Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.4%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.0%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.7%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 156 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 113 24.3%

  • Total voters
    465
He likely can, but probably isn't required to

I'd like to point out that the Judge did the same thing as every poster here, and also got confused about what he ordered at the hearing.
View attachment 7330295

Well, I guess Russ can't fulfill this new order then.
Hm, maybe I'm overly optimistic, but perhaps that is exactly what the judge intended?
Produce these documents, and they better confirm exactly what you wrote to Mister Hardin, or there will be hell to pay.
Or don't, and the case will be dismissed regardless, in accordance with Rule 37.

It's a Morton's fork, where the only option is failure. Like Greer's entire life...
 
Last edited:
The fact the court has had to order Russell to produce the RO twice should really warrant some juicy sanctions. In the first order at 227 he was already ordered to show cause as to why he shouldn't pay attorneys fees (5 page limit) regarding the motion to compel, but as far as I can tell he never did this and only filed the (21 page) motion to reconsider instead - which then prompted more time invested by Hardin in responding to oppose the reconsideration along with everything else related to this up to and including yesterday's hearing. This, plus potential sanctions for Steve Taylor bullshit, plus the filing fee, plus the first sanctions will surely only strengthen Russell's will to fight injustice in this case.
Sanctions are on the table. Regardless of whether or not Russ provides the paperwork. He's going to get hit for the costs and fees for this and the Steve Taylor bullshit. Bennett seemed a bit peeved about Barlow meddling in the previous sanctions.

And imagine the fun when Drippy runs to tattle to Barlow that "they gave po po widdle wetard him mo sanctions". Barlow went easy on the basis that he was IFP and it was the first sanction of a Pro Se Retard who possibly didn't know better. None of that applies now.
 
haven't been posting much or at all because everything around me is a flaming dumpster fire but this is the one thread I've tried to keep up with and I took time out of my shitty, shitty schedule to watch the hearing (and only got pulled away a couple of times). I'm very glad I was wrong and greer actually showed up and was his standard pushover self when facing any authority.

I wonder what will happen if he manages to fuck up the SPO again, despite all his recent experience and clear instructions direct from the judge.
 
Its like 50 bucks right? Sure
1 Kayla.
I wonder what will happen if he manages to fuck up the SPO again, despite all his recent experience and clear instructions direct from the judge.
Nothing. Even if Greer totally fails to mark the document before sending it to Mr. Hardin there's no way Mr. Hardin will share it in any way as he's also gotten clear instructions. The only possible breach would be if Greer just randomly emails it to the clerk without marking and the clerk doesn't notice and just posts it to the docket.
 
I think I can get the transcript for us, maybe, but I'm trying to gauge interest of the thread. Would people pitch in?
I don't have a lot in crypto, but I can send some your way, if needed. Don't have a lot of use for it anyway.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Marvin
1746650285940.webp
thank you for your prompt request, mr. hardin. the audio recording is already on its way ...
 
Back