Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Post Reply]

New poll idea: Is Russell Greer really worse than @Joseph Stalin?

 

[Swole McPole]

Everything in this paragraph is gold

Also, this paragraph makes it pretty damn clear that Russell isn't suing over copyright, but rather because the site is publishing discussion of Russell's past behaviour. He believes he should be able to bury his history of litigation and the consequences of that.

"It's actually caused plaintiff a lot of depression that he can't move on from his mistakes and is why this case was even filed, so that Mr Moon can be held accountable for hosting such a vile site."

Fortunately, the US constitution thinks differently. Don't like it? Don't read it. But you have no right to silence it, gimp face or not.

 

[RodgerDodger]

Everything in this paragraph is gold

View attachment 7384155

He's learned! He's changed! He's gone to therapy. It's all in the past. Nevermind that He's trying to steal a 100 year old family run family friendly hotel via government fraud in order to turn it into a Whorehouse so he can get him his penis sucked everyday, just last week. He's changed! Why bring up the past?

 

[Sneed Force One]

ECF 296, 297, 298, 299
View attachment 7384120
View attachment 7384121

I'm just a widdle retard ya honor, it's not my fault I was emailing the city during your proceedings! That stalker lawyer child Hardin needs to be sanctioned for even questioning a poor widdle retard boy! Throw him in jail!

 

[Dizzyuntildeath]

Also, this paragraph makes it pretty damn clear that Russell isn't suing over copyright, but rather because the site is publishing discussion of Russell's past behaviour. He believes he should be able to bury his history of litigation and the consequences of that.

Fortunately, the US constitution thinks differently.

Don't forget: the 10th said he won. Why are you being like this?

 

[Probably An Autist]

* Hardin filing a supplemental authority on the brand-new LLC that was registered in lieu of paying sanctions and filing fees

Hardin has been pretty quick with the supplements so i'm putting it all on this. it's gonna squirt

 

[RodgerDodger]

If the stamps are anything to go by, the motion to show cause came in yesterday afternoon:
View attachment 7384164

And then the supplemental authority in the wee hours of this morning:
View attachment 7384167

And he is still using his Cargo Cult approach to filings. He simply repeats the magic words that Hardin has used.

 

[DavidS877]

I will say I like the "Granting in part and denying in part" docket text order where the "denying in part" is obviously for Null to pay for the document but is not explicitly mentioned.

I wonder if Russ is gonna be dumb and request a clarification. Or better yet just email Mr. Hardin and ask for money.

 

[RodgerDodger]

And after all that searching people did this morning to pull up the old screenshots. Crafty Plaintiff Greer is going to make all that hard work pointless by admitting it himself on the record.

Why do we even autism? Are our painstaking archives meaningless, in the face of unrelenting, repeating retardation?

He's truly made fools of us all.

 

[HackerX]

View attachment 7384240

"I becoming of a lawyer"

Russ even lies in his typos. Every filing he makes puts him further away from becoming a lawyer.

I'm assuming he meant "unbecoming", but I can't ignore the freudian slip!

Is there a threshold where a litigant, even an IFP pro se, can get admonished for constant typos and shit formatting? Or where it plays some sort of factor to consider? I assume there is a very high bar to get to that point, but it's an obvious indicator for the lack of time and effort that person is spending on their filings.

 

[Dizzyuntildeath]

So, Mr. Greer has penned to paper Hitler and Stalin in this litigation. Dare he go for Mussolini, Churchill, Truman/Roosey?

 

[Silver Coin Anon]

Hardin has been pretty quick with the supplements so i'm putting it all on this. it's gonna squirt

Please do not restart the quick and hard Hardin thirst posting with implications of gamba squirting.

 

[obsdj]

View attachment 7384163

Huh, so not copyright...?

Also, this paragraph makes it pretty damn clear that Russell isn't suing over copyright, but rather because the site is publishing discussion of Russell's past behaviour. He believes he should be able to bury his history of litigation and the consequences of that.

Yet another tidbit I desperately hope Hardin picks up and pounces on as soon as possible, or at the bare minimum he includes in his reply to Greer's opposition on the motion to dismiss. But that's over a month away, sigh.

 

[Swole McPole]

I will say I like the "Granting in part and denying in part" docket text order where the "denying in part" is obviously for Null to pay for the document but is not explicitly mentioned.

Judge: "Pay the $30, mushmouth and bring me the damn document! If you can afford to open whorehouses in Winnemucca, you can afford to pay for the document you insisted was so critical to your case."

 

[HackerX]

And he is still using his Cargo Cult approach to filings. He simply repeats the magic words that Hardin has used.

TBH, I eagerly anticipate the Greer motion that makes the recent ones pale in comparison. Russ using ALL the magic words in incomprehensible conjunction with each other. Copyright dispute. Excusable neglect. Plights. Hardship. What are the other big ones?

 

[DavidS877]

Judge: "Pay the $30, mushmouth and bring me the damn document! If you can afford to open whorehouses in Winnemucca, you can afford to pay for the document you insisted was so critical to your case."

By a quick back of the envelope calculation, assuming a 40MPG car, it cost Russ probably $100 in gas just for the drive to Winnemucca and back. He has no viable excuse for not just ordering the damn document.

 

[mindlessobserver]

Almost to docket entry 300. Let's hope it's a banger.

 

[RodgerDodger]

Utah enacted their anti slapp laws 3 years after this lawsuit was filed, so it's not binding

Would the Amended Complaint put them on the table?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Would the Amended Complaint put them on the table?

I don't think so.

 

[ScooterL]

He doesn't see what he did there, does he?

This is where he's distinct from most other cows. Russell has learned to keep his worst insanity off the internet.

After this filing, I wish to retract the above comment.