African-American Appreciation Thread - Highlighting contributions from our most productive citizens

Kek! Are they wearing wigs at school age?
"weave" is not a wig, and it's DEY CULCHA! EDUCATE YOSEFF *pinches long nailed fingers in your face*

seriously though, yes, they start this shit early because black mammas seem to want their kids slathered in enough chemicals to poison an elephant and encumbered in so much trash from as young of an age as possible, they don't ask why, they just must
a duck doesn't ask why it must migrate for the winter
a beaver doesn't ask why it must build a dam
a black woman doesn't ask why she must get her weave installed
 
On today's episode of U NOT UNNASTANNIN YT; AH'M SKERD UV DA POLEESE: "MAH PIZZA WUZ COLE"
View attachment 7378090
I hate listening to dumb people trying to speak intelligently when they're bullshitting.
blacks invented refrigeration and red lights (half true, Frederick McKinley Jones did revolutionize portable refrigeration, blacks however did not invent refrigeration itself).
I always reference George Washington Carver inventing the peanut. Not just in contextually related convos like these, but just in general. It's one of my favorite completely stupid things to say. I highly recommend it because you can't lose. If someone tries correcting you that he invented uses or techniques or something involving peanuts and other legumes, you call them racist.

"Wow. So a black man isn't smart enough to invent even a peanut in your racist mind? Unreal."

There's no telling how far you can take that nonsense. Maybe go full-court press and suggest that if George hadn't worked his peanut magic, elephants wouldn't be a quarter of the size they are today.

"But you probably don't think African elephants deserve food, either, do you?"

If they concur or agree with you initially, even better. Fun for the whole family when they repeat that shit out in the wild. I can honestly see why black people love pulling that card. It's such a dirty trick.

Anyway, I actually did look up black inventions a bit ago so some is fresh in my mind. IIRC, a black man invented the stop light, as well as early home burglary systems. I thought both of those were funny.
Black people claiming to be "exhausted" by living around white people has been a meme for a few years. It's their "It's all so tiresome."
They often couple this with a complete misunderstanding of violent crime statistics. In their minds, whites are roving around hunting them down for kicks. Quite the opposite, I'm afraid. But they literally can't understand data, so we're fucked trying to explain it.
My long-held stance that black/hood chicks have optimal street fighting technique remains undefeated. While white women pathetically latch onto hair and throw rabbit punches, black chicks legitimately use it for head control. Head control is one of the most important aspects of fighting; control the head, control the body.

Black chicks consistently lock down a grip on hair and repeat the following sequence:
  1. Snap Down - By whipping down their opponent while remaining standing, they begin with about as big as an advantage as you can without a sucker punch KO. When you're already on the floor/your knees, your hands are busy getting yourself up.
  2. Uppercuts - As soon as their opponent is on the ground, they're raining uppercuts. No shit, these bitches legitimately got some fucking power. Trying to regain a standing position while eating uppercuts in-between, "bitch!" is very difficult. Plus the high ground on a downed opponent makes uppercuts pack even more power.
  3. Whip Around - This is the crucial step in the sequence that gives black women the street fighting title. When their opponent has finally managed to nearly get up - at great expense, mind you - FWOOM! They whip around the girl by the hair, which is a blend of #1 that leads to more uppercuts.
It's truly just a fucking tornado of eating punches, desperately fighting to gain a position to try for offense, only to have exerted all that energy to be snapped right back down for more punches. It's genuinely hard to combat.

*David Attenborough voice*

This is probably why black women evolved to have no hair. In the video above, the girl's wig flying off is an evolutionary adaptation, possibly a mix of convergent evolution with a dash of mimicry. Blending in, the wig is like camouflage for a black woman hoping to blend in with those devilish Eurocentric beauty standards.

Most crucially is their importance in a sneak attack. Her opponent takes the bait, needing to ensure she's not going to hit an actual straight-haired person. But even with the surprise attack, her fake hair comes in handy, confusing her attacker.

Similar to an iguana's caudal autotomy defense mechanism, she instantly releases her scalps grip on the horsehair. Brilliant. To further confuse potential predators, she utilizes her pantyhose to resemble Homer Simpson for a second.

Classic shit. White girl going to be jumped for breaking it up, though.
"weave" is not a wig,
That's definitely a wig, though, right? A weave is actually woven into the hair and that shit went flying.

RE: Rittenhouse, I'd say the biggest likelihood of success for him suing would be that he referenced the video of it. He's referencing literal video of the events, which clearly do NOT show him shooting people in the back. He can obviously just say, "I never saw them. I just heard he did that" but hard to believe. He has to know video didn't show any of that.
 
Last edited:
OK, now I never went to law school, now stating an objective fact such as Rittenhouse "shot 3 people in the back" and this video has been public for over 3 years. Fuck. I'm not gonna even comment I'm just going leave the video for all to judge. I'd imagine this would be a very short civil case.

Slander/Libel is a bitch man.
Off the top of my head you have to prove;

-The statement is a knowing lie: when the person makes the statement if they reasonably believe it's true, it's not slander. (legal definition of reasonable mind you, so saying something like Mandela died in the 90s is an example of a reasonable person believing a lie)

-The statement is meant to cause harm: the slander is meant to cause damage to a reputation and/or cause loss (a measurable loss, such as contractual)

-Publicized: the slander needs to broadcast in some manner.

-Source: kind of goes with publicized but the slander needs to be credibly sourced and broadcast. So if Dolly Parton's tits are filled with cocaine, and that's the front page of the National Inquirer, that's not Slander (libel) because no one reasonably (again legal reasonable) believes that source. But that same headline on The Wall Street Journal. That's slander(libel). Again this is why Musk didn't lose his case, he isnt a credible source and the statement didn't do harm.

-Opinion: opinion isn't slander even if it's mostly a lie.

-Truth: the truth isn't slander and a half cooked, he shot 3 people, is the truth in much of the comment.

In this case Kyle did actually shoot 3 people, which is a big portion of where a defense will hang their hat. Ultimately they'd argue that no one of importance would believe some nigger saying Kyle is a cold blooded killer and that the people who did believe him, already believe Kyle did shoot 3 people in the back with an AK47, so no actual harm was done to Kyle Rittenhouse.

Slander is a bitch, the big one in my opinion is number 1, the knowingly harmful statement. This is how Trump won his slander cases (or they settled) same with those white kids in the park. As a news organization you should know better (this is the legal reasonable definition) and not make statements that are easily fact checked. Some wife/child beating nigger is not a reasonable source and no one actually believes him except for other dumb ass black people, but they aren't important and don't cause harm to Kyle R in any measurable way.
 
This is probably why black women evolved to have no hair. In the video above, the girl's wig flying off is an evolutionary adaptation, possibly a mix of convergent evolution with a dash of mimicry. Blending in, the wig is like camouflage for a black woman hoping to blend in with those devilish Eurocentric beauty standards.

Most crucially is their importance in a sneak attack. Her opponent takes the bait, needing to ensure she's not going to hit an actual straight-haired person. But even with the surprise attack, her fake hair comes in handy, confusing her attacker.

Similar to an iguana's caudal autotomy defense mechanism, she instantly releases her scalps grip on the horsehair. Brilliant. To further confuse potential predators, she utilizes her pantyhose to resemble Homer Simpson for a second.

I fucking love Science.
 
1747373382517604.webp
 
I went back to Wednesday ITT and didn't see this posted, hopefully it's not something ancient that I'm just now coming across. Female nigger refuses to pay bus fare, bus driver refuses to drive without the fare, female nigger chimps out, other niggers also nig in protest.

 
I went back to Wednesday ITT and didn't see this posted, hopefully it's not something ancient that I'm just now coming across. Female nigger refuses to pay bus fare, bus driver refuses to drive without the fare, female nigger chimps out, other niggers also nig in protest.

Seattle Fare Enforcement Disproportionately Punishes Blacks, Data Show​

Sound Transit says its fare enforcement system is design to be unbiased, but analysis about fare evader data indicates disparities.

Heidi Groover reports that data from Sound Transit in the Seattle area show that black riders are disproportionately caught in the fare enforcement system. While blacks make up 9 percent of riders on light rail and commuter rail trains, 22 percent of riders who were warned or penalized since 2015 were black.

"For black riders, the disparity grows as the punishment gets more severe, from warnings to $124 tickets to misdemeanor theft charges. In the last four years, about half the riders who faced a misdemeanor charge for failing to pay a fare were black," notes Groover.

Approximately a third of Sound Transit’s rail operating revenue comes from fares, and fare evasion affects the agency's bottom line, says Groover. Critics argue the findings show that fare enforcement measures are problematic and affect those riders least able to pay fines. Still, officials say the reasons behind the disparity and people not paying fares are not entirely clear, and the agency plans to conduct surveys later this year to gain more insight.
Black people wouldn't pay their fares. Naturally, the news reports it as some systemic racism stereotyping and targeting. Fare enforcement officers literally asked EVERYBODY each time. though. In the end, they waived ALL of the fines for them.

This is that white privilege, I take it?
 
I went back to Wednesday ITT and didn't see this posted, hopefully it's not something ancient that I'm just now coming across. Female nigger refuses to pay bus fare, bus driver refuses to drive without the fare, female nigger chimps out, other niggers also nig in protest.

View attachment 7387798
Too bad then that driver was white, he could have gived a good uppercut like that bus driver from Cleveland a decade ago.
 
I always reference George Washington Carver inventing the peanut. Not just in contextually related convos like these, but just in general. It's one of my favorite completely stupid things to say. I highly recommend it because you can't lose. If someone tries correcting you that he invented uses or techniques or something involving peanuts and other legumes, you call them racist.

"Wow. So a black man isn't smart enough to invent even a peanut in your racist mind? Unreal."

There's no telling how far you can take that nonsense. Maybe go full-court press and suggest that if George hadn't worked his peanut magic, elephants wouldn't be a quarter of the size they are today.
I find it funny that the Carver man invented 400 uses of the peanut, but not ONE of them AFAIK involved an edible form of the peanut. That just reminds me of somebody overthinking an obvious, in hindsight, idea.
That's definitely a wig, though, right? A weave is actually woven into the hair and that shit went flying.
I actually don't know. Somebody correct me if that's not the case. How on Earth do we go from shitposting about African Americans to writing logical theses on WHY they behave this way?
 
Why do they always try to turn a police encounter into a 2 on 1 gunfight they're almost guaranteed to lose.

I was in the lefty memes thread and saw this pic and it just made me mad all over again. Things that contribute to white supremacy apparently include Tolerance, White Saviors, Good Intentions, Color Blindness, and Meritocracy.
Literally nothing will placate them short of you just fucking killing yourself, which they really want. Wake up every day smiling knowing that every breath of air you take causes them to seethe at your existence. Oh, have a job too, and save money, and be a productive member of society. These are all traits of a racist culture and they hate that.
 
Last edited:
Literally nothing will placate them short of you just fucking killing yourself, which they really want. Wake up every day smiling knowing that every breath of air you take causes them to seethe at your existence. Oh, have a job too, and save money, and be a productive member of society. These are all traits of a racist culture and they hate that.
See if you were dead who's going to have to wear the star labeling you a recipient of white privilege? If you're not paraded down the street covered like the maosists did during the cultural revolution in a paper pancho or holding a sign saying you are an evil white devil who only achieved anything in life because of niggers and spicks then the message doesn't get spread to other whites?
 
Lol like Chimcongo wont do anything to that fucking nigger, he's what they wanted for like four decades a nigger that they can prop up and keep in office until he's in his 80's unlike their first go-around with Washington who died in a couple years or the last mayor who was a creature from innsmouth.
Optimistic reacts only I guess but:
 
Back