Crime High school track athlete, 16, fatally stabbed at championship meet, officials say - Guess the races.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

The suspect is a member of another team​

By Ryan Morik
Fox News
Published April 2, 2025 4:55pm EDT | Updated April 2, 2025 6:29pm EDT

A 16-year-old track athlete was killed during a championship meet Wednesday morning in Texas by a member of another team, officials said.

Frisco Police confirmed the student-athlete died "despite lifesaving measures." The suspect, 17-year-old Karmelo Anthony, has been charged with first-degree murder.

A student from Frisco Memorial was the victim, according to local reports. Frisco Memorial Principal Brook Fesco wrote in an email obtained by Fox News Digital that Austin Metcalf, a junior at the school, had died Wednesday.

1743637159122.png
Austin Metcalf (right) was killed in a stabbing on Wednesday at a track meet. (FOX DFW)

The incident occurred at about 10 a.m. at Kuykendall Stadium at the University Interscholasic League's District 11-5A championship meet. Anthony attends Frisco Centennial, roughly 7 miles away from Frisco Memorial.

According to the Frisco Independent School District, the meet was suspended shortly after the incident. The ISD added that the stadium "was immediately secured, and students were released and sent back to their home campus on FISD buses with expediency."

In her email, Fesco said the school "will acknowledge Austin’s death during 2nd period and will offer support throughout the day," adding counselors would be available.

1743637185527.png
Karmelo Anthony, 17, was arrested and charged with first-degree murder. (FOX DFW)

"As a parent, your guidance and support will be important in helping your child process grief. Talking about this together, face-to-face, will give you a chance to discuss how your family understands and copes with loss. You may also want to discuss with your child how to be a supportive friend to classmates," Fesco wrote. "This loss might remind your student of past losses as well. The most important thing you can do is provide your child a chance to be heard and to express their feelings."

"The Frisco Police Department grieves with all those affected by this devastating loss and extends its deepest condolences to the victim’s family, students, and staff who are experiencing unimaginable pain," the department said in a statement. "The department is collaborating with the Frisco Independent School District and will continue to provide any support they need during this incredibly difficult time."

Metcalf, who also played football at the school, participated in both the boys shot put and discus events earlier in the day, with threw distances of 39 feet, 9¾ inches and 86 feet, 4 inches, respectively.

1743637208975.png
Metcalf attended Frisco Memorial High School and competed in the shot put and discus events. (FOX DFW)

Anthony ran the boys' 100-meter dash in 12.38 seconds and was scheduled to compete in the long jump.

Eight schools competed at the meet, according to MileSplit.

Source (Archive)
 
Zimmerman did not claim SYG as a defense.
He claimed plain old self defense because Martin was pounding his head into the sidewalk.
I believe the prosecution and the judge wouldn't let him use Stand Your Ground. I remember it being one of the elements Zimmerman got fucked on, that his defense was able to overcome. The defense wasn't even allowed to bring up that Trayvon had been found at school with jewelry and "burglary tools" in his backpack, which strongly suggested that Trayvon may even been casing houses on the night of his death.
 
The defense wasn't even allowed to bring up that Trayvon had been found at school with jewelry and "burglary tools" in his backpack, which strongly suggested that Trayvon may even been casing houses on the night of his death.
To be fair, everything that wasn’t directly related to whether or not Zimmerman was in genuine fear for his life when he pulled the trigger was a distraction.
 
Entertaining the creative writing musings of black Twitter is stupid in itself. Give time for the prosecutor to get their case together.

Besides, the police report states that the first police officer on scene found Anthony’s knife that he tried to dispose of in some bushes.
I’m going to trust that a police officer knows how to correctly label a knife; the cleat files or whatever don’t look like a traditional knife. I wouldn’t call it a knife if I saw it on its own.
Police reports need to be descriptive because it will be used in court, and the DA will most likely interrogate the police officer on the witness stand about his report. If it weren’t just a traditional looking knife, it would most likely be worded differently.
 
I believe the prosecution and the judge wouldn't let him use Stand Your Ground. I remember it being one of the elements Zimmerman got fucked on, that his defense was able to overcome.
SYG doesn't play into the incident at all.

SYG is a chorally to Duty To Retreat but Zimmerman was on the ground with Martin on top of him. Not only that but Trayvon had hold of Mr. Zimmerman's head and was slamming it into the ground.

Based on such a position, there was nowhere Zimmerman could have retreated to.

Duty to retreat is interesting as it's supposed to only apply to retreat if on is in complete safety but if the aggressor is posing an legitimate imminent deadly threat then I cannot think of many situations where absolute / complete safety is assured for retreat.

But then again, I a fucking autist that actually thinks things through dispassionately.
 
SYG is a chorally to Duty To Retreat but Zimmerman was on the ground with Martin on top of him. Not only that but Trayvon had hold of Mr. Zimmerman's head and was slamming it into the ground.

Based on such a position, there was nowhere Zimmerman could have retreated to.

The context for Stand Your Ground in Zimmerman, is that he followed after Martin while reporting him in the 911 call, with the operator advising him not to do so once she realized that he was. An argument was made in the press that he had some sort of legal obligation not to follow after Martin, which isn't true. Zimmerman had every right to be at the location, just as Martin did, and Martin had engaged Zimmerman. On this basis it was argued that Zimmerman under Stand Your Ground had additional authority to pursue Martin. A better argument for self defense was made at trial, but a myth was created that Zimmerman's case involved SYG, which it didn't and was never argued by his lawyers.
 
Last edited:
Stand Your Ground in Zimmerman, is that he followed after Martin while reporting him in the 911 call, with the operator advising him not to do so once she realized that he was.
A lot of outlets also glossed over the fact that Zimmerman had stopped following Trayvon and returned to his vehicle, and that Trayvon approached and attacked him. Zimmerman had already functionally retreated.
 
If you read the thread you’ll discover that there are many factors that invalidate ‘stand your ground’ in this case. Not the least of which is that Anthony intitiated and escalated the conflict that lead to Metcalf grabbing him, and overreacted by responding with lethal force to a clearly non-lethal threat.
SYG is not a license to kill, it’s an escape clause for when someone has no option but to kill to protect life or prevent serious bodily injury. Anthony had multiple ways to avoid the use of lethal force, including responding with equal non-lethal force, and chose not to do so, safe in the knowledge he had a lethal weapon on his person where Metcalf did not.
You can’t provoke a fist fight then stab or shoot the person you’ve provoked and claim SYG
You're confusing the stand your ground doctrine with generalized self defense. All stand your ground says is that even if you have an avenue of retreat with complete safety, you are not obligated to take it before resorting to lethal force.

Anthony's multiple problems are not related to stand your ground. As you point out, he responded disproportionately, lethal force against Metcalf's ordinary force.

There is also the problem of his apparent provocation with intent, which would make him the initial aggressor, not Metcalf. Which, again, isn't directly tied to they idea of stand your ground.

You could even argue that his actions leading up to and during the event shows he had neither a subjective fear nor objective reason to fear Metcalf, which can also cook him. Still not stand your ground.
 
You're confusing the stand your ground doctrine with generalized self defense
I think we’re both maybe misunderstanding each other. My position is that Anthony’s actions were consistent with neither self-defense, nor SYG. Disproportionality of response alone invalidates both.
My biggest concern with this case is the possibility that Anthony may get a nigged jury and walk as a result of nigger misinfo on social media, which would legitimize lethal nigger violence against whites.
Legal precedent is a dangerous tool in malicious hands.

IMG_8795.webp
 
Last edited:
Why would it matter if it was a knife or a tool? Of you purposefully go and get a sharp implement from your bag and use it to kill someone, youve used it as a weapon. Doesn’t matter what it is.
It doesn't matter ethically or pragmatically. But if he came prepared with a knife that shows a degree of pre-meditation that can be used in court. Were it to be this hitherto unknown to Science "cleat sharpener" or something else with a legitimate reason to have on him, then defence will try harder to push a narrative of him just pulling this out as necessity to protect himself.

Which is unlikely to fly in court (I hope) or to anyone with intellectual honesty, but supporters online will go to town with this narrative. Of course, pretty sure it was in fact a knife.

You sound like a bigger cuck than Austin's Dad.
I would murder this guy for killing my son, so no.
 
I think we’re both maybe misunderstanding each other. My position is that Anthony’s actions were consistent with neither self-defense, nor SYG. Disproportionality of response alone invalidates both.
My biggest concern with this case is the possibility that Anthony may get a nigged jury and walk as a result of nigger misinfo on social media, which would legitimize lethal nigger violence against whites.
Legal precedent is a dangerous tool in malicious hands.

View attachment 7269401
Ultimately the point of contention, what stand your ground exactly means and entails, is moots, since pretty much every other aspect of legal self defense is fucked for Anthony.

He was arguably the initial aggressor with provocation.

He disproportionately met Metcalf's ordinary force with lethal force.

His actions did not appear to be subjectively or objectively reasonable.

Now, Texas is stand your ground, so he has no obligation to retreat. And Metcalf did use force upon Anthony, so there was an imminent threat. If Anthony has just punched Metcalf in response, he'd be in a much better position. But like a low IQ nigger he overreacted and used the knife.

A self defense claim is all or nothing. When you claim self defense, you're saying "I deliberately used lethal force on this person, but I did so for reasons of self defense." Sometimes it works, like with Rittenhouse and Zimmerman.

But if the prosecution can disprove any of the aspects of self defense beyond a reasonable doubt, all the jury will be thinking is you saying "I deliberately used lethal force on this person, but I did so for reasons of self defense." And that just looks like a confession.
 
likely not deserving of its own thread but there was another stabbing in Virginia (West Potomac High School, majority Hispanic school) today, apparently this kid did survive despite bleeding all over the place. this involves two beaners though so i doubt people will care that much.



swarthy.webp
 
Most serial killers are intra-racial, that is, they target people of the same race. I’d argue that cops historically facing the black ‘wall of silence’ and dealing with their own challenges of TNB and nigger fatigue might lead to a lower apprehension rate of black serial killers than might be expected.
Crimes are done in an opportunistic manner. So it's always going to be a level of convenience. There's a difference between serial killers who kill constantly out of a weird level of necessity (hitmen) vs. The psycho-sexual serial killer (the ones commonly portrayed in media)
The FBI Behavioral Science Unit set a completely false expectation, from its earliest days, that serial killers were almost entirely straight white men.
That was describing a subset, not the entire group.
This may arguably have resulted in black serial killers having been unrecognized or mis-profiled, allowing them higher counts than they otherwise may have achieved.
Most black serial killers are trigger happy teenagers who kill with no remorse because they are socio/psychopaths. They are usually caught because their crimes are sloppy and obvious. So they don't rack up high numbers. Although the new highest is a guy named Samuel Little.
Black violence is not a problem that can be addressed until there’s some honesty about it, but powerful interests are doing everything they can to muzzle that honesty.
The big question: who are those interests, and why do they do it?…
Just look who pushed the civil rights movement. It's always the jews.
You get a bunch of nigger and nigger lovers trying to suggest that bladed raised legged strikes to above the torso is super common in hockey but they fail to produce any video of said super common acts nor explain why no safety equipment have been developed for what they claim to be a super common action.
It's cargo-cultism, they know if they lie and complain enough, it sometimes gets them what they want. They don't actually care or believe anything they say, it's just a tribal identity that they can later use for themselves.
 
That was describing a subset, not the entire group.
At its inception, the BSU assumed serial killers to be motivated primarily by psycho-sexual factors, as can be seen in ‘Sexual Homicide: Patterns and Motives’ by Douglas, Burgess and Ressler.
It’s only latterly that serial murder has been more broadly redefined. Most likely because the supply of classic ‘lust murderers’ was dropping and so a redefinition was needed to keep the BSU relevant and in business.
If you ask the average man on the street what the average serial killer looks like, they’ll still tell you ‘white male between 25 and 45’ even though it’s not been true for decades.

The rest of the sperging
Calm down, mang.
 
If you ask the average man on the street what the average serial killer looks like, they’ll still tell you ‘white male between 25 and 45’ even though it’s not been true for decades.
The average man on the street knows that if a TV crew point a camera at him and ask him to describe the average serial killer and he says "a young black man", he's going to get raked over the coals and maybe lose his job.

Not saying you're wrong about the impression created by the media. Just saying there's a response bias (specifically a Social Desirability Bias) that can also be at play.
 
At its inception, the BSU assumed serial killers to be motivated primarily by psycho-sexual factors, as can be seen in ‘Sexual Homicide: Patterns and Motives’ by Douglas, Burgess and Ressler.
Glad you agree with me and then pretend like you dont. They identified the most obvious crimes to connect together.
It’s only latterly that serial murder has been more broadly redefined. Most likely because the supply of classic ‘lust murderers’ was dropping and so a redefinition was needed to keep the BSU relevant and in business.
Or they realized that multiple murderers were more common than they thought.
If you ask the average man on the street what the average serial killer looks like, they’ll still tell you ‘white male between 25 and 45’ even though it’s not been true for decades.
Yeah the media has a vested interest in pushing a narrative opposite to reality. Most serial killers exist in shithole countries with no one to stop them or when they do, they end up in a shallow grave.
Calm down, mang.
I am calm, you are just a retard.
 
Glad you agree with me and then pretend like you dont.
What?
They identified the most obvious crimes to connect together.
BSU was formed specifically to tackle cases of serial killing with a sexual basis (‘lust murder’) so they assumed all serial killings were thusly motivated.
they realized that multiple murderers were more common than they thought.
They categorically and specifically split ‘serial killer’ off from ‘multiple murderer’ when the BSU started categorising killers and it’s only in the last ~15 years they have re-merged them. The difference? The sexual motivation.
O my brother in Christ, I own and have read the literal BSU textbook on the topic circa 1998. Can you say the same?
I am calm, you are just a retard.
IMG_2706.webp
 
Back