive Illinois farmers to sell their corn, soybeans, pork and beef, Pritzker said.

“We’ve got to focus on targeted tariffs,” he said. “Good trade policy, I might add, is really about protecting U.S. workers, making sure that we’re expanding markets overseas, and focusing on lowering costs for American families. And none of what President Trump has done really does that.”

Pritzker also pushed back on the argument that Trump’s use of tariffs is causing U.S. companies to consider building up domestic production or retain jobs here that otherwise might have gone overseas.

Some of those decisions already were being made as a result of President Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act, while any possible significant increases in U.S. manufacturing and jobs as a result of steep tariffs would take years to materialize, “and we’re going to lose a lot of jobs and have a big recession in between,” Pritzker said.

Pritzker also criticized Trump for using tariffs as a way of “punishing” major allies and trading partners, including Europe, Canada and Mexico, where the governor recently completed a trade mission and signed a memorandum of understanding with the state that contains Mexico City.

“We’ve got a free trade agreement between Mexico, Canada and the United States that should be strengthened, and we should continue to use that,” Pritzker said. “It’s one that President Trump put in place, President Biden abided by during his term, and now President Trump wants to blow all that up and re-trade the very thing that he negotiated.”

Earlier in the program, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said Trump “is working to fix” imbalances that have hurt American producers.

“For decades, the way we have been treated in this country and especially our farmers and ranchers is absolutely stunning,” Rollins said. “We have been living under a tariff regime but it has been the regime of other countries.”

During the interview, Bream pressed Pritzker on his frequent claims that Republicans in Congress want to cut Medicaid, noting that both Trump and U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson have said cuts to the government-run health insurance program for the poor aren’t on the table in current federal budget negotiations.

But Pritzker said the GOP’s proposed $880 billion in cuts to federal spending would not be possible without hitting Medicaid or other social safety net programs.

“There are only three places that you can find that kind of money. And those are the things that most Americans, frankly, rely upon. I mean Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security,” Pritzker said. “It’s going to really hurt working families across the United States.”

Unmentioned in the interview was the invitation Pritzker received Friday to testify before the House Oversight Committee about Illinois’ policies toward immigrants who are in the country without authorization.

Pritzker spokesman Alex Gough said last week that the governor was “evaluating whether he should take time from his busy schedule serving the people of Illinois to educate the House GOP on these matters.”

The request from Republican U.S. Rep. James Comer of Kentucky, chairman of the Oversight Committee, came about a month after Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson testified before the same committee about the city’s similar policies.

Comer said in a social media post Thursday that he also invited Democratic Govs. Tim Walz of Minnesota and Kathy Hochul of New York to testify about their states’ “sanctuary policies,” which he contended threaten safety and violate federal law.

Illinois law “is fully compliant with federal law and ensures law enforcement can focus on doing their actual jobs while empowering all members of the public — regardless of immigration status — to feel comfortable calling law enforcement to seek help, report crimes, and cooperate in investigations,” Gough said in an emailed statement, also noting that one of the Illinois laws in question was signed by Pritzker’s predecessor, Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner.
Another one making plans for 2028 along with Newsom.
 
Khan Academy was, without exaggeration or hyperbole, a godsend when I was a wee lad going through the school system like 10-15 years ago. Did your class finally get up to trigonometry and you're sitting there struggling to understand what the hell sine, cosine, and tangent are? Khan Academy's got you covered. I did myself no favours cutting Algebra II in high school, and it was specifically hustling toward the end of the year with Khan Academy videos teaching me the stuff I missed out on in a digestible manner that allowed me to pass the state math exam and not become at risk of being a super senior.

It's an absolute travesty that the greatest gift to education on the internet has not yet earned some type of accreditation in $current_year. Completely fucking unforgivable.
Khan Academy can never receive accredidation at all costs, because that wpuld threaten tenure for the fat golem women with english majors we staff in schools. Repeat that for the entire system, really, whenever you have ideas of making some better way of doing things.
 
I just watched Empire of Dust this weekend. I remember the Chinese CREC companies were trying to get some sort of minerals deal out of the road repair project, wonder how far that ended up getting.
That movie almost makes you sympathetic with the Chinese.

But it also doesn’t get super deep into all the aspects.. like, with the belt and road stuff, China would make these deals where they’d agree to buy x from y country and just completely reneged, they did tofu dreg shit that just fell apart, they’d book out an entire hotel specifically to prevent any Africans from sleeping in the same building as the Chinese.. but mostly I think you were dealing with two cultures who over promise and under deliver, so of course nobody would be happy with the outcome.

For the African countries, they’d realize they got Chinese quality infrastructure they’d be paying off longer after it was gone, and the Chinese people realized they weren’t actually going to get paid back, lol.
 
If employees cost $40/hr (or more) instead of $4/hr you aren't going to waste them doing "hand operated" tasks (except high-end lower volume products).
Sometimes in piece-work, which would be what you’d call the kind of thing where you don’t get to move much and just sit in one spot doing a short cycle, repetitive task, companies will offer pay per piece as opposed to hourly wages.

It works well in two ways.. makes it less boring for people who really want the money, and lets them get paid more fairly for the effort.

My dad’s company had a piece-work department that was staffed on a volunteer basis
 
(((Noticers))) who were mad over Trump's Passover post, where are you now?
1744595106705.webp
Source (Archive)

1744594862208.webp
d75c2fe76d5ea529.webp
Source (Archive)

Full Presidential Message:

Presidential Message on Holy Week, 2025​

The White House | April 13, 2025

This Holy Week, Melania and I join in prayer with Christians celebrating the crucifixion and resurrection of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ—the living Son of God who conquered death, freed us from sin, and unlocked the gates of Heaven for all of humanity.

Beginning with Christ’s triumphal entry into Jerusalem on Palm Sunday and culminating in the Paschal Triduum, which begins on Holy Thursday with the Mass of the Lord’s Supper, followed by Good Friday, and reaching its pinnacle in the Easter Vigil on Holy Saturday night. This week is a time of reflection for Christians to memorialize Jesus’ crucifixion—and to prepare their hearts, minds, and souls for His miraculous Resurrection from the dead.

During this sacred week, we acknowledge that the glory of Easter Sunday cannot come without the sacrifice Jesus Christ made on the cross. In His final hours on Earth, Christ willingly endured excruciating pain, torture, and execution on the cross out of a deep and abiding love for all His creation. Through His suffering, we have redemption. Through His death, we are forgiven of our sins. Through His Resurrection, we have hope of eternal life. On Easter morning, the stone is rolled away, the tomb is empty, and light prevails over darkness—signaling that death does not have the final word.

This Holy Week, my Administration renews its promise to defend the Christian faith in our schools, military, workplaces, hospitals, and halls of government. We will never waver in safeguarding the right to religious liberty, upholding the dignity of life, and protecting God in our public square.

As we focus on Christ’s redeeming sacrifice, we look to His love, humility, and obedience—even in life’s most difficult and uncertain moments. This week, we pray for an outpouring of the Holy Spirit upon our beloved Nation. We pray that America will remain a beacon of faith, hope, and freedom for the entire world, and we pray to achieve a future that reflects the truth, beauty, and goodness of Christ’s eternal kingdom in Heaven.

May God bless you and your family during this special time of year and may He continue to bless the United States of America.
Source (Archive)
 
Last edited:
You have a recommendation for one?
Depends what you want out of it and what political leanings you tolerate or can filter.

Dan Carlin has a large audience and is the "Joe Rogan of history podcasts". The podcast is called Hardcore History. The episodes related to Rome are: 21-23 Punic Nightmares (Punic wars fought between Rome and Carthage), 34-39 Death Throes of the Republic (Roman Republics transition into the Roman Empire), 41 + 41.5 Thor’s Angels (The Vandals sacking Rome and Normans up through Charlesmagne), 60 Celtic Holocaust (Julius Caesars conquest of Gaul)

The History Of Rome - Podcast By Mike Duncan is well researched. It does have the typical academic "leftist" bias. They were recorded from 2007-2012 so not the modern radical leftism of today. They are free on YouTube and Archive.org.

Those should give a good overview.
 
You said my job should be condensed until people don’t have time to use their phones, right?
No. I said that companies looking for efficiencies would. It was not an endorsement, but rather an acknowledgement of reality.

But I will also add that I actually thought you were talking about an IT job (watching movies on a tablet while the machine runs). I also didn't see this:

there’s this thing called cycle time, and these other things called changeovers

You can’t be responsible for two machines being down at once.

Obviously my company is doing ok the way they are, because we have voluntary overtime available, but thanks for wishing hardship.
I wish neither you nor anyone else hardship. Jfc.

Back at you!
Thanks much.

Blame the outsourcing

Are you an HR lady?
how close was I with the hr lady guess?
Very, very far off.

Adding, people age out of my job by getting vertebrae fused. One guy didn’t leave after, he’s still here and can’t tie his shoes. Don’t mistake having free moments with having a spare spine
I have nothing but respect for physical jobs. For the record.
 
Someone else in the thread pointed out how Republicans love shitting on men as well, because it's so much easier than actually addressing their problems.
It's the same way the SJWs shit on anyone who isn't a far-left, pro-feminist, pro-tranny socialist. The only men Republicans can tolerate are corporate wage slaves with a wife and two kids, at the very least. Double points if they're religious and have more than two kids. But any other kind of man is haram to them.

-A single man who's hardworking and lives on his own dime? Bah! You're a traitor to your race and country by not having kids!

-A man who protests against big business and doesn't let local corpo fuck with him? How dare you protest against your social betters!

-A man who would rather enjoy video games and anime over football and hunting? You're an anti-social dweeb and you're what's wrong with this country.

Both the Left and the Right have this picture-perfect mold of what people should be, and they try to force everyone into it.

It always goes back to blaming men, blaming Americans for not wanting to compete with foreigners, blaming Americans for wanting to be paid a decent wage for grueling work, etc.
That's why I'm not optimistic about them supposedly returning jobs to the USA. They want to bring back jobs that pay a dollar an hour. And they gave a massive tax break that's in the trillions, to the people who shipped out those jobs to begin with.

The amount of money these guys are walking away from because they're terrified of anyone using these things for porn is hilarious to me, for example. They've sunk so much money into lobotomizing and censoring the models, spending far more than they would make if they would just fuck off and let people have fun.
The modern right is so scared of porn, to the point where it's matching and surpassing the Left's fear of beautiful women. It's surreal to live in an era where the two political sides can hate each other so much, yet they agree on things that should be personal and up to the citizen.
 
Back