US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's a country where the concrete is literally cut with corn cobs and old newspapers. The dam literally bows in the wind now, we half expected the damned thing to fail on it's own. I do not think for a second that Chinese engineering would survive a solid kick, yet alone a bomb strike from America Fuck Yeah bombs.
Ohh baby dont do me like this, your one of my favorite!

I dont mean you should blindly agree with me but as a guy I thought was pretty smart you should know that the water pressure put up against it in any second is generating the energy equivalent of 150,000 MOABS, please feel free to check the math on that.

the dam holds back 40 billion cubic meters of water

Nothing short of a nuke will bring it down I PROMISE YOU
 
What if we are all wrong and you can just bullshit you way through construction projects?

:smug:
Having had to deal with the jeets recently I realize my entire life I've had standards, morality, and worth ethic, and none of that is even remotely useful for survival and thriving in the world the boomers created for us.

If you want to get ahead, screw over strangers as hard as you can as fast as you can. Lying is fine until it becomes fraud and the line between that is blurry. There is no greater goal in life than power; resources allow you to gain power, and power allows you to gain resources.
 
Look up seal of confession retard.

I don't have any respect for established religious practice that prevents the rape victim from more easily taking a Louisville Slugger to their perpetrator's nut sack. As far as I'm concerned, it makes the priest just as deserving of the rope as the rapist.
 
I don't have any respect for established religious practice that prevents the rape victim from more easily taking a Louisville Slugger to their perpetrator's nut sack. As far as I'm concerned, it makes the priest just as deserving of the rope as the rapist.
What does that have to do with violence?
 
It's a country where the concrete is literally cut with corn cobs and old newspapers. The dam literally bows in the wind now, we half expected the damned thing to fail on it's own. I do not think for a second that Chinese engineering would survive a solid kick, yet alone a bomb strike from America Fuck Yeah bombs.

An attack that wrecks the 3 gorges dams will be responded to with nuclear weapons.
 
Not after a flight of B2s knock out the Three Gorges Dam.
Id like to share the words of an esteemed friend, I think they put it better than I ever can.

You speak of a preemptive strike on the dam as if it were a chess move—as if the lives behind that wall are nothing more than pawns to be sacrificed for some greater gambit. But I ask you plainly—have you even measured the weight of what you propose?

Behind that dam stands not an enemy army, but the lives of families, children, the elderly—the very same innocents we claim to defend on our own soil. Your ‘logic’ demands we drown them before they might stand against us.

If that is logic, then call me a fool. But I will stand with the fools who believe that power should be tempered by mercy, and that might is no justification for murder.

We are a people who pride ourselves on justice and decency—do not disgrace that heritage by becoming what we claim to fight against. If war comes to our door, we will meet it as free men. But I will not—I cannot—stand by while we become the authors of a tragedy so vast that history itself would weep at our memory.

You seek to strike at the heart of another nation before they’ve even drawn their sword. But mark my words—those who swing first out of fear are the quickest to fall.

So I ask you, as a brother to his brothers: Are we the nation that builds dams, or the one that breaks them? Will our legacy be found in the light we share—or the darkness we unleash?
 
ok your the second guy to say some 3 gorges meme, do you know what your even talking about or did you just see some memes from NCD about nuking the three gorges?

The 3 gorges is a gravity built dam straight up, that means each section is using is sheer mass to hold the water back not some physics tricks. China built the 3 gorges to serve as a nuclear fallout shelter worst case ontario so I think anything short of a tac nuke is going to tickle it.

Ive read about the dam buster raids in ww2, was a miracle we pulled it off with those skipping mines and even then it was only beacuse our bomber were allowed the opportunity to take multiple passes to drop the munitions correctly.

That damn is nearly 60 stories tall from its base and over 7,500 feet long, visualize that. reall think of a skycraper, biggest you can imagine and then stretch the fucker 25 football fields.

Think of how big a crater would be in a football field if you drop a jdam on it, prolly wont even have 2, maybe 3 feet of penetration into the soil and thats fucking dirt, imagine hardened concrete. its over 100 feet thick at its thinnest.

you hear that bucko?

100 feet

of fucking concrete.

Its a NUCLEAR BOMB SHELTER
It's also built by the Chinese. Meaning that 100ft of concrete is probably more like 30.
 
Id like to share the words of an esteemed friend, I think they put it better than I ever can.

You speak of a preemptive strike on the dam as if it were a chess move—as if the lives behind that wall are nothing more than pawns to be sacrificed for some greater gambit. But I ask you plainly—have you even measured the weight of what you propose?

Behind that dam stands not an enemy army, but the lives of families, children, the elderly—the very same innocents we claim to defend on our own soil. Your ‘logic’ demands we drown them before they might stand against us.

If that is logic, then call me a fool. But I will stand with the fools who believe that power should be tempered by mercy, and that might is no justification for murder.

We are a people who pride ourselves on justice and decency—do not disgrace that heritage by becoming what we claim to fight against. If war comes to our door, we will meet it as free men. But I will not—I cannot—stand by while we become the authors of a tragedy so vast that history itself would weep at our memory.

You seek to strike at the heart of another nation before they’ve even drawn their sword. But mark my words—those who swing first out of fear are the quickest to fall.

So I ask you, as a brother to his brothers: Are we the nation that builds dams, or the one that breaks them? Will our legacy be found in the light we share—or the darkness we unleash?
There are billions of Chinese, they'll make more.
 
Ohh baby dont do me like this, your one of my favorite!

I dont mean you should blindly agree with me but as a guy I thought was pretty smart you should know that the water pressure put up against it in any second is generating the energy equivalent of 150,000 MOABS, please feel free to check the math on that.

the dam holds back 40 billion cubic meters of water

Nothing short of a nuke will bring it down I PROMISE YOU
Well, you might be right, the water pressure is definitely something I was thinking about being an issue. I still don't think that it's the invincible superstructure it needs to be to be a cornerstone of their entire country like it is.
 
Id like to share the words of an esteemed friend, I think they put it better than I ever can.

You speak of a preemptive strike on the dam as if it were a chess move—as if the lives behind that wall are nothing more than pawns to be sacrificed for some greater gambit. But I ask you plainly—have you even measured the weight of what you propose?

Behind that dam stands not an enemy army, but the lives of families, children, the elderly—the very same innocents we claim to defend on our own soil. Your ‘logic’ demands we drown them before they might stand against us.

If that is logic, then call me a fool. But I will stand with the fools who believe that power should be tempered by mercy, and that might is no justification for murder.

We are a people who pride ourselves on justice and decency—do not disgrace that heritage by becoming what we claim to fight against. If war comes to our door, we will meet it as free men. But I will not—I cannot—stand by while we become the authors of a tragedy so vast that history itself would weep at our memory.

You seek to strike at the heart of another nation before they’ve even drawn their sword. But mark my words—those who swing first out of fear are the quickest to fall.

So I ask you, as a brother to his brothers: Are we the nation that builds dams, or the one that breaks them? Will our legacy be found in the light we share—or the darkness we unleash?
Your friend talks like a fag and his shit's all retarded.
 
I’ll break any commie’s dam any day of the week you giant faggot.
Your going to need to go through plenty of fellow Americans with a moral code, like me, first

Nuclear war was averted already by one man who was cursed by his whole submarine crew but hailed as a hero of humanity

Vasili Arkhipov

feeling right and being right are 2 very different things boy
 
Memorandum to Make Showers and Toliets Great Again:

Rescission of Useless Water Pressure Standards​

Presidential Memoranda
May 9, 2025

MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF ENERGY
THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR
THE DEPUTY ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS


SUBJECT: Rescission of Useless Water Pressure Standards

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby direct:

Water conservation requirements for faucets, showers, bathtubs, and toilets — promulgated by the Department of Energy pursuant to the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-486) — make bathroom appliances more expensive and less functional. “Efficiency” standards render other American appliances like clothes washers and dishwashers less useful, more breakable, and more expensive to repair. The Federal Government should not impose or enforce regulations that make taxpayers’ lives worse.

To address these unnecessary radical green agenda policies, I direct the Secretary of Energy to consider using all lawful authority to rescind — or, as appropriate, amend to revert to the standards required by statute — the regulations found in 10 C.F.R. 430.32(f), relating to water and energy use in dishwashers; 10 C.F.R. 430.32(o), relating to water use in faucets; 10 C.F.R. 430.32(p), relating to water use in showerheads; 10 C.F.R. 430.32(q), relating to water use in water closets; 10 C.F.R. 430.32(r), relating to water use in urinals; the definitions of “automatic clothes washer,” “clothes washer,” “dishwasher,” “faucet,” “other clothes washer,” “semi-automatic clothes washer,” “urinal,” and “water closet” contained in 10 C.F.R. 430.2; the residential washing machine efficiency standards contained in 10 C.F.R. 430.32(g); and the commercial washing machine efficiency standards contained in 10 C.F.R. 431.156.

Furthermore, I direct the Secretary of Energy to publish in the Federal Register a notice clarifying the Waiver of Federal Preemption of State regulations covered by the application of “Energy Efficiency Program for Consumer Products: Waiver of Federal Preemption of State Regulations Concerning the Water Use or Water Efficiency of Showerheads, Faucets, Water Closets and Urinals,” 75 Fed. Reg. 80289 (December 22, 2010).

I further direct the Secretary of Energy not to enforce any of the regulatory provisions listed in this memorandum, pending rescission or reversion of such provisions; the provisions of 42 U.S.C. 6295(j) and (k); or energy and water efficiency standards for washing machines, including the provisions in 42 U.S.C. 6295(g) and 42 U.S.C. 6313(e).

Finally, I direct the Secretary of Energy and the Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of the Office of Legislative Affairs to jointly prepare and submit recommendations to the President, within 60 days of the date of this memorandum, through the Chair of the National Energy Dominance Council, for the Congress to rescind, insofar as each relates to the subject matter of this memorandum, 42 U.S.C. 6295(g), (j), (k), and (o) and 42 U.S.C. 6313(e), or to repeal the Energy Policy Act of 1992 in its entirety.

This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.



DONALD J. TRUMP
Source (Archive)
 
I dont mean you should blindly agree with me but as a guy I thought was pretty smart you should know that the water pressure put up against it in any second is generating the energy equivalent of 150,000 MOABS, please feel free to check the math on that.
would you rather get shot with 5.56 or get hit by a car going 30km/h? the car has roughly 30 times more energy btw.
Nothing short of a nuke will bring it down I PROMISE YOU
Nukes aren't made for penetration. Now the GBU 57/MOP on the other hand. 14 tons of pure penetration (6 greater than the GBU2), capable of going through 200ft and more of whatever the fuck was unfortunate enough to get in it's way. Outfitted with all the latest and greatest in precision bombs. tailor made to be carried by B2 spirits, 2 at a time btw.
 
Back