Sick paedophile blindfolded girl and raped her in 'campaign' of abuse - Perry McCarthy's brave victim told a court she remained 'haunted' by his abuse while there was applause in court as the paedophile was handed a lengthy jail term

Link: https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/sick-paedophile-blindfolded-girl-raped-31562696
Credit: Philip Dewey, Wales Online
Archive: https://archive.ph/wip/QreMV

0_PDR_ECH_020525PerryMcCarthy.webp

Paedophile Perry McCarthy (Image: South Wales Police)
A paedophile subjected a young girl to a "campaign of rape and sexual abuse" over a number of years which left her "helpless, terrified, and ashamed". As a result of the abuse she suffered the victim has had suicidal ideation and has self-harmed.

Perry McCarthy, 65, of Penarth, carried out a series of rapes and sexual offences against the victim, which began when she was of primary school age. It started when the defendant asked the girl for a hug and made her wear a blindfold to conceal what he was doing.

A sentencing hearing at Cardiff Crown Court heard McCarthy made the victim touch his penis and masturbate him until he ejaculated.

The victim would later tell police this was "the usual type of abuse" she suffered but the defendant's behaviour escalated and he would orally rape the victim while she was blindfolded.

He went on to penetrate the victim with his fingers and groomed her by buying her electronic items as well as chocolate and games.

If she refused McCarthy's sick demands he would call her "selfish".

The defendant also sexually assaulted the victim by grabbing her breasts and massaged her thigh with an electric device as well as encouraging her to watch pornography.

The victim later told her teachers about the abuse and she gave an interview to the police about what she endured.

McCarthy, of Shakespeare Avenue, faced trial and was found guilty of rape of a girl, three counts of raping a girl under 13, three counts of causing/inciting a girl under 13 to engage in sexual activity, attempting to assault a girl under 13 by penetration, three counts of causing/inciting a girl under to engage in sexual activity involving penetration, assault by penetration, sexual assault, and voyeurism.

Reading her own victim personal statement to the court the victim said: "The emotional and sexual abuse continued for many years and throughout that time I felt helpless, terrified, and ashamed. The secrecy of it all made me feel alone and I became isolated as though I was trapped in a nightmare I couldn’t escape. I was too scared to tell anyone, convinced that no-one would believe me or that I would be blamed for what had happened...

"As a result of being called a liar and being constantly made to feel as if I was to blame for what was happening I now find it very difficult to accept advice and guidance...

"I now live with chronic anxiety, nightmares, and a constant feeling of unease. My sleep has been terribly affected as the fear instilled by being blindfolded by Perry leaves me exceptionally fearful of closing my eyes and experiencing the darkness. There are times that the demons that I fear in the dark, that take on the shape and persona of Perry, force me into leaving the house in the night to try and escape from them and even though I know that this is in itself an unsafe activity it still feels safer than reliving my abuse nightmare. This then impacts massively on my ability to function during the day – I’m not only physically too tired to be able to engage in regular daily activities but also emotionally too drained to rationalise my thoughts.

"I struggle to trust people and I often feel like I am on edge, waiting for something bad to happen. I have frequently resorted to self-harm in the hope that physical pain will negate the mental anguish I experience. This has resulted in numerous hospital admissions and times when I think it would be easier to not have to live with the hurt and pain.

"Relationships have been difficult for me to navigate as the trauma has made it hard to open up to others, even those I love and care about, and as soon as I feel that I am starting to trust [people] I withdraw and isolate myself as the ingrained fear of that trust being abused never goes away. I’ve found it challenging to form healthy connections... The abuse has taught me to be passive and not question others’ actions and I am only slowly learning how to recognise and avoid this.

"The abuse has affected my mental health, my self-esteem, and my sense of safety in the world. I constantly question my worth and whether I deserved any of this pain....

"I want to be heard. I want to be understood. I want to be believed. The impact of the abuse extends beyond what happened during those years – it is a constant presence in my life that I struggle with every day. I am slowly learning to live with the trauma but I am still haunted by it. I feel like I am living a life in which I am constantly on the outside looking in, never fully able to be myself."

In mitigation Kevin Seal said his client had no previous convictions and there was no evidence of offences being committed against anybody else.

Sentencing, Judge Shomon Khan said: "The victim was left in the impossible situation of having to endure further abuse from you thinking no-one would believe her... Blindfolding was linked to the abuse which left emotional and physical scars. When she turns out the lights she fears she will see images of you...

"She describes losing her childhood and even now she feels she's an outsider. She feels her voice was lost but the jury heard her and I heard her loud and clear.

"She was brave and did come forward. You thought you could get away with it because of her vulnerability... You abused and used her as your plaything."

McCarthy was sentenced to a total of 21 years imprisonment with an extended licence period of one year. People in the public gallery clapped as the judge passed sentence

The defendant was also made subject to a restraining order and sex offender notification requirements for life and was made subject to a sexual harm prevention order for 15 years.

Following the hearing detective constable Joanna Cecerko from South Wales Police said: “I want to commend the victim for her courage in coming forward. Thanks to her report and support from her family justice has been served.

“It has been a traumatic time for everyone involved and I am hopeful the outcome at court brings the victim and her family some comfort which they deserve.”
 
Last edited:
Perry McCarthy, 65, of Penarth, carried out a series of rapes and sexual offences against the victim, which began when she was of primary school age. It started when the defendant asked the girl for a hug and made her wear a blindfold to conceal what he was doing.
This is why stranger danger is (rightfully) a thing these days.
 
I don't get it. Who is he? Why did he have constant, unsupervised access to this girl? The fact that they're being so vague about who exactly this guy is makes me extremely suspicious. "It started when the defendant asked the girl for a hug and made her wear a blindfold to conceal what he was doing"? What the fuck does that mean?
 
I don't get it. Who is he? Why did he have constant, unsupervised access to this girl? The fact that they're being so vague about who exactly this guy is makes me extremely suspicious. "It started when the defendant asked the girl for a hug and made her wear a blindfold to conceal what he was doing"? What the fuck does that mean?
I think I get what they were trying to do with this article. Instead of just relaying the facts of "man rapes child", they went with "man rapes child, here's what the victim has to say about the long-term impact on her psyche and how she copes with it". Basically focussing more on the victim and establishing her as a person who will have to deal with this shit for the rest of her life. But in doing so, they kinda failed to establish some basic facts.

Anyway, considering this was an ongoing abuse involving plenty of verbal manipulation by him, I, too, believe that he's either a relative or a family friend, not just some random stranger.
 
I don't get it. Who is he? Why did he have constant, unsupervised access to this girl? The fact that they're being so vague about who exactly this guy is makes me extremely suspicious. "It started when the defendant asked the girl for a hug and made her wear a blindfold to conceal what he was doing"? What the fuck does that mean?

Reports like this will often try to obfuscate the relationship in order to provide the victim privacy. He is obviously a family member. Since they’re not reporting when this occurred, that info would likely clarify further. At his age she’s likely either his (step) daughter or granddaughter. Providing a “when” would indicate which.
 
Last edited:
Everyone talks about the woodchipper, which I totally understand. But please hear me out. It's been a few generations since anyone has done truly experimental surgeries on people just to see what happens. What we have with people like this is a chance to expand medical knowledge from theoretical to practical on so many things.
 
I don't get it. Who is he? Why did he have constant, unsupervised access to this girl? The fact that they're being so vague about who exactly this guy is makes me extremely suspicious. "It started when the defendant asked the girl for a hug and made her wear a blindfold to conceal what he was doing"? What the fuck does that mean?
They are being vague because UK law does not allow the victim to be identified. This includes identifying any family relationship to the offender.

UK news reports of sexual crime sentencing are full of these statements indicating no more than whether the victim was "a child" or "a woman" because identifying any family relationship makes piecemeal identification of the victim possible, and victims of sexual crime here have a right to lifelong anonymity. They may choose to waive this right themselves. The media may not disclose any details that would make the victim identifiable, however. Nevertheless, any familiarity with criminal justice in the UK readily discloses the pattern.

Whenever you read a report of a UK sexual offence against "a child", overwhelmingly the child is living in the same household as the offender. Overwhelmingly there is a family relationship.

This subhuman is either this girl's father or stepfather. Possibly a grandfather. Absolutely a close relative. This appears to be a 'historical' case in that the victim has reported after childhood once they are out of the family home. Long term CSA like this occurs in family relationships where the offender has plenty of unsupervised access to the victim and due to family circumstances, the victim does not expect to be believed. The majority of adults in the UK who report CSA report that they first disclosed to a family member and were not believed, or were in some way threatened or coerced to keep quiet. 'Late reporting' usually coincides with a change in family circumstances such that the victim believes other children to be presently at risk from the offender.
 
Everyone talks about the woodchipper, which I totally understand. But please hear me out. It's been a few generations since anyone has done truly experimental surgeries on people just to see what happens. What we have with people like this is a chance to expand medical knowledge from theoretical to practical on so many things.
That or rural Wales (most of the country is hilly or mountainous) has plenty of ravines and places where walkers will never venture to.

Kick them off a mountain in the Brecon Beacons or near Cadair Idris or somewhere in Snowdonia and they'll never be found.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: KiwiFuzz2
I knew it had to be a white dude since we're seeing him suffering the consequences in UK.

He went on to penetrate the victim with his fingers and groomed her by buying her electronic items as well as chocolate and games.

If she refused McCarthy's sick demands he would call her "selfish".
I'm not blaming the victim here, I'm rather blaming modern parents rising kids that allow this to happen. When I was a kid, any adult I didn't know was stranger danger for me, specially when they talked to me and asked me things I wasn't meant to answer.

Better said, if your kids are going to strangers for candy, you failed as a parent.
 
Everyone wanted to fly this mission. We drew names, I stayed out. Milton, please warm up the helicopter, you're flying left seat. Check ride for you, Bob is check pilot. Charlie, please fly right seat. Kira, Jan, and Will, please assist Mike, the crew chief, after the rest of us complete the special processing.
 
I knew it had to be a white dude since we're seeing him suffering the consequences in UK.


I'm not blaming the victim here, I'm rather blaming modern parents rising kids that allow this to happen. When I was a kid, any adult I didn't know was stranger danger for me, specially when they talked to me and asked me things I wasn't meant to answer.

Better said, if your kids are going to strangers for candy, you failed as a parent.
100% bang on the money.

Recently, I had to travel up to Manchester by train on business, and at Ludlow a woman and a young girl got on. They sat opposite me, the woman's face was buried in her mobile, whilst the young girl was running up and down the aisle. She then came over to me and said 'hiya!' so I said 'hello, is that your Mum there?' trying to get the woman's attention. She looked over and said 'oh I'm her Aunt' and then went back to her phone.

The young girl was wearing a cropped top which showed her midriff and what I would consider to be too short denim shorts. She was bubbly and had a sweet but innocent nature - her Aunt didn't care what she did, she was too busy and seemed uninterested that anybody could have swiped her away at any point. Thankfully, they left the train at Shrewsbury and I wasn't bothered all the way to Manchester.

Some other passengers did comment that what the young girl, no more than five years of age, was wearing wasn't appropriate and that her Aunt was neglectful. Talking with her Aunt about stranger danger would be the same as explaining advanced calculus to a stone - she won't take it in and would most likely say 'well you're the one with the problem, I did nothing.'
 
I'm not blaming the victim here, I'm rather blaming modern parents rising kids that allow this to happen. When I was a kid, any adult I didn't know was stranger danger for me, specially when they talked to me and asked me things I wasn't meant to answer.
When you were a kid, the person statistically most likely to sexually abuse you was a first degree relative living in your home. Overwhelmingly. The figure reported today is about eight or nine of every ten sexual abusers fit that profile.

That is still true today, and the facts as disclosed of this case support that being the case here. Child sexual abuse is a crime overwhelmingly committed by people the children and their adults trust. To keep your own kids safe, you have to understand that and think about protecting them with that in mind.

Stranger danger is very important learning for kids. It is not enough to keep them safe. It isn't even the most important part of keeping them safe. It's why we teach them now about tricky people, and why the most important thing when someone makes you feel uncomfortable is to tell an adult you trust. It's why you must reinforce with your own kids, over and over, that if they tell you something about a tricky person, you will believe them and protect them. The single most protective factor for a kid against CSA is the ability to tell and the belief they will be believed and protected. Paedo offenders admit this over and over: they are actively looking for the kids they believe either won't tell, or won't be believed if they do.

When you were a kid, it was normal for a dad or dad figure to give you chocolate and buy you a gameboy and tuck you in at night. God willing you had a normal dad and that's where it ended.

Lots of kids, a tragic torrent of kids, aren't that lucky.
 
Back