'Inculcating shame about our past!' Schoolchildren taught black people built Stonehenge - Eighty three per cent of secondary schools change their history curricula to 'decolonise it'

Link: https://www.gbnews.com/news/woke-madness-schoolchildren-taught-black-people-built-stonehenge
Credit: Lewis Henderson, GB News
Archive: https://archive.ph/wip/Vn0TM

stonehenge.webp

Schoolchildren are being taught that black people built Stonehenge as part of a push to "decolonise" the curriculum, a bombshell report has revealed.

According to research by the think tank Policy Exchange, the book Brilliant Black British History makes this claim and is still used in schools.

Written by Nigerian-born British author, Atinuke, the book states that the first British people were black and "Britain was a black country for more than 7,000 years before white people came".

Stop Hate UK said the book "is a huge step forward in ensuring racist attitudes do not progress into children of the next generation".

The report from Policy Exchange suggested the book is pushing the "diversifying" narrative "too far", with history in schools.

It found that 83 per cent of secondary schools changed their history curriculum to "decolonise" it, which tends to involve reducing topics that are too white.

It stated: "In some cases, this had a positive effect, exposing students to varied and knowledge-rich studies that better cover key areas of British history, such as the women's suffrage movement, as well as a wider range of world history.

"However, in too many cases, this process has gone too far, leading to the teaching of radical and contested interpretations of the past as fact, or with anecdotes of interesting lives replacing a deeper understanding of the core drivers of history.

"Numerous cases of poor-quality resources being used to teach contested narratives as fact have been identified.

"For example, one book used in classrooms claims black people built Stonehenge, whilst free resources produced by a subject organisation celebrate the genital mutilation of a slave as a form of 'gender transition'."

The research discovered schools had dropped key parts of British history, including the Battle of Agincourt, where less than one in five teach the topic, and only 11 per cent include the Battles of Trafalgar and Waterloo.

The report recommended creating a new exam paper focused on British history, with historian Lord Roberts noting that "it is vital pupils are taught the history of their own nation".

school-children.webp

The book in school claims black people were the first people to arrive in Britain

Roberts added: "It is vital that pupils are taught the history of their own nation in a manner that seeks to do more than simply inculcate shame about our past."

Former Education Secretaries Lord Blunkett and Nadhim Zahawi also endorsed the report.

Ex-Conservative Schools Minister Sir Nick Gibb said: "Policy Exchange's report rightly identifies that the area where further improvement is needed is at GCSE-level.

"Where increasing specialisation and an over-emphasis on narrow 'theme-related' topics, such as health, means that too many pupils are never exposed to the full chronological breadth of British history.

"It cannot be right that a pupil could achieve a 'nine' in GCSE History and yet never have heard of the Glorious Revolution or the Act of Union."
 
I am going to sound like a broken record at this point.

 
Hey that sounds like an enlightening and revolutionary historical work that should be shared and read by all.

Here you go.
IMG_3321.webp
IMG_3322.webp

'This powerful, vividly illustrated book proudly reframes Black British history'
The Guardian

'... a brilliant, fascinating history book'
The Week Junior, Book of the Week

'I started reading and couldn't put it down. It's the kind of book I wish I'd had when I was a kid'
Joseph Coelho, Children's Laureate

'This book is revolutionary'
Kelechi Okafor, actor, writer and podcast host

* THE BRITISH BOOK AWARDS: CHILDREN'S NON-FICTION BOOK OF THE YEAR WINNER * ENGLISH 4-11 PICTURE BOOK AWARDS: 7-11 NON-FICTION WINNER *

An eye-opening story of Britain, focusing on a part of our past that has mostly been left out of the history books: the brilliant Black history of England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland.

Did you know that the first Britons were Black? Or that some of the Roman soldiers who invaded and ruled Britain were Black, too? Join this fascinating journey through the ages to meet those first Britons, as well as the Black Tudors, Georgians and Victorians who existed in every walk of life here. The incredible journey through time is brought to life through Atinuke's fascinating storytelling and illustrated scenes, detailed maps, and timelines created by illustrator Kingsley Nebechi.

From science and sport to literature and law, celebrate the brilliant Black people who have helped build Britain. Learn about key and complex historical topics such as the world wars, slavery, the industrial revolution, Windrush and the Black Lives Matter movement. This fascinating book will change everything you thought you knew about our green-grey British isles.

'We would recommend this book to any child, adult or teacher'
Stop Hate UK
 

Attachments

Last edited:
I think that should read as 'Established Fact', nothing conspiratorial about that belief at all.

There's also a story on GB News about how the NEU (National Education Union) is attempting to brainwash children into believing in the 'Palestine Struggle' and that Israel/Jews are the baddies.


Doing this would violate legislation against promoting partisan political views in schools.
 
I am going to sound like a broken record at this point.

Actually this is why memes are necessary.

“We wuz…” is fun and others can even join in while you mock the opponent. It’s basic Rules for Radicals stuff.
 
The blacking of cheddar man is a crime that keeps reverberating.
WHG were not black. The study that blacked cheddar man was bunk. Utter dreck. Their model is garbage. We know he had blue eyes, we cannot say he was black. He was probably a swarthy WHG
These are the same people who acknowledge that you can’t use modern forensic dna samples to determine skin colour by the way
 
Thinking about what @teriyakiburns has said, I've come up with my own Conspiracy Theory:

Wokeness is just a way to make people Far Right.

(Rainbows drop on this post... I know.. however, at least hear me out).

The people who are behind Woke and Wokeness are deep cover operatives who are a nudge unit for Right Wing or TradCons.

Worried that the world is becoming too liberal and global, 'Woke' was quietly rebranded in order to make people despise it. Sounds crazy? Well if you watch the clip below from Yes Minister, then you might get what I'm on about:


To destroy the Left, the Right had to become the Left and infest it with stupid, self-sabotaging ideas and beliefs which would never fly without big media and financial backing:

* Trans people are wonderful and are valued more than CIS people
* Black and LGBTQWERTIES are permanent victims
* Whites and Jews are the bad guys

If the Right had said this, the Left would have pivoted strongly against these and laughed them out of the room, and would have been 100% right for doing this.

The Right have therefore pitted the Left against each other in a death spiral - the Trans Community are fighting the Feminists, the LGB lobby are fighting the Trans, the Blacks are fighting the Asians and the Jews, the Whites are hated by all of them... just like pitting the Italians against the French or the Dutch against the Spanish back in days of old.

With the ideas and ideals of Woke becoming ever more crazy, the push back against it thanks to Trump and Farage has not only clued people up as to the craziness of liberal politics, it's also defeated globalisation and the planned end of statehood and sovereignty.

The end result is that most people with an IQ in the positive are buying out of the bollocks of Woke and would rather have Trump or Farage as leader even if it means short term pain for long term gain.
 
There is, as I understand it, some consensus that many or some early human ancestors had dark skin, owing to their simian heritage. But this is just all so tiresome.
Europeans were dark prior to the neolothic, around 10,000 years ago, and may have been darker-skinned than today after that point, but that's around the time white skin (alongside a host of other cold adaptatiopns, such as narrow noses and thicker body hair) is thought to have evolved on the continent. They keep trying to pull the date for white skin closer to the present with "new discoveries", because it's an easy way to develop a classic motte and bailey argument. When they say "early britons were black", what they mean is "early britons were indistinguishable from africans", but when challenged they will retreat to "we're just saying they darker skin bro, why are you so upset?" The idea is to claim that white Europeans usurped black african kangz.
 
There is, as I understand it, some consensus that many or some early human ancestors had dark skin, owing to their simian heritage. But this is just all so tiresome.
Our nearest extant simian relatives have pink skin though

Dark skin probably evolved after or concomitant with us losing body hair

So really, pink skin is returning to monke 🐒
 
Back