Culture Hollywood Is Cranking Out Original Movies. Audiences Aren’t Showing Up. - New movies based on fresh ideas are fizzling at the box office

By Ben Fritz
April 13, 2025 2:17 pm ET

1744720148344.webp
Director Christopher Landon with Meghann Fahy, who stars in the thriller ‘Drop.’ Photo: Bernard Walsh/Associated Press

LOS ANGELES—When director Christopher Landon introduced his new thriller, “Drop,” before its premiere at the Chinese Theater on Hollywood’s Walk of Fame, he had a warning for the packed auditorium.

“It’s really hard out there for an original movie,” he said, urging everyone who liked the Universal Pictures release to “scream it from the rooftops” and on social media.

“Drop” opened this weekend to an estimated $7.5 million domestically, one of two new movies based on fresh ideas that fizzled at the box office. The other was Disney’s “The Amateur,” a spy thriller adapted from a little-known 1981 book, which opened to an estimated $15 million.

After years of gripes from average moviegoers and Hollywood insiders alike about the seemingly nonstop barrage of sequels, spin offs and adaptations of comic books and toys, the film industry placed more bets on original ideas.

The results have been ugly.

Nearly every movie released by a major studio in the past year based on an original script or a little-known book has been a box-office disappointment. Before this weekend’s flops were Warner Bros. Discovery’s“Mickey 17” and “The Alto Knights,” Paramount’s “Novocaine,” Apple’s “Fly Me to the Moon,” Amazon’s “Red One,” and the independently financed “Horizon: An American Saga Chapter 1” and “Megalopolis.”

1744720153948.webp
Jack Quaid in ‘Novocaine.’ Photo: Paramount/Everett Collection

Jason Blum, who produced “Drop” and built his company Blumhouse largely on original horror franchises, said audiences’ preference for known properties has made it harder to release original movies in theaters, “even though that’s where some of the most exciting and risky storytelling still lives.”

Need for advertising​

Getting people into theaters more frequently is a priority for a movie industry still recovering from the pandemic. Box-office revenue in the first three months of this year in the U.S. and Canada was the lowest it has been, excluding the pandemic, since 1996.

1744720215915.webp

t the CinemaCon industry convention in early April, theater owners said they welcome more original films, but only if they are backed by robust advertising campaigns. Building buzz for a new film in a media environment fractured between YouTube, TikTok, streaming and sports is tough, particularly when it is an unknown title.

“We’re opening films that have almost zero awareness,” said Bill Barstow, president of Main Street Theatres, a small Nebraska-based chain.

Many consumers are content to wait until an original motion picture is available to rent online a few weeks after its theatrical release or to stream on a service like Netflix in a few months.

‘Creating new franchises’​

The only films succeeding in the current environment are those with built-in audiences, like “A Minecraft Movie,” which was released in early April and has grossed more than $280 million domestically. And these days, even franchises can be far from a sure thing. Long-running series such as Marvel and DC superheroes and live-action remakes of Disney animated classics are showing their age and proving unreliable at the box office.

Studios say they have little choice but to make more original movies they hope will buck the odds.

1744720252960.webp
‘A Minecraft Movie’ has grossed more than $280 million domestically. Photo: Warner Bros/Everett Collection

“Telling original stories and taking risks is the only path toward creating new global franchises,” Bill Damaschke, Warner Bros.’ head of animation, said at CinemaCon.

Some of the increase in original film releases is attributable to Amazon and Apple, which are building film businesses with few well-established franchises. One of the biggest bets on an original film from any company this year is Apple’s “F1,” a June release starring Brad Pitt as a race-car driver.

Amazon hyped 11 coming movies to exhibitors at CinemaCon, of which six were originals. Among traditional studios, Warner Bros. is taking the most risks on originals, with big budget films from directors Paul Thomas Anderson and Maggie Gyllenhaal.

Hollywood’s next original release comes Friday with Warner’s “Sinners,” a horror movie starring Michael B. Jordan. Next month even Marvel, home to Hollywood’s biggest franchises, is taking a gamble with “Thunderbolts,” about a super team brand new to all but the most devoted comic-book readers.

Source (Archive)
 
And then the full-length trailers came out. And then the movie released, and the reviews came out. And then I saw clips of Hollywood uber-Leftist Mark Ruffalo showcasing his very Trump-like hair and doing his best batshit crazy evil power-mad villain shtick, and I thought Fuck that. No way.
So it is a profound mystery that the TDS crowd, the crowd who purport to uphold the arts, causally namedrop auteurs, and think Parasite was the bestest film ever ("Eat the rich!!!!"), refuse to see this film.
 
Stop making movies with comedically bloated budgets, cease casting often-jewish nepo baby manlets who will never be stars, quit writing hamfisted social commentary into everything, and definitely give up on winning awards when their issuers demand you award makework jobs to nigs and fags or promote them as main actors.
Do all this, plus nurture new stars that won't inspire disgust, and maybe the film industry can recover.
 
Its hilarious. These people don't ever get that the best stuff was years ago. ALL these "original" anime/games/tv shows/movies/music are just rehashes of ideas from old. Remember when people shat Darling in the Franxx for being a retarded version of Evangelion/Gurren Lagann? Or VALORANT for being a gay rip-off of Counter-Strike? Or how Bluey is just a sandwiched attempt at Blues Clues and My Little Pony? or M3GAN just being a generic slasher movie but with a robot? All the entertainment industry needs to do is burn and bring everyone involved to hell.
 
Novocaine is an original movie? It kind of seems like the premise is Kickass + Crank but less fun and far stupider.
I legit thought it was a remake of Max Payne with more Marvel-MCU/millennial writing.
I kinda wanted to like it but all those shitty jokes turned me away.
It's one thing to have a Schwarzenegger/Willis type character spouting a few one-liners in an otherwise in-universe serious moment, and another when the characters constantly don't treat their own universe/threats/stakes as tense/real.
 
Its hilarious. These people don't ever get that the best stuff was years ago. ALL these "original" anime/games/tv shows/movies/music are just rehashes of ideas from old.
Well if you want to get into the nitty gritty of it, there are no original ideas. Everything is a derivative of something else. I've long since given up on original concepts and just appreciate anything that has at least something different to say. That being said, I'll defend M3GAN. It's not a great movie, or even a good movie, but at least it has something to say about parenting and the dangers of pawning your kids off on technology. Even if they just come right out and slap you in the face with it. Frankly, I'll take that any day over things that are absolutely fucking soulless or creatively bankrupt like Netflix's Chucky series or Devil May Cry that has absolutely nothing to say.

I have no idea how they'll replicate anything with meaning in a sequel, but that's M3GAN 2's problem.
 
Its hilarious. These people don't ever get that the best stuff was years ago. ALL these "original" anime/games/tv shows/movies/music are just rehashes of ideas from old.
Well if you want to get into the nitty gritty of it, there are no original ideas. Everything is a derivative of something else.
Brandon Sanderson once compared telling stories to cooking meals. It doesn't have to be unique or revolutionary to be good.
 
Brandon Sanderson once compared telling stories to cooking meals. It doesn't have to be unique or revolutionary to be good.
Exactly. I like Squid Games Season 1 but that's not unique, or original, or revolutionary, or even all that creative. In fact it gets very dumb. Despite all that, it does what it set out to do well and that's why I like it. Nobody has to reinvent the wheel here.
 
Exactly. I like Squid Games Season 1 but that's not unique, or original, or revolutionary, or even all that creative.

And it won't help that they'll beat 4 or 5 sequels out of it, each more palid than last, and wonder why this "original" idea failed to become a gold-plated money-printing machine....

Audiences just don't like new things.
 
I just genuinely don't like going to see movies anymore. A lot of the time it's way too long or half the theater is eating a full meal during the film or there's black people doing black people shit. Bring back drive ins so I can watch a movie in peace outside my home.
There's a drive in place in Sacramento I've been to a few times. It does not help the niggernanigans. In fact I think it made them feel empowered to be even more obnoxious.
 
The irony in what Jason Blum said is that Megan is basically a derivative of the killer doll trope and artificial intelligence becoming sentient trope, essentially taking the plot from the Child's Play remake.
It was a halfway amusing film marred by the fact that Allison Williams seems just as insufferable as her father. Also, knowing what we now know about Hollywood, I fear for what the girls playing M3GAN and Cady were probably subjected to.


Cgi slop has worn out its welcome I honestly think that’s what killed Snow White more than anything else.
Nah, it being utter woke slop killed it. The entitled brat with delusions of grandeur just put a spotlight on it, and the CGI abominations simply threw the last shovel of dirt on the coffin.
 
I want practical effects.

Special effects have looped around and cost more than building a god damn set.
Not to mention that abuse of CGI has pushed them towards increasingly absurd visuals, which only harms them. A movie has to put in the work to have a bit of the feel of real life in it, to be relatable and for you to be able to feel you are there and/or that this could be real, to provide that immersion. If you go too hard on CGI these days, you start to look more like a videogame, but you lose the interactivity of a videogame that helps bridge the immersion gap - Yea, Mass Effect doesn't look real, but when you're controlling what's going on your brain is more willing to accept it. A lot of current CGI is the worst of both worlds, with the artificial visuals of videogames and the inherent disconnect of cinema, and it can't bridge the two.

Not that any amount of practical effects could save the immersion factor when its paired with modern writing, but one problem at a time.
 
No stars are worth seeing.
That's another thing not talked about. The big stars of the past are getting old and turned off portions of the population with their hot political takes. And who is there to replace them? People who got where they are because of who their parent is or how many casting couches they laid on.
 
Back