Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.7%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 55 12.0%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 16.0%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 153 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 109 23.9%

  • Total voters
    457
Fascinating read and seemingly very convincing. In a sane world, with just courts, these legal arguments would be a nuclear detonation in Greer's lap.

I sincerely hope the case is dismissed, but I'm not exactly holding my breath, given the lunacy the federal courts have permitted in this case (and even generally) over the past four years.

But I'd definitely bet $1 that Greer mentions his disability in any subsequent filing, because manipulating the world with self pity is the one card he always plays.

Keep on fighting the good fight
 
" *Sigh* I went to law school for this." --Matthew Hardin, maybe
I strongly suspect every law school has the Professor who teaches The Class and he has a whole week on how you'd unload the entirety of the world on a pro se retard, but he sadly says "of course, this chance never comes up, but in theory, here's how it would go."

It's like in basic training when you get to unload the full power of your entire team's arsenal and then the sergeant says "enjoy it, you're never going to get to do this in the sandbox."

Master, forgive me, but I'll have to go all out .... just this once.
 
I strongly suspect every law school has the Professor who teaches The Class and he has a whole week on how you'd unload the entirety of the world on a pro se retard, but he sadly says "of course, this chance never comes up, but in theory, here's how it would go."

It's like in basic training when you get to unload the full power of your entire team's arsenal and then the sergeant says "enjoy it, you're never going to get to do this in the sandbox."

Master, forgive me, but I'll have to go all out .... just this once.
Hardin will be able to teach this from first hand experience when he's a tenured professor at neo-chudharvard school of law
 
He's anything but.

His Hardship is in the flower of youth, elegantly striding through the halls of law and dispensing arguments, citations and the occasional cocky rejoinder. Thank fuck Null found him, or else we might be less entertained and more inclined to doomposting right now.

Hardin fell upon Greer like a thunderbolt.

Like Sun Tzu once said: “Let your plans be dark and impenetrable as night, and when you move, fall like a thunderbolt.”
 
Fascinating read and seemingly very convincing. In a sane world, with just courts, these legal arguments would be a nuclear detonation in Greer's lap.

I sincerely hope the case is dismissed, but I'm not exactly holding my breath, given the lunacy the federal courts have permitted in this case (and even generally) over the past four years.

But I'd definitely bet $1 that Greer mentions his disability in any subsequent filing, because manipulating the world with self pity is the one card he always plays.

Keep on fighting the good fight

It's the only thing that's going to be happening in or to Shit-Lips' lap for a very, very, very long time.
 
A great read as usual, since Hardin seems to be the only sane one here. I can't say what I want or expect to come of it but I can predict one or more of these things either in an email or as a filing:

All caps. Buddy boy-ing. Saying there have been more trolls as a result of Hardin's waste of judicial resources and flagrant filing which is INVITING more trolls. This is not Plaintiff's job. His prior court cases and stalking claims are old news and he's mooooved on so it has no relevance to the copyright harassment website case. Somehow the trolls and criticisms equal copyright because the song and book are solid gold art and thus the only reason they would steal is because they hate him.

And lastly, that Steve being dead was excusable neglect and the case staying in Utah was good anyways so get over it.
 
The filing read like a desperate plea for sanity and just a reminder to the judge on what has happened and how out of hand this whole matter has become, why deal with the gordian knot when you have a sword? There's an exit, and it's simply recognizing how this farce will go on as long as Greer is alive and allowed to.
 
The filing read like a desperate plea for sanity and just a reminder to the judge on what has happened and how out of hand this whole matter has become, why deal with the gordian knot when you have a sword? There's an exit, and it's simply recognizing how this farce will go on as long as Greer is alive and allowed to.
Magistrate judges work hard draining the life essence of the innocent for their masters with the promise that one day they will be granted a phylactery of their own so that death, and therefore true judgement, cannot find them.
 
I mean, that was the deadline to file these things.
There's a high probability I'm retarded, but wasn't the deadline for a response to the FAC? Couldn't he file a motion to dismiss (or summary judgement) at any point before the trial, which hasn't been scheduled yet?

Obviously there's responses to aspects of the FAC in this Motion, I just don't know if there's a meaningful distinction between a formal Response and this Motion.
 
I'm not a magistrate janny or a district janny but if such a thorough filing was made by a clearly very capable lawsmith, I'd grant the motion (I'd still have to write a lot about why but Hardin has all the bases covered) and let the pro se IFP retard fight it out in appeals, because I'm sick and tired of this case.

But they don't make fellas like me jannies.
 
I'm not a magistrate janny or a district janny but if such a thorough filing was made by a clearly very capable lawsmith, I'd grant the motion (I'd still have to write a lot about why but Hardin has all the bases covered) and let the pro se IFP retard fight it out in appeals, because I'm sick and tired of this case.

But they don't make fellas like me jannies.
Another appeal begs the question if the guys who saved his ass the first time would make a second appearance
 
There's a high probability I'm retarded, but wasn't the deadline for a response to the FAC? Couldn't he file a motion to dismiss (or summary judgement) at any point before the trial, which hasn't been scheduled yet?
Rule 12 motions must be filed before a response, and filing of such motions tolls the time for a response.
 
The new Hardin diss track paints a really grim picture. I hope this means we'll pop some sanctions on the omnibussin and then get this tardfest dismissed.

As an aside - we get frequent posts on how this thread should be locked, half the posts are derivative driver and so on - have you read the fillings? If anything the thread is a perfect mirror to the case, where we have an equal measure of absurd, idiotic, well thought out and bizarre entries interwoven into a retarded tapestry. A tardestry even.
But they don't make fellas like me jannies.
I'm starting to think the legal system as a whole could be improved by introducing a retard with a LMAO WHY NOT stamp.
 
Back