UK U.K. Top Court Says Trans Women Do Not Meet Legal Definition of Women Under Equality Act - The UK Supreme Court says YWNBAW! (although the trans identity is still a protected characteristic)

Article | Archive
The New York Times. Published: 16 April 2025

U.K. Top Court Says Trans Women Do Not Meet Legal Definition of Women Under Equality Act​

Britain’s Supreme Court was asked to rule on whether trans women can be defined as female under a British law that aims to protect against discrimination.

The Supreme Court in Britain ruled on Wednesday that trans women do not fall within the legal definition of women under the country’s equality legislation.

The deputy president of the court, Lord Hodge, said in a summary of the decision: “The unanimous decision of this court is that the terms ‘woman’ and ‘sex’ in the Equality Act 2010 refer to biological women and biological sex.”

However, he added: “We counsel against reading this judgment as a triumph of one or more groups in our society at the expense of another, it is not.” He said the ruling “does not cause disadvantage to trans people” because they have protections under anti-discrimination and equality laws.

The landmark judgment follows a yearslong legal battle over whether trans women can be regarded as female under the 2010 law, which aims to prevent discrimination on the basis of gender, sexuality, race and other protected characteristics.

The decision was highly anticipated because it could have potentially far-reaching consequences for how the law is applied to single sex spaces, equal pay claims and maternity policies as well as to some of the rights available to transgender people in Britain.



BBC live reporting; https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cvgq9ejql39t
0.webp
1.webp 2.webp 3.webp 4.webp

Also, sex is binary:
5.webp 6.webp

👀
single-sex-spaces.webp



Related:
JK Rowling, the Queen of TERF Island who helped fund this lawsuit, is celebrating.
Queen-of-TERF-Island.webp GosUamSXUAAWcMW.webp
And the troons are melting down even more than usual over her. See:
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/u-k-to...women-under-equality-act.217313/post-21120381
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/u-k-to...women-under-equality-act.217313/post-21129887
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/u-k-to...women-under-equality-act.217313/post-21135630
a.webp b.webp c.webp d.webp e.webp
 
Last edited:
The only thing that amazes me about this ruling is that United Kuckistan still has the balls to tell trannies “fuck off, YWNBAW” Will wonders never cease?

IMG_2766.webp

Not even surprised that mentally ill men are already fantasizing about murdering an old woman without the slightest shred of irony
 
While the British government has been treating its citizens like crap lately with all of the censorship and surveillance measures, I think that the British will be among the first in the developed world to succeed in beating back this trans nonsense if it can be defeated.

Here in Burgerland, pink pills are being vomited out constantly in our culture, academia, and social media.
 
:semperfidelis:

Despite this ruling being excellent news, it cost our taxpayers many hundreds of thousands of our Great British Squid to decide this.

Judge will need to hire some personal bodyguards at all times because he has incurred the full wrath of every 6'3'' AGP fetishist and Discord ageplay groomer in the country. The bottom of his garden wall will be scaled by thousands like that scene from World War Z. Just instead of zombies it's men in women's clothing.

They are not gonna go after the judge. They only go after, and harass, women.

He's also the judge, not some Harry Potter writer, so if he started getting threats I'm 99% sure British cops would use their internet hate crime unit to find and arrest the offenders.
 
Back