US Two Israeli diplomats shot, killed during event at Capital Jewish Museum in Washington, DC - Towelhead supporter attacks

source
archive

Two Israeli Embassy staff members were shot and killed during an event at the Capital Jewish Museum in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday night, authorities confirmed.

Tal Naim Cohen, a spokesperson for the Israeli embassy in the capital, confirmed to Fox News that two diplomats were shot "at close range" during a Jewish event at the museum. The American Jewish Committee confirmed it was hosting the event in a post on X.

"We have full faith in law enforcement authorities on both the local and federal levels to apprehend the shooter and protect Israel’s representatives and Jewish communities throughout the United States," Cohen said.

Fox News confirmed a man and a woman were both killed in the shooting. Further details on their identities were not immediately available.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said DHS is "actively investigating" the incident and "working to get more information to share."

"Please pray for the families of the victims. We will bring this depraved perpetrator to justice," Noem wrote on X.

The Metropolitan Police Department said a shooting investigation was underway near 3rd Street and F Street Northwest, which is where the Capital Jewish Museum is located.

Danny Danon, Israel's Ambassador to the United Nations, said an event was taking place at the museum and the deadly shooting was a "depraved act of anti-Semitic(sic) terrorism" in a statement posted to X late Wednesday night.

"Harming diplomats and the Jewish community is crossing a red line. We are confident that the US authorities will take strong action against those responsible for this criminal act. Israel will continue to act resolutely to protect its citizens and representatives – everywhere in the world," he wrote.


Fox News Digital has reached out to DC police, the Israeli embassy and the Capital Jewish Museum.

 

[Blewberry Nausea]

Have they ever tried running a candidate in an election?

That would be conformity and collaboration to a corrupt and despicable system that can only turn you against your beliefs.

 

[MeltyTW]

Was it Israel that said that or liberal western Jews? unless you are grouping all Jews together in which case why are you upset that Jews do the same to whites?

That's a great question and the answer is both groups to varying degrees. Western liberal jews still tend to be zionist as seen with even h3 who's trying to join some of the most lefty circles and still saying Israel should exist even though he agrees it was built on an immoral action.

Jews tend to stick by another on some issues even if they try to destroy each other on others. Many take this to mean all inter jewish conflicts are fake but I take it more as them all benefitting from a shared identity even if they hate each other. As seen when the adl ben Shapiro and libsoftiktok and even to some extent Ethan klein can all agree broadly.

But on white identity even figures amicable to almost any other right wing point are completely unwilling to entertain it or even acknowledge it exists and it's not even for safety as the only ones really sticking up for the jews now who aren't a million years old are very right wing white youths. Id probably get less pushback with antisemitic taking points on a twitch channel than I would in some threads here

I think they do this for several reasons, formerly fear, historical grievances and wanting to maintain a presence or live in white countries completely camouflaged as being an other of any sort to any degree while also maintaining a sort of superiority as being from a more exclusive tribe even though they fltry and force whites to be an aracial all comers group and I think they're arrogant enough to think God will give them both that and Americans loving them enough to give them aid when all its done is made elements of the right hate them for double standards on identity and the left hate them because they are infact racist

 

[Stoneheart]

You should join Elias in the Hall of Martyrs then. I'm sure Mahmoud Abbas will pay your family if you do.

or be a white person and just put them in labor camps.

 

[soy_king]

or be a white person and just put them in labor camps.

Unless he has that Teutonic gene for autistic hyper-organization that you and your robotic brethren were blessed with I doubt he could pull it off.

 

[Twix Eatr]

You tried to flex like the most reddit redditor ever and you're stilling bringing up the fact you got clowned for it.

There was no flex, just a correction. But I can see how everything comes off as a flex to people who didn't have the brains, initiative, or heart to build the best Chrome extension to make user notes on Kiwis in modern history.

View attachment 7402840
Don't take this the wrong way but you really need to touch grass.

None taken. I've only heard retards say that "touch grass" shit, tbh. I think learning to code has been a good use of time. Arguing about how others spend theirs doing shit like coding isn't, imo, but to each their own.

I do actually care about reaction scores though, so feel free to judge me on that one; not the negative ones since they rarely indicate anything substantial. But I try and have more of the positive ones, especially "Informative." It's a lot for null to maintain the site, both as an archive of sorts and for free speech. It's not free (for him) so I try to contribute useful information more often than these spergouts so server space goes to good use.

I think it's from the extension he made. Keeping a tally of other users scores and posts here (unless you're Null or a janny) is mental.

That's a screenshot from my own reactions page. It just rearranges what's already there into a side-by-side table where I can see the totals and filter them down easier at once. You are the only person analyzing another person's scores, oddly enough.

The user notes can include a link to the post you make the note on for reference. It's not to keep track of or log other people's posts or their reactions received. When people make good posts, especially with links in them to shit I care about, I like to note it. It has the option to include a URL to that post. It shows up under their name on each post they make.

When people make really shitty arguments or in bad-faith, I also like to note that. If I know someone already ignores evidence when presented to them, like these clowns still tripling-down on my grudge-extension-for-evil-kiwis-notetaking, I can avoid engaging them in the future.

I have also tagged some users who actually are on the spectrum, folks who've expressed thoughts about or have a past of self-harm and/or suicidal ideation, those formerly "trans" or who came close, etc. It's easy to get drawn into hostility or have a default position of aggressively insulting others on here. I am not impervious to this, either. So I find it useful to remind myself that certain others do think differently from me or have pasts that might make certain comments actually hurtful. I don't want to inadvertently or purposely say things that I wouldn't have if I had more information. If people volunteer that information, in some cases, I'd like to remember it. If people want to imagine this as the opposite, where I'm noting what I can to damage enemies in the future, I can't stop them from being retards (but I can note it. ).

If that's weird or autistic or whatever. I don't care. I find it a useful function and a good use case to have AI explain more coding concepts to me. Plus the extension gets me tons of pussy.

To be fair it’d be interesting to see the extension in question in action if I were gay and retarded enough to use Chrome, LOL.

Like to be fair, it's actually just a completely useful function that isn't included with XenForo. Chrome extensions work for FireFox as well, they only need a slightly altered manifest. I don't know about other browsers.

If you use FF and would like the join the club of HaTeFuL AuTiStIcS WhO nEeD tO ToUcH GrAsS, shoot me a PM and I'll give you a copy when I make the next update.

What tool is that? I've always found the reaction score tracker to be buggy

Interesting. You might be a HaTeFuL AuTiStIc WhO nEeDs tO ToUcH GrAsS. I also found the functionality less than ideal. So I threw together code for that page like I'd done for others. At some point, I had functions for enough different parts of the site that I just turned it into an extension. PM me if you want a copy. You've been cool.

Anyway, did we learn anything new about the "Free Palestine" loser yet? His reddit account will probably blend in with all the bots and leftoids on there way too much. It's like TAILS and Tor making all the browser stats the same to not stand out.

 

[Feline Supremacist]

tl;dr

Touch grass.

 

[Twix Eatr]

Touch grass.

No tag needed for you.

 

[Feline Supremacist]

View attachment 7407421
No tag needed for you.

Touch grass.

Also nice job outing yourself as a sock.

 

[YouTube Autist]

Deuteronomy, Exodus and Numbers all tell the story of Jews stealing a bunch of shit from Egypt then getting lost in the desert before eventually fighting Amorites and Canaanites to take over their land. According to the ‘holy’ books the Jews passed down to my ancestors, Jews are not ‘indigenous’ to Palestine any more than would be Big Chief Horsefeather.

A few points:

1) Exodus depicts the Egyptians willingly handing over their valuables to the departing Israelites because "[God] had disposed the Egyptians favorably toward the people." Neither Deuteronomy nor Numbers has anything to say about this episode.

2) The Israelites wandered in the desert for 40 years at God's command, not because they were lost.

3) None of the books you name depict the conquest of Canaan. The conquest of Canaan is mainly covered in the book of Joshua. Numbers depicts the Israelite conquest of two Amorite territories, Heshbon and Bashan, after the king of Heshbon refused the Israelites' request to travel peacefully through his land.

4) No usable definition of "indigenous" requires a group to have occupied the land to which it is indigenous since the beginning of time. Even Big Chief Horsefeather's ancestor's migrated to North America from somewhere else at some point.

It's your right to hate Jews, but you're also Biblically illiterate, which I object to.

 

[SITHRAK!]

you're also Biblically illiterate, which I object to.

I’m far from a bible scholar. My only interest in Christianity is how it’s been warped, twisted and manipulated into a weapon that’s been used against European white people.
Take it up with whomever created this website, Martin Luther.

 

[pikachudidnothingwrong]

Crap.. RIP

We should put all pal supporters, the people who openly justify this kind of shit.. against a wall and nothing of value to society will be lost. The overlap between them and the general strain of ideological parasite sickening society is near complete 1:1.

Where are all the public MSM media and academic calls for crackdown and blame on hateful rhetoric based solely on it's support for the cause some terrorist/murderer supported? .........Crickets? Shocking!

If society don't take back higher edu and restore sanity and their mission.. Society is doomed. This kind of crap is not only enabled but supported by it's subversion.

Accelerationists, of both sides really, the ones that 'do something' at least, are the literal short bus riders of political/ideological activism. In very few cases does non mass "action" actually help your cause. Never when targeting randos and innocents. (the health insurance CEO is maybe one of the few cases where it doesn't, especially since he wasn't a rando)

 

[soy_king]

Touch grass.
View attachment 7407745
Also nice job outing yourself as a sock.

I didn't want to say it, but you've got an average of 8 posts per day for the last six years, while @Twix Eatr only has an average of a little under 3 for half a year, so he kinda has a point.

 

[Feline Supremacist]

I didn't want to say it, but you've got an average of 8 posts per day for the last six years, while @Twix Eatr only has an average of a little under 3 for half a year, so he kinda has a point.

And? I don't post every day but lots of folks post often in threads they have an interest in, it means nothing. He, on the other hand, keeps a running tally of users he fixates on going back months, maybe years. He actually wrote an extension so he could pull up his KF user scorecard. That's some extreme autism for a gossip forum, and his investment in what users post indicates he's has a history on KF that goes back farther than Jan 2025.

The only one making an issue out of it is him, tbh. And, no offense, you.

 

[soy_king]

And? I don't post every day but lots of folks post often in threads they have an interest in, it means nothing. He, on the other hand, keeps a running tally of users he fixates on going back months, maybe years. He actually wrote an extension so he could pull up his KF user scorecard. That's some extreme autism for a gossip forum, and his investment in what users post indicates he's has a history on KF that goes back farther than Jan 2025.

The only one making an issue out of it is him, tbh. And, no offense, you.

Let's just say you're both fags and leave it at that. And lol about the autism, as if that wasn't apparent simply from me being here.

 

[Twix Eatr]

It was so successfully sold that literal Jewish death squads had to rape and murder Palestinians at Tantura, Deir Yassin, Khan Younis, al-Shusha, Saliha, al-Dawayima etc.

Deir Yassin is the only one I'm decently familiar and I'd need a refresher on Khan Younish. But Deir Yassin was absolutely not a "literal Jewish death squad." And nobody said that every single Arab owner sold every tract of land to Jews. But when Arab states attacked Israel immediately after her establishment, they understandably pushed Arabs further out to expand territory in their defense. Key locations that provided a tactical advantage to future defense were necessary. That's a totally reasonable thing to do when a half-dozen countries band together in an attempt to exterminate your people.

A decent % of those displaced fled their homes willingly; some because Arab leaders told them to make way for the invading armies, promising a return once they'd wiped out the Jews. Others fled because they believed the lies told by Arab leaders of the Jews butchering and raping Arab women in their massacres. The Arab leaders believed these lies would galvanize the Arab men into defending their villages and women. Unfortunately, many who believed it simply fled. In the cases where the women and children fled, but men stayed, fighting to defend the village wasn't very successful. If there aren't women and children around, who cares about their village?

At Deir Yassin, they announced via loud speaker that those who surrendered would not be harmed. IIRC, there was an issue with the speaker not reaching enough people or something about their Jeep getting stuck. I'm hazy on it and don't have time to re-read now, but something like 200 people did surrender and all were unharmed. Those aren't the actions of an invading army intent to massacre everyone.

Civilians did die during Deir Yassin, but the reason is as predictable as one would expect if familiar with Muslim fighting strategy. They had steel doors barricading themselves inside. They shot the commander of the Irgun first, which kicked off the fighting. They put white flags on the doors to feign surrender and fired when the Irgun soldiers approached. Men were also dressed in women's clothes to feign surrender before attacking. Jews had to use dynamite to break through the doors and grenaded homes with fire coming from inside. This is what racked up civilian casualties. I blame Arabs. You may disagree.

Spoiler: A Mythical Massacre: Deir Yassin

THE BATTLE OF DEIR YASSIN

In his book The Apocalypse Code, Hanegraaff cites a battle that took place in an Arab town West of Jerusalem in 1948. He says, “Brother Andrew . . . recalls the well-known 1948 massacre of Deir Yassin in which an entire village of two hundred fifty men, women, children, and babies were brutally slaughtered by the Israeli paramilitary.”10 Hanegraaff then quotes Brother Andrew’s account as follows: “A few men were left alive and driven around to other villages to tell the story; then those men were killed too. The result was a panic. That’s why so many Palestinians fled. Entire villages were emptied, which is exactly what the Israelis wanted. They just took over those people’s homes.”11 What really happened during this battle?

Virtually nothing in the above description of the battle of Deir Yassin is correct. First of all, it was a military campaign not a massacre. Even before Israel’s declaration of national independence on May 14, 1948, Arabs were already attacking Jewish communities in the land and were blockading Jerusalem, since it was made up of primarily Jewish residents. Furthermore, six Arab nations also attacked Israel in their stated goal to drive all Jews into the Mediterranean Sea. The town of “Deir Yassin was strategically situated on a hill overlooking the main highway entering Jerusalem.”12 It has been documented that by March, 1948 that about 150 soldiers from Syria, but mainly from Iraq had taken up posts in Deir Yassin. A series of attacks on Jewish convoys to Jerusalem were launched by Arab soldiers disguised as villagers from Deir Yassin. The Arabs began to regularly shell Jewish convoys and parts of West Jerusalem from Deir Yassin. 13 It is not surprising that Jewish military leadership decided in April that year that they must take over Deir Yassin for obvious strategic reasons. Since the Israeli army was not formed until after statehood was declared, it was decided that Menachem Begin’s Irgun forces, aided by the Haganah, would attack Deir Yassin. Begin helped plan but did not take part in the battle.

As the Jews approached the village to attack it, they were led by a truck with a loudspeaker that warned civilians to flee via the rear of the village that the Jews kept open during the entire battle “and more than 200 residents left unharmed.”14 “It is unclear if the civilians had chosen to stay of their own free will, or were held hostage by Arab soldiers who thought that their presence would deter the Jewish forces.”15 If the intent was to perpetrate a massacre then no one would have been warned or allowed to leave. Before the battle, the Arab’s had fortified the houses in Deir Yassin and placed Iraqi soldiers in the houses. The homes had doors made of iron, which replaced the more common wood doors. The battle was a difficult one for the Jews lasting hours. Because the houses were fortified, the Jews had to dynamite open most of the doors, which caused a higher than expected number of casualties among the Arabs, and accounts for most of the civilians who were injured or killed.

“After the remaining Arabs feigned surrender and then fired on the Jewish troops, some Jews killed Arab soldiers and civilians indiscriminately.”16 Some of the Arab soldiers dressed up like women with the veils that covered their faces. The Jews began to search each individual they had captured to insure that they were unarmed. “One of the people being checked realized he had been caught, took out a pistol and shot the Jewish commander. His friends, crazed with anger, shot in all directions and killed the Arabs in the area.”17 “The Irgun suffered 41 casualties, including four dead.”18 Instead, of 250 as stated above, the current consensus of both Arab and Israeli investigation agree that Arab casualties were 107 killed and 12 wounded.19 “Contrary to claims from Arab propagandists at the time and some since, no evidence has ever been produced that any women were raped. On the contrary, every villager ever interviewed has denied these allegations.”

20 There is no evidence to support the notion that a few of the remaining survivors of the so-called “massacre” were taken to other Arab villages causing them to flee. Instead, those captured were taken to Jerusalem and later released.21 Initial news reports, like one in the New York Times, simply reported about the battle with no hint of a massacre. The day after the battle, “the Irgun escorted a representative of the Red Cross through the town and held a press conference.”22 There was no hint of a massacre, that myth was developed later. What came did come just a few days after the battle of Deir Yassin was an Arab ambush of “a Jewish convoy on the way to Hadassah Hospital, killing 77 Jews, including doctors, nurses, patients, and the director of the hospital. Another 23 people were injured. This massacre attracted little attention and is never mentioned by those who are quick to bring up Deir Yassin. Moreover, despite attacks such as this against the Jewish community in Palestine, in which more than 500 Jews were killed in the first four months after the partition decision alone, Jews did not flee.”23 The Jews had nowhere to go.

CONCLUSION

It is true that upon occasion there were a few Jews that committed some atrocities against Arabs during Israel’s War for Independence, which can be classified as war crimes. However, they were few and far between and were not indicative of the leadership of the new Jewish state. Peters contradicts another of Hanegraaff’s false claims when she notes: “According to a research report by the Arab-sponsored Institute for Palestine Studies in Beirut, however, ‘the majority’ of the Arab refugees in 1948 were not expelled, and ‘68%’ left without seeing an Israeli soldier.”24 While Arabs had the option of fleeing to many different Arab nations, most of the 800,000 Jewish refugees expelled from Arab nations in the late 40s had nowhere to go but Israel. I doubt Christian Zionists had much to do with such events. Maranatha!

Here are quotes from those in Deir Yassin during the purported massacre, including a fighter. The 2 other provided refutations were featured in NYT's as letters to the editor in the 70s and reference the same Arab who lived in Deir Yassin.

Spoiler

To the Editor:

In reply to Naseer Aruri's May 2 letter, it is a clear indication of Israel's exceptionally fine record in her treatment of Arabs bent on her destruction that those wishing to defame her must dig, in desperation, all the way back to 1948 and Deir Yassin to try to find some example of alleged Jewish brutality, and even this example is not valid.

Eye‐witness accounts testify that there was no massacre or gunning down of innocent civilians at Deir Yassin. According to a statement in the Jordanian daily, Al Urdun, of April 9, 1955, by Yunes Ahmad Assad, a prominent inhabitant of Deir Yassin who survived the battle, “The Jews never intended to hurt the population of the village but they were forced to do so after they met enemy fire from the population which killed the Irgun commander.”

Mr. Aruri ignores the warning broad cast by the Irgun to noncombatants of the village to withdraw from the danger zone before the fighting began, and the 200 villagers who did and remained unharmed. Mr. Aruri's “peaceful” village was heavily fortified and contained local bands, as well as Iraqi soldiers, some wearing women's garb over their army uniforms.

White flags of surrender lured the Jews to approach, and they were shot down. In the battle, soldiers and civilians died because of the common Arab tactic of keeping civilians beside soldiers to receive the bullets and grenades returned against the soldiers; witness the bases beside refugee camps and schools.

Mr. Aruri quotes Menachirn Begin, the Irgun leader. He is apparently unaware of Mr. Begin's recent statement to Louis Heren of The London Times, who drew an anology between Mylai and Deir Yassin. Mr. Begin wrote, “Mr. Heren calls Deir Yassin a Jewish Mylai. It is neither that no a Jewish Amritsar. The reason is simple. No massacre was either ordered or car ried out at Deir Yassin.”

Mr. Aruri speaks of my “Ignorance,” and he complains of “the repressive measures practiced against the occupied Arab peoples.” Apparently many Arabs living in the area are similarly ignorant Of this supposed repression. News reports have described Arab refugees in Jordan screaming that they would prefer to have Moshe Dayan rule over them than King Hussein. It is easy to understand why when we compare Israel's humanitarian treatment of Arabs to the reported brutality that Arabs repeatedly prac tice even against each other.

Finally, It is not the “dense fog of Zionist propaganda,” but my own eyes which enabled me to see in July 1967 rows of homes in the Old City with holes in the stone doorposts, mute witnesses of the Jewish me zuzahs that had been wrenched out, and the Jewish lives that had similarly vanished.

How ironic that the world accepted this behavior, and rejects Israel's humanitarianism.

Shirley Landman
Brooklyn, May 17, 1971

https://www.nytimes.com/1971/05/28/archives/alleged-brutality-in-israel.html

To the Editor:

Abdullah Bishara's “Mideast: A Can vas for Fairness” [Op‐Ed Sept. 20] rightly praises “the chivalry and gal lantry of the desert” which molded the Arabs.” But one sentence in that article cannot go unchallenged, and it had better be challenged by a gentile Christian, who looks back at twenty years' residence in the Middle East. I mean the sentence: “In no instance throughout the history of the tragedy of Palestine had the Arabs tried to emulate the terrorism thrust upon them in the Deir Yassin massacre.”

That Deir Yassin is brought up again and again by Arabs is, in my opinion, a tacit testimony in favor of Israel. It seems to be the only case available. But the case of Deir Yassin is not at all clear. It was a war action. The inhabitants were warned by loud speaker. I will simply quote one testimony of an Arab inhabitant of Deir Yassin who survived. Yunes Ahmad Assad, as published in the Jordanian daily “Al Urdun” of April 9, 1955, wrote: “The Jews never in tended to hurt the population of the village, but were forced to do so after they met enemy fire from the popula tion which killed the Irgun com mander.” The only inaccuracy of this statement is that the Irgun com mander was wounded but survived.

But before Deir Yassin the Arabs massacred forty unarmed workers at the Haifa oil refineries. The Jews of Motza and Hebron were ruthlessly massacred (among them the venerable Rabbi Zalman Sach). A convoy of 71 Jewish doctors and nurses, a convoy clearly marked with the medical insignia, was ambushed by Arabs on its way to the Hadassah Hospital on Mount Scopus and all of its unarmed personnel were senselessly murdered.

Other instances could be found. But I want to be brief. May this therefore suffice.

(Abbot) LEO A. RUDLOFF
Wetson, Vt, Sept. 21, 1972

https://www.nytimes.com/1972/10/09/archives/two-views-of-mideast-terror.html

“There were no rapes. It’s all lies. There were no pregnant women split open. It was propaganda that Arabs put out so Arab armies would invade. They ended up expelling people from all of Palestine on the rumor of Deir Yassin” - Muhamed Radwan, Deir Yassin survivor and fighter.

Another refugee told the Jordanian daily a-Difaa on September 6, 1954: "The Arab governments told us, 'Get out so that we can get in.' So we got out, but they did not get in." - Yunes Ahmed Assad, refugee, formerly of Deir Yassin, 4/9/1953 in the Jordanian daily al-Urdun

Note: I think 4/9/55 is the correct date of that quote since two separate LTTE above that use quotes from him cite it, but I'm going to leave the sourced quote above with it's in tact text of 4/9/1953.

"For the flight and fall of the other villages, it is our leaders who are responsible, because of the dissemination of rumors exaggerating Jewish crimes and describing them as atrocities in order to inflame the Arabs... they instilled fear and terror into the hearts of the Arabs of Palestine until they fled, leaving their homes and property to the enemy."

This isn't specific to Deir Yassin, but the overall attitude among many. Their flight due to their fear from these invented claims doesn't account for the majority of the expulsions, but definitely a decent amount. You can find quotes from Arabs supporting this reality throughout the time period, too.

And? I don't post every day but lots of folks post often in threads they have an interest in, it means nothing. He, on the other hand, keeps a running tally of users he fixates on going back months, maybe years. He actually wrote an extension so he could pull up his KF user scorecard. That's some extreme autism for a gossip forum, and his investment in what users post indicates he's has a history on KF that goes back farther than Jan 2025.

The only one making an issue out of it is him, tbh. And, no offense, you.

"And? So what if I post constantly on here for years and years all day and am actually a total dweeb. It's him who REALLY needs to touch grass, not me! LOTS OF PEOPLE POST ON HERE ALL DAY IN THREADS THEY FIND INTERESTNG! He wrote a script that rearranges his existing reaction scores! That's what separates us! YOU'VE GOTTA SEE THAT!"

God, why are all of you such fucking imbeciles? For a board of racists, I honestly expected more intelligence and reasonable arguments. Maybe that's the difference between people fatigued with blacks; they'll have statistics at the ready that validate why they're fatigued.

This thread has me dealing with conspiracy-minded autistic retards who not only blame every issue on Jews (without evidence), but also accuse everyone online of being a Jew (without evidence). Given that you're inventing multiple fantasies about something you can literally go back a few pages and read yourself, I probably shouldn't expect any higher thought out of you.

The "issue" I'm making out of this is simply calling you retards out for being retarded. None of what you said is true. I'm sorry for whatever Jewish space laser zapped your brain into the cue ball smoothness it currently has, but it wasn't me (or my totally bitchin' Chrome extension that doesn't do anything you're suggesting).

I have notes on people "going back years" because I've read old threads years after they happened, genius. That doesn't mean I read them when they were made, ffs. I was curious what KF's takes were on notable events as it serves as an archive for shit you won't find on MSM. Hilariously, I had 2 notes on you that weren't showing until just now (had old version running by accident).

Correctly, I noted that you were a moronic anti-Semite with extremely poor logic. They were your posts in a thread after 10/7 and on the Citibike Karen. This isn't me holding a grudge. This is my only account here. You're just some dumbass, dude, not an enemy. Had I had these notes, I could've just handed you a ball to keep you busy.

We're all posting on an internet forum (and currently arguing). I assure you, I don't give a fuck if you think me building useful extensions to make my browsing easier is nerdy, autistic, or stupid. Touch grass or don't, little tard. I don't care! Mazel tov!

 

[Sportsball]

Just call them palestinians and other arabs. Now that natives are kicked out state imported street shitters.

View attachment 7404620
Once again, I've never seen a jew work.

Dear god, they're really replacing Palestinian workers with Jeets?

This is almost like a win for Hamas. The Jeets will grope and harass every Israeli woman in sight (they already do that on Twitter). I really hope they think this through.

 

[Dawdler]

Dear god, they're really replacing Palestinian workers with Jeets?

This is almost like a win for Hamas. The Jeets will grope and harass every Israeli woman in sight (they already do that on Twitter). I really hope they think this through.

Every jewish queen deserves a paheet king

 

[Super-Chevy454]

There some comments dropped about the shooter manifesto who might be worth to read.

https://www.unz.com/kbarrett/the-israel-embassy-shooter-manifesto/

https://archive.ph/Q1Tfx

And the guys of American Thinker did a rant about the victims and the killer as well.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/05/the_dc_murders_we_re_on_our_own.html

https://ghostarchive.org/archive/rvA0F

https://archive.ph/HxYn7

May 24, 2025

The DC murders: we're on our own​

By Mike McDaniel

May 21, 2025, outside the Capital Jewish Museum in Washington, DC. Yaron Lischinsky, 30 and Sarah Lynn Milgrim, 26 were brutally murdered. They were soon to be engaged and were employees of the Israeli Embassy in DC. Elias Rodriguez shot them both and they collapsed. Badly wounded, Sarah tried to crawl away. Rodriguez approached and standing over them, fired multiple rounds into their backs, killing them. The probable cause affidavit indicates Rodriquez fired 21 9mm rounds and may have reloaded at least once...

...That both crimes took place in anti-liberty/gun, blue cities is hardly a coincidence. It’s no coincidence there was one present to stop the killers, no one present to intervene to save lives. In both places, most honest citizens are disarmed, and even if they were armed, they’d reasonably believe they’d be likely to be arrested and imprisoned for saving the lives of innocents. This would be even more likely today in NYC. Genovese’s killer was black and was sentenced to death. Today, he might be released on his own recognizance and disappear. The DC killer is apparently a terrorist and/or terrorist supporter. In today’s Democrat political climate, he’s a hero.

 

[The Ultimate Ramotith]

Since Elías i simping Hamas o wholeheartedly, then I hope that he becomes Hamas' rape slave.

 

[Hunter Hearst Helmsley]

Dear god, they're really replacing Palestinian workers with Jeets?

This is almost like a win for Hamas. The Jeets will grope and harass every Israeli woman in sight (they already do that on Twitter). I really hope they think this through.

They may grope on the bus but they are a bit less likely to blow the bus up with them in it.