"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

The Keno Kasino chat wants to file a class action lawsuit for the light mode blindness they’ve received
Sue.webpNull.webp
 
  • Like
  • Horrifying
  • Feels
Reactions: and six goriilion others, donjulio, JustSomeDong and 8 others
Adolf Hulkler said:
Orite SPCC streamed there.(and once connected josh with that black fish n chips shop)
Im still convinced that SPCC is LPC but he had a new sort of "personality" in the prank calls.
I distinctly remember spcc have his audio stuff physically break so he sounded exactly like LPC
Click to expand...
He wasn't LPC but seemed to know him IRL. He all but confessed that LPC was the cohost that showed up a couple times and was in some of his recordings.

I miss SPCC every day. I'm still out there pressing 3 for Greek, jamming to that Cisco hold music.

 
  • Feels
Reactions: MrReeShopper, I'm a Silly, Asian tech support and 1 other person
I'm gonna do some PR for the finished KF Doom Project No. 2.

1744918442060.webp
One day the Ooperator wanted to do science. He took random kiwi shitposters and connected them to a dream reading machine. Unfortunately, this caused every single one of them to fall into a permanent coma. Even worse, the nightmares may soon break free. A gigantic CONSENT ACCIDENT is threatening the fabric of reality. Billions will die! As the only able-bodied bird left, you've been called back to the KF laboratory to undo as much damage as possible.

After 6+ months and who knows how many hundreds of hours, not including the months it took making the graphics or the time the mappers spent + testing, this is the result. It has the amount of content of a smaller comercial game, but with a KF touch.

The things you can expect from this are: kiwis, chuds, cheese, plenty of autism, HRT, memes, farts, more autism, mighty Balldos, many levels with bonus content and much more.

@ArticleWriter has collected a couple of "reviews".

1744919356481.webp
1744919452881.webp

Someone also posted this project to Doomworld, and for their trouble they got banned within 15 min. No explanation.

Doomworld, that has been the central hub for Doom modding since the early Internet, has become an absolutely toxic wasteland there anyone that doesn't suck up to the "authorities", trannies and their enablers, will be immediately banned. And if they hate you enough(not uncommon), your projects are gone too.
If you are the least critical of trannies ever changing mental state, or their constant issues with "problematic" stuff and think including very questionable content(children) into your maps should lead to removal from the forum, you're gone.
All this is wildly enabled and lauded by the biggest narcissists on the net.

Do you want to mod for Doom while finding the above not acceptable, well, sucks to be you.

For a more thorough explanation of things, there's a write up included in this projects zip, for those interested. It's a pretty sad story how modding for a game forces people to be ok with manipulative behavior and child grooming, among many things.


But if you don't give a shit about that and just want to blast demons, chuds, gunts, and who knows what else (and even Null?), just download this and check it out. People who doesn't go into shock from seeing the word nigger seems to enjoy it.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: Pedophobe, Spider Princess Fan, Harvey Danger and 5 others
Null said:
Honestly it's a good stream, give it a try and if it sucks knowing the results put on a a few of the four hour ones
Click to expand...
How many hours of sleep did you get after that stream?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Jotch
bring dinner & lunch 12hour stream

1744922544409.webp1744922997664.webp
TLDR: blood in water
The Issue
Open Letter to the Record Labels Suing the Internet Archive

We, the undersigned, call on the record labels and members of the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA)—including UMG, Capitol Records, Concord Bicycle Assets, CMGI Recorded Music Assets, Sony Music Entertainment, and Arista Music—to drop your lawsuit against the Internet Archive.

Your $700 million lawsuit, targeting the Internet Archive’s efforts to preserve and provide access to historical 78rpm records, is not just about music—it’s about whether our digital history survives at all.

These fragile recordings are part of a vanishing American culture. They capture early jazz, blues, gospel, and folk—voices and sounds that might otherwise be lost forever. The Internet Archive’s Great 78 Project seeks to preserve that legacy, and make it available for research.

But your lawsuit doesn’t just threaten these recordings. It threatens the very existence of the Internet Archive, including the Wayback Machine, a vital public service used by millions every day to access historical snapshots of the internet. Journalists, educators, students, lawyers, and citizens use the Wayback Machine to check sources, investigate disinformation, and preserve public accountability.

This lawsuit is an existential threat to critical infrastructure for the internet. At a time when digital information is being deleted, rewritten, and erased, preservation is more important than ever. We cannot afford to lose the tools that safeguard memory and defend facts.

We urge you to drop this lawsuit and support, rather than punish, the preservation of our shared cultural heritage.

Defend the Internet Archive. Protect the Wayback Machine. Drop the 78s lawsuit.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Dumb
Reactions: Harvey Danger, Zemblan Physics, Let's find Crack and 5 others
waffle said:
He wasn't LPC but seemed to know him IRL. He all but confessed that LPC was the cohost that showed up a couple times and was in some of his recordings.

I miss SPCC every day. I'm still out there pressing 3 for Greek, jamming to that Cisco hold music.

Click to expand...
ah, no, SPCC cohost was "out of it" constantly.
He always talked about "yeah other people than fucking lpc can make prank calls online" when people asked if he was lpc.
but the amount of audio gear SPCC seemed to have, with SPCC not having any traceable "history" of prank calling before his streams while having expert level prank calling skills, he DID hint he had used other usernames to prank call before but none were dug up and proven, or, fuck even speculated.

SPCC was LPC, he just didnt want to stream his prank calls live anymore because faggots started calling up the places HE had called about how they were on a live show.
If i recall, faggots like @dispatch and his crew were doing it.
Huh, was his account deleted?
Last i heard of dispatch was that he hosted Bitwave.tv and then sold the streamind code to odysee....

Oh right, Dispatch did this https://odysee.com/@Captain'sClippingClan:b7/bitwave.tv-bits-dispatch-visits-dick:3
only the first 25 seconds are a worth the watch.
Dick in his next ACK ACK ACK show said he was holding a revolver behind the door.
 
1744923794018.webp
Nana meme . exe are u really 18?
The state of New Jersey has announced that they’re suing the communication app Discord, claiming that it lacks safety measures for children and “obscured the risks” of using the app. Discord has since spoken with Dexerto and given their response, revealing they plan to fight New Jersey in court.

New Jersey Attorney General Matthew J. Platkin has raised the suit alongside several other state officials, alleging that Discord misled parents about how safe their children would be while using the app and failed to create strong enough parental controls to keep children safe.

“The multiyear investigation by the New Jersey Office of the Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs revealed Discord’s conduct violated New Jersey’s consumer protection laws and exposed New Jersey children to sexual and violent content, leaving them vulnerable to online predators lurking on the Discord app,” an official statement from the state says.

They’re seeking immediate action from Discord to not only buff up security measures against underage users signing up for the service, but also the seizure of any funds generated by Discord via users under the age of 13.

New Jersey hits Discord with lawsuit
The suit asserts that the state of New Jersey has conducted a multi-year investigation into Discord’s business practices and security, which drove them to ultimately file a complaint against the company.

They claim that Discord has failed to enforce policies barring children under the age of 13 from accessing the app, citing what they believe to be laid back security measures as a huge concern.

“At all relevant times, Discord’s Terms of Service have stated that users must be ‘at least 13 years old and meet the minimum age required by the laws in [the users’] country.’ To this day, however, Discord only requires individuals to enter their date of birth to establish their age when creating an account—nothing more,” reads the document.
Click to expand...
“Discord does not require users to verify their age or identity in any other way. Simple verification measures could have prevented predators from creating false accounts and kept children under 13 off the app more effectively.”

It also claims that children can easily join a server with over a million users on it, allowed for any user on that server to send them a direct message with no restrictions since they’re a part of a common server.
Click to expand...
They also call out Discord users being able to make alternate accounts with little difficulty if they get banned, alleged that their “Safe Directing Message” feature didn’t do enough to protect children, and other offenses New Jersey views as a violation of their Consumer Fraud Act.

“Discord actively chose not to bolster its age verification process for years and has allowed children under the age of 13 to operate freely on the app, despite their vulnerability to sexual predators,” the statement says.

“Simply put, Discord has promised parents safety while simultaneously making deliberate choices about its app’s design and default settings, including Safe Direct Messaging and age verification systems, that broke those promises. As a result of Discord’s decisions, thousands of users were misled into signing up, believing they or their children would be safe, when they were really anything but.”

Discord responds to the lawsuit
Dexerto reached out to Discord to get a response on the matter, and they had this to say in an official statement:

“Discord is proud of our continuous efforts and investments in features and tools that help make Discord safer. Given our engagement with the Attorney General’s office, we are surprised by the announcement that New Jersey has filed an action against Discord today. We dispute the claims in the lawsuit and look forward to defending the action in court.”

Additionally, they claim that the safety measures New Jersey is targeting in this lawsuit have been significantly upgraded in recent years, and that the safety features that were implemented in 2017 aren’t accurate to what the app is today.

The current version of Discord allows users to block messages from any source, even people on your friends list. There’s an option to completely block DMs if you so choose to access Discord in that way – or if your guardian chooses that for you.


“The lawsuit’s focus is on safety initiatives we undertook years ago as a small startup to offer our users safety controls. It is important to note that we have continued to invest in and improve safety practices, products and teams since then,” Discord told Dexerto.

“Today’s litigation does not question the value of these tools for users, but instead whether we could have been clearer with our description of them. We have worked hard to provide our users with a clear understanding of the tools and controls we offer.”

In other words, Discord believes that some of the problems that have arisen on their app are a result of security measures not being used the way they were intended to be, pointing to resources they have that explain tools that are within the Family Center to allow for parental controls.


They were also adamant about Discord not being traditional social media, and that users decide what they do and don’t engage with on the platform.

“Unlike social media platforms, Discord users are in control of their experience—they decide with whom they interact and what communities they join. There is no endless scrolling, no counting of likes, and no ‘going viral.’ Discord is not a platform designed to maximize engagement by an algorithm picking and choosing the content users see, and our business model is not based on the paid amplification of content,” Discord explained.

All of these factors combined are why Discord is fighting this lawsuit and going to court in order to defend themselves rather than choosing to settle.

This isn’t the first lawsuit that’s been raised against Discord in recent times, with a class action lawsuit being raised against them late in 2024 claiming it’s too difficult to unsubscribe from their Nitro service.
Click to expand...
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Pedophobe, I'm a Silly and Rattus Ebrius
Null said:
i am fucking stressed out majorly over the next stream. i've been busting ass this week to get the new check idea rolled out and tomorrow i have an infinite amount of shit to talk about.
Click to expand...
We are in a tinkering singularity, time warp stream?
 
Null said:
i am fucking stressed out majorly over the next stream. i've been busting ass this week to get the new check idea rolled out and tomorrow i have an infinite amount of shit to talk about.
Click to expand...
Remember to have a quick smoked oyster snack break when you hit the second hour of YouTube link superchats :⁠^⁠)
 
  • DRINK!
  • Lunacy
  • Like
Reactions: MrReeShopper, Critical Raxx Theory, BarberFerdinand and 5 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back