Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.5%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.8%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 155 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 112 24.2%

  • Total voters
    463
forgive me if stupid ass question, on day 7 of an 8 day stint at work for a huge project, but @Useful_Mistake , is there a way for you to see other cases on judge barrett’s docket? i just wonder how many more pressing matters he may have on his hands than russell greer’s Plights v. Moon.

edit: or if it even works that way, if judges respond more quickly to things they think are more important.
What could be more important than the privilege of basking in the light of the legal genius that is Greer's docket entries?
 
Edit: Another possibility: Greer thinks that Jersh made some sort of pact with unseelie faeries. If that's the case and Hardin is fae, then there is no possible way that "Matthew Hardin" is his real name, that's just his fake human name he uses when he wears his human skin. To know something's True Name is to give you power over it. If Greer knew Hardin's True Name, he could order Hardin to twist the language of the pact with Jersh and turn on him (as the unseelie are very good at doing). So, Greer is desperately trying to find Hardin's True Name, and thinks that maybe LVPD can help with that, because everyone knows that the MGM Grand is run by the children of Arawn.
Perhaps Ralph is wrong about having reproduced while Josh has not, and Josh gave Hardin his firstborn to seal the contract. It would explain his favorable rates for legal work.
 
forgive me if stupid ass question, on day 7 of an 8 day stint at work for a huge project, but @Useful_Mistake , is there a way for you to see other cases on judge barrett’s docket? i just wonder how many more pressing matters he may have on his hands than russell greer’s Plights v. Moon.

edit: or if it even works that way, if judges respond more quickly to things they think are more important, or if it’s “first filed, first answered.”
 
We already know that Russ reads this thread. I think Russ has picked up on something circulated a bit too frequently here and has led Greer to realize that the man purporting to be Matthew Hardin is in actuality a certain Fire Nation sympathizer.

Greer is so close to unmasking this fiend for the court and all the world to see. Out of concern for Josh and the safety of this case I've refrained from making it too obvious in case Russ hasn't quite put it together yet. It would horrible if we were yet again to give him free legal advice, and Josh can't afford such a useless mistake that would no doubt leave both Josh and his counsel open to massive sanctions outlined under FRCP 11 (g)(7)(B).

If I remember correctly, we were warned not to joke about that in this thread.
 
Ah yes, Utah Vapor Business Association v. State of Utah - the case where they somehow only managed to get a TRO on warrantless inspections granted but failed to get the same for the actual flavored tabacco products and now a bunch of businesses that put their faith in UVBA are closed. Judge has been quick to issue orders on this one.
 
Fascinating Captain a search for Judge Barlow referred to Judge Bennet shows 28 cases. With a combined docket of 2400 entries. Greer v Moon is the first that pops up. And is by far the single largest docket. The only other case to cross 200 is Combs v Safemoon LLC which similarly appears to be some spat between lolcow tier Crypto Bros. Everything else rarely gets above 100-120 docket entries.

Somebodies got to be paying attention to this shitpile.
 
Fascinating Captain a search for Judge Barlow referred to Judge Bennet shows 28 cases. With a combined docket of 2400 entries. Greer v Moon is the first that pops up. And is by far the single largest docket. The only other case to cross 200 is Combs v Safemoon LLC which similarly appears to be some spat between lolcow tier Crypto Bros. Everything else rarely gets above 100-120 docket entries.

Somebodies got to be paying attention to this shitpile.
In most cases people have to pay money to draft and then file anything. Which means they tend to think about what they are doing before they do it. Greer however hasn't had to pay for anything up till now so he's gotten to use the federal court as his personal blog.
 
In most cases people have to pay money to draft and then file anything. Which means they tend to think about what they are doing before they do it. Greer however hasn't had to pay for anything up till now so he's gotten to use the federal court as his personal blog.

Greer is an example of why, at the discretion of the presiding judge, they should be allowed to require a per-item filing fee for participants that shit up the docket with mindless garbage. It would help to greatly curtail this kind of crap. There is absolutely no reason not to penalize individuals that treat the docket in the same manner that Greer has throughout this case.
 
Greer is an example of why, at the discretion of the presiding judge, they should be allowed to require a per-item filing fee for participants that shit up the docket with mindless garbage. It would help to greatly curtail this kind of crap. There is absolutely no reason not to penalize individuals that treat the docket in the same manner that Greer has throughout this case.
The greater effect of that would be a punishment on the non-IFP participant of the case.
 
The greater effect of that would be a punishment on the non-IFP participant of the case.

Note the:

for participants that shit up the docket with mindless garbage

Unless you're insinuating that for some reason non-IFP participants in a case are more likely to shit up the docket with random garbage, which, to me, seems like a very odd argument.
 
Note the:



Unless you're insinuating that for some reason non-IFP participants in a case are more likely to shit up the docket with random garbage, which, to me, seems like a very odd argument.
The asshole tax. I see what you mean, and I agree with it, but a lot of times recently where Hardin has felt the best way to zealously defend his client is by responding to the insanity, which he's probably correct about. Both of them annoy the judge, and the asshole tax would probably be something the aggrieved could appeal on, unless it was applied to both parties, which punishes the more innocent party who's just trying to do his job.

I feel like that is largely like dei - as stated its a good idea, but in reality it ends up favoring some people and punishing others who can't do anything about their inherent qualities.

The judge could put a stop to this anytime he wants. All he needs to do is tell them to stfu and back it up by threatening sanctions, and why he hasn't is beyond me. Even the tard guarding against another appeal argument has fallen apart.
 
Unless you're insinuating that for some reason non-IFP participants in a case are more likely to shit up the docket with random garbage, which, to me, seems like a very odd argument.
It's actually a pretty common tactic for wealthy plaintiffs trying to bully people to spam the docket with barely non-frivolous filings knowing that the impoverished victim won't be able to respond to all of them because it would cost them tens of thousands.

They're a lot more scary than Ratface.

Examples: the McLibel defendants, sued by McDonald's for saying their products are shit, in the U.K., a protected opinion in any country with even a pretense of free speech (oh yeah there is only one and it is the United States and it is under attack even here).
 
Man, it's been like christmas for a week. I come home and there's another 5 or 10 pages, I get to pick up where I left off with anticipation until I get to U_Ms post.

1747792427266.webp
Son of a bitch did it again

1747792780173.webp
So this is defamation per se right? Going around and telling (presumably) several people that Hardin is a stalker? Since stalking is a criminal offense?

1747792913859.webp1747792936259.webp
I cannot wait to read this! After the court compels shitlips to produce it for discovery and it's added to the docket of course.

1747793009661.webp
Rusty sure has.

Overall 10/10, truly unhinged. Thank you Russel.

@Potentially Criminal better hop to or you're going to be way behind again lol.

ETA:
Notice he's being careful with his language again. He says he "has to go" to the police, not that he has done so.
Fuck, I read it as "had" not "has". Very good catch.
 
why he hasn't is beyond me
I think he's afraid of looking like a bully and having to deal with this getting knocked back to him after an appeal so he's trying to accommodate as much as possible. I just wish he took into account that someone is footing the bill on the side of the defense.
 
I'm not exaggerating when I say that words literally fail me: 'bonkers' isn't adequate any more, and I can't think of a word that's past that.

Oh no, first Bossman is a fugitive and now Hardin too!?
Fucking Greer talking to the Poh-Leese!
If I knew where Hardin was right now I'd consider contacting a local bakery to bake him a cake with a file in the middle and arrange to have it delivered to him.

View attachment 7388507

A double typo! How many ways can he fail at copy-paste at a time?
Another Ingreerobang!
Man I can't wait for Null to be able to talk about this lawsuit freely
I think that @Potentially Criminal should interview him instead of Null doing an unscripted livestream.
He's also implied that Hardin isn't really a lawyer, either.
I'd like to see Hardin sue Rusty for defamation, just for my amusement.
To be a fly on the wall when Russell explains to a city council that they need a brothel because a lot of horny miners are coming.
...but they're not cumming, that's the problem!
Does he not know Hardin's middle name is Phillip?
You mean like... Terrance and Phillip? OH GOD HARDIN IS CANADIAN IT ALL MAKES SENSE BLAME CANADA
 
Greer is filing a retraining order on Hardin.
I don't think Hardin is the one who needs to go back to school.

surely they'll also begin to see that his allegations against Josh/Kiwifarms are equally unhinged and similarly lacking in legal substance?
surely the 10th circuit won't rule that actions after the fact can contribute to an alleged tort. surely now that they've asked for comments about the en banc review this will all get cleared up. surely.
 
I don't think Hardin is the one who needs to go back to school.


surely the 10th circuit won't rule that actions after the fact can contribute to an alleged tort. surely now that they've asked for comments about the en banc review this will all get cleared up. surely.
The Tenth Circuit literally believes in time travel.

Something you say after something happened can cause it.

Pure magic!

These faggots are considered our overlords.
 
Man, it's been like christmas for a week. I come home and there's another 5 or 10 pages, I get to pick up where I left off with anticipation until I get to U_Ms post.

View attachment 7389681
Son of a bitch did it again

View attachment 7389704
So this is defamation per se right? Going around and telling (presumably) several people that Hardin is a stalker? Since stalking is a criminal offense?

View attachment 7389706View attachment 7389708
I cannot wait to read this! After the court compels shitlips to produce it for discovery and it's added to the docket of course.

View attachment 7389711
Rusty sure has.

Overall 10/10, truly unhinged. Thank you Russel.

@Potentially Criminal better hop to or you're going to be way behind again lol.

ETA:

Fuck, I read it as "had" not "has". Very good catch.
Can Las Vegas Metro even do anything for something that nominally happened on the opposite side of the state?
 
Back