UK U.K. Top Court Says Trans Women Do Not Meet Legal Definition of Women Under Equality Act - The UK Supreme Court says YWNBAW! (although the trans identity is still a protected characteristic)

Featured on Apr 17, 2025 by Null: U.K. Supreme Court declares: You will NEVER be a Woman.
Article | Archive
The New York Times. Published: 16 April 2025

U.K. Top Court Says Trans Women Do Not Meet Legal Definition of Women Under Equality Act​

Britain’s Supreme Court was asked to rule on whether trans women can be defined as female under a British law that aims to protect against discrimination.

The Supreme Court in Britain ruled on Wednesday that trans women do not fall within the legal definition of women under the country’s equality legislation.

The deputy president of the court, Lord Hodge, said in a summary of the decision: “The unanimous decision of this court is that the terms ‘woman’ and ‘sex’ in the Equality Act 2010 refer to biological women and biological sex.”

However, he added: “We counsel against reading this judgment as a triumph of one or more groups in our society at the expense of another, it is not.” He said the ruling “does not cause disadvantage to trans people” because they have protections under anti-discrimination and equality laws.

The landmark judgment follows a yearslong legal battle over whether trans women can be regarded as female under the 2010 law, which aims to prevent discrimination on the basis of gender, sexuality, race and other protected characteristics.

The decision was highly anticipated because it could have potentially far-reaching consequences for how the law is applied to single sex spaces, equal pay claims and maternity policies as well as to some of the rights available to transgender people in Britain.

BBC live reporting; https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cvgq9ejql39t
0.webp
1.webp 2.webp 3.webp 4.webp

Also, sex is binary:
5.webp 6.webp

👀
single-sex-spaces.webp

Related:
JK Rowling, the Queen of TERF Island who helped fund this lawsuit, is celebrating.
Queen-of-TERF-Island.webp GosUamSXUAAWcMW.webp
And the troons are melting down even more than usual over her. See:
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/u-k-to...women-under-equality-act.217313/post-21120381
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/u-k-to...women-under-equality-act.217313/post-21129887
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/u-k-to...women-under-equality-act.217313/post-21135630
a.webp b.webp c.webp d.webp e.webp
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Ripstart Reginald, Enzo, Yellow Rose Of Texas and 601 others
Click to expand...
Okay, now that's something that makes me believe the pendulum is going the other way. The fact that someone in charge finally sat down and thought about it enough to say "Wait a fucking second. None of this makes any fucking sense." (In fucking bongland of all places) is enough for me to say nature is finally healing.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Like
Reactions: Elim Garak, 90 Seconds, WildWoman and 8 others
Marvin said:
On the basis of being male. They ruled that discrimination against a male person because they're male is still unlawful sex discrimination under Title VII, which is correct.
Click to expand...
Yes, and the discrimination in question is not pretending that they are a woman. The effect is the same regardless of the legal reasoning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elim Garak
In case any of the "nothing ever happens" crowd is still grousing, here are what the practical effects of the case will be according the head of the Equality and Human Rights Commision:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...t-gender-prison-hospital-school-b2734937.html

Basically

1. the ruling means single sex spaces “must be based on biological sex”
2. For example, a trans woman who presents as female, is now barred from accessing women’s loos
3. Wednesday ruling now means NHS wards must accommodate patients based on their biological sex.
4. Baroness Falkner told the BBC’s Radio 4 programme that the ruling made it clear that people assigned male at birth can no longer take part in women’s sport.
5. The EHRC’s updated code of conduct for services will also apply to prisons

So basically as I said earlier in this thread this ruling is TOTAL TRANNY DEATH. Pretty much the end of gender ideology in the UK for any forseeable future.


jertzog said:
They did it because moslems don't like it. Simple as.
Click to expand...

True.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Moosebonker, Barry Williams, Sonic Speed Monkey and 60 others
It's not enough.
They are clearly trying to satisfy both parties by humoring the "gender =/= sex" nonsense, and attempting to draw the line at biological sex to placate the anti-troon side. Maybe the "TERFs" will consider this good enough, but this will do nothing to stop troons, who see literally any slight negative as a genocide, from continuing to lobby and chimp out until they eventually get the legislation reversed and indoctrinate more people into their ideology and lifestyle. They are still a protected class, and their heckin totes real gender identity is still super freakin valid legally. It's clear that the ruling class still is all-in on trannyism, so I doubt this is any real sign of a change in tide.
In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if this turns into a massive rallying point for trannies and "allies" which will just end up radicalizing more people into supporting them.
Only by going hard against troons, proliferation of leftist ideology, and putting a complete stop to the nonsense will we see society return to normal.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Dumb
Reactions: DogPack404, Mid Na, Elim Garak and 9 others
EleusaPalmer said:
Wouldn't this mean there will be weird men in women's bathrooms claiming they're biologically female? Or is something going over my head? Cause all I'm getting from this is TROONS PISS AT HOME!
Click to expand...
I bet them bobbies will start arresting troons that enter female only spaces, rather than prosecuting people for spicy memes on Facebook. TTD for the Anglos has arrived! :story:
 
  • Optimistic
  • Like
Reactions: Elim Garak, DagothUr, Vecr and 2 others
Imagine being a troon and having to cope and seethe so hard as a Supreme Court literally tells them "YOU WILL NEVER BE A WOMAN."

Transgender women are MEN. You are MEN, troons!

And also fun fact you troon scum. That isn't just like, my opinion, man.

It's the LAW.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: SpiceyHuman, Elim Garak, Thumb Butler and 22 others
Qui-Gon's Gin said:
Yes, and the discrimination in question is not pretending that they are a woman. The effect is the same regardless of the legal reasoning.
Click to expand...
No, it was about any sort of sex based discrimination in employment that isn't justified by a legitimate business purpose. ie in employment law they're called BFOQs

If you provide any kind of benefits or different treatment for female employees than you do for males, that isn't tied substantially to a legitimate business purpose, that can be challenged under Title VII.

And it's simple enough for anyone familiar with the tranny issue that it applies to trannies too, not because they're women, but because they're male and that would make it sex discrimination. It applies to cis men just as much.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Like
Reactions: WildWoman and DagothUr
Product Placement said:
Some good news from the UK, it's been awhile.
Click to expand...
First the concentration camps for shitbulls and now the "valids" definitions. A come from behind rare W on bongland

Thumb Butler said:
Is "Keffals" still in the UK? It's not like he would leave his troon flat cave much, but still.
Click to expand...
The red hand of Ulster is pounding down his door as we speak to haul him away for being invalid. Possible use him as a meat shield next time they run into nationalists again
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Elim Garak, Thumb Butler, 90 Seconds and 4 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back