UK U.K. Top Court Says Trans Women Do Not Meet Legal Definition of Women Under Equality Act - The UK Supreme Court says YWNBAW! (although the trans identity is still a protected characteristic)

Article | Archive
The New York Times. Published: 16 April 2025

U.K. Top Court Says Trans Women Do Not Meet Legal Definition of Women Under Equality Act​

Britain’s Supreme Court was asked to rule on whether trans women can be defined as female under a British law that aims to protect against discrimination.

The Supreme Court in Britain ruled on Wednesday that trans women do not fall within the legal definition of women under the country’s equality legislation.

The deputy president of the court, Lord Hodge, said in a summary of the decision: “The unanimous decision of this court is that the terms ‘woman’ and ‘sex’ in the Equality Act 2010 refer to biological women and biological sex.”

However, he added: “We counsel against reading this judgment as a triumph of one or more groups in our society at the expense of another, it is not.” He said the ruling “does not cause disadvantage to trans people” because they have protections under anti-discrimination and equality laws.

The landmark judgment follows a yearslong legal battle over whether trans women can be regarded as female under the 2010 law, which aims to prevent discrimination on the basis of gender, sexuality, race and other protected characteristics.

The decision was highly anticipated because it could have potentially far-reaching consequences for how the law is applied to single sex spaces, equal pay claims and maternity policies as well as to some of the rights available to transgender people in Britain.



BBC live reporting; https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cvgq9ejql39t
0.webp
1.webp 2.webp 3.webp 4.webp

Also, sex is binary:
5.webp 6.webp

👀
single-sex-spaces.webp



Related:
JK Rowling, the Queen of TERF Island who helped fund this lawsuit, is celebrating.
Queen-of-TERF-Island.webp GosUamSXUAAWcMW.webp
And the troons are melting down even more than usual over her. See:
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/u-k-to...women-under-equality-act.217313/post-21120381
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/u-k-to...women-under-equality-act.217313/post-21129887
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/u-k-to...women-under-equality-act.217313/post-21135630
a.webp b.webp c.webp d.webp e.webp
 
Last edited:
Five years, four judges, a decision made in the supreme court, and fuck knows how much money to announce that men aren't women.

On reflection, no matter how much I despise trannies, it's a hollow victory and illustrates how fucking stupid, degenerate and regressive we've become as a society. This utterly dumb situation of insisting that men are women should never have been given even a moment's credence or consideration. I actually remember the radio interview with Starmer when he said that some women could have penises, and that is where I completely tuned out of UK politics for good. It doesn't matter which party was in power at that time, all of them would have toed that line. They are all complicit, lying, self-serving scum and I loathe every single fucking one of them.

Enjoy the seething, because the self-inserts, grooming, and depraved, debauched behaviour and ideas of the tranny cult is not going anywhere. They will find other ways to gain access to children and women.
 
I have a former British friend who trooned out by taking troonshine bought in shady sites and later cut all contact with me, but before that he made sure to act like an asshole whenever I said anything slightly gender critical. Hopefully he's in agony right now.

Also I was shared this screenshot so I had to look it up.
1744879040120.webp
Source/I dunno how to archive posts from closed Tumblr blogs

Context part:
1744879311706.webp
Source/Archive

Archived links in order of appearance:
JK Rowling reportedly donates £70,000 to group’s Supreme Court appeal over ‘woman’ definition
'Proud' JK Rowling donates £70k to legal battle to stop the SNP Government changing the definition of a 'woman'
JK Rowling funds women-only rape help centre in Edinburgh
How Much Royalties Does J.K. Rowling Get From Harry Potter?
Is J.K. Rowling Making Money From 'Hogwarts Legacy?' What We Know
Does J.K. Rowling make money from the ‘Harry Potter’ movies?

I haven't read or watched Harry Potter since I was a kid, but maybe I should buy some merch if it helps fund TTD
 
JK Rowling, the Queen of TERF Island who helped fund this lawsuit, is celebrating.
Queen-of-TERF-Island.webp
And the troons are melting down even more than usual over her. See:
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/u-k-to...women-under-equality-act.217313/post-21120381
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/u-k-to...women-under-equality-act.217313/post-21129887
a.webp b.webp c.webp
The mental image of some scrawny faggot in a dress seething and throwing golf balls that ineffectively bounce off jk rowling's smug aura is glorious.
 
What are "trans rights" anyway? Not "misgendering"? Turning this world into a huge "safe space"? Treating "transgenders" as sacred and high in the "hierarchy of oppression"?
Aside from that, they probably want the right to touch & groom children, assault people who misgender them without consequence and be given welfare by society without doing the actual work.

The more these people want more rights for themselves, the worse it makes them look in the eyes of normal people.
 
Here's a good song i recommend to play in background as you sift through watching Trannies, Pro-Trans Karens, and Commies react to the news that common sense (somewhat) prevailed.

EDIT: Start at 1:00 mark if you'd like.
View attachment 7233213
Imagine making an opera based on British India and it's better than anything their culture has produced in thousands of years.
 
Back