US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The “woke right” discourse has now reached the 90’s Liberalism stage, as expected.

“You say you want whites to establish an ethnic identity and sit at the table with the other ethnic special interests instead of abolishing DEI/AA and retvrning to a racial colorblind meritocracy? Woke.”

And it’s like, yeah sure I’d obviously prefer a meritocratic outcome over ethnic position jockeying, but there’s absolutely no path to get us there that doesn’t involve outrageous levels of chimpouts and mass violence. Ending DEI/AA and not recapturing the tens of millions of unearned sinecures is about as pointless as securing the border without mass deportations.

We have about ten years to do something about this before demographics makes the country majority-minority and the window closes forever. It took subversive elements the better part of 50 to slowly boil society to this point; we can’t end DEI/AA and let the current beneficiaries flush out of the system “naturally” in the time frame we have left. And forcing them out obviously immediately collapses the country into a firebomb.

Which makes it simple: establish a firm racial identity and join in the ethnic power battles while slowly rolling back the post-CRA regime - or do nothing, quickly become a hated minority, and watch as all the other ethnic minorities repeatedly vote to steal your shit like in South Africa. Easy choice, if not a happy one.
 
Good Old Judge Boasberg, the Jew whose trying to bring all those gangsters back from El Salvador and whose holding Trump in contempt, has now issued a order that hides the names and identities of all of the people involved in the lawsuit.
You might have to take my word for it, but even federal judges have personally expressed to me that they're getting pissed off at the Supreme Court. Roberts's black robe has turned yellow because of how cowardly he is. The refusal to rule on these issues and rein in radical judges like Boasberg is going to cause a constitutional crisis.

And when I say "radical," I don't mean politically. I mean that there's a class of people like Boasberg who have no idea how equity jurisprudence works. He believes he is God—he can speak a word and the results come into existence. But equity (injunctions) only works if you can actually enforce your rulings. Boasberg believes that if he said "let there be light" from the bench, then light would come into existence. It's these types of people that led to the downfall of the Roman Republic. Remember, it wasn't Julius Caesar who started the Roman civil war, it was the entrenched political elites in Rome who went so over-the=top to destroy him that started it.
 
India-Pakistan as the flashpoint for WWIII
>Russia-Ukraine is going to start WW3
>Israel-Palestine is going to start WW3
>India-Pakistan is going to start WW3


Why would India and Pakistan starting a war over a border dispute in some remote part of the third world escalate into WW3? Doesn't make sense to me given the US afaik is against both India and Pakistan to varying degrees for different reasons.
 
>Russia-Ukraine is going to start WW3
>Israel-Palestine is going to start WW3
>India-Pakistan is going to start WW3


Why would India and Pakistan starting a war over a border dispute in some remote part of the third world escalate into WW3? Doesn't make sense to me given the US afaik is against both India and Pakistan to varying degrees for different reasons.
Because India and Pakistan both have nuclear weapons and China has a direct interest in the situation (also nuclear armed) as they, too, have land claims in Kashmir. It's a far more serious situation than Ukraine-Russia or Israel-Palestine.
 
Yeah opening the door to the government regulating art, media or the internet in general based on morality is a really, really bad idea. The way people talk about this stuff feels like the way low IQ blacks are literally incapable of understanding hypotheticals or the concept of the future, where it's just purely about short term lols from headlines that make Bluesky libs mad, but zero consideration of what happens when that same power structure is in the hands of someone else in the future.
The door has always been open to the government regulating obscenity, and Miller v. California keeps it open. "What if the government could regulate obscenity?" is like "What if the government could regulate medicine?" It can, and it does.

Additionally, the last four years taught us the left doesn't care about laws, courts, or precedent. If they want to have the FBI surveil "disinformation spreaders," they're just going to do it. If they want to put people in solitary for four years without a trial, they're just going to do it. They're not going to wait for the right to establish precedent for them. They're just going to do whatever the fuck they want.
 
Last edited:
Strange how I remember the notifications, and his views never went down.
View attachment 7345388
It's almost like an Op started last month.
He stopped doing videos for four months after moving to Tenet. Enough time for me to bail. Looks like he came scrambling back to YouTube after realizing that he fucked over his audience. Shame I didn't notice.

Sucks for him. I'm off the Matt train. Don't ditch your fans.

That last month stat is weird though.
 
2 kids got a hold of and were playing with a handgun.
They were disarmed safely and successfully.
Blacks on social media outraged they weren't actually shot.
--------
New Mexico police fire non-lethal rounds and successfully disarm two young boys who were holding a loaded handgun. The boys, 7 and 9, were seen pointing the gun toward police. The moment was caught on a drone which helped police carry out the operation. The boys were eventually disarmed and were not injured.
 

Attachments

  • video1.mp4
    10 MB
2 kids got ahold of a handgun a were disarmed successfully.
Blacks on social media outraged they weren't shot.
New Mexico police fire non-lethal rounds and successfully disarm two young boys who were holding a loaded handgun. The boys, 7 and 9, were seen pointing the gun toward police. The moment was caught on a drone which helped police carry out the operation. The boys were eventually disarmed and were not injured.
If you're going to have firearms in a house with children, you need to teach them about respecting firearms. No ifs, ands, or buts.
It's a shame that those children had to go through all that, but I pin the blame squarely on the parents.
 
Back