UK NHS to test all ‘trans’ children for autism


Every child referred to a gender clinic will be screened under new guidance following Cass Review

The NHS will test all children who believe they are transgender for autism under new plans seen by The Telegraph.

Every child referred to a gender clinic will be “screened for neurodevelopmental conditions” such as autism and ADHD under new guidance, to be introduced in the wake of the Cass review.

The review, by paediatrician Baroness Cass, found that the mental health conditions were disproportionately common among children and young people with gender dysphoria.

Medics will also evaluate each child’s mental health, their relationship with their family and their sexual development, including whether they are experiencing same-sex attraction.

As part of a proposal to incorporate Lady Cass’s recommendations, the health service will move away from the “medical model” operated by the controversial Tavistock’s Gender Identity Development Service in favour of a “holistic” approach.

The new guidance will be released for public consultation imminently before being rolled out later this year.

It will be used by established children’s gender clinics in London and Manchester, and was reviewed by Lady Cass at the start of 2025.

Medics will also evaluate each child’s mental health, relationship with their family and sexual development, including whether they are experiencing same-sex attraction.

However, some groups criticised a “serious flaw” in the policy as it leaves an open door to the use of cross-sex hormones. They also condemned its absence of recognition of the wider societal issues to which children are exposed.

Policy probes eight key areas​

The new NHS Children and Young People’s Gender Service will explore eight key areas of a child’s life.

To assess “development”, doctors will take a “detailed history” of the child’s social, cognitive and physical growth, particularly because of the “substantial” changes that take place during puberty.

They will screen children for autism and learning disabilities and look into whether further “cognitive assessments” are necessary.

The specification says: “Given the high prevalence of neurodiversity identified within this population, all those attending the NHS Children and Young People’s Gender Service should receive screening for neurodevelopmental conditions.”

The “multidisciplinary team” of experts, including a consultant specialising in neurodevelopmental disorders, will create a treatment plan for each individual depending on their diagnosis.

If screening “identifies the presence of neurodevelopmental conditions, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD), a referral should be considered to the Paediatric Neurodevelopmental Service or Paediatric ASD Service,” the guidance states.

In such cases, the team of doctors will have to determine if the child’s symptoms are caused by autism or whether they also need separate treatment for gender dysphoria.

They could also be kept under review every six months while getting help for their autism or discharged from the service.

Cases of both conditions have risen sharply in recent years. Recorded rates of gender confusion in under 18s have risen from 0.14 per 10,000 people in 2011 to 4.4 per 10,000 in 2021, driven largely by girls entering adolescence.

At the same time, autism has gone from being diagnosed in about one in 2,500 children, to one in 34 children aged 10-14 as of estimates for 2018.

Prof Michael Craig, clinical lead for the NHS National Autism Unit from 2007 until 2023, previously estimated half of patients seen by the Tavistock’s clinic had autism after observing sessions.

In her review, Baroness Cass linked the rise in teenage girls “struggling with gender identity, suicidal ideation and self-harm” with cases of “undiagnosed autism, which is often missed in adolescent girls”.

She said it was the “common denominator” with one study finding transgender people were three to six times more likely to be autistic than those who are not.

Patients at the new service will also undergo a thorough mental health assessment because of the “higher rates of mental health difficulties” among gender-questioning children.

The NHS guidance described a previous “reluctance to explore or address” mental health conditions because gender dysphoria was not classified as one, but said that “identifying and treating” any mental illness should be an “integrated part” of their care.

It added that they should undergo a “mental state examination” and be questioned about “mood, anxiety, emotional regulation, beliefs around weight, potential somatic symptoms, concentration, sleep and appetite, self-harm, and suicidal thoughts and behaviours”.

‘Family context’​

Another key area is dubbed “family context”, with medics being tasked to paint a picture of each child’s upbringing and familial relationships.

The specification noted that “there is evidence of an increased frequency of family parental physical and/or mental ill health and other family stressors in this group”.

Under the section titled sexual development, knowledge and sexual orientation, it said “clinicians should seek to understand the child/young person’s emerging sexuality and sexual orientation”.

If this has been a previous issue, doctors should consider whether the child was exposed to “adversity and trauma”.

They will also examine the children’s physical health needs and the impact of any long-term conditions, along with their broader well-being, school relationships and educational attainment.

Medical teams will “undertake an in-depth assessment” of how the gender dysphoria “manifested”, how it has been managed by the family, if any “social transition” has taken place and the impact of any distress caused.

They have been told to look out for “safeguarding issues” such as “transphobic bullying”, “online grooming” and a “breakdown in relationships with families”.

The Clinical Advisory Network on Sex and Gender welcomed the “proposed holistic approach and prioritisation of psychological interventions”.

NHS wait times ‘very long’​

Dr Louise Irvine, a GP and the group’s co-chairman, said: “The new service recognises that many also experience mental health, neurodevelopmental and/or personal, family or social complexities in their lives.

“The challenge will be to ensure NHS services can provide prompt access to appropriate service for any identified needs as waiting lists are currently very long.”

But she went on to say a “serious flaw” in the policy was that it “leaves the door open for referral of children and young people under 18 for cross-sex hormones”.

She described the guidance’s reference to a drug policy that is “seriously out of date, was published before the Cass Review and does not take on board the scientific reviews which showed lack of evidence of benefit of hormones in this group” as “irresponsible”.

A spokesman for Bayswater Support Group, which advocates for evidence-based care on behalf of 600 families with trans-identifying children, said: “The more careful and holistic assessment by the NHS is welcome, however, there is still scant recognition of the environmental factors influencing children’s understanding of gender issues.

“Schools continue to teach gender identity as fact and socially transition children without parental consent. Young social media influencers monetise content claiming the health benefits of controversial medical treatments.

“And authority figures, including politicians, cast doubt on the findings of the Cass Review and falsely associate evidence-based findings with far-Right narratives.”

They added: “Within this context, it is very difficult indeed for professionals to make accurate diagnoses or to determine the most effective support for a patient experiencing distress.”

An NHS spokesman said: “We will soon be going to full public consultation on this draft specification which sets out the new holistic assessment framework that was described by Dr Cass in her report.

“NHS England has recently changed the referral pathway so child patients can only access gender services that we commission if they’re referred by a paediatrician or a child and adolescent mental health worker.”
 
Even if it's a separate mental illness, it's still a mental illness and the "treatment" shouldn't be chopping your dick off. Most people "treated" actually end up more depressed and more dysphoric afterward when they realize the effects from HRT are unpredictable and bottom surgery usually looks botched without much sexual sensation.
It should be treated like other forms of body dysmorphia and body integrity disorder. The treatment for those isn't giving into the delusions.
 
It's possible they've even been abused and are trying to desexualise themselves to regain control (this is a thing).

It most definitely is a thing. We also see this with deathfats and morbidly obese people; feels like 9/10 times they've been molested and are unconsciously trying to make themselves as unattractive as possible for protection. Shit's sad.
 
All troons are 'tistics, but not all 'tisticles have trans. We must test the 'tismos for trans.
Why is 'just telling them they will never be women' never treated as an option?
Trannyism isn't an actual 'thing' that you are born with, it's forced onto you externally by creepy weirdo adults.

No, just because you had a plastic doll as a child, doesn't mean you are a woman.
 
Seems like no one understand what the transgender stuff really is. The fact is that its a product of social interactions wherein the individual is seen as a member of the opposite sex. This is common on the Internet where social interactions are limited or distorted due to avatars, usernames, and filters making someone seem like a member of the opposite sex. When a person is perceived as a member of the opposite sex and treated as such, then they'll eventually internalize it. When the majority of a person's social interactions are online, its not surprising that personal identity can be skewed.

Autism and trannyism are linked but its a correlation rather than a causation. Autistic people get most of their social interactions online and thus they often define themselves as the gender they're treated as. So when a boy plays an online game using a girl as his avatar, he'll be treated as a girl and eventually think he's one. This is common sense.

As for historical trannies, prostitution of minors often resulted in boys being treated as girls and thus, unsurprisingly, they started to see themselves as girls.
 
After have to ask, what was the real story on that? Back in the 2000s I seethed and believed all the horror stories and such but i was a raging leftist at the time. Haven't heard about it in years.

How many of the horror stories were true? Were they exaggerated? Was most of it just well intentioned christian stuff?

Frankly what even is conversion therapy?
It ranges, but none of the actual methods I read of involve the cartoonish electric chair shit that redditors spout.
  • One of the more retarded ones is those 'pray the gay away' camps. As you can guess from the name, of course the retarded method has christian roots. So they take all the gay boys and put them together in a camp in the forest, far isolated from any witnesses with only one or two adults watching them and organizing some activities like singing in choirs, reading the bible or some simple sports stuff. The inevitable result is that nothing is accomplished and it just turns into a gay club for underage boys.
  • Then there's a much more low effort activity that people did as 'conversion therapy'. They'd seat all the gay men and all the lesbian women in one hall with chairs arranged in a wide square or circle so everyone could see each other face to face. Then they'd encourage the gay men to pick a lesbian woman that they think is good looking and ask them out. Or they organize the same thing as a partner dance. By the end of it, about a third of the gays are suddenly straight.
Or to put the whole 'suddenly straight' thing more bluntly, they were never gay and were merely socialized into getting fucked in the ass via peer pressure. And the moment you give them 'permission' to be straight, they accept it willingly.
 
It most definitely is a thing. We also see this with deathfats and morbidly obese people; feels like 9/10 times they've been molested and are unconsciously trying to make themselves as unattractive as possible for protection. Shit's sad.
In the distant past this was actually a commonly accepted idea, that girls in particular who got fat and practiced notably substandard hygiene did so because they were subjected to sexual abuse and were trying to make themselves less appealing to potential offenders. Which makes perfect sense from the perspective of a child, it's very common for child molesters to mention to their victims how attractive they find them, how appealing certain features are, how they can't help themselves - to a child it's then perfectly logical to try and "remove" or minimize those features in an effort to get the abuse to cease.
 
At least reddit's good for some laughs sometimes.
>Further down in the article, they are also evaluating "whether they are experiencing same-sex attraction".

What the fuck? Who the fuck do they think they are, the Mormon Church? I've literally never heard that language used to refer to realizing that you may be bi or gay outside of religious, conversion therapy-inclined settings. So that's super reassuring.

They're really going all-in on rolling everything back to the '70s.
I've heard it used outside of religious settings - it was used by gay people themselves pre Obergefell to argue why they were gay. They only recently started saying that only religious people use it. Same-sex attraction replaced homosexuality because 'homosexual' was deemed too sexual.
being autistic inherently doesnt affect you
Yes it does. It affects how you perceive faces - that's been done and replicated in studies. It affects how you see the world, literally. I wish I could be as confident as a troon.
being autstic in an environment of non austistics affects you

imagine youre autistic with bullying haunting you and having little connection to your peers because your brain is just different and doesnt connect with the social aspects.
They keep saying being trans is innate and genetic - the only thing that is innate - and now they suddenly don't want it done? Methinks thou doth protest too much.
 
They also will investigate family life to look for trauma and identify the child's orientation. So we are at the stage where children can't be trans they must have cognitive issues suggesting they aren't competent (because apparently that's where we are heading for autistic people), you were traumatised by your family, or you are actually gay. This is a terrifying world.
Oh this is what they’re actually afraid of. People realizing ‘trans kids’ are actual traumatized kids, and that trans adults are traumatized adults, and that the realization of their “transness” is a symptom of trauma and mental illness.

The trans identity is not natural and never was, and most people are hit by the cult at their most vulnerable moments. Every tranny is like a demon waiting to possess you at your lowest moment. Get fucked. Get absolutely fucked.
 
I'm admittedly uninformed on this topic, so do forgive me if the answer to me question is a little too obvious:

What makes autistic kids more likely to identify as trans? Is it something specific about what it means in an identitarian sense, or is it just autistic fixation being popularised?

Autistic fixations in my experience don't tend to be specific enough between different people for it to exist on this scale purely out of fascination.
 
IDGAF if someone 18 or older wants to mess up their body chemistry and embrace the brain washing that tricks them into supporting the very eugenics operations aimed to cull them. Have at it! Chemically castrate yourself. Enjoy being sterilized. As long as you pay for your reproductive lobotomy at an adult age, go knock yourself out.

But these leeches calling it "care" and thinking children should even have access to information about it are sick, twisted demons.
 
I'm admittedly uninformed on this topic, so do forgive me if the answer to me question is a little too obvious:

What makes autistic kids more likely to identify as trans? Is it something specific about what it means in an identitarian sense, or is it just autistic fixation being popularised?

Autistic fixations in my experience don't tend to be specific enough between different people for it to exist on this scale purely out of fascination.
The answer someone who believes in gender stuff would give you is that autistic people are generally nonconformist and this often applies to gender roles as well. The answer someone who is opposed to gender stuff would give is that autistic people are lonely and naive (weird how spellcheck still wants the diaresis on naive even though that variant is antiquated) and therefore more vulnerable to grooming
 
It ranges, but none of the actual methods I read of involve the cartoonish electric chair shit that redditors spout.
  • One of the more retarded ones is those 'pray the gay away' camps. As you can guess from the name, of course the retarded method has christian roots. So they take all the gay boys and put them together in a camp in the forest, far isolated from any witnesses with only one or two adults watching them and organizing some activities like singing in choirs, reading the bible or some simple sports stuff. The inevitable result is that nothing is accomplished and it just turns into a gay club for underage boys.
  • Then there's a much more low effort activity that people did as 'conversion therapy'. They'd seat all the gay men and all the lesbian women in one hall with chairs arranged in a wide square or circle so everyone could see each other face to face. Then they'd encourage the gay men to pick a lesbian woman that they think is good looking and ask them out. Or they organize the same thing as a partner dance. By the end of it, about a third of the gays are suddenly straight.
Or to put the whole 'suddenly straight' thing more bluntly, they were never gay and were merely socialized into getting fucked in the ass via peer pressure. And the moment you give them 'permission' to be straight, they accept it willingly.
From what I'm reading, the shocking was mostly done when psychiatry's solution to everything was either a lobotomy or shocking the piss out of someone. If you were extra unlucky, you might get put into an insulin coma. I wouldn't be surprised if one of those shady troubled teen camps tried it well after that. Those places are already cartoonishly evil. Why not throw in some old school asylum shit?
 
What makes autistic kids more likely to identify as trans? Is it something specific about what it means in an identitarian sense, or is it just autistic fixation being popularised?
Autistic kids usually get most of their social interactions online. This leads to people treated many as members of the opposite sex due to avatars, usernames, or intentional obfuscation. If a boy is treated like a girl by most of the people he interacts with online, then he'll start to see himself as a girl. If a girl hangs out in places where people assume everyone is male and is treated as such, she'll see herself as a boy.

Correlation is not causation. So autism doesn't cause trannyism but it is correlated. If society looks into the issue and finds out why autism is so strongly correlated with trannyism, then they'll understand that trannyism is purely a product of the incomplete nature of social interactions online.
 
Back