Furry Art Freak Show - From ungodly eyesores to nauseating masterpieces

[Vinluv Handesbukia]

View attachment 7255061
You might be right, also these are furries have some really old accounts, some are from 2006 even.

You're probably right, but you're still a chickenshit and an annoying dick.

Notice the artistic quality of the PFP and the artistic talent of the dead guy they're glazing.

 

[pawypaw]

I sometimes wonder why they waste their time to draw this shit, imagine having tablet, software and drawing scat, vore or diaper furry arts instead creating something that will be liked by people

 

[Noebel]

I sometimes wonder why they waste their time to draw this shit, imagine having tablet, software and drawing scat, vore or diaper furry arts instead creating something that will be liked by people

Either they like it themselves, or get paid.

 

[Vinluv Handesbukia]

Either they like it themselves, or get paid.

Wheres the :depressing: award?

 

[The Cringe Connoisseur]

View attachment 7255061
You might be right, also these are furries have some really old accounts, some are from 2006 even.

You're probably right, but you're still a chickenshit and an annoying dick.

I would be more likely to take anything you have to say seriously if you weren't saying it on a furry art thread while having a hand down your pants.

 

[Friendly Primarina]

Spoiler

 

[pawypaw]

Spoiler

View attachment 7265526

I don't know if laugh or be terrified

 

[Shlomo XL]

"Ew furries"

Ew, trannies!

 

[Cuntspiracy Man]

Ew, trannies!

The man did make a good point

 

[Shlomo XL]

The man did make a good point

You may observe that this thread is in the furry subsection of a tranny-hating, Nazi-enabling, 9/11-denying, unfettered speech-enjoying, doxxxing-allowing, mentally challenged-harbouring Internet forum, and the described thoughtcrime of "bitching about trannies existing" is somewhat in vogue.

That said, the piece that started this entire reply chain isn't really "freakshow" worthy. However, "good quality art" isn't what I'd describe even a significant minority of this thread as, either.

 

[Cuntspiracy Man]

Aw hell naw...
View attachment 7202787
it's kinda like cartoonmania where it isn't even like a petit woman thing they're just into how kid's abdomens look.
View attachment 7202795
Real damn shame because they're such a great artist. I guess pedophilia is just the Nipoonese's favorite hobby.
One of the reasons I naturally try to stay away from anime as much as possible.
Like for real nigga did you have to draw it like that?
way too anatomically accurate.
Exactly like cartoonmania now that I think of it.
It's not just making a short petit version of an adult,it's studied,researched. Like all the adult characters are stylized and cartoony,but the kiddies are super realistic for no discernable reason whatsoever. So creepy.

Can you really say this is sexual? Lots of people find toddlers' tummies cute and appealing, why do you think women always go around kissing and poking them whenever someone brings a baby along? Just because it's the focus doesn't mean it's sexual in nature

I think you guys are often skipping the part where a person is jacking off to something and then showing that it's something weird and unconventional, and just straight up seeing someone post something that WOULD be weird to jack off to, and assume they're jacking off to it
As of right now this just looks to me like someone who likes drawing cute baby characters with no erotic intent

 

[Friendly Primarina]

seeing someone post something that WOULD be weird to jack off to, and assume they're jacking off to it

With furries it's a pretty safe assumption. Besides, there's no way the beige one raising its leg like that is innocent, at least to me.

The sad thing is, if this had been anything other than furries I'd have agreed with you. I think that the sheer depravity we have been subjected to over the years has left us with a hyper sensitivity, where we assume things that shouldn't be remotely sexual, are. But furries? With this particular example? Nah, there's no way this wasn't intended to be sexual.

 

[Shlomo XL]

I mean, is he wrong though?

Technically, no.
...lol, why delete your post?

Anyway, if someone's going to enter a thread with the intent to complain about the discussion within, then that's kind of on them.

 

[A-Stump]

Can you really say this is sexual? Lots of people find toddlers' tummies cute and appealing, why do you think women always go around kissing and poking them whenever someone brings a baby along? Just because it's the focus doesn't mean it's sexual in nature

I think you guys are often skipping the part where a person is jacking off to something and then showing that it's something weird and unconventional, and just straight up seeing someone post something that WOULD be weird to jack off to, and assume they're jacking off to it
As of right now this just looks to me like someone who likes drawing cute baby characters with no erotic intent

There doesn't need to be jizz flying around and huge gaping cooters for it to be porn. I'm guessing from the mouth shirt pull and the, you know, legs being splayed wide open it was supposed to appeal to a certain subset of people.

I get giving people the benefit of the doubt but come on man that's just ridiculous

 

[Vinluv Handesbukia]

Can you really say this is sexual? Lots of people find toddlers' tummies cute and appealing, why do you think women always go around kissing and poking them whenever someone brings a baby along? Just because it's the focus doesn't mean it's sexual in nature

I think you guys are often skipping the part where a person is jacking off to something and then showing that it's something weird and unconventional, and just straight up seeing someone post something that WOULD be weird to jack off to, and assume they're jacking off to it
As of right now this just looks to me like someone who likes drawing cute baby characters with no erotic intent

There’s a difference between kissing a babies’ tummy and hyper realistically depicting them on your designated nsfw account where you post other fetishy erotica ya know? Like part of the sleeze comes from this account already making conventionally sexual images you know?

 

[The Cringe Connoisseur]

With furries it's a pretty safe assumption. Besides, there's no way the beige one raising its leg like that is innocent, at least to me.

The sad thing is, if this had been anything other than furries I'd have agreed with you. I think that the sheer depravity we have been subjected to over the years has left us with a hyper sensitivity, where we assume things that shouldn't be remotely sexual, are. But furries? With this particular example? Nah, there's no way this wasn't intended to be sexual.

You say that as if some of the retards on here don't actively seek out depravity and gross shit in the dark corners of the internet that only degenerates tread and then post about it acting like they're disgusted and offended, like they didn't willingly jump into a sewer and yell "THERE'S SHIT IN HERE!" as if they made some kind of point. It's really nothing but going out of your way to feed your own confirmation bias, it's stupid and pointless and it's why I firmly believe a large portion of the posters on this thread are in the closet. People who are confident and secure in who and what they are don't do that shit lol.

 

[Friendly Primarina]

You say that as if some of the retards on here don't actively seek out depravity and gross shit in the dark corners of the internet that only degenerates tread and then post about it acting like they're disgusted and offended, like they didn't willingly jump into a sewer and yell "THERE'S SHIT IN HERE!" as if they made some kind of point. It's really nothing but going out of your way to feed your own confirmation bias, it's stupid and pointless and it's why I firmly believe a large portion of the posters on this thread are in the closet. People who are confident and secure in who and what they are don't do that shit lol.

I was speaking in a more general sense, rather than just this thread. This video is over 10 years old but is a perfect example of the hyper sensitivity I was talking about.

Direct link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1qfZ8q3ljg&t=325
Yahtzee complaining that the cat forms in Super Mario 3D World are sexual when there really is nothing sexual about them. Anything involving children or animals and people's minds just immediately go to sex now.

This is just a thread for laughing at retards and the retarded things they post. "Posters here are in the closet" isn't a particularly fresh or original take. Every so often someone comes in here and accuses people of secretly being into what they post.

 

[Cuntspiracy Man]

I was speaking in a more general sense, rather than just this thread. This video is over 10 years old but is a perfect example of the hyper sensitivity I was talking about.

Direct link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1qfZ8q3ljg&t=325
Yahtzee complaining that the cat forms in Super Mario 3D World are sexual when there really is nothing sexual about them. Anything involving children or animals and people's minds just immediately go to sex now.

This is just a thread for laughing at retards and the retarded things they post. "Posters here are in the closet" isn't a particularly fresh or original take. Every so often someone comes in here and accuses people of secretly being into what they post.

Yeah this thread went from "This guy draws the weirdest shit, look!" to "This guy draws something normal, but... Imagine IF it was weird.... Imaaaaagine...."
Once people learn that some people out there have a fetish for something they start viewing every instance of it as a fetish, just like how once foot fetishism started getting attention online, people began pointing at every childrens' cartoon where the character shows their feet as an example of "the writers' barely hidden fetish", when in reality, like 99% of the time, it's just writers doing it because kids find feet funny, they're weird looking and smell gross and it's a silly body part, same with bums, armpits, farts, characters getting blown up like balloons or stretched out or flattened, crossdressing, transforming into animals, whatever... Maybe it's a fetish sometimes, but usually it's just a strange, funny or plot serving scenario that people became hypersensitive too because they have too much knowladge now of what some people wank to

Fact of the matter is, there's someone out there with any kind of fetish, no matter how obscure
Just wait for the day when we start censoring kitchen tiles

People also forget that sometimes people have a nonsexual fixation, just because some autist is super into seeing characters spinning or getting stuck in drain pipes or something doesn't mean he gets hard from it, could just be that his brain is oddly fascinated with it, and that too seems impossible for some people to grasp because they're so obsessed with it all being sexual that they forget some people's brains just work the way pretzels are shaped

 

[pawypaw]

To be fair, they are creatively bankrupt, they should make the penises with the sharp teeth's, voring their 'sex slaves' right into a meaty magical sex dungeon filled with the cum and scat

 

[A-Stump]

Is this nigger really in here trying to convince people the very young character in a diaper (or underwear? I can't tell, doesn't matter) in what people would consider sexy poses for just about any other character isn't trying to appeal to someone jerking off?

Take that incredibly young character. OK now switch it out for a chick with big titties doing a mouth shirt pull or spreading her legs out in a suggestive manner. Now try to tell yourself some dude just thinks that's interesting and it's not because he's jerking off to it.

Jesus Christ this is the most retarded game of devil's advocate I've ever seen. It's actually impressive.