Off-Topic Transgender Legislation and Litigation

[obsdj]

it’s all fun and games until the right colour smoke comes out of the chimney!

Our trannies want a rainbow glitter cannon to blow out of it.

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

The majority found that troons are too mentally and emotionally immature to make these decisions until they are 21.



"JACKCKSON, Miss. (AP) — The Mississippi Supreme Court on Thursday upheld a ruling denying a transgender teen’s name-change petition.

The ruling comes nearly two years after a then 16-year-old undergoing a gender transition filed a petition to change his name to better fit his gender identity. Both of the teen’s parents consented to the name change. But Hinds County Chancery Judge Tametrice Hodges in November 2023 denied the petition, citing the teen’s lack of maturity.

The Mississippi Supreme Court voted 8-1 to uphold the ruling.

“The petitioner’s primary appellate argument is that the chancellor had no discretion to deny the name-change petition because it was uncontested and both parents agreed,” the majority opinion reads. “But Mississippi law says otherwise.”

Presiding Justice Leslie King was the sole dissenting vote. He wrote that the record in the case is deficient, leaving it unable for the Supreme Court to decide whether the lower court was wrong to dismiss the petition.

“I find that the chancery court’s order should be vacated and that the case should be remanded,” King said in his dissent."

Transitioning teen cannot change name, Mississippi Supreme Court rules

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

Another frivolous troon lolsuit from a wacky pooner.



"A former Pinellas County schools transgender teacher claims he was forced to resign because of the school district’s implementation of Florida’s 2023 law restricting the use of preferred pronouns.

Toby Tobin last week filed a federal lawsuit alleging the district discriminated against him on the basis of sex, in violation of a recent Supreme Court ruling on federal Title VII guidelines. The suit follows other administrative efforts to find the district violated Tobin’s rights by refusing to call him Mr. Tobin after the law took effect.

Those steps included a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which was referred to the U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division. The department showed interest in the case, said Gabe Roberts, Tobin’s lawyer with the Scott Law Team. “However, after the election (of President Donald Trump), that interest went away.”

Transgender teacher sues Pinellas schools, claims pronoun discrimination

 

[Anasa Tristis]

Another frivolous troon lolsuit from a wacky pooner.

View attachment 7258339

"A former Pinellas County schools transgender teacher claims he was forced to resign because of the school district’s implementation of Florida’s 2023 law restricting the use of preferred pronouns.

Toby Tobin last week filed a federal lawsuit alleging the district discriminated against him on the basis of sex, in violation of a recent Supreme Court ruling on federal Title VII guidelines. The suit follows other administrative efforts to find the district violated Tobin’s rights by refusing to call him Mr. Tobin after the law took effect.

Those steps included a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which was referred to the U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division. The department showed interest in the case, said Gabe Roberts, Tobin’s lawyer with the Scott Law Team. “However, after the election (of President Donald Trump), that interest went away.”

Transgender teacher sues Pinellas schools, claims pronoun discrimination

Toby Tobin? Are you fucking kidding me? Toe Bee Toe Bin? You can bet too, that she didn’t change her name to Tobias Tobin and just asked people to use the standard nick name. Nah. That’d be too adult and true masc for comfort. “I wanna be Toe Bee Toe Bin! Whee! Tee hee!”

 

[Jacques1194]

I get so fucking annoyed by the assertion that anyone not accepting the borderline magical thinking that comprises troon biology must be a science denier. Troons and handmaidens - most often not being scientists themselves - smugly suggest that TERFs leave the science to "the biologists". I myself am a "biologist" (an extremely expansive field with a large variety of different knowledge spheres, so it is a flimsy label to try and throw around) and I entirely disagree with tranny science.

There's a microbiologist on instagram I enjoy because she posts fairly informative stuff about infectious disease and foodborne pathogens (two autistic interests of mine) but has recently made a string of exactly these sorts of comments while grossly overestimating her authority on the subject. I'm unsurprised she's a handmaiden but it still felt bad unfollowing her.

The troons are absolutely the ones waging a war on science, in the past they've attacked TERFs in the field for telling the truth. Science is on their side when it can be misconstrued in their favour, and a "politically captured institution" otherwise.

This is why I mentioned in the "Things Troons Have Ruined" thread that TRAs have ruined science because nobody can trust anything from modern scientists because if the same people are claiming "Gender identities" exist and that men can become women by simply stating they are, how can anyone trust scientists nowadays? Hell, considering that most of the scientists that post these pro trans articles are troons themselves or giant TRAs how do we know they aren't posting their own confirmation bias research and cherry pick studies they don't like? (Cass Report)

 

[Écho Öwl]

cherry pick studies they don't like? (Cass Report)

I learned soooo much from the cass report. Outside of the trans issue; it defines how to academically ponzy scheme.

 

[Screamer_2]

I learned soooo much from the cass report. Outside of the trans issue; it defines how to academically ponzy scheme.

It's so worrying how an ideology spreads and then the shittiest of science that confirms it is just accepted. When it comes to CASS, I've noticed in comment sections to go to is to just dismiss it as very flawed. With out any actually criticism. It's just blasphemy.

Yet the stuff it is criticising was literally stuff people just made up as medical protocols based on wishful thinking.

 

[Écho Öwl]

It's so worrying how an ideology spreads and then the shittiest of science that confirms it is just accepted. When it comes to CASS, I've noticed in comment sections to go to is to just dismiss it as very flawed. With out any actually criticism. It's just blasphemy.

Yet the stuff it is criticising was literally stuff people just made up as medical protocols based on wishful thinking.

It’s illegal to dock tails or crop ears on a dog in multiple jurisdictions.

But cut tits or dicks off on humans, a-ok for the most ludicrous « science » reasons.

I avoided the comments that transpired after the release, but kept abreast on terfier environments. While the uk fucks up many, many things; initiating this review will be a godsend when they finally read it in Canada in 20 years time.

The terfier places laughed at one of the contrarian reviewers. They selected a geriatric researcher to comment on a paediatric meta study, led by an expert in the field.

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

Properly conducted and controlled scientific research is now "eugenics."

 

[Athena Save Us!]

Properly conducted and controlled scientific research is now "eugenics."

View attachment 7259822
View attachment 7259824

That's because trans research would go like this: Study Finds that HRT and SRS Lead to Happy People 100% of the Time! Sources: Cherrypicked Reddit discussions and our imaginations! No, we don't need to interview people outside of their hugbox! That's eugenics! It's a violation of their privacy! Why not just make the data up?

 

[Écho Öwl]

— this takes a prize for something.

 

[Hoi Polloi]

That's because trans research would go like this: Study Finds that HRT and SRS Lead to Happy People 100% of the Time! Sources: Cherrypicked Reddit discussions and our imaginations! No, we don't need to interview people outside of their hugbox! That's eugenics! It's a violation of their privacy! Why not just make the data up?

Even more so if I recall a lot of these studies have pretty poor retention so it goes like this: "100% of patients immediately reported being really happy with the HRT they were prescribed last week that they'd been extremely excited about taking/with the SRS they'd waited an extended period of time for and hyped up extensively in their mind. Well, only 20% actually returned to tell us how they were doing the following year, but we're going to assume the 80% that dropped off the earth are super busy leading fulfilled joy-filled lives and not wallowing in depression in their bed!"

 

[Vi0l3t]

Didnt know where to throw this but a congresswoman called out a tranny and the ol tranny brought out his man voice. Super hilarious.
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/16Rvaa2qkk/

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

Fascism is defined as refusing to play along with Alex's magical gender delusions.

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

Not seeing a problem here Fat Dumb Gay Al.

Race hustling and pseudoscience have no place in academia.



Antifa member and Black Lives Matter stooge sues Trump on behalf of trannies.

"Attorney General Keith Ellison is suing the Trump administration over two executive orders targeting transgender children and adults, alleging among other things that they amount to the federal government “commandeering the States to carry out federal law or policy,” which the 10th Amendment protects against.

“Trump’s unconscionable attack on this small number of vulnerable children is bullying, plain and simple,” Ellison said. “I’ve been around my share of bullies in my life, and if there’s one thing I’ve learned, it’s that you don’t give bullies an inch. We’re not going to cave at the expense of trans kids — or any vulnerable community that needs our compassion and protection.”

The orders in question attempt to ban transgender girls from competing in women’s sports and to impose a strict governmental definition of biological sex that does not recognize transgender individuals.

Executive orders are not laws, but rather statements of administration policy. “An EO is nothing more than an interoffice memo from a boss to his underlings telling them what he wants them to do,” as Fordham law professor John Pfaff describes them.

Ellison argues that by abiding by the White House orders, Minnesota would be violating its own Human Rights Act.

The administration is threatening to withhold federal funding from states that refuse to toe the line on transgender issues. In February, Attorney General Pam Bondi said that the Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights had begun an investigation into Minnesota over the state’s refusal to ban trans kids from school sports.

The administration has been working to dismantle the Department of Education, however, and it is unclear whether its Office of Civil Rights even has enough staff to carry out such an investigation.

The office hasn’t officially opened up a new investigation since Trump’s inauguration, according to the Department of Education website, and the newsroom of the Office of Civil Rights hasn’t issued any updates since the beginning of February.

Bondi has nevertheless continued to make vague threats in Minnesota’s direction, and Ellison’s lawsuit is a response to those actions. He has asked the federal court to declare that specific parts of the administration’s orders are unlawful and constitutional, and to prohibit the administration from enforcing them against Minnesota."

Attorney General Ellison sues Trump administration over trans athlete ban

 

[Crunkle]

The fox-killer general is pursuing an appeal of the Supreme Court ruling despite being upfront with his followers that they will lose. He's already raised £20k in a matter of hours from the dents.

Read all about it:

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/jolyon...wyer-grifter-fox-clubber.159432/post-21229216

 

[monstrous bubo]

God he is such an annoying grifter. To be clear he is not pursuing an appeal, as the UK Supreme Court is the last stop, and also he is not a party who could appeal anyway. Instead, he is pursuing a new legal argument:

We believe the UK is now in breach of its obligations under the Human Rights Act and the European Convention of Human Rights and we plan to ask the High Court for a declaration of incompatibility. We believe the legal arguments are strong – but we must also point out that the Supreme Court has revealed a readiness on the part of our courts to disapply, in the case of trans people, normal legal and procedural safeguards.

Let’s say he succeeds in the High Court and the Supreme Court refuses to hear an appeal or agrees with him. Hey, he won! It changes literally nothing. The Equality Act as interpreted by the Supreme Court remains the law of the land. At best, the issue is referred to Parliament to consider amending the Equality Act to treat transwomen as women. The UK Parliament can ignore it totally. If he then decided to try his luck in the European Court of Human Rights and succeeds, guess what, it changes literally nothing. The UK Parliament can completely ignore that too.

If he was really serious about this, he’d raise money to donate to the Labour Party in return for rewriting the Act. Only a shitload of cash could ever make this a political priority, and even then there’s no guarantee considering how toxic an issue it is and how little political capital the Labour Government has to burn.

 

[Écho Öwl]

God he is such an annoying grifter. To be clear he is not pursuing an appeal, as the UK Supreme Court is the last stop, and also he is not a party who could appeal anyway. Instead, he is pursuing a new legal argument:



Let’s say he succeeds in the High Court and the Supreme Court refuses to hear an appeal or agrees with him. Hey, he won! It changes literally nothing. The Equality Act as interpreted by the Supreme Court remains the law of the land. At best, the issue is referred to Parliament to consider amending the Equality Act to treat transwomen as women. The UK Parliament can ignore it totally. If he then decided to try his luck in the European Court of Human Rights and succeeds, guess what, it changes literally nothing. The UK Parliament can completely ignore that too.

If he was really serious about this, he’d raise money to donate to the Labour Party in return for rewriting the Act. Only a shitload of cash could ever make this a political priority, and even then there’s no guarantee considering how toxic an issue it is and how little political capital the Labour Government has to burn.

Thanks for the clarification. I was confused how that this could be even remotely possible—to the point of “is there something I’m missing in my knowledge of common law….”

I can’t wait for the uk ruling to be cited in tranada. Wont help though, our Supreme Court is woke as fuck.

 

[TaimuRadiu]

The majority found that troons are too mentally and emotionally immature to make these decisions until they are 21.

View attachment 7257859

"JACKCKSON, Miss. (AP) — The Mississippi Supreme Court on Thursday upheld a ruling denying a transgender teen’s name-change petition.

The ruling comes nearly two years after a then 16-year-old undergoing a gender transition filed a petition to change his name to better fit his gender identity. Both of the teen’s parents consented to the name change. But Hinds County Chancery Judge Tametrice Hodges in November 2023 denied the petition, citing the teen’s lack of maturity.

The Mississippi Supreme Court voted 8-1 to uphold the ruling.

“The petitioner’s primary appellate argument is that the chancellor had no discretion to deny the name-change petition because it was uncontested and both parents agreed,” the majority opinion reads. “But Mississippi law says otherwise.”

Presiding Justice Leslie King was the sole dissenting vote. He wrote that the record in the case is deficient, leaving it unable for the Supreme Court to decide whether the lower court was wrong to dismiss the petition.

“I find that the chancery court’s order should be vacated and that the case should be remanded,” King said in his dissent."

Transitioning teen cannot change name, Mississippi Supreme Court rules

Old enough to kill, but not for trooning?

 

[Écho Öwl]

Old enough to kill, but not for trooning?

There is an old survey regarding religiosity that I wish I still had a reference to. Long story short, they found that if you’re not “born again Christian” by 21 that you’ll probably never be.

This is why godsquad and hatching “eggs” — encouraging transitions — in late teens is so important for the aforementioned villains.