Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.5%

  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%

  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.8%

  • Next Year

    Votes: 154 33.3%

  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 112 24.2%
  • Total voters
    462
Hunter Hearst Helmsley said:
When is the sanction due v. the filing fee due? If he needs to pay the sanction first and can't afford it...then he can't afford the filing fee either. Whatever he has should go to the sanction bill first as far as my useless opinion is concerned.
Click to expand...
Sanction is due for whenever it was issued, so he's very late on this. Filing fee is due next month, 5th, I think.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Not a bee, Justice Tony, Turtle O'Carolan and 15 others
Jimmy Hopkins said:
Man I thought Acerthorns filings were bad. This is atrocious.
Click to expand...

I think this is as close as we come to seeing Greer breakdown. I know it's all rainbows but I think he's starting to understand he will lose this case and Jersh will own him for the rest of his miserable life due to the court awarding costs.

I almost feel sorry for Mushmouth...almost.
 
  • Like
  • Optimistic
  • Feels
Reactions: Not a bee, $5.3 Million Dollars, Sexy Senior Citizen and 13 others
i have aids.webp
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Feels
Reactions: Chi, Mr. 305, Not a bee and 117 others
There are no "wrongly issued" protective orders. You are a misogynist lunatic.

A payslip demonstrates only that you are a wagecuck. You have already admitted you can afford your fees regardless of whatever imaginary investors you have.

Challenging the factual basis of your claims is not irrelevant. Particularly when those claims are giving you an unfair advantage you wouldn't otherwise have.

You published your family's information by not learning the fucking rules you should've been aware of during your 5 years of "education". The Magistrate has explained this to you in baby words multiple times.

A motion is not something you bring just to be retaliatory, it is supposed to have a sound legal basis or at the very least, a coherent argument behind it.

If you were frightened of Mr Hardin you wouldn't dare to address him the way that you do.

I'm not sure you can bemoan the "financial burden" of filing fees when you were able to evade them in the first place under false pretenses at the expense of the taxpayer, only to admit now that you're perfectly capable of paying but just don't want to.

At what point does this just become contempt of court? What the fuck is going on??? :lossmanjack:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: Windy Moors, Not a bee, Fetch! and 39 others
LiquidChrisRespecter said:
At what point does this just become contempt of court? What the fuck is going on???
Click to expand...
Have some faith

Harvey Danger said:
I can confidently claim Russ wrote this filing himself. Even uncensored AI don't get this unhinged.

View attachment 7362377

Allegedly licensed? :story:

Mr Plaintiff Russell Greer, is there some evidence you'd like to share with the class?
Click to expand...
I can 100% confirm that Mr. Hardin is licensed attorney, and that is public knowledge.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Not a bee, Justice Tony, rubytintedchix and 47 others
THE PLIGHT SPERGING WILL CONTINUE UNTIL THE COURT LETS ME NOT PAY THE FILING FEES I 100% TOTALLY SAID I COULD AFFORD!

Mother of God. The retardation just continues to bubble and burble up. It's like a volcano that never stops oozing. I am completely stunned. I had a feeling he would try to dodge the filing fees but I had no idea he would stab himself in the neck and threaten to take the knife out if the court doesn't do what he wants NOW NOW NOW!
 
  • Like
  • DRINK!
  • Feels
Reactions: Windy Moors, Not a bee, Fetch! and 23 others
Thomas Talus said:
Incredibly unlikely, and without some additional aggravating factors (like the lawyer using the litigant as a stalking horse to harass the other party, or to advance flagrantly non-meritorious claims) it would not be sanctionable in general.
Click to expand...
At least according to the ABA, if a lawyer is substantially assisting a pro se in drafting filings, he has an ethical duty to disclose this to the court and actually sign any documents on which he substantially assisted. This is just the ABA's opinion, though, and isn't actually the law everywhere.

It's generally permissible, though. It's legal to act pro se. It's legal to assist someone in doing something that's legal. That's the prevailing opinion about lawyers assisting pro se litigants with or without compensation.

This is not a statement about Nevada or Utah or any relevant jurisdiction. Other ETA: the specific language I relied on from the ABA did in fact involve Nevada.

ETA: but this is.
Useful_Mistake said:
It's forbidden to do that in the 10th Circuit, and lawyers have been threatened with sanctions over it. See, for example, Duran v. Carris, 238 F. 3d 1268 (10th Cir. 2001) (holding that ghost writing is impermissible and threatening sanctions)
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Not a bee, $5.3 Million Dollars, often puzzled and 13 others
Sneed Force One said:
I am no legal mind, can you even get a protective order against opposing counsel?
It would literally stop them from performing their duties.
Click to expand...
The closest to this is the Dershowitz classic (convincing the court to keep firing opponent's lawyers). I think he is literally the only one who has managed to make it into an art form.

I think it's Dershowitz anyway.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: Not a bee, Neetorino, gorororo and 12 others
Useful_Mistake said:
ECF 290
View attachment 7362251

View attachment 7362255
View attachment 7362285
Click to expand...
Okay, this is actually insane. Like round the bend bonkers insane. Russel has left the building.

Defendants have requested an extension pending the outcome of several motions currently before the court that will have direct impact on their response. This is rational, reasonable, in the courts interest, and not in any way " I have an important business meeting that day so fuck you all! I need another month."

He's openly threatening opposing Council. That alone is sanctionable. Russel fails to grasp his prior legal history is not "in the past". It is a public record. One which may be used against him in any and all litigation that he selectively entered into. Null doesn't want to be here. Hardin does not want to be here. Only Shitlips chose to be here. I think given what has now come out Null and Hardin both have an excellent case to request a restraining order barring Russel from attempting to open any further fraudulent legal or criminal actions, bar actions, or any actions regarding the defendant and council outside of the current court.

And once again the only litigant in this case that is an actual convicted stalker is the Plaintiff.

That aside this might be Russels best filing ever. It's amazing. Hey Russ! We don't stalk you. We simply read the stuff that you publicly put out there. Like this glorious filing.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Windy Moors, Not a bee, Fetch! and 60 others
  • Like
  • Agree
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Windy Moors, Not a bee, Fetch! and 22 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back