Culture 'American Psycho’ Director Says “Wall Street Bros” Missed Point of Film: “A Gay Man’s Satire on Masculinity” - My media literacy is constant and sharp and I do not hope for better slop for anyone. In fact, I want this slop to be inflicted on others. I want no one to escape.

Article|Archive

American Psycho director Mary Harron said she’s “mystified” by the way the 2000 film has been “embraced by Wall Street bros.”

The filmmaker recently chatted with Letterboxd Journal about the “sigma male” social media phenomenon and how some men have grown to look at Christian Bale‘s Patrick Bateman as a role model.

“I’m always so mystified by it,” Harron said. “I don’t think that Guinevere [Turner, American Psycho writer-actress] and I ever expected it to be embraced by Wall Street bros, at all. That was not our intention. So, did we fail? I’m not sure why [it happened], because Christian’s very clearly making fun of them… But, people read the Bible and decide that they should go and kill a lot of people. People read The Catcher in the Rye and decide to shoot the president.”

However, The Notorious Bettie Page director added that “Wall Street bros” actually missed the overall point of the film, which follows Patrick Bateman, a wealthy New York City investment banking executive who hides his alternate psychopathic ego from his co-workers and friends as he delves deeper into his violent, hedonistic fantasies.

“It was very clear to me and Guinevere, who is gay, that we saw it as a gay man’s satire on masculinity,” Harron explained. “[American Psycho author Bret Easton Ellis’] being gay allowed him to see the homoerotic rituals among these alpha males, which is also true in sports, and it’s true in Wall Street, and all these things where men are prizing their extreme competition and their ‘elevating their prowess’ kind of thing. There’s something very, very gay about the way they’re fetishizing looks, and the gym.”

In Ellis’ novel, Patrick Bateman also idolizes Donald Trump, who is currently serving his second term as the U.S. president. While American Psycho is set during the Reagan era in the ’80s, when the AIDS Epidemic hit the LGBTQ community, the filmmaker was taken aback at how the story has aged over time, as transgender rights are now under attack by the Trump administration.

“It was about a predatory society, and now the society is actually, 25 years later, much worse. The rich are much richer, the poor are poorer,” she said. “I would never have imagined that there would be a celebration of racism and white supremacy, which is basically what we have in the White House. I would never have imagined that we would live through that.”

As American Psycho celebrates its 25th anniversary this year, Luca Guadagnino is set to helm a new film adaptation for Lionsgate.
 
Death of the author faggot, cope and seethe.
IMG_2973.webp
 
“I would never have imagined that there would be a celebration of racism and white supremacy, which is basically what we have in the White House. I would never have imagined that we would live through that.”
Imagine if we actually lived in the world these people think we live in...
 
The director is a woman so I don't care about their opinion on masculinity. Easton-Ellis seems like the oldschool kind of gay where he doesn't want to fuck dudes who look like kids and instead wants to fuck dudes who look like bodybuilders. So while I wouldn't allow him around kids I have no real problem with faggots wanting to fuck dudes who actually look like dudes. Mainly because AIDS will inevitably out-evolve medication and they'll all die.
 
The so-called "Wall Street bros" are simply at a higher level of media literacy where they understand the director's intent but choose to prioritize their own reading and recontextualization of the material instead. Not sure why leftoids struggle to recognize that
Recontextualization and narrative subversion is a keystone of postmodern leftism, too, so you'd think they could figure this out without being told.

But I guess all those film school essays about "late-stage capitalism and détournement in the French avant-garde" mean nothing beyond "I saw this string of words in a book, and am dimly aware I need to repeat them around fellow travelers if I want to make a career in Hollywood".

american_psycho_image39.webp

That said, I do kinda like how the "ummm achually Bateman is gay" reading suggests that, in the author's mind, all faggots want to murder women and keep their heads in the fridge. Very based.

Is Guinevere a tranny? Or a lesbian? I'm guessing the latter, since that sounds like something a lesbian would write (trannies would write that kind of character too, in all honesty, but a tranny would write it unironically, and openly sympathize with the killer gay dude).
 
For a lot of people it was the line "I am simply not there" at the end of the morning routine which made them relate to the character. And this beautiful soundtrack by John Cale (the pianist from the Velvet Underground) named, The Ritual.


Patrick Bateman reminded me of Meursault from The Stranger. He is a modern-day existentialist character. He is completely divorced from reality, does not understand the world that he lives in and in the end he is utterly trapped in it, pour fucker can't even kill himself. The whole time he is just pretending to be like the people around him. A bit like Donnie Darko with his human suit.
1744990838902.webp
1744991152275.webp


Hard to hate him but I guess he is a rich white guy so for the leftoids that all that matters and defines his entire character. Sucks to be a retard.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
“It was very clear to me and Guinevere, who is gay, that we saw it as a gay man’s satire on masculinity,” Harron explained. “[American Psycho author Bret Easton Ellis’] being gay allowed him to see the homoerotic rituals among these alpha males, which is also true in sports, and it’s true in Wall Street, and all these things where men are prizing their extreme competition and their ‘elevating their prowess’ kind of thing. There’s something very, very gay about the way they’re fetishizing looks, and the gym.”
That explains the Yale thing scene.

 
Yes, yes, and we're supposed to sympathize with the genocidal bugs, and know that cool uniforms = fashism, and hate Obersturmenwafflegruper John Smith and Homelander, and side with the ((nerds)) over the frat jocks, etc...

The problem is, Lefties are so insufferable and dysgenic, that even when they try to turn everything into Heckin' Nahtzees vs. Muh'Pressed Resistance Fighters, their side looks gay and unappealing, and whatever they're parodying looks healthy and cool and fun.
 
"It was about a predatory society, and now the society is actually, 25 years later, much worse.

Yeah, I can't imagine why disaffected young men in a predatory society that hates them and forces them to "hide their power level", would identify with a character who hates the predatory society around him and is forced to hide his power level. We got a real mystery here, media literacy sisters.
 
Yes, yes, and we're supposed to sympathize with the genocidal bugs, and know that cool uniforms = fashism
I was trying to rewatch Total Recall recently and Paul Verhoeven's hatred towards white women in this movie is nauseating. Sharon Stone gets punched in the face by Arnie then shot right in the middle of the face and killed and the horrible chimpanzee with the mono brow becomes the main girl.
 
That explains the Yale thing scene.

Wow, yeah, ok, the more I think about this, the crazier it gets.

I'm pretty sure the screen-writer is a legit lesbian, and not a tranny:
Screenshot 2025-04-17 214143.webp
If American Psycho really was intended to be a "gay man's satire on masculinity", as written by a lesbian (who are notoriously opposed to gay men, and vice versa), then the whole film takes on a genuinely homophobic, fag-hating hue.

Turner's essentially saying "look at all these fruity closeted gay dudes running around, aren't they so vain and vapid! But it's not all fun and games, no! They're MEN, which means they want to kill women and each other! Because competition and masculinity and violence blah blah blah". Which is a fairly standard narrative for radfems, but definitely not something you're supposed to say in leftist circles in Current Year, since it means Committing a Homophobia. (if you want to criticize masculinity, it has to be directed at hetero incels, and/or the kind of dudebro you pined for in school but who stood you up for prom because he liked cheerleaders and not bookish protolesbians like you)

Honestly, if Turner and Harron are telling the truth, then kids co-opting and rehabilitating Bateman may be LESS "problematic" (by lefty standards) than the author's original intent.
 
Back