Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

[BIG BILL HELL'S]

But the question remains: if they're incapable of blaming themselves, how do they cope with this logical series of events? How do they quietly maintain the narrative’s first principles while abhorring its consequences?

SSRIs and/or copious amounts of alcohol, mostly.

 

[The Ugly One]

Women are "emotionally intelligent" only in the sense that they can manage a very complicated web of drama. The bullshit mind games women play with their social circle can be very complicated and multifaceted once you think about it. Next time you hear a bunch of female friends gossiping, if you actually pay attention the plans they are hatching for the poor chap not engaged in the gossip circle are actually really elaborate. But when it comes to actual constructive actions? Completely useless.

The type of emotional intelligence you mentioned (Being a good listener, being able to express ideas clearly) is male emotional intelligence.

"Is there anything wrong?"
"Nuh actually I'm fine"
- Creature with high emotional intelligence

"Emotional intelligence" means being able to intuit when something will hurt somebody's feelings. The main driver of woke DEI crap is women whining that getting stuff done, having competent people, and making products people will buy is hurting the feelings of women, trannies, and people of color.\

The ways this avoidance manifests can sometimes be farcically convoluted. I came across this story about a woman organizing some sort of retreat who clearly didn’t want trans women included, but couldn’t come right out and say it, because it would violate the rules of the game she herself subscribes to. So instead, she trotted out the explanation that Muslim women would be attending, and it would be "disrespectful to their religious beliefs" to include biological males, so therefore, ta-da! no trans women allowed. Invoking Islam provides a culturally acceptable loophole through which she can smuggle back in the boundary she's otherwise not allowed herself to articulate.\

"Islam is right about women." -feminists

 

[SouthernBitchBob]

Tell the truth though, would you still take a class if you walked in and it was majority female?

I have. In practice it usually means I'm going to top the curve more easily.

 

[Ultrapenguin]

Tell the truth though, would you still take a class if you walked in and it was majority female?

Oh hell yeah, imagine being the one dude in a class full of women. You'd be the king of the castle. Manspreading in the classroom. And they'd secretly love it.

It reminds me of how the pitiful beta virgin underclass thinks that lifting weights and doing tons of traditionally masculine things is how to finally get romantic attention...it isn't, unless you're looking for attention from other men.
If all someone is looking for is to get with women then they need to become a dancer, or a hair dresser or something. If you're a straight male professional ballet dancer (tap dance or irish step dance is acceptable, but less ideal), you'll be DROWNING in puss. The ladies will be fighting over you.

Plus when you remove undesirable males form the equation it removes the simp class that enables and encourages negative behaviors among women. A group of almost exclusively women will possibly be more tolerable than a mixed group (assuming you follow a set of rules); many of the modern day's feminist issues are not so much a product of women, but rather a product of weak men.

Plus like person above said, it'll probably be much easier to get to the top of the class.

So yes that would be great, I'd be more likely to take a class if it was all women. Sign me up.

 

[SouthernBitchBob]

Now, to add a caveat to that- if it's a group project-heavy class then no way. I've had classes with intelligent, hardworking women who give my academic curve a hard fight. But since most classes are full of mid men and women, that's where things get tricky. A mid-to-underachieving man is a wildcard. Maybe he'll flake out, maybe he'll take forever to get his part done, maybe his work will be sub-par, but it'll be there. Or it won't, and he'll show his bullshit early in the semester. A mid-to-underachieving woman is a different animal entirely. Almost without exception, she'll start in on the standard "uwu I'm so stupid, I don't get it, could you do it for me pleeeeease?" routine, and that kind of dead weight is much more of an albatross around your group's neck than someone who just stops showing up and you can tell your professor he bailed.

 

[The Hardest R]

In grade school I was in an advanced English class and for a couple grades, I was the only boy in the class. I did just fine in them. Yes, there were a couple girls that tattled on me for damn near everything. Yes, there were a couple of secret admirer notes. It was fine. I did do better than all but one girl who interestingly enough now works for Autism Speaks. This was between second and third wave feminism though when schools were not quite viciously anti-white male. I can’t imagine how it’d be now.

 

[Sneed's Feed n Seed]

"Emotional intelligence" means being able to intuit when something will hurt somebody's feelings. The main driver of woke DEI crap is women whining that getting stuff done, having competent people, and making products people will buy is hurting the feelings of women, trannies, and people of color.

What amuses me to death about this is that none of them seem to realize they need competent people to whine to so that they might do things for them.

I should probably put that into the extreme whining theorem
(women most affected)

 

[There Is Light At The End]

"Emotional intelligence" means being able to intuit when something will hurt somebody's feelings

Another reinvention of bicycle. It's called empathy

 

[Qonas]

none of them seem to realize they need competent people to whine to so that they might do things for them.

Do things for them????? Aren't we always told that they only want to whine and gripe? Any time we start offering solutions they get mad and crash out even harder.

 

[Kalsarikännit]

The people who did this, some of them trannies, most of them women, all of them rhetorically immunized

Finally, someone who not only gets it, but can put it to words. Only snipping my favorite part to reply to, but a very good post in all.

 

[Sneed's Feed n Seed]

Do things for them????? Aren't we always told that they only want to whine and gripe? Any time we start offering solutions they get mad and crash out even harder.

Yes but the lights remain on and garbage men take the trash from the curb regardless who puts it in the can, etc.

So they need it even if they don’t grasp someone’s doing it and themselves care about feelings themselves.

Spaces, once moralized, are nearly impossible to un-moralize. So don't forget why you're here in the first place, and don't let anybody convince you that your grief is less important.

This is fine. The problem is we need to become sophisticated moralizers and dismiss the children who interrupt when the men are talking.

Bluntly, to most people, "moral" is their emotional reaction to a sentence. Nothing more.

If you talk about right and wrong in abstract cases, to make rules that are general and categorical, so that things as best as possible for as many people as possible, including rules you would follow yourself, you're at least started on the way toward meaningful morality and meta-ethical conversation.

Why do I say this? Because it's time to advocate for your own values, interests, wants, needs, and desires, same as every other fucking person. Being socialized to take care of others and be a worker drone stifles you from reaching your true potential. It's not bad to want things or say "No, actually, I think my values are better than yours."

Basal people just go through the motions to fit in. Somewhat sophisticated but limited people might try to alter the social contract to suit themselves as much as they can and carefully build social capital within it to keep pushing the needle - and quietly remove old things they said during prior social contracts, like how old tweets come back to haunt people.

Most of the women we're complaining about (not all women, and likely far from the majority, mind you) are going to be "WHAT I WAAAAAANT" or "I changed the social contract, follow it." Or maybe "I redefined things so I'm good and you're evil."



As you can see, children and niggers are going to be basically at level I. Kinda slow people end up in level II. Level III is where you start having people think about social contracts, shrewd people say "oh I'll change the contract," and people who are actually smart and meaningfully moral start to think about principles that disregard consensus bullshit.

Let's look at the canonical example, the Heinz dilemma.

Steal the fucking medicine or you're a goddamn faggot.

 

[smile.jpg]

Women have one particular fetish, one that is prevalent in every single female gaze oriented work, one that is even more common than their hybristophilia fetish, or their rape fetish, it's the fetish that defines the context in which all these other fetishes occur: The passivity fetish.

Notice how in Twilight, or 50SoG, the main character does literally nothing the whole story? That's not poor writing, that's actually the paramount component of the fantasy. The fantasy of being given everything you want, exactly how you want it, while you do absolutely nothing. Women don't want to tell men to do things, they want men(who are extremely attractive) to do things and make things happen, things that they like. If that involves having sex with her, she couldn't give consent, as that would require her to do something and would ruin the fantasy. That does make it rape, technically, but she would never want to stop it anyway. And if she told chad to stop, and he did, that would mean she controlled him, which would immediately give her the ick. Women's rape fetish is less about rape like you imagine it, and more about chad giving her exactly what she wants without her having to tell him anything or do anything.

This is why the protagonists have to be so plain, girls know that the pretty girls get the bad boys in real life, but mary sue can get two hot billionaire vampires to fight over her without even being particularly good looking. The reader also doesn't want to be reminded that there are women out there who are prettier than them who would probably get the hunks in the story, hence, mary sue is a slightly idealized version of the reader. Female characters in general have to be very plain, or, even extremely bitchy and unpleasant as to not compete with mary sue, it plays perfectly into the fantasy, there are no other women to compete with, nothing to worry about, it's only you and chad.

 

[The Ugly One]

disliking trannies is not about them making women uncomfortable. That might be true, it might even be worth discussing as a way to make it palatable

Note "trannies are bad because they're bad for women" is the same sort of thinking as that feminist who said trannies weren't allowed because they offended Muslim women. A minority group's felt offense is not the foundation of right and wrong. You have to break out of that thinking and reject that framing.

At what point is a woman's clothing considered "modest" anyway?

When she feels comfortable sneering at what a whore that other woman looks like.

 

[Sneed's Feed n Seed]

A minority group's felt offense is not the foundation of right and wrong. You have to break out of that thinking and reject that framing.

Indeed, their entire stated notion of right and wrong is what happens to offend them is bad, what they want is good, whether or not it is good for them in the end.

The passivity fetish.

This is why most women irritate the ever loving shit out of me. Things just 'are', nothing is mutable except whining until they get what they want, and then continuing to whine until they get more. You are "pretty" or not and it comes down to a social power play, not effort like fitness and diet. At most, it's stuff you buy and complain about paying for.

To this kind of woman, they aren't fat, they "feel fat." They aren't ugly, they "feel" ugly.

Their brains stop developing after high school.

 

[The Ugly One]

Indeed, their entire stated notion of right and wrong is what happens to offend them is bad, what they want is good, whether or not it is good for them in the end.

It's the job of "society" to make sure it's good for them in the end. Not the women of society, of course, but they won't say it's men's job, either. They depend on the non-female part of society.

Their brains stop developing after high school.

 

[Sneed's Feed n Seed]

This is apropos of literally nothing I just didn't want to wait to upload because I might forget.

 

[Dawdler]

Women's rape fetish is less about rape like you imagine it, and more about chad giving her exactly what she wants without her having to tell him anything or do anything.

That's actually really good observation.

 

[JoseRaulChupacabra]

Their brains stop developing after high school.

The vast majority of female development that happens after high school is the accumulation of adipose tissue.

 

[Big Shot]

That makes me think, why are human females so utterly useless that they need their everything to be cared of while they sit on their asses? I mean, other mammalian females are capable of doing many of other things their male counterparts do like hunting, ... on their own even if they are smaller and weaker than the average male of their species, but human females are laughably useless and have zero talents except birthing kids.

No I don't find it "cute" and "endearing" to have to cater to the whims of a womanchild and behave like a tardwrangler to a fully grown adult. When children do it it's cute because they're stupid and need to be guided, but having to go through a headache every time she's having a woman moment or having to clean after her dumb mistakes is the polar opposite of cute, it's pathetic

> cooking and cleaning
All top tier chefs are men and all companies prefer hiring male janitors

 

[Dawdler]

Tell the truth though, would you still take a class if you walked in and it was majority female?

Working with majority females is horrible.
Classes with majority females is also horrible, I am never repeating that experience. Modern women are even worse, I cannot imagine how it would be now.
They will constantly nitpick and attack you for any reason and consistently spread anti-male ideas that stem from their own insecurity. It's just impossible to be calm and level headed in such environment.
If you like lasagna (your gf), you enjoy it until you are full. If you make your bed out of lasagna (women everywhere) you wouldn't.