Uhh... I also think that Palestine is a state, despite lacking sovereignty for at least half a century. Can someone tell Qatar this?Qatar to Gift $400 Million Plane to President Trump:
According to ABC News, the Trump administration is set to accept a luxury Boeing 747-8 jumbo jet—valued at around $400 million—from the Qatari royal family.
So do I? But that's irrelevant when we're discussing keeping obscene materials away from children by locking any sites with obscene materials behind an ID verification wall.
You aren't a legislator. And we already have legislators gunning for us. Around the entire planet, not just America.
i don't know what that has to do with ID verification on porn sites
It doesn't. It has to do with ID Verification on websites that furnish obscene materials.
ok dude
Because it won't stay limited to porn sites, you fucking sperg.
Everyone agrees that children shouldn't be looking at adult content. Computers and phones have existing parental controls to ensure that children can't easily look it up, everyone takes issue with childproofing the Internet to "protect the kids", we shouldn't be sharing the Internet with children at all. Their ability to access the Internet as a whole should be monitored to ensure this. Is it going to actually happen? No, it's unrealistic unless there are harsh restrictions placed on selling phones and PC parts like associating all purchases with your ID. Any laws that target websites that host adult content will require ID, Pornhub and the Kiwi Farms will be subject to this as both websites host adult content. Yes, only one hosts pornographic but both fall under adult content that minors should not look at.
repeating myself but that's a problem with the legislation not the idea
I'm convinced at this point they're either being willfully ignorant for the lulz, or they are functionally retarded. They don't seem to be able to grasp that the current introduced legislation seeks to broaden and specifically define "obscene", which will almost certainly include any depiction of genitalia, regardless if it's for "discussion" or for "jerking off".
They said the same thing about the Patriot Act, the same thing about the Hart-Celler Immigration act as well.
Randomly popped into my head while skimming past the porn spergery:
nigga i didn't even know there was introduced legislation for this shit i thought you guys were just talking about it
Gooners are mad. That's it. No complaints about needing federal ID to fly domestically, no acknowledgement that obscenity law doesn't apply to the nigger word, not a care for publicly traded companies debanking you for thinking trannies are a menace. That is not the free speech issue that generates tens of pages of argument.
It's like talking to a 13 year old who just listened to his first Sam Harris podcast and thinks he has the entire world figured out.
This is a favorite tactic of leftists. During GamerGate they would weaponize CSAM by posting it themselves and then reporting it to try to get websites like 8chan taken down.
Because it's an encroachment on your right to privacy. What if this information got leaked, as information typically does? Do you really want people knowing, for example, that you look at scat porn?
Pornography isn't a right, dumbass. Don't use porn if you are afraid sites will use your data maliciously or get hacked. Easy solution.
But I don't look at scat porn. *chirp* I don't understand why you're even asking that!