- Joined
- Aug 1, 2021
How dangerous mages are in Dragon Age is basically the “is crime caused by poverty or does crime exist independently of poverty” debate in a fantasy context.
Mage defenders will argue until they’re purple in the face that mages would be totally fine and happy without the chantry and Templars oppressing them. On the other hand-we see what mages do-with or without the Circle leaves a lot of room for doubt. For every Malcolm Hawke you have a dozen blood mage covens in the wilderness. Connor and Amelia(Meredith's sister) are great examples of what happens when Mage children exist independently of the circle.
The problem IU is mages are always at risk of possession-it requires discipline and constant vigilance to prevent it(that's the entire point of the Mage origin). OOU-its more that the writers weren't really ever clear on what precisely the answer is-only that its a fundamental problem of the setting.
Importantly though-in DA overall lore, magic destroyed the world. It was the evanuris taking on physical bodies and waging war against "the pillars of the earth" that produced(or at least initiated) the blight, it was Solas creating the veil that fucked up the way Spirits behave in relation to mortals, and it was the Magisters' Sidereal entering the black city which verifiably started the actual blights.
Also Magic in DA while not being as uber overpowered as say Warhammer Fantasy is still vastly OP in a medieval/renaissance society. The Hero of Ferelden is a verifiable army killer-and that's when they aren't a mage. A Post Awakening maxed out Amell or Surana is a walking nuke. Hawke and the Inquisitor are less powerful(mostly for game balancing reasons) but are still insanely dangerous people(even moreso as mages)-Veilguard somehow has even more magical hax bullshit and I don't even want to try to quantify a comparison.
So my view is-you have four options.
The Southern Chantry and Southern Thedas' approach-Magic is contained and policed, sometimes with abuses(templar rapes and beatings, tranquility, etc...)
Tevinter-Mages rule, the rest of society is ground down by people that use their blood as fuel for power ups
Qunari-mages are treated as beasts of burden and are even more viciously repressed
Just kill any child with magic.
TLDR: "The mage question" is perhaps the heart of Dragon Age' narrative dilemmas, and Veilguard only makes it worse because we have god mages actually fucking up the world at a mythic-foundational level.
At the same time-the writers' present cases like Rivaini seers, the Dalish keepers, and the Avvar augurs-showing that smaller scale tribal societies seem to be able to include mages more functionally, and Nevarra is a mess of inconsistencies in basically every game. So its both intentionally ambiguous and a case of different writers handling the problem in such a way you get contradictions as to just how dangerous or amenable magic and mages are to society.
*Anders strikes me as the sort of person who even if he were born into a soporati family in Tevinter he would somehow be made tranquil or exiled because he can't help but piss off and alienate everyone who ever tried to be his friend. Do remember this is a guy who in a scenario where Hawke supports the mages and spares his life-can't keep fellow mages from kicking him to the curb because he's that insufferable.
Mage defenders will argue until they’re purple in the face that mages would be totally fine and happy without the chantry and Templars oppressing them. On the other hand-we see what mages do-with or without the Circle leaves a lot of room for doubt. For every Malcolm Hawke you have a dozen blood mage covens in the wilderness. Connor and Amelia(Meredith's sister) are great examples of what happens when Mage children exist independently of the circle.
The problem IU is mages are always at risk of possession-it requires discipline and constant vigilance to prevent it(that's the entire point of the Mage origin). OOU-its more that the writers weren't really ever clear on what precisely the answer is-only that its a fundamental problem of the setting.
Importantly though-in DA overall lore, magic destroyed the world. It was the evanuris taking on physical bodies and waging war against "the pillars of the earth" that produced(or at least initiated) the blight, it was Solas creating the veil that fucked up the way Spirits behave in relation to mortals, and it was the Magisters' Sidereal entering the black city which verifiably started the actual blights.
Also Magic in DA while not being as uber overpowered as say Warhammer Fantasy is still vastly OP in a medieval/renaissance society. The Hero of Ferelden is a verifiable army killer-and that's when they aren't a mage. A Post Awakening maxed out Amell or Surana is a walking nuke. Hawke and the Inquisitor are less powerful(mostly for game balancing reasons) but are still insanely dangerous people(even moreso as mages)-Veilguard somehow has even more magical hax bullshit and I don't even want to try to quantify a comparison.
So my view is-you have four options.
The Southern Chantry and Southern Thedas' approach-Magic is contained and policed, sometimes with abuses(templar rapes and beatings, tranquility, etc...)
Tevinter-Mages rule, the rest of society is ground down by people that use their blood as fuel for power ups
Qunari-mages are treated as beasts of burden and are even more viciously repressed
Just kill any child with magic.
TLDR: "The mage question" is perhaps the heart of Dragon Age' narrative dilemmas, and Veilguard only makes it worse because we have god mages actually fucking up the world at a mythic-foundational level.
At the same time-the writers' present cases like Rivaini seers, the Dalish keepers, and the Avvar augurs-showing that smaller scale tribal societies seem to be able to include mages more functionally, and Nevarra is a mess of inconsistencies in basically every game. So its both intentionally ambiguous and a case of different writers handling the problem in such a way you get contradictions as to just how dangerous or amenable magic and mages are to society.
*Anders strikes me as the sort of person who even if he were born into a soporati family in Tevinter he would somehow be made tranquil or exiled because he can't help but piss off and alienate everyone who ever tried to be his friend. Do remember this is a guy who in a scenario where Hawke supports the mages and spares his life-can't keep fellow mages from kicking him to the curb because he's that insufferable.