India-Pakistan Conflict - Land Of The Indus Versus Land Of The Pure

How many more border skirmishes can we take in one decade? This is yet more innocent people, dead, destitute, or injured for life.

How did it get this bad?
View attachment 7327818
Some people are just shitty and are simply too stupid to live and there is nothing you can do but to let them fight and murder each other.

The best thing you could do is not intervene and let nature take its course.
 
This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.
Remember, remember the Poojet Attack on Dopinder.

20250507_070809.webp
 
It's literally anything but.

Reminder that the originator of nuclear winter theory was the hackfraud Carl Sagan, who before that point was notoriously anti-nuke. That's not to say that it can't be a real phenomena, but that the people who pushed the idea had/have a political reason to do so.
A very mild nuclear winter can only occur if
>every nuke is detonated
>every nuke is detonated on the ground

and even then, how many of the nukes from the cold war even still work? tritium is in short supply and it only has a half life of ~12 years
 
these stats are fake and gay
you can't realistically the measure the amount of radiation caused by nuclear testing in Nevada in areas like the midwest because that's where nuclear waste went and was then improperly stored retard. you can run simulations about the spread of it but that would be as accurate as predicting the weather 10 years into the future.
You are aware that nuclear test radionucleotides are different than nuclear waste radionucleotides?
For fucks sake, we can determine carbon isotopes from a million year ago.
and even then, how many of the nukes from the cold war even still work? tritium is in short supply and it only has a half life of ~12 years
Tritium is not vital for detonation. Modern nukes are designed so the tritium charge can be replaced if need be. If you use design with li-6 you don't even need to do that. The yield with expired tritium will be lower but not 0.
The plutonium sponge has to be recast due to helium embrittlement anyway.
Nukes require a decent amount of maintenance and it's just easier to make more new ones if you have the abilities.
 
This is like in that civ game (civ 4 maybe?) where ghandi was glitched to be super aggro, and rushes to nuke its neighbors the moment they decline a single diplomatic request.
That was actually Civ 1. It was a coding error. Civ 1 Ghandi was programmed to be completely pacifist, and was given a 99 point towards diplomatic rolls leading the AI to decide to not go to war.

The problem was that as the game progressed, there was an increasing chance of an additional point to be added to Ghandi's RNG. However, since the games RNG only had 2 digits on its dice rolls (So that there would always be a 1% chance of anything happening), the game registered the the new dice roll as -99, maximum hostility. Which meant turning down a simple request for Grain from Ghandi would cause him to launch nuclear missiles at you.

The glitch was never patched because the Dev's and the players found it funny. This was back in a time when games were meant to be fun.
 
There's been thousands of surface nuclear tests since the first nuke dropped in 1945, and we haven't been completely irradiated yet. I don't know about you but i've never seen Supermutants or Deathclaws anytime in my life.
As far as I can recall, nuclear winter won’t come from the immediate effects of the nukes themselves but rather the widespread global fires that the nukes will cause which will release so much smoke into the atmosphere that much of the heat of the sun will be deflected by this new blanket of smog, causing extreme drops in temperature globally. Also all those nuclear tests occur in remote areas, of course we haven’t seen any mutant humans yet, and besides radiation is much better at killing humans than keeping them alive while changing the physiology and anatomy of them, deathclaw mutants are just a pop culture myth.

Granted the same people who came up with the concept of a nuclear winter are behind all the wishy washy climate nonsense, so I think it’s fair to keep a healthy degree of skepticism for the concept of a nuclear winter in the event of a major nuclear exchange.
 
Last edited:
It's literally anything but.

Reminder that the originator of nuclear winter theory was the hackfraud Carl Sagan, who before that point was notoriously anti-nuke. That's not to say that it can't be a real phenomena, but that the people who pushed the idea had/have a political reason to do so.
Here's an excerpt from a survival handbook from Cresson Kearny about this
756657.webp234.webp
 
I mean, if you expected anything good out of India's armament industry, then you're not only optimistic, but also slightly retarded.
No point in even bothering with making a new AK-derived platform when the SIG SG series exists (fun fact, they're actually replacing this with a SG marksman)
Yeah Pakistan is unironically better at making weapons than India because they actually sought out already proven designs and the proper knowledge, training, license and tooling to manufacture them from the likes of H&K.
While India illegally reverse engineered the FN FAL only to replace it with the disaster that is the INSAS.
 
You are aware that nuclear test radionucleotides are different than nuclear waste radionucleotides?
For fucks sake, we can determine carbon isotopes from a million year ago.

and none of it has a single impact on absolutely anything at all.

The "background radiation" moved from "completely irrelevant & harmless" to "completely irrelevant & harmless"
 
Back