Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
New essay dropped and it's pure gasoline.

https://x.com/jk_rowling/status/1918747065460420745

1746305471910.webp1746305503178.webp1746305523495.webp


In light of recent open letters from academia and the arts criticising the UK's Supreme Court ruling on sex-based rights, it's possibly worth remembering that nobody sane believes, or has ever believed, that humans can change sex, or that binary sex isn't a material fact. These letters do nothing but remind us of what we know only too well: that pretending to believe these things has become an elitist badge of virtue.

I often wonder whether the signatories of such letters have to quieten their consciences before publicly boosting a movement intent on removing women's and girls' rights, which bullies gay people who admit openly they don't want opposite sex partners, and campaigns for the continued sterilisation of vulnerable and troubled kids. Do they feel any qualms at all while chanting the foundational lie of their religion: Trans Women are Women, Trans Men are Men?

I have no idea. All I know for sure is that it's a complete waste of time telling a gender activist that their favourite slogan is self-contradictory nonsense, because the lie is the whole point. They're not repeating it because it's true - they know full well it's not true - but because they believe they can make it true, sort of, if they force everyone else to agree. The foundational lie functions as both catechism and crucifix: the set form of words that obviates the tedious necessity of coming up with your own explanation of why you're one of the Godly, and an exorcist's weapon which will defeat demonic facts and reason, and promote the advance of righteous pseudoscience and sophistry.

Some argue that signatories of these sorts of letters are motivated by fear: fear for their careers, of course, but also fear of their co-religionists, who include angry, narcissistic men who threaten and sometimes enact violence on non-believers; back-stabbing colleagues ever ready to report wrongthink; the online shamers and doxxers and rape threateners, and, of course, the influential zealots in the upper echelons of liberal professions (though we can quibble whether they're actually liberal at all, given the draconian authoritarianism that seems to have engulfed so many). Gender ideology could give medieval Catholicism a run for its money when it comes to punishing heretics, so isn't it common sense to keep your head down and recite your Hail Mulvaneys?

But before we start feeling too sorry for any cowed and fearful TWAWites who're TERFy on the sly, let's not forget what a high proportion of them have willingly snatched up pitchforks and torches to join the inquisitional purges. Call me lacking in proper womanly sympathy, but I find the harm they've enabled and in some cases directly championed or funded - the hounding and shaming of vulnerable women, the forced loss of livelihoods, the unregulated medical experiment on minors - tends to dry up my tears at source.

History is littered with the debris of irrational and harmful belief systems that once seemed unassailable. As Orwell said, 'Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals believe them.' Gender ideology may have embedded itself deeply into our institutions, where it's been imposed, top-down, on the supposedly unenlightened, but it is not invulnerable.

Court losses are starting to stack up. The condescension, overreach, entitlement and aggression of gender activists is eroding public support daily. Women are fighting back and winning significant victories. Sporting bodies have miraculously awoken from their slumber and remembered that males tend to be larger, stronger and faster than females. Parts of the medical establishment are questioning cutting healthy breasts off teenaged girls is really the best way to fix their mental health problems.

One seemingly harmless little white lie - Trans Women are Women, Trans Men are Men - uttered in most cases without any real thought at all, and a few short years later, people who think of themselves as supremely virtuous are typing 'yes, rapists' pronouns are absolutely the hill I'll die on,' rubbing shoulders with those who call for women to be hanged and decapitated for wanting all-female rape crisis centres, and furiously denying clear and mounting evidence of the greatest medical scandal in a century.

I wonder if they ever ask themselves how they got here, and I wonder whether any of them will ever feel shame.

I am so glad that she (and others, e.g. Forstater/Joyce) have understood at some point that you can't fight for part of reality, that you have to reject a cult entirely and not make accommodations.


Edit: the inevitable Fredo is present and accounted for in his usual "trans Ralph Wiggum" mode.

1746305892836.webp
 
I am pretty sure Rowling is echoing Vaclav Havel in this, from "The Power of the Powerless." Luckily, she can actually afford to say this because she is not herself powerless. It's about how people are forced to consent to a lie (in Havel's case Soviet Communism) and do so, but do not mean it.

A brief excerpt:
The manager of a fruit-and-vegetable shop places in his window, among the onions and carrots, the slogan: "Workers of the world, unite!" Why does he do it? What is he trying to communicate to the world? Is he genuinely enthusiastic about the idea of unity among the workers of the world? Is his enthusiasm so great that he feels an irrepressible impulse to acquaint the public with his ideals? Has he really given more than a moment's thought to how such a unification might occur and what it would mean?

I think it can safely be assumed that the overwhelming majority of shopkeepers never think about the slogans they put in their windows, nor do they use them to express their real opinions. That poster was delivered to our greengrocer from the enterprise headquarters along with the onions and carrots. He put them all into the window simply because it has been done that way for years, because everyone does it, and because that is the way it has to be. If he were to refuse, there could be trouble. He could be reproached for not having the proper decoration in his window; someone might even accuse him of disloyalty. He does it because these things must be done if one is to get along in life. It is one of the thousands of details that guarantee him a relatively tranquil life "in harmony with society," as they say.

Obviously the greengrocer is indifferent to the semantic content of the slogan on exhibit; he does not put the slogan in his window from any personal desire to acquaint the public with the ideal it expresses. This, of course, does not mean that his action has no motive or significance at all, or that the slogan communicates nothing to anyone. The slogan is really a sign, and as such it contains a subliminal but very definite message. Verbally, it might be expressed this way: "I, the greengrocer XY, live here and I know what I must do. I behave in the manner expected of me. I can be depended upon and am beyond reproach. I am obedient and therefore I have the right to be left in peace." This message, of course, has an addressee: it is directed above, to the greengrocer's superior, and at the same time it is a shield that protects the greengrocer from potential informers. The slogan's real meaning, therefore, is rooted firmly in the greengrocer's existence. It reflects his vital interests. But what are those vital interests?

Let us take note: if the greengrocer had been instructed to display the slogan "I am afraid and therefore unquestioningly obedient;' he would not be nearly as indifferent to its semantics, even though the statement would reflect the truth. The greengrocer would be embarrassed and ashamed to put such an unequivocal statement of his own degradation in the shop window, and quite naturally so, for he is a human being and thus has a sense of his own dignity. To overcome this complication, his expression of loyalty must take the form of a sign which, at least on its textual surface, indicates a level of disinterested conviction. It must allow the greengrocer to say, "What's wrong with the workers of the world uniting?" Thus the sign helps the greengrocer to conceal from himself the low foundations of his obedience, at the same time concealing the low foundations of power. It hides them behind the facade of something high. And that something is ideology.
Definitely read Vaclav Havel.
 
The reason the Harry Potter IP is so popular is because it is marketable. You can't sell anything in Goosebumps or Animorphs, but you can sell a shitload of wands, special edition books, character figurines, house-themed items, robes, butterbeer, jelly beans, chocolate frogs. You can build theme parks people will flock to. No other IP has shit on Harry Potter, except maybe Star Wars.
 
Vaclav Havel
Tl;Dr I am a good person like the rest of you. Exactly like the rest of you. Even though you all haphazardly throw around diversity is our strength, when that phrase itself can be construed as a horrendous and devious lie.

No. No, not a lie, but dubious in meaning.

Diversity is our strength? Of course, it is. It is the strength of those who speak it to keep us divided.
 
I am pretty sure Rowling is echoing Vaclav Havel in this, from "The Power of the Powerless." Luckily, she can actually afford to say this because she is not herself powerless. It's about how people are forced to consent to a lie (in Havel's case Soviet Communism) and do so, but do not mean it.
Yes indeed, she also quoted that part 3 years ago.
Screenshot2025-05-04.webp
 
What liberals? Most of them have openly abandoned HP and and calling on people to embrace such riveting literature as Goosebumps and Animorphs.

I actually have a bit of a nostalgic fondness for GERSBERMS, but I will never forget people on this very forum negrating me for saying that they are not suitable reading material for adults.

Listen, man, I loved them as a kid too, but come the fuck on. Face facts. Reals over feels, here.

Goosebumps books were poorly written because they were churned out by the dozen, were literally never scary, and usually had stupid retarded twist endings like, "Oh shit, nigger, the kids were robots the whole time, betcha didn't see that coming!"

The best thing about Goosebumps books was literally Tim Jacobus' cover art. That's what inspired your imagination. That's what you really remember about those books. I couldn't fucking tell you what the fuck happened in Deep Trouble II - I literally can't remember - but I know it had a fucking sick evil goldfish on the front cover.

View attachment 4716904

Or, my personal favourite, The Curse of Camp Cold Lake. Fucking awesome cover. Look at that shit. Look at those staring red eyes. That's fucking terrifying.

View attachment 4716936

What happens in the book? What's the main character's name? Don't know, lol. Literally don't fucking remember. But I will ALWAYS remember that cover.
I dunno, man, enjoying campy things is one thing, and rate me controversial here, but if you are unironically still enjoying Goosebumps books as an adult, I am going to assume you are in some way mentally defective.

There's nothing in a Goosebumps book that should hold the attention of a grown adult.

There is literally no comparison between Harry Potter and Goosebumps.
 
“Most of them” is hilariously not true, not sure why you’d even think that
Name me a high profile liberal or leftist that still quotes Harry Potter or at the very least has their house in their bio. I'll wait.

Animorphs were always pretty lame, even when I was 10. G-Rated thriller series that went out of it's way to avoid anyone getting killed. The aliens were stupid too.
 
Name me a high profile liberal or leftist that still quotes Harry Potter or at the very least has their house in their bio. I'll wait.

Animorphs were always pretty lame, even when I was 10. G-Rated thriller series that went out of it's way to avoid anyone getting killed. The aliens were stupid too.
Yeah you're way too online if you think that's true. And also just because you saw one or two suggest "Animorphs" doesn't mean all of them do. The reality with these freaks is ridiculous enough, you don't have to invent stories
 
Definitely read Vaclav Havel.

This is completely off topic for this thread but once in a while I see a westerner talk about Havel and it always rubs me the wrong way.

Havel was a fucking communist, or rather, he was a completely spineless swine - amoral, devoid of any principles, only looking to enrich himself and get shitfaced. If he was born a few decades earlier, he would have been a Nazi. A few decades before that and he'd be an Austrian monarchist. The entire mainstream Czechoslovak "dissent" was like that, they were all informants, they all kept telling on each other to the cops. He was under surveillance by the secret police (StB), yes, they'd tail him whenever he took his Mercedes Benz on a trip (because the supposed oppressed dissident owned a fucking Benz in the mid-80s when normal people were spending their entire life savings and queuing for days to buy a Škoda 120). The StB tail was there to make sure he wouldn't die of alcohol poisoning. Havel was also briefly imprisoned several times for the same reason - to keep him from drinking himself to death, because the regime needed him; by the 80s the communists knew the eastern bloc was going to collapse, it was unsustainable, and Havel was their guy to take over and make sure that none of them would face any consequences for their actions. That's why he was allowed to live in luxury unavailable to 99% of the people in Czechoslovakia, while real dissidents like Pavel Wonka were being beaten to death in prison, even in the 80s when the regime mostly mellowed out.

The Power of the Powerless isn't bad reading, but it's not exactly novel either, it didn't take a genius to figure out that everyone was just going through the motions and quietly making fun of those stupid red banners and their silly slogans. EVERYONE was doing that, even party members. By the 80s the entire regime was a farce. The term to describe it is "hypernormalization" and it's happening in the West right now. For the Czechs, it's happening for the second time in living memory.
 
Still with the absurd scenarios.

1746444518741.webp

Interesting. I wonder if she'll also be funding the cases of women who will be strip-searched by the British Transport Police if they are deemed to be not "woman" enough - this being a direct consequence of the Supreme Court judgement that Rowling paid "For Women Scotland" to make happen.

At what point will they stop expecting all those absurd predictions of the last few weeks to come to pass?

Incidentally, this one has an er interesting twist on the usual "transed by hentai/lolliporn stuff" back-story.

1746444713579.webp


You know, his trademark big tiddy Philip Femme Fry avi that was the talk of town.
 
Back