No, 4chan is already a sunk-cost fallacy only propped up by money and free-time that people pour in. Better it dies, or change ownership and restart from the ground-up. Tabula Rasa you know.
Tangentially related but it reminds me of an obscure episode from the X-files in season 7 or 8 where the monster of the week is a disabled magical Indian midget that climbs up people's butt holes and shits himself out which kills the person in the process. I couldn't stop laughing when I first watched it. Anyway here is a scully to cleanse your mind of the thought.
It's literally important for the stability of the world
Null would buy the domain just to redirect it here.
eh... couldnt be bothered to read 900 pages of talk.
The brand alone is worth a few million, stickers and coins can't pay for that.
I've seen you say that several times. Like I have any kind of relationship with 4chan moderation and also implying KF moderation goes above and beyond by inviting you to dinner and weddings. My only interactions with 4chan moderation were when I had to go to the IRC twice over the years to get a poxy ban overturned, and both times I got a result, other than that, I've had no contact with them. It very much depends on where you're at, if you're a /pol/ack, they'll leave you alone so long as you stay in your containment board, but be on good behaviour whenever you get adventurous and go exploring other boards. I've been reading posters from other boards here, and they come across as having a nemesis/parasocial relationship with their boards mods.
Especially when the fucking barracks bunnies kept fucking everyone and then saying they raped them for no reason. One of them cut herself and said it was because she got raped but that bitch was a whore.
Bc they’re all gay
I do think that's what this is about. There's no reason the ban cannot publicly say "called people jews and niggers 100 times". Allowing this sort of resentment to fester hidden away breeds redditors.
Like any website with jannies, experiences may vary. Still it's nice actually talking to our mods, because some are interesting. They might watch the same lolcow as you, know things about particular subjects, etc. They're actual people, not invisible forces of nature.
Ideally, it should, not disputing that. But I understand why they stick with the cookie cutter rule broken message.
I'm bouncing between the 3 last options. I got phases where I go a week with no internet lurking (only email and calender). sometimes I scroll though the alt. boards and the farms. I have noticed that not putting your eggs in one basket is the best option. As "reddit" it might sound, balancing it out gives you a better perspective on things, and it's more important than evern considering how psyop'ish some sites has gotten. So if you diversify it (kek). you have smaller risk of lurking in a circlejerking echo chambers, bot sites and honeypots in one instance. Spread the risks so to speak.
It's real, rapeape is just very ashamed and tsundere about it
>knowing how many posters there are
/v/ is definitely adversarial because of the sheer amount of mismanaging theyve done over the years. I've been personal witness to a 3 day ban and thread deletion over humiliating a janny in an argument on /v/
back in my day we compiled dossiers on the mods of our board such that we were able to geolocate them based on their moderation activity, correlated them against joins/leaves in IRC, and waited for a network failure that would interrupt vhost masking on their handle to get their hosting provider to confirm. Then the fun began
