Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.4%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.0%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.7%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 156 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 113 24.3%

  • Total voters
    465
Mostly. He just sounds like a guy playing Speak Out with a mouthful of marshmallow fluff and an unsucked penis.
View attachment 7331805
OT but I wonder if Russell finds things like this unbelievably offensive and bias to the disabled (IE people with his specific condition). I don't remember ever seeing him pick a fight with toy/game companies but if he thinks women can't say no to disabled men, perhaps someday.

On-topic, I think Russ is gonna pay everything he has to right now, and then if by some miracle the current considerations for dismissal don't bear fruit he will hold it over Hardin (and the court) as some sort of undue punishment he suffered because of Josh and his harassment, when the sanction(s) are to make Josh whole as far as prejudice before the court, and the filing fee came about because retard ape didn't think before he spoke when he knew the IFP status was in contention.
 
Even with the $1000 to Null and $400 to the court, that's only $1400.

The costs and fees awarded to Skordas for the Ariana Grande hearing was $1500, so he still hasn't been punished as bad as he was for wasting Skordas' time for ONE DAY in small claims court
 
Is there any chance that Greer fucks up so bad that he files the SPO himself in such a way that it ends up publicly on the docket and completely unredactet?
It's almost a certainty IMO, and then we have the hardest task of all - not archiving it on the farms, but instead laughing about it second hand.
 
I've never actually heard Greer talk, is he intelligible?
You get the gist of what he's saying but it's really annoying to listen to because you have to strain yourself to understand him. The finer details of what he says don't really matter though, what matters is the substance of his response and the judge's rulings.

He's kind of just on the border of needing an interpreter. It's like listening to someone talk with a really thick accent.
 
Now that I'm caught up...I'm gonna say it: Shit-Lips will fuck this up somehow. Whether he doesn't pay the filing fee in time, or whether he fails to provide Hardship Hardin with the court filings from his attempt at gaining a protective order, or whether he simply just shuts down due to narcissistic injury because the judge didn't kiss his ass and give him his way...he's going to fuck this up and it'll be the end of that.

I wonder, does losing his IFP status in this case negatively impact his ability to gain it in any future lolsuits he files? Like if he files another suit and tries to gain IFP, will the court see that it was revoked/reversed this time and say "Nah fam. That don't won't hunt. You gotta pay now."?
 
Is there any chance that Greer fucks up so bad that he files the Restraining Order himself in such a way that it ends up publicly on the docket and completely unredactet?
Once again, to remind all. The document is the application for a restraining order. The Utah Sheriff or Judge apparently took one look at it and said it would violate Josh’s Rights, slapping it down immediately.

Of course Greer has the potential to fuck it up. Not the least of which is it does not seem to be something that would be permissibly sealed under the SPO. “Spurious and Fanciful Legal Claims” are not actually covered. It could and would be confidential as part of the Discovery Process assuming neither party has reason to present it to the court as evidence of something? And depending on who or what, it involves the Judge May elect to enter it into the public record. That the Judge ordered that it be treated as Attorney’s Eyes Only is probably not the end of it, unless it’s a complete nothing burger.
 
He pays to do it
He does it.
1746669346281.webp
 
Sorry, I'm stupid. Why is #1 moot, wasn't Hardin arguing both that Russ should need to pay the fees (#5) but also that there should be more fees?

Is it moot because it gets argued later?
Magistrate Judge Bennett can't rule on it since District Court Judge Barlow made the call.

Bennett said "First Sanctions Approved, work with Greer" Hardin said: "LOL, Greer refused, here's the amount."
Barlow said: "LOL, $1000" (without likely reviewing Hardin's actual amount).
Bennett is now overruled and the amount Hardin sent is moot.

There are still more possible sanctions in play.
 
Sorry, I'm stupid. Why is #1 moot, wasn't Hardin arguing both that Russ should need to pay the fees (#5) but also that there should be more fees?

Is it moot because it gets argued later?
It's moot because both Hardin and Bennet agreed that Bennet cannot overrule the Superior Judge Barlow. The $1000 Sanction came down from Barlow, regardless of what Bennet was going to do.

I suspect that Russholes end run around the process to the District Judge who took pity on the poor retard before examining all of the facts will bite Russ hard in the end.
 
Back