Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 15.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 5 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 98 24.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 69 17.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 159 40.5%

  • Total voters
    393
This sentencing recommendation was definitely a pleasant surprise. I think the best funniest outcome would be a combination of community service and a longer probation, say 3-5 years. We all know he can’t go that long without substance abuse. Jail time I can without, I would prefer to play the long game and have him get in further trouble during his probation.

For the lawyers and legal wise people in the this thread, is it possible weens have bugged the prosecution with Nick’s antics and that’s why they’ve recommended a harsher sentence than we expected?
100%, though it's all speculation.

Facts we know, and the PSI investigator probably knows plenty of this as well, either through gossip or official letters:
  • The county is tiny; Nick is something of a local celebrity (he was self-conscious about going out in public after the arrest)
  • He publicly defamed Judge Jennifer Fischer (aka "Judge Pussy Liquor")
  • He heavily implied that the cops who searched his home snorted 2-3 g of cocaine that's unaccounted for, and called them fat
  • He accused a county social worker of lying on the stand (CPS case)
  • The man he kicked out of his second home (since sold), and a member of his church, works for the prison system
  • I forget all the insults he hurled at David Schneider (Monty's attorney), but he's a well-respected lawyer in the County
  • He has had about 9 traffic violations in the year preceding his arrest, and has not paid the fines on 4 to the tune of $539.00
  • He has joked about "Brent" who did his drug tests for staring at his penis
  • He has shamed his former church, particularly his well-respected father-in-law, for having a mental breakdown due to his concern about the drugs
The MN Scandinavian prudes have played it by the book, but they're only human. IANAL, but I've learned that subjectivity is part of the process.

The entire MN Statutes on Presentence Investigations is interesting if read closely. This stood out to me.
Screenshot 2025-04-17 at 4.01.36 AM.webp
Several "confidential sources" could have written letters against him. We'll probably never know unless... Nick's recklessness gets the best of him.

Disclaimer: I couldn't find anything on "adjudicated" pre-sentence investigations, particularly. I assume that it's the same process.
 
Last edited:
Lets talk about PSIs for a moment.

a PSI like this is a big long process which includes interviews, a recommendation like this likely reflects that Nick's risk factors came back very high and a recommendation of jail is pretty significant here because it shows they likely don't feel that Nick has shown that he understands what he did was wrong and why what he did was wrong.
 
This sentencing recommendation was definitely a pleasant surprise. I think the best funniest outcome would be a combination of community service and a longer probation, say 3-5 years. We all know he can’t go that long without substance abuse. Jail time I can without, I would prefer to play the long game and have him get in further trouble during his probation.

For the lawyers and legal wise people in the this thread, is it possible weens have bugged the prosecution with Nick’s antics and that’s why they’ve recommended a harsher sentence than we expected?
It doesn't seem harsh. It is what the sentencing guidelines say actually. He was caught with a lot of cocaine. I think people were assuming it was going to be less and it still might be. The Prosecution has been very retard tolerant so far.

But yes, that PBI was compiled by a probation officer and after meeting and discussing with Nick. They also likely spoke to the rehab people as well. So, if he was an unrepentant prick, yup.
 
Last edited:
I’m not saying they should sit their asses at home. But for each of these small children to have multiple music, dance, etc. lessons is fucked up. Especially because they never hear the end of what a hassle the driving is. Kids will feel guilty and simultaneously resent being made to feel that way.

And what is the point of doing something like music or dance if the enjoyment of doing those things is gone because of the grief the parent gives you because of their burden.
 
Kids generally don’t want to talk about stuff the way adults wish they would. One near-universal exception is within the context of a car ride. That atmosphere of shared mundanity helps children feel more comfortable opening up and letting parents know what’s really on their hearts.

But with dad fuming at the wheel, muttering under his breath and barely able to stay on the road after downing whiskey all night and having only a short nap before getting behind the wheel, I can imagine how tense and fraught car rides are in that family. Walking on eggshells constantly to avoid setting dad off must be excruciating for those poor kids.
 
Especially because they never hear the end of what a hassle the driving is. Kids will feel guilty and simultaneously resent being made to feel that way.
I felt this in my soul. This is so spot on that it isn’t funny. Thank you for that. I have no doubt that the kids feel, to some degree or another, like a burden. Burdens that Nick and Kayla may have even imposed on them.

They’re expected to do their parents’ emotional labor for them. When your CHILD is expected to monitor you for drug or alcohol abuse in addition to his own struggles, you’ve lost the game of life. Congrats. Slow clap for Nick and Kayla, everyone.

Too bad Megan Fox didn’t add that to her letter. “His kids love him SO MUCH, they’re willing to try to watch over his drug and alcohol use! Aren’t they so close?!”
 
As noted by others, the pre-sentencing investigators may have received reports from Nick's mandated "drug outpatient" sessions (rehab), where the program leaders may have noted that Nick was being a smarmy "I'm too good for this" faggot and proceeded to relay that to the PSI.

As always, Nick is his own worst enemy. A pathological need to box his way out of a corner, even when it's not in his own interest.

I suspect Nick always believed he was going to win his case dismissal and had no intention of pleading guilt until forced to do so by no other option. The man sees nothing wrong in his actions and is dismissive of efforts to rehabilitate or humble him.

I hope we'll see the judge call him the fuck out while he has to sit in his defendant cuck chair and take it. He'll seethe hard in his return stream after his 30 days in the shower block with Big Bubba.
 
When your CHILD is expected to monitor you for drug or alcohol abuse in addition to his own struggles, you’ve lost the game of life.
There have been certain details emerge in this case that just blew me away. One was the transcript where either the guardian ad litem or social worker (I can’t recall which) testified that the oldest child was prepared to monitor his parents’ behavior and help them through challenging times while also liaising between them and the authorities as needed. I am still floored that nobody in that courtroom pointed out how grossly inappropriate and inherently abusive such a dynamic is.

If the Rekeita kids ever do find this thread, I hope they can understand that none of this was their responsibility to manage. That they should have been allowed to remain children. That they should never have been confronted with information about their parents’ sexual activity. That their parents should never have tried to insert April into their family sanctuary. That their father never should have described his children being made wards of the state as “a rough summer.”

But mostly I hope they know it’s not their fault their parents are unrepentant fuckups, and that they are not required to maintain contact with either of them when they come of age. Nobody has carte blanche to hinder your safety and well-being, even if they’re your parents.

The first memoirs from the children of mommy bloggers are already being published. I hope the Rekieta kids never have to sell their stories to finance their lifelong therapy. But if they do, they’ll find a very sympathetic global audience ready to hear what they have to say.
 
I’m not saying they should sit their asses at home. But for each of these small children to have multiple music, dance, etc. lessons is fucked up. Especially because they never hear the end of what a hassle the driving is. Kids will feel guilty and simultaneously resent being made to feel that way.
Especially when the never-ending activities are paired with at-home neglect. Even the most dimwitted child will eventually put two-and-two together and realise they're unwanted, and that the activities are a means to get them away from the house and occupy them - essentially daycare. Although with all this said, I'm glad Nick has done the bare minimum here and exposed them to some of the outside world. The worst possible situation would be total at-home neglect where they don't get a feel for the world beyond their retarded parents. That's cult territory.
 
Last edited:
Apparently, Rekieta is capable of encouraging his audience to donate over a million dollars to charity, but he can't encourage a single one of them to write a letter of support.

That's a missed opportunity right there because I'm sure Still-Life would be only too happy to write a letter on Nick's behalf.
 
is it possible weens have bugged the prosecution with Nick’s antics and that’s why they’ve recommended a harsher sentence than we expected?
The Presentence Investigation looks into Nick's life, how he behaves, for aggravating or mitigating factors.
His kids and their reliance on him is a massive mitigating factor, which is why all three letters to the court are playing it up.
It will very likely keep Nick out of prison, because judges want to avoid punishing children for their parent's mistakes if anyway possible.

The aggravating factors would be Nick entire social media activity, which a good investigator will have found easily. Which includes harassment towards a witness in the case, possible admission of further crimes committed, plans to visit Las Vegas to consume drugs, attempts to lay the positive drug tests of his daughter on someone else, attempts to downplay his guilty plea and insinuating that he is only doing it for the family, but that there is a "real story". (If the investigator found this thread and used its archived contents it would be all the more hilarious)

And then we have his comments about "Judge Pussy Liquor", who has since recused herself from the Montagraph case, because those were likely seen by the Judge Wentzel in the process of this lawsuit when he had to review the coke stream to evaluate if the police had lied.

The evaluation is likely very negative and paints a very bad outlook on the chance of Nick remaining clean without the state putting an incentive in place via probation.

And the judge has an interest in slapping Nick around a little bit because he disrespected his colleague and the court system in general.


I fully believe that he will not see prison, as funny as it would be, instead sticking with a high probation duration and extra community service.
Since Nick likes to drive around kids so much, they could use him as a free taxi service to drive senior citizens to doctor's appointments.
 
The aggravating factors would be Nick entire social media activity, which a good investigator will have found easily. Which includes harassment towards a witness in the case, possible admission of further crimes committed,
I’m sure the prosecution would be well aware that Ethan Ralph was given a nationwide warrant and charged for intimidating a witness.

Even a cursory glance at his nonsense over the last 12 months tells you how smug he has been. There’s been no remorse. He thought the rehab, that wasn’t rehab, was beneath him. He also thought the statement by the police or social worker (I forget which) that people of his socioeconomic class don’t find themselves in this situation funny, rather than maybe reflecting that it not a good thing.

In hindsight I guess this all makes sense.
 
Comparing nick's dad's letter and kayla's letter...it feels like it goes against each other. The dad's letter implies that nick has enough money to throw around but kayla's letter states that nick has to do all these trivial jobs. Jobs that can be delegated to other hired persons that nick can afford to pay. If the judge has rehabilitation in mind, he/she would probably weight kayla's letter negatively and tell nick to focus on rehab and give the reccommended sentencing. Which would be great tbh.
 
If my 17 year old son asked me to make him food at 11pm, I'd probably tell him that dinner was about 4 hours ago and that he needs to either eat with us at the table at that time, or sort himself out.

How often could this possibly be happening to merit a mention in the letter anyway??
How do you think Nick got the black eye? Why do you think he's constantly late to streams? If he doesn't cook the 11pm tendies he cops a beating from the eldest. Truly he's a saint for putting up with this constant injustice.
 
Even a cursory glance at his nonsense over the last 12 months tells you how smug he has been.
Remember when @Potentially Criminal advised Nick to take a quick plea and STFU about the case entirely?
Nick was always better than anyone else, only he knew the real story, that the warrant would be easily crushed and that Aaron was the actual perpetrator all along.

Worked out great for him to ignore the good advice her received from an actual lawyer.
 
One was the transcript where either the guardian ad litem or social worker (I can’t recall which) testified that the oldest child was prepared to monitor his parents’ behavior and help them through challenging times while also liaising between them and the authorities as needed.

Is this the same oldest child that supposedly needed Nick to cook him dinner at 11PM?

It is interesting to note that Nick and Kayla are so low functioning as parents (even when trying to look good in an appeal to a judge) that they are just about able to be replaced by AI. Teslas can drive you around. There are plenty of AI assistants that can “schedule” and “plan” your week. A subscription to blue apron can make food appear at your door. Heck, even Nick’s ongoing crusade against government oppression can be handled by spambots on most Internet forums. (See 4chan hack)
 
Back