Twelve-Foot Tall Sculpture Of A Black Woman Stands Tall In Times Square.

att.s6tkyfBhaaqCnk1qURHWYRa0Dju-rsfHrFtuTgYUDgk.webp

Price's "Grounded in the Stars" sculpture is a subtle nod to Michelangelo’s David and inspires deeper reflection around the human condition.

Visitors and residents of Times Square have a new piece of artwork on view these days: a 12-foot-tall sculpture of a woman, titled Grounded in the Stars, stands at Broadway and 46th Street.

The bronze sculpture is the brainchild of London-based figurative artist Thomas J Price. By creating the fictional character, Price aimed to encapsulate the observations, images, and open calls of New York, Los Angeles, and London.

According to Times Square’s official website, “Times Square stands as an iconic symbol and site of convergence, uniting people from all walks of life, individual stories and experiences intersecting on a global platform.”

The new installation, presented by Times Square Arts, is a subtle nod to Michelangelo’s David and captures familiar everyday qualities through the woman’s stance, countenance, and clothing.

Grounded in the Stars contrasts two permanent statues of men in Duffy Square, and the installation invites the busy city to embrace a moment of personal reflection and empathy. “The intention of my public works is to become part of the place they inhabit and its physical, material history, as well as the visitors that pass through and around the location, no matter how fleeting.”

The sculpture of the young woman is just one of Price’s works for onlookers to observe as they pass through the iconic area. Throughout May, Price’s stop-motion animation Man Series will be featured on over 90 billboards. The multi-channel presentation is part of the world’s largest digital public art initiative, Midnight Moment, and passersby can catch the nightly presentation on screens from 11:57 p.m. to 12 a.m.

“I hope Grounded in the Stars and Man Series will instigate meaningful connections and bind intimate emotional states that allow for deeper reflection around the human condition and greater cultural diversity.”

Grounded in the Stars is supported by the Jacques and Natasha Gelman Foundation, Morgan Stanley, the New York State Council on the Arts, public funds from the New York City Department of Cultural Affairs and the City Council, and the Times Square Edition Hotel. The sculpture will be on display through June 17.


Edit:


If there was ever a reason to trek to Times Square, this is it: a massive, 12-foot tall bronze sculpture of a young woman by figurative artist Thomas J. Price was just installed in the area, on the north side of Duffy Square on Broadway and 46th Street facing 47th Street. It will be on display through June 17.

The public art piece is part of a series called "Grounded in the Stars," which "confronts preconceived notions of identity and representation," according to Times Square's website.

Anchored by a wide base, the woman in Grounded with the Stars invites passersby to gawk and engage—standing in stark contrast to Duffy Square’s two other permanent statues, both of men. Unlike those, she wears everyday clothes, her stance a subtle nod to Michelangelo’s David.

The statue of the woman was woven from observations, images and open calls that happened across New York, Los Angeles and London.

Alongside the massive sculpture, passerby should on the lookout for another work by Price, this one on display across the neighborhood's screens. "Man Series," stop-motion animations set to play on billboards nightly in May, also involves a sculptural installation that "foregrounds the intrinsic value of the individual and amplifies traditionally marginalized bodies on a monumental scale."

“Times Square stands as an iconic symbol and site of convergence, uniting people from all walks of life, individual stories and experiences intersecting on a global platform," said Price in an official statement. "The intention of my public works is to become part of the place they inhabit and its physical, material history, as well as the visitors that pass through and around the location, no matter how fleeting. I hope 'Grounded in the Stars' and 'Man Series' will instigate meaningful connections and bind intimate emotional states that allow for deeper reflection around the human condition and greater cultural diversity.”
 
Last edited:
An interesting artistic analysis from a redscarepod lurker:

It's hard to gripe too much on artists like this because they accurately reflect the taste and aesthetic acumen of the general public, but if you do evaluate them technically and artistically they're frustrating and the level of investment that goes into hosting them in public is upsetting.

One of the first things I see looking at a piece like this is an apparently high level of technique (i.e. it's very "realistic") - but an odd lack of design or sophistication. As soon as I see that I go look them up and see what their oeuvre looks like and - what do you know - 90% of the time they are hiding their process, and there are never images or videos of them working. No roughs, no works in progress, just a whole lot of very "realistic" completed pieces. 10% of the time they do talk about what they're actually doing - and in the case of this artist (Thomas J Price) that is the case: "Amalgamated from multiple sources, the works are developed through a hybrid approach of traditional sculpting and intuitive digital technology. "

Ok so no surprise there, digital sculpture has a "look" and these sure do look like it. Lots of very legitimate, skilled art being made this way - but lets look at his "paintings and works on paper". Admittedly attractive abstracts and photos of his hands. His primary subject is the figure - but he doesn't draw or paint people. We see his clay sculptures that he stop-motion animates and they're extremely unsophisticated. What gives?

If I had to guess at his process - I think he's taking digital 3d scans of people (you can do it with an iPad or a purpose made scanner) - cleaning them up in Blender or some other 3d software, 3d printing them, and casting them (I admit I have no idea how he enlarges them this big). 3D scans tend to bork the eyes - what do you know they all have really poor eye anatomy and I think he's going back and resculpting those parts. That's where we see his hand. The hair is almost preposterously detailed and perfect and I suspect he's just using "hair brushes" that kind of stamp out the hair for you.

There is an extremely common version of this idea for muralists - you find a picture of a celebrity, you put a "posterize" filter on it in photoshop to break it down to 3 shades (black, white, grey) and it basically makes an extremely easy paint-by-numbers that you can blow up to any size with a projector or a grid. Bing bong - it's Tupac, but he looks like a stencil. People like it because it's a pretty picture they recognize.

I saw a very good, legit portrait painter get "called out" by a woman who ONLY does this on Instagram recently - because the women he paints are mostly young and beautiful and "sexualized" in a way she doesn't think his men are. Someone who can't do it - literally can't sit down with a blank canvas and paint anything - critiquing the intent of this man along the most rudimentary cultural axis, because she can't look at what he does and see what makes it special, which means she can only critique the choice of subject. Maybe she's right - her art is blown up to the size of a wall and painted on a microbrewery or whatever after all.

This is the level of investment in public art that is commensurate with the level of artistic taste of the general public. It's the public art we deserve - it doesn't say anything about its subjects, the message is implied culturally by the chosen subject and location.
 
her stance a subtle nod to Michelangelo’s David.

David, for reference.
1746647480178.webp
1746647903049.webp
She's not naked, she doesn't have a towel over her shoulder, the stance isn't even close, the statue looks more like one of those metal 3d print scans of people tied to online activist influencer groups they've been putting up everywhere to replace "old racist statues" the last few years than a stone carving that took months to make.
The bronze sculpture is the brainchild of London-based figurative artist Thomas J Price. By creating the fictional character, Price aimed to encapsulate the observations, images, and open calls of New York, Los Angeles, and London.
I like how they have to emphasize this is a "fictional character" that the guy created and frame it as a super deep and complex origin tied to empathy or some shit in case someone sues for likeness because it legitimately just looks like some rando fat black woman. I miss when people would just go "yeah so I made this cause I wanted to".
 
If you want to make a good statue of a Black woman (which is not their goal) it should have well-developed musculature, athletic. I ramble about it in another post somewhere here, but the ideal Black woman aesthetic is statuesque/majestic. They don't tend to be pretty like White and Asian women, but they can be handsome, so to speak.

But like I said, this ain't about real aesthetics, because the whole point is to celebrate Blacks as deathfat consoomers of all of society's productive resources, not as, like, some badass Swahili warrior chasing a lion.
 
This is a perfect metaphor for the state of modern American society. Imagine a 12 foot tall fat black woman stomping on your face. Forever.
If you want a vision of the future winston, imagine a morbidly obese black woman on welfare stomping on an american mans face forever - and scratching the fuck out of it with her gnarly toenails cause every day is welfare day and she just got her hair and toenails did
 
the woman in Grounded with the Stars invites passersby to gawk and engage
Engage in vandalism.

So subtle no one would know unless they were told. The only parallel I see is that she's putting most of her weight on her right leg.
That's the parallel, which is not really one as this is a very common stand, otherwise the person would look quite unnatural.

Also, there is a reason David is like this. He's about to do what's he's most famous for. The beauty of the statue is that we don't see him doing it, but we know because all the elements are there. Even though it's a statue and it's immobile, it's in action.

This is just an obese woman being there.
 
It seems like modern sculptures are all about doing giant ugly niggers.
We live in a unjust, inverted world. North europeans, especially men are hailed as monsters when they're the least shitty population of people. Racial, class and economic differences have driven mainly Caucasians/West Eurasians mad. Now we are trying racial equality bs and that has ended in disaster.


The type of woman black men run away from.

I love it when Black men call their women masculine. Especially if it's to their faces. I know BW are seething.


I don’t want to hear about “celebrating white mediocrity” ever again
As usual, it was an act of projection. Black mediocrity gets celebrated all the time. The standards are so low for them that just being the baseline for civilized gets them applause.


And I'm sorry my dude, you pass for huwhite with a tan.

You're joking right? Americans are so racially confused lmao.
 
Last edited:
This has to be some kind of really clever insult to black women.
If so, it's a great reverse Uno move.

There was a TV show in the UK back in the 1980s called 'Beadle's About' whereby some poor sod would be the victim of a misfortune, only for Mr. Beadle to turn up at the end and go 'surprise, it was just a joke!'

Now, as comedy has evolved since then and the woke idiots will believe anything, imagine their shock if a rumour was started that actually Trump paid for it because he has a secret thing for black fatties or he's trying to hard troll Black Lives Matter by saying 'I own you like slaves'...

Add some sprinkles on the top of that cake of lies and, before you know it, the woke ones will seethe and tear it down.

'It represents Black Women and oppressed Peepoo of colour!'

* AUTISTIC SCREECHES OF 'TEAR IT DOWN, TRUMP RAPED MY EYES!'
 
Back