US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This nigger in his ultra autistic explanation of dehumidifiers just has to make some mini rant about 'due process' and that 'all Americans' deserve it. I know he's always a shitlib but holy crap, just ruins the vid implying that illegals are 'Americans'.

Sigh. I wish this guy would just stick to his appliance autism. I watch him for his detailed, informative explanations of things. If I wanted to watch performative libshit takes, there's any number of breadtubers I could watch.

I'm sure this was totally an accident, and not a play on the part of Mossad, or perhaps the CIA. Regardless, defanging Iran's ability to stir shit up without direct military action is always good.
Maybe Mossad, maybe not. It actually doesn't take sneaky Jewish glowies to fuck things up, just regular sandnigger incompetence. Some chemicals, mishandled, are disasters waiting to happen. Remember the 2020 Beruit explosion?
 
Remember the 2020 Beruit explosion?
Lebanon has got to be the in the top 5 most Mossaded countries on Earth, so I’m not convinced that was an accident either.

(There was an entire civil war between Hamas and Israeli “backed” Christian militias that led to a massive Christian exodus from the country.)
 
Last edited:
1745740395951.webp

Star wars does a hecking social commentary on American immigration policy

deft hand once again Mr Lucas, I personally would have had the death star part 3 but it looks like Elon Musk doing the Nazi salute while fucking the statue of liberty, that should get the point across to all the stooges "watching" this as second monitor content

Edit: we[t salt mining and found what the black are discussing, shit made me wheeze
1745740918347.webp
 
Last edited:
Anyone wanna tell this fucker than Trump won Texas by double-digits?
I had a conversation with a friend the other week about Donald Trump. She brought up a good point: with some figures, like, say, a mainstream actor or a pop singer, you don’t really expect them to be deeply immersed in the intricacies of policy. They often operate in spheres of entertainment, brand building, and general appeal. So when they stick to those lanes, it doesn’t necessarily raise eyebrows. It’s somewhat the expected playbook.

But Donald Trump is different. He cultivated an image as a disrupter, someone who wasn't afraid to challenge the status quo and speak his mind on a range of issues. He built a significant part of his appeal on directly addressing political and social matters, often in a very outspoken way. He positioned himself as someone taking on established norms and shaking things up.

So when his engagement on certain issues feels less than robust or inconsistent with the image he projected, it resonates differently. For example, at times when certain segments of the population feel particularly vulnerable or underrepresented, a perceived neutrality can feel jarring to those who saw him as a voice for change. Certain turns of phrase or talking points can sometimes echo in unexpected corners. And when there's a perceived lack of in-depth engagement on issues important to his base, while having built a political identity on strong opinions, it can feel somewhat detached.

His public persona often promises a certain level of directness and engagement. It’s the contrast between the image of the outspoken leader and any perceived silence or ambiguity on key issues that can feel noteworthy.

Additionally, while one can argue for separating the individual from their actions, if the divergence becomes too pronounced, it can color the perception. So, for some, a disconnect might lead to a reassessment of their support.

P.S. While I have your attention, have you ever noticed how some speeches just kind of...end? They build up this whole momentum, and then it just trails off. What's with that? LOL."


1745741543015.webp
 
So when his engagement on certain issues feels less than robust or inconsistent with the image he projected, it resonates differently. For example, at times when certain segments of the population feel particularly vulnerable or underrepresented, a perceived neutrality can feel jarring to those who saw him as a voice for change. Certain turns of phrase or talking points can sometimes echo in unexpected corners. And when there's a perceived lack of in-depth engagement on issues important to his base, while having built a political identity on strong opinions, it can feel somewhat detached.
What "certain issues" are you talking about here? What "vulnerable or underrepresented" segments of the population are finding Trump "jarring"? What talking points are "echoing in unexpected corners"?

I'm really trying to get a handle here on exactly wtf you are talking about. Your writing style is so oily, it slips around all the proper nouns and direct statements that would give your post meaning. It's just a bunch of vaguely negative adjectives that are hinting at something, but are divorced from any type of proper subject matter. It reads as a thinly veiled "Orange Man Bad" post.

If you have a criticism, stop beating around the bush and just say what it is and who is doing the criticizing. I'm not one of those who think Trump is above criticism, maybe it's valid, who knows? Criticisms need to be more clearly stated than a Crazy Days and Crazy Nights blind post in order for discussion to be possible.
 
View attachment 7284988

Star wars does a hecking social commentary on American immigration policy

deft hand once again Mr Lucas, I personally would have had the death star part 3 but it looks like Elon Musk doing the Nazi salute while fucking the statue of liberty, that should get the point across to all the stooges "watching" this as second monitor content
Star Wars is a dead franchise, liberals killed it, and nothing is ever going to bring it back to life. Nothing.

The only people who still sincerely like Star Wars are 40+ people who spend more time lamenting its death than actually enjoying it. The most charitable thing you can say about them is that they're fighting to give their favorite franchise a dignified burial, instead of letting a gang of DEI necrophiles keep its corpse. The people who make modern Star Wars pander exclusively to sallow-brained liberal simpletons. The target audience for modern Star Wars think The Daily Show is still relevant, and I'm confident that everyone reading this understands why that's an insult.

The younger generations don't care about Star Wars. They are too busy enjoying Vtubers and gacha games, media made by Asians who weren't raised to hate the ideas of optimism and attractive women. Meanwhile, Star Wars is made by and for people who think filling it with ugly black women is a history-making accomplishment. That's not going to change. Even if it did, it would be like putting lipstick on a bog body.

At this point, you'd have more luck getting people interested in The Rocketeer or The Phantom than in Star Wars. The last significant thing those titles released came out before woke parasites attached themselves to pop culture.

At least Star Wars died a less embarrassing death than Star Trek or Doctor Who. The faggots killed those two so thoroughly that nobody's even pretending they can be salvaged.
 
I'll place this here... God damn the fucking Socialists. It's always one Hypocrit bullshit mantra or another that they say in Unision. For 4+ years they have stated "No one is above the Law". When a socialist Judge get caught helping a illegal to flee ICE in her own Court Room, Now the same Socialists now say..

"It does not apply to them" or "Constitutional Crisis"! or "Orange Man now the new Hitler"....

REEEEEEEE!!!!

Fuck.... them... Just fuck them.

 
I wonder if they even know what that term means. They certainly say it enough.
It's the same fucking pattern by the Socialists on saying a catch phrase over and over and over again.


This bullshit has been going on to close to 10 years man... These fuckers do not think. They do not create.

They can only distort and destroy.
 
What "certain issues" are you talking about here? What "vulnerable or underrepresented" segments of the population are finding Trump "jarring"? What talking points are "echoing in unexpected corners"?

I'm really trying to get a handle here on exactly wtf you are talking about. Your writing style is so oily, it slips around all the proper nouns and direct statements that would give your post meaning. It's just a bunch of vaguely negative adjectives that are hinting at something, but are divorced from any type of proper subject matter. It reads as a thinly veiled "Orange Man Bad" post.

If you have a criticism, stop beating around the bush and just say what it is and who is doing the criticizing. I'm not one of those who think Trump is above criticism, maybe it's valid, who knows? Criticisms need to be more clearly stated than a Crazy Days and Crazy Nights blind post in order for discussion to be possible.
I'll place this here... God damn the fucking Socialists. It's always one Hypocrit bullshit mantra or another that they say in Unision. For 4+ years they have stated "No one is above the Law". When a socialist Judge get caught helping a illegal to flee ICE in her own Court Room, Now the same Socialists now say..

"It does not apply to them" or "Constitutional Crisis"! or "Orange Man now the new Hitler"....

REEEEEEEE!!!!

Fuck.... them... Just fuck them.

I wonder if they even know what that term means. They certainly say it enough.
You should see the trolls under the Fox News videos carrying water for these morons. That judge didn't do anything wrong? Then explain to me, in actual words that don't sound like they were written for an 8+ audience.

Yeah, Trump is the criminal, the crook, the corrupt one. I don't like the guy one bit, but can these fucks cut the bullshit?!
 
What "certain issues" are you talking about here? What "vulnerable or underrepresented" segments of the population are finding Trump "jarring"? What talking points are "echoing in unexpected corners"?

I'm really trying to get a handle here on exactly wtf you are talking about. Your writing style is so oily, it slips around all the proper nouns and direct statements that would give your post meaning. It's just a bunch of vaguely negative adjectives that are hinting at something, but are divorced from any type of proper subject matter. It reads as a thinly veiled "Orange Man Bad" post.

If you have a criticism, stop beating around the bush and just say what it is and who is doing the criticizing. I'm not one of those who think Trump is above criticism, maybe it's valid, who knows? Criticisms need to be more clearly stated than a Crazy Days and Crazy Nights blind post in order for discussion to be possible.
QRD you never see Trump and Chappelle Rohan in the same room and that is concerning
 
Max is 42. Let that sink in: the dude is 42 and looks 24. He credits the fact that he doesn't go in the sun too much.
I wouldn't go quite that far (I originally pegged Max as in his early 30s when he first started his channel) but yeah, it's remarkable what drinking lots of water and avoiding the sun does to keep one youthful looking.
 
View attachment 7284988

Star wars does a hecking social commentary on American immigration policy

deft hand once again Mr Lucas, I personally would have had the death star part 3 but it looks like Elon Musk doing the Nazi salute while fucking the statue of liberty, that should get the point across to all the stooges "watching" this as second monitor content

Edit: we[t salt mining and found what the black are discussing, shit made me wheeze
View attachment 7285012
What is this? Is there still new Star Wars stuff coming out? Season 2 and this is the first I heard of it.
 
Isn't this the one where the Supreme Court ruled ages ago that the courts have no say in this act?
The courts have a very limited say per SCOTUS. They can review whether the act is constitutional and review whether any given alien falls within a president's proclamations, but not the proclamations themselves.
 
"Constitutional Crisis
I wonder if they even know what that term means. They certainly say it enough.
"guys guys, we gotta help the institutions that relished in lording over us and impoverishing us to save our brown rapist replacements!" - this is what the left is hoping they can get to happen by screaming about the constitution that they defile on the daily by inspiring a sense of protectiveness over institutions they subverted into demoralizing symbols of oppression
Star wars does a hecking social commentary on American immigration policy
"america rapes and kills illegals"
good. i hope any would be illegal sees this and sincerely believes if they sneak over theyll be assfucked and murdered or beaten and enslaved to pick cotton for a thousand years or whatever. idgaf. no one fucking cares even if the hollyjew exaggerated version was real. good crack skulls rape them beat them idc. i will not have empathy weaponized against me anymore.
 
Last week, I jokingly said the guy who stole Kristi Noem's purse was going to be the first American sent to El Salvidor.
Turns out there was nothing to worry about.
It was an illegal all along.
The suspect who was arrested Saturday in the theft of Secretary Kristi Noem’s purse is in the country illegally, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia said in an interview with NBC News.

Ed Martin said a second suspect who also is in the country illegally is being sought by law enforcement.


It is not believed the suspect targeted Noem because she was the Department of Homeland Security secretary, Martin said.

“There is no indication it was because of that. It was frankly, it was a nice looking purse,” Martin said, in a recorded telephone interview.

In the call, Martin said Immigration and Customs Enforcement is now involved.

“President Trump’s direction to us is we charge these folks that are here illegally and we prosecute them, as well as deport them when need be, you know, as soon as that can happen,” Martin said, adding, “What I can tell you is he won’t be back on the streets in America.”

The person who took the bag knew what he was doing, Martin said.

“This was not an amateur. This was a person, a thief, that knew how to do this. You could see how he scouted the room out.”

No further information about the man’s identity was available.

A D.C. Metropolitan Police spokesperson declined to comment.

 
Back