Debate Israel's right to the land they occupy for the millionth time

I get the same feeling of resignation from seeing anyone declaring themselves some vague civilised notion - calling themselves a pacifist, calling themselves empathetic, saying they believe in democracy, etc. etc. - as I would if I saw a man walking around wearing assless chaps. At some point, whether I want to or not, I'm going to see their but.

These are things that are assumed by default to be the functional truth for most people in civilised society. E.g. 99.99% of people in civilised society are at least close enough to pacifist (e.g., including people that could potentially see the case for it but will follow the law, or have safer means to make their case) that pacifism is taken as a given. The only people who need to call themselves a pacifist are those who are about to say some violent shit and need to try and even the scales from being correctly ID'd as a violent thug.

Ian only needs to try to declare himself empathetic because he's defending trying to rip children away from their parents because one of them was conscripted against their will. He wouldn't have needed to say it if he wasn't providing counter-evidence.
I said it earlier but I think it is worth repeating. I feel like ian has been terminally reddit brained. They're not so much the "hecken marvelrino" type and more the "I too once was an evil nazi Republican who use to say niggerfaggot on an mw2 lobby but now I've reformed and thus I am better"-babys first socialism bullshit. I seriously think he spent so much time on his subreddit that he went off the reservation and into the site as a whole. That's why he does all the reddit approved*tm* stuff. He hates Israel, loves the turkcock, self flagilates, is a ok with taking his wife's name AND letting his wife become a whore (isn't it cool guys, you might be jerking off to her but I get the real thing :smug:) he reeks of adolence perma virgin view of sex, relationships and the world; many opinions fir someone with no life experience. The worst I can say is that ethan and hila are just big city artist lefties who support big city Democratic policies.It might be stupid but I think it's genuine and comes from some type of lived experience/upbringing they have had. The RAPED is what happens when you listen to the reddit and let them dedicate what's good or bad.

They forgot the biggest thing, people on reddit have never experienced anything they talk about.
 
The other camp gradually became more insane while it grew since young people chose it over the other. Huge migration waves from the middle east resulted in a large population of young muslims entering digital spaces in their western countries of destination. They were also more popular among young people culturally (in Europe they often record rap music including frequent mentions of their faith) and brought their form of socialism (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_socialism). The broad agreement in the political sciences is that this form of socialism looks more like some system created by a retard who read Marx but never understood it due to the language barrier - funfact. So, the influence was much bigger. This is also the "sjw" camp because they got their political socialization from the internet (e.g. Turkroach).
A huge factor in the support of Islam and the third world by communists was the decline of the Soviet Union and the growing influence of Maoism throughout the 70s within non-aligned countries. It is a fact that Mao supported the Mujahideen against the Soviet Union. Most serious marxists in the west were Trotkyists, but Trotskyism never manifested as a serious political force because it was fragmented and lacked popular support. Maoism was able to attach itself to decolonization movements and racial politics, especially in France and America.

Nobody in the west who was middle class and white was delusional enough to support communism, so all the communists realized that if they want power and political influence they needed to target poor and stupid people who fuck goats. Communists are almost all opportunists, so its not like they are upset by betraying the purity of their cause.
 
Last edited:
When did all the Muslim cocksucking from the left even start anyway? It has probably been like this for awhile but I only really noticed it within the past few years.
It was around in some of the more extreme segments of the left back in the 90s but post 9/11 under Dubya is when it ramped up as a major countercultural thing about how those poor innocent brown people were being killed by da white devil republikkkan Amerikkkan imperialist pigdogs.

By 2010 the default position was full blown "religion of peace" dicksucking about how America was the cause of all pain and suffering in the millennia-old blood-soaked dustbowl across the sea because something something Oil.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: Vernon Dozier
no we claim we have lived there continuously for over
"we"
8jhtwz-1792143447.webp
 
So? Ethan was fucking right.
Right about what? The sacredness of Israel? How every critic of zionism is a hecking antisemitic bigot?
Just because Hasan is a retarded breadtuber faggot doesn't mean you should give phull sappot to the soulless equally homosexual kike positioned against him.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
But they also kill fags and don't really respect women.

Jews still seem to be the proper holy cow.
I still can't believe how quickly that fucking switch flipped.
There's three problems:

1: Generally, if you think about the reasons leftists think white people are evil (e.g. White people get disproportionate amounts of high paying jobs) and then look at the same figures wrt jewish people, the latter seems almost like a caricature of the former. Like the Jewish are a cartoon's over-exaggeration of a problem that's far more subtle with white people.
2: The right wing boomers are the most openly supportive of Israel, and a very large part of modern leftism is just 'fuck you dad' in a trenchcoat.
3: The left wing has spent years promoting immigrants from impoverished or fucked up countries (many of which are muslim) and as a result, are incredibly receptive to them and self-blinded to their faults. Dual-nationalist israelis, meanwhile, are continuing to try having their cake and eating it too, by being openly critical either in supporting measures like these except for when it concerns israel, or forbidding racism except when it's against palestine.

The jewish population in general is only just starting to realise the golem they created is turning against them, and even fewer are ready to admit any part of it might be their fault.
 
When did all the Muslim cocksucking from the left even start anyway? It has probably been like this for awhile but I only really noticed it within the past few years.
To piss off conservatives that love Israel. The funny thing is, faggots like Hasan and every other muslim larping breadtuber would be stoned should they act the way they act in actual muslim countries
 
A
Anne Frank isn’t real

Actually Frank fortifies the revisionists perspective, she died of typhus in Belsen and wasn't gassed in the magical morgue with no ventilation or in the room with the electrified pavement , or the one with the soviet tank engine in the elusive transit camp Treblinka.

The whole boutade over the ball pen ink it's just as distasteful as the omnipresent anti German hate propaganda that neutered a whole nation for the last 80 years.
 
I hate both of them but jews claim to that land is that they suposesly inhabited it 2000 years ago. Thats fucking retarded.
I don't care about any claims going back prior to WW2 honestly, if we play that game everyone owes everyone something.

My thing is who makes better use of the land now? Unless you buy into /pol/ theories, jews have made a civilization, arabs (or rather muslims) have not.

If some reasonable family who's dad works as a factory forman lives in a house, and they pay taxes, obey the law, and get along with neighbors, i'm fine with them. If some strung out rapist crack head came up and was able to prove beyond any doubt that this house belonged to his great grandfather, and the current guy's great grandfather forcefully exelled him 100 years ago which caused the domino effects leading to this guy becoming a crackhead i would not care.

We don't live in history, we live in the present, and in the present our choice is between a rapist crackhead and a respectable citizen.

And in the middle east we have a choice between a country that keeps its shit together and contributes to the world, vs dozens of countries who chimp out at every opprottunity and worship pedophiles.

Hell the most successful arab nations are egypt and saudi arabia and both were signalling being done with hamas' shit before the attacks. And no i don't care what iran thinks. /pol/ will tell me that israel wants me dead, but muslims tell me that muslims want me dead.

To be clear i totally understand why people criticize israel they do some shady shit, but people simping for palestinians is just retarded.
 
Last edited:
A

Actually Frank fortifies the revisionists perspective, she died of typhus in Belsen and wasn't gassed in the magical morgue with no ventilation or in the room with the electrified pavement , or the one with the soviet tank engine in the elusive transit camp Treblinka.

The whole boutade over the ball pen ink it's just as distasteful as the omnipresent anti German hate propaganda that neutered a whole nation for the last 80 years.
As someone who is completely out of the loop and doesn't even know what to google for, can someone tell me why are ball pens relevant in this discussion?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Thé au lait
As someone who is completely out of the loop and doesn't even know what to google for, can someone tell me why are ball pens relevant in this discussion?
It is frequently alleged that Anne Frank's diary was written in ballpoint pen, which wasn't invented until after World War II.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Thé au lait
jews claim to that land is that they suposesly inhabited it 2000 years ago. Thats fucking retarded.

jews claim to the land is that they inhabit it now.
muslims counterclaim is that they inhabited it 80 years ago aka "we were here before you"
jews counter-counterclaim is that they inhabited it 2000 year ago aka "actually we were here before you"

if you go down the road of historical claims to the land, the picture looks something like this

pre-biblical times: various peoples live there, most of them extinct now except the jews
biblical times: mostly jews live there
roman times: romans drive the jews out, now romans (pagans) live there
later roman times: roman pagans convert to christianity
early islamic times: arab muslims conquer the land from the christian romans, now arab muslims live there
crusade times: christians conquer the land back (in part), now both muslims and christians live there
later islamic times: crusaders are driven out, muslims live there
ottoman times: muslims live there
early 20th century: turks lose ww1, brits take over and start shipping in jews at scale
mid 20th century: jews take over from brits, first arab/israeli war, muslims are driven out
today: jews live there

tl;dr jews have the most recent claim to the land (because they rule it now) and also the most ancient claim (because they lived there before anybody else who still exists)
 
That’s a pretty reductive take. The original 1947 UN partition plan called for a dual state solution, which both peoples had legitimate historical and cultural claims to. The region wasn’t some unbroken Jewish homeland reclaimed after exile it was already a deeply contested and populated land by Arabs who had lived there for centuries.

Saying someone has the most valid claim just because they “rule it now” or because their ancestors lived there thousands of years ago is like saying someone can kick you out of your house because their great-great-grandfather once slept there. Historical presence doesn’t equal perpetual ownership, especially in a place with as many overlapping identities and tragedies as this one.

Both peoples have a claim. That’s why it was always going to be messy and why simplifications like this don’t help.
I think I can easily reduce this whole problem into a single solution. You might even call it The Final Solution to the Jewsish and Muslim question

Nuke both countries off the face of the earth. There. Now no-one can have it.
 
I don't care about any claims going back prior to WW2 honestly, if we play that game everyone owes everyone something.

My thing is who makes better use of the land now? Unless you buy into /pol/ theories, jews have made a civilization, arabs have not.

If some reasonable family who's dad works as a factory forman lives in a house, and they pay taxes, obey the law, and get along with neighbors, i'm fine with them. If some strung out rapist crack head came up and was able to prove beyond any doubt that this house belonged to his great grandfather, and the current guy's great grandfather forcefully exelled him 100 years ago which caused the domino effects leading to this guy becoming a crackhead i would not care.

We don't live in history, we live in the present, and in the present our choice is between a rapist crackhead and a respectable citizen.

And in the middle east we have a choice between a country that keeps its shit together and contributes to the world, vs dozens of countries who chimp out at every opprottunity and worship pedophiles.

Hell the most successful arab nations are egypt and saudi arabia and both were signalling being done with hamas' shit before the attacks. And no i don't care what iran thinks. /pol/ will tell me that israel wants me dead, but muslims tell me that muslims want me dead.

To be clear i totally understand why people criticize israel they do some shady shit, but people simping for palestinians is just retarded.

i dont believe they actually from that area but if they say they are il believe them and wish them a happy repatriation...oh they are not actually going back.
Im not simping for Palestinians, they can all fucking die for all i care but i understand why they are upset that these guys just showed up and took over.
"Make best use of the land" why should i care how that land is used? I dont live there and i dont care what happens there. I care that they are dragging the US and the west into endless wars and then flooding us with refugees.

jews claim to the land is that they inhabit it now.
muslims counterclaim is that they inhabited it 80 years ago aka "we were here before you"

They were also there 100 years ago and 200 and 300 and 400 and 500....
They are mostly descended from cananites and other peoples from the levant.
The jews even in their own story are not locals. So no they dont even have the oldest claim.
 
Last edited:
Back