India-Pakistan Conflict - Land Of The Indus Versus Land Of The Pure

WelperHelper99 said:
Honestly? I have no fucking idea. It depends on who fucking survives. We're in uncharted territory of mass nuke strikes.
Click to expand...
It'll be interesting to see the effects at least. I really don't think that either side has anything close to a clean burning weapons system. So there would be a lot of radiation damage, a lot of fires, and essentially total collapse of wherever they hit. I know people are talking about refugees, but unironically I don't think there would be. India is big, and walking out of it when you have no power is just not happening.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
Tiggletown said:
I watched a documentary on how sad the state of the United States Nuclear missile program is and how we have not had a replacement to the minutemen from the 50s and the new program to make them stalled out because we literally outsourced away our manufacturing base so we cant repair or make new ones.

I very much believe India and Pakistan have "Nuclear Missiles" in name only and they could not fire or detonate reliably rusted out cold war era warheads.

I'd believe North Korea having first strike capabilities over Pakistan.
Click to expand...
That is what we call propaganda. Nukes are real retard. You're about to bear witness to multiple megatons worth at this rate.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Fetch!, Smar Mijou, pikachudidnothingwrong and 11 others
Star Classic said:

India better watch out, he finally grew up...
Click to expand...
vOU4XfLzklGlEXiTQRBEivQJLQoR_o5hSPSSYqNc2QY.webp

This is hilariously bad timing for Kier Starmer too considering today he just did a trade deal with these filth-lords.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Mike Matei's Penis, Coo Coo Bird, Potassium Chloride and 9 others
I don't mean to be a downer on those calling for total Jeet death, and trust me I sympathise. But so far while Indian strikes have occurred within Pakistani territory, I would be cautious to call this guaranteeing an all out war just yet. India and Pakistan are no strangers to flinging shit at each other (pun intended) in the form of heavy ordinance and there have been numerous instances of on and off heavy fighting in Kashmir, particularly since 2013.

It always plays out the same way, a terrorist attack occurs in India that was probably backed by Pakistan (or at least the Pakistani army), India then responds with airstrikes or in some cases ground incursions into Pakistani Kashmir, Pakistan responds to the response and a tit-for-tat goes on for months before a ceasefire gets called.

Now admittedly while I think the above is the most likely course of action, the shredding of the water treaty does lend credence to the idea that this conflict is different and could spiral into an all out war, as regardless of how intense fighting got in the past, and that includes the very serious 1965 and 1978 wars, the Indus Waters Treaty still stood. Therefore the decision to break from the treaty does indicate a willingness on India's part to take things further than may have before, but ultimately time will tell and I'll be the first to admit I'm wrong if Lahore gets turned into a crater in the next 48 hours.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Feels
Reactions: Fetch!, Midwit, Look At You and 20 others
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Fetch!, pikachudidnothingwrong, Potassium Chloride and 15 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back