Big Al, Pooner Vanessa, and this wacky troon "lawyer" have this completely backwards.
The "free speech" right at issue belongs to the government, not the trannies.
"The information contained in a passport is unquestionably government speech. The United States – not the passport holder – controls every aspect of the issuance and appearance of a U.S. passport. A U.S. passport is a government-issued document. See 22 U.S.C. § 211(a). The function of a passport is to serve as a “letter of introduction in which the issuing sovereign vouches for the bearer and requests other sovereigns to aid the bearer” and as a “travel control document” representing “proof of identify and proof of allegiance to the U.S.
Doe v. Kerry (N.D. Cal., Sept. 23, 2016, No. 16-CV-0654-PJH) 2016 WL 5339804, at *16
"Passports remain government property even when held by individuals, and must be surrendered to the U.S. government upon demand. See 22 C.F.R. §§ 51.7(a), 51.66. Individuals have no editorial control over the information in a passport; only the U.S. government may amend a passport. See 22 C.F.R. § 51.9. Indeed, criminal penalties are imposed on individuals who mutilate or alter their passports. See 18 U.S.C. § 1543."
Doe v. Kerry (N.D. Cal., Sept. 23, 2016, No. 16-CV-0654-PJH) 2016 WL 5339804, at *17
Once you identify the correct speaker, the "compelled speech" bullshit completely falls apart,