India-Pakistan Conflict - Land Of The Indus Versus Land Of The Pure

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
STRIKE INBOUND SAAR
1746647413055.webp
 
True, the Indians have beaten the Pakistanis three times out of three (in 1947, 1965 and 1971). But look at what happened the one time they tried fighting a real army: the India-China war of 1962. India decided that its new status as world power required it to grab a few square miles of Himalayan wasteland from China. They worked themselves up into a war frenzy and attacked the Chinese. The Chinese, who don’t do woofing, made no boasts, tried smoothing things over, and when that failed, quietly flattened the Indian army. It was a rout: mustaches and swaggersticks sprinting downhill so fast the snow hadn’t yet melted on their helmets when they hit 120-degree Delhi. After that, the Indians decided they’d stick to picking on someone less than half their own size: the Pakistanis
The 1962 Sino-Indian war was the one time in the entire 20th century where the Chinese military had fire superiority over an opposing military.

India was still being run by Nehru, a wannabe communist pacifist who didn't really fund the Indian military and especially the Indian army.

Due to this... The Indian army went into the war with the exact same gear they had in 1947. Enfield rifles, Sterling SMGs, and Bren guns.

The Chinese (remember this is RIGHT before the Cultural Revolution so it hadn't gone to shit) were rocking SKSs, proper belt fed MGs and some AKs.

After the war India went with the FAL, the FN MAG, AKs, and sent all of the old guns to the Police and Border Guards.

Also, the War Nerd is a dumbass and I'm so glad his retarded blog is shuttered. He was David Axe before David Axe.... Ugh

As for the current situation.... It seems Pakistan is very happy with the current results but who knows about India.... Losing 2-3 jets must sting.
 
Nukes use about 1% of fuel
you're misinterpreting whatever statistic you read. that much of the mass might be turned into energy (it's usually more with fourth and fifth gen nukes). Most of the fuel is used in nuclear weapons the difference is that not all of it turns into energy because there is a level of inefficiency that you must accept.
 
What are the odds that the jeets strike some muslim holy sites in Pakistan, and take our place as the Great Satan for a while?
It wouldn't be the first time. The Sikhs once had a similar 'holiest of sites' to how the muslims treat Mecca, until they decided to use it as a headquarter for a nationwide rebellion/attempted coup. The (female) prime minister went there with armed men and sacked the place. She killed absolutely everyone and burned it the fuck down.
The sikhs are whining about it to this very day.

And yes, that was a woman and her name is Indira Gandhi. She leveraged the political power bestowed upon her to crush the enemies of her people. Compare that to traitorous cunts like pic related who not only allows Pakistanis to rape her people's children but actively runs interference for them.
white woman with power.webp
>Why do you have no patience for White women's treachery?
Comparisons like this are the reason why.
 
If you think my grasp on English is bad, listen to Ubereats, Budbee, Foodora drivers speaking, you'd be busy using phone to translate Arabic, Indian and see how AI gets confused.
Don't use those delivery service if you value health and sanity. You end up wrangling 60 IQs and risk food poisoning,, theft or broken goods.

I suggest making a list of British kiwis in good standing, organising rescue effort, strange housing and jobs. Literal kiwifarm.

UK, Germany and Sweden are fucking mess. There is a desperate need for freedom speech Zion.
A Kiwi Farm? I was thinking more some sort of Camp. Someplace where we could concentrate all of the displaced refugee and rapeugee Kiwis together.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Glowie
This shit exploded so not sure if it's been asked, but if, by the grace of God, this goes nuclear and all of these subhuman monkeys die, what would be the enviromental consequences of the nukes in the rest of the planet? As in, water contamination and airborne radiation flying for miles.
 
This shit exploded so not sure if it's been asked, but if, by the grace of God, this goes nuclear and all of these subhuman monkeys die, what would be the enviromental consequences of the nukes in the rest of the planet? As in, water contamination and airborne radiation flying for miles.
Nukes are a rather clean weapon of mass destruction. Cant say the same about jeets tho.
 
This shit exploded so not sure if it's been asked, but if, by the grace of God, this goes nuclear and all of these subhuman monkeys die, what would be the enviromental consequences of the nukes in the rest of the planet? As in, water contamination and airborne radiation flying for miles.

Completely negligible.
 
This shit exploded so not sure if it's been asked, but if, by the grace of God, this goes nuclear and all of these subhuman monkeys die, what would be the enviromental consequences of the nukes in the rest of the planet? As in, water contamination and airborne radiation flying for miles.
The price of construction goods go down heh. No jeets remaining that need houses to be built.

The radioactivity will only stay for some years if it's not dirty bombs or one made especially to be really radioactive when they explode. You especially need to be wary of micro-particulates in the atmosphere (until they fall down), and the fishies in the Indian Ocean. But I wouldn't touch anything from this area even now.

Tldr ; Follow the clouds from India.
 
This shit exploded so not sure if it's been asked, but if, by the grace of God, this goes nuclear and all of these subhuman monkeys die, what would be the enviromental consequences of the nukes in the rest of the planet? As in, water contamination and airborne radiation flying for miles.
Relatively low. They wouldn't go for hard targets mostly - there aren't any in the US/Russian sense of the word. So for maximum effect it'd be air bursts which are relatively clean. The numbers of warheads present would make for low impact and almost nothing outside the region.
 
And yes, that was a woman and her name is Indira Gandhi. She leveraged the political power bestowed upon her to crush the enemies of her people. Compare that to traitorous cunts like pic related who not only allows Pakistanis to rape her people's children but actively runs interference for them.
Wasn't that bitch slaughtered by two of her bodyguards because she was retarded enough to keep Sikh men on the payroll? They literally shot her to pieces.

Edit: One of them was even taken off her detail after the Indian military did their whole Sikh slaughter. She made sure to get him back on. Women everywhere, literally and without fail, bend over backwards to utterly screw themselves over, even the 'based' ones.
 
Last edited:
@Null fun question, would kiwifarms still be available worldwide if india and pakistan nuked eachother?
A not so significant amount of the cabling connecting Europe to asia directly makes landfall there, including the coast of pakistan.
View attachment 7331574
If it's just nukes, the cabling should be fine. Conventional munitions, not so much
 
This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.
I don't blame the French for thinking this claim is some Paki bullshit. The Rafale is one hell of a good warplane and the IAF are well trained competent pilots. 1 being shot down is possible, 3 in one night seriously strains credibility.
 
If it's just nukes, the cabling should be fine. Conventional munitions, not so much
It's only optical cables, so there is nothing to fry for the electromagnetic burst, and they should not be retarded enough to send bombs into the water.
We should only worry like you say, about conventional munitions, so sabotage.
 
If it's just nukes, the cabling should be fine. Conventional munitions, not so much
im pretty sure you need some sort of land based infrastructure, if you want to keep those cables powered on and retransmiting data.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Fetch!
Back