US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Africa is shit because of the Africans and it's self-evident if you're not working backwards from some vague notion of tabula-rasa style humanist egalitarianism.

Colonization, famine, whatever did not produce the rape statistics in sub-saharan African nations.
The day I learned that, as far as we know, within the known universe the single most rare thing is wood I realized ALL of our petty squabbles and differences are just nil.

We all breathe the same air, drink the same water, live on the same planet. Its not an option we HAVE to do everything we can to help ALL humans cause we are special in this bitch and clearly meant for more than making craters on our incomprehensibly perfect planet that sits just far enough from our sun to give us liquid water but just close enough to not cook us alive. WE CANT EVEN FIND AMEBAS IN THE VAST STRETCHES OF THE COSMOS BUT THERE IS 14 BILLION OF THEM IN YOUR OLD TACO BELL CUP (mom said to throw that out days ago btw)

The issues your describing are real and not made up but are we so bitchmade we arent up to the challenge of fixing it? I grew up learning about a country that kept an entire CITY alive via C-47 airlifts, a feat though IMPOSSIBLE by all the contemporary greatest minds of the time. BTW I HIGHLY reccomend you dig into this topic (Berlin Airlift) if you have time, its seriously up there with the WW1 Christmas truce as one of the single greatest moments in mankinds history.

Actually fuck it, you know what, we will do it live, sit tight kid im about to give ya The Bullet Points!

>Is June 1948
>Germany look like this
>1748113289323.webp
>Notice how its split down middle but the capitol is also split between the powers despite being entirely within soviet zone
>Berlin looks like this
1748157753531.webp
>Currency issue (both sides issue their own currency, fucks everything up im VASTLY OVERSIMPLIFYING)
>Stalin blocks roads into West Berlin (reference maps, allied supply convoys needed to make daily trips in to deliver food and fuel cause berlin was bombed tf out)
>100 miles from the allied zone, 36 days of food left, 45 days of coal. Allied troops are surrounded and outnumbered 62-1
>3 Options in from of Truman
> 1. American forces could withdraw but that would signal western democracys are unable to counter soviet aggression
>2. Stay in Berlin until the starving populace forces them out and accepts Soviet rule out of desperation
>3. Send an armed convoy (on the ground, think armored column with supply trucks in center) to open roads, almost guaranteed world war
>Trumans cabinet universally recommends withdrawl
>He famously says (with big brass balls) "We stay in Berlin period!"
>Cant "block" a transport plane, lets do it by air!
>All American generals think this is crazy impossible
>4,000 tons of food and fuel a day is needed MINIMUM to stop city from collapse
>This translates to 1,300 flights a DAY, every hour more than 50 planes needed to unload its cargo
>Royal air force though its possible, just spent 5 years surviving on half a old loaf of bread
>Under pressure from Truman US generals agreed to try
>First flight begin June 26th
>Soviets threaten to shoot down the planes but thats and act of war, we call their bluff
>Anit aircraft guns stay silent
>Pog, but not enough crew or air planes, pulling air wings from as far as Guam
>Still not enough, 2 weeks in only delivering 1,000 tons a day, a quarter of whats needed
>Sant overstate how perilous this all was
>Single old airport, Tempelhof, WAS A GRASS FIELD that needed patching between landings
>Apartment building blocked the main landing corridor, when coming in your wheels were 17ft from buildings
>BTW they are transporting coal and flower dust, both of which are highly explosive
>Despite shortfalls in delivery the story of this caused morale to soar in Europe
>War time grudges were set aside as blitz survivors in London send care packages to the beleaguered city
>RAF mechanics dident even wait to be called up, en masse they hitched flights in to repair the planes of a city 3 years ago they were bombing
>Germans who used to be hostile to allied pilots who had leveled their citys began to offer free beer as thanks to resting pilots
>Despite all this the chaotic operation wasent meeting quota
>Pentagon fucking ults and casts General William Tuner, a taciturn man who loved him some charts (1000% autistic)
>Under his watch planes took off in PRECISE 3 min intervals 24/7
>Flights would stack in 5 different altitudes in a column formation
>Each plane was unloaded in 30 mins or less
>Brilliant fucker hired German mechanics and just had the manuals translated to German rather than try and teach them english
>His shakeup works on august 4th the airlift hits it goal for the first time, 4,500 tons
>Amid this joy Tuner finds out one pilot is making unauthorized cargo drops
>Pilot Gale Halverson was dropping small handkerchiefs of candy and sweets with an accompanying parachute to the german kids who would gather at the gate of the airport to watch the planes come in
>In a shine of brilliance you dont often see anymore he orders the "candy drops" expanded to ALL pilots and sends Gale Halverson on a press tour back home to show the public what the might of America can be when wielded diplomatically rather than violently
>PR victory was needed because winter was coming, its what the soviets have been stalling for
>It was not a gentle winter either
>Fog was so think there are many, many reports of people working at the airport being forced to crawl lest they be struck by and unseen prop
>Aircraft landed in 0 viability with iced up engines
>They collided midair
>They smashed into mountain ranges
>Exhausted pilots fell asleep at the stick multiple times
>Meteorologists circling high above in b-29s alerted ground control of 15 minute breaks in the weather that would allow flights to get through
>Somehow, they did
>On New Years Eve 1948 Allied forces delivered over 6,000 tons of food and fuel, a new record!
>Stalins strategy had backfired
>Rather than prevent a West German State, he had fueled it
>Far from revealing allied weaknesses, he had allowed them to take the moral high ground
>Demonstrating their commitment and turning Germans from an occupied people into comrades
>The soviets had been outmaneuvered
>On the morning of May 12th 1949 the first roadblocks were removed and American supply convoys once again moved freely into Berlin, that road would never be closed again
>In 15 months of operation the airlift delivered over 2.4 MILLION TONS of food and fuel, saving Berlin from famine
>79 Allied Pilots and aircrew lost their life and the world would never be the same
>Stalin's willingness to starve civilians marked a turning point and united Europe together, convinced such a threat must be checked
>1 month before the end of the Airlift, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization was formerly signed into being
>1 month AFTER the airlift West Berlin became a independent nation followed by East Berlin
>Europe was split in half
>2 months after that the Soviets test the first atomic bomb
>This marked the beginning of a new kind of war
>One of political influence, fought by great powers over proxy states
>A war of threat and restraint
>One where governments see JUST how far they can push each other without starting a full scale conflict




1748158129519.webp

>
 
Last edited:
IMG_3701.webp
IMG_3702.webp
IMG_3703.webp
IMG_3704.webp
I just discovered that certain American gambling companies have made a business out of “real life” betting categories. I wonder if eventually there might be legislation to mitigate the obvious conflict of interest bound to arise here with politicians. Sports betting on its face has a built in limitation. In the absence of full on match fixing, nobody truly knows how a game is going to go. While some autists are REALLY good at predicting that kind of thing, that is because they’re very skilled, not because they have some hidden knowledge (again, we assume the absence of match fixing). But politics betting is different because to some extent there are people who unambiguously know how things are going.

I would like to propose a hypothetical scenario here. Let’s say there’s a disarmament negotiation going on with Iran, and the betting market gets really hot. Now let’s say a diplomat just witnessed a private negotiation that was absolutely and utterly botched, to the extent that he can be sure that the deal won’t happen. So he tells his wife’s relative to take out a big loan to bet against the deal. Has he broken the law? How on earth would he be punished for this if he got caught?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3700.webp
    IMG_3700.webp
    66.6 KB · Views: 9
Star Trek is set in a post-war post-scarcity society and you know what the prime directive is ? Do not interfere.

Yes that's right, the woke space hippie show tells you don't fucking interfere in a planet's interior conflicts or "uplift" civilizations

The last 30 years have been neoconservative -- ex leftists, mostly jews (at this point is there anyone who thinks it's not just Israel laundering its foreign policy?) who want wars in the middle to "set up democracy" and humanitarian interventionists like Samantha Power, Hillary, Susan Rice, who got us Syria, Libya and more dogshit wars from the "left-center"

Star Trek is very not woke in that interfering with a society that doesn't ask for your help is heavily discouraged, almost a taboo.
Another point towards the "TNG/Berman Era Trek Was Not Woke" argument is in the first episode "Encounter At Farpoint."

When Q first puts them on trial, Picard mentions some UN law or something from Earth's past which made it illegal to hold people responsible for the crimes of their ancestors.

This would not sit well with the white guilt and reparations crowd. Woke liberals firmly believe you should be held liable for the crimes of your parents, grandparents, etc. That's why they support the ill treatment of a 30-40 year old white South African farmer who was a child or not even born during Apartheid, for example.
 
As an aside, I love posting that song and referring to it as a goof, but I've been listening to jazz more and more over the last decade. Recently I was on a long drive and thought after mocking him so much, I could give him a shot, maybe he's actually a good underground artist. I mean, that song does unironically slap...

I couldn't get through more than a few songs on the album. He is so viruently anti-White and just 100% All Black Power, All The Time. I mean, he had talent, but his stuff was just clearly and definitively Not Made For Me. I can watch Kung fu movies and Blaxploitation flicks that are so bad I ironically like them. Others are legit well done and even though the culture they depict is alien to me and they aren't made for me, I can unironically like them, like the Poitier/Cosby Uptown Saturday Night trilogy or Willie Dynamite.

But Gil Scott Heron...that dude just seethingly hates wypipo.
He is no longer alive - succumbed to drug complications in 2011. I loved his "The Revolution Will Not be Televised".
 
Today is the 5th anniversary of that little moment George Floyd and Derek Chauvin shared together.
I am seeing a lot of headlines and articles commemorating saint Floyd, even an entire piece trying to paint him as a gentle giant with a big heart, I'm shocked they haven't tried memory holing him since it feels its common knowledge now that Floyd ODed when he ate his stash and a sizeable amount of people know he was a delinquent thug, county for coke dealing a few times and armed robbery.
My god they really do need him to be a saint to stand for white guilt
 
Why is this even a thing? Are state judges taught they have unlimited power beyond their hobby of releasing dangerous criminals, to challenge the President? Do they not receive education about knowing their place? There's already so much corruption among judges, what even happened that gave them such hubris?
It's been my assertion for a while now that most people can't handle the level of power judges have.

Once you can order people to die, serve life in prison, have all their property seized, ect you eventually go mad with power or ego and start thinking you're a God.

I don't know how to fix this either.
 
Why is this even a thing? Are state judges taught they have unlimited power beyond their hobby of releasing dangerous criminals, to challenge the President? Do they not receive education about knowing their place? There's already so much corruption among judges, what even happened that gave them such hubris?
Judges have always been this way. You can go into any court room the last 100 years and see judges power trip on ordinary people. They view themselves as high priests to the God that is the Law/Government. They determine Gods will based on their interpretation of the scripture. No matter how black and white something like "shall not be infringed" is.

Its just past Judges knew their power was more theoretical than real and not to press their luck against people with real power. Too many generations of lawyers drinking their own piss and being run by Jewish legalistic perspective that says you can pwn God himself and we are here.

Now you have Judges who are proclaiming they are the rulers. Not the people. Trump is collecting political examples to buck break the courts is what it seems like to me. The Supreme Court knows this. They overall want to shut that down, but Roberts knows if he goes too mask off the Rinos he will have to run too when Trump goes Jackson will shrug. Hence this bipolar behavior from the Supremes.
 
Last edited:
>The US Defense Department promoted Kingsley Wilson to chief Pentagon spokesperson, a decision that has intensified controversy given her history of promoting antisemitic and racist content on social media platforms.

>The promotion has generated fierce opposition from legislators across party lines and prominent Jewish advocacy groups, who point to Wilson's documented pattern of spreading antisemitic conspiracy theories through her social media accounts.

>Wilson has repeatedly targeted the Anti-Defamation League for sharing the historical account of its establishment, which followed the lynching of Leo Frank, an American Jewish man, in the early 1900s. In her posts, Wilson claimed that "Leo Frank raped and murdered a 13-year-old girl" – perpetuating a debunked conspiracy theory that persists today despite overwhelming historical evidence that Frank was falsely convicted and killed due to antisemitic sentiment. Wilson further wrote that "He also tried to frame a black man for his crime. The ADL is despicable." These inflammatory posts remain visible on her social media accounts.
image_2025-05-25_141700869.webp
You realize this is a testing time for the Jewish community, right? Considering what just happened in D.C. do you think it appropriate to promote a foid /pol/ack to a public facing role representing the Pentagon? You think this is funny? You better watch your ass burgers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
View attachment 7409066
You know libs are getting desperate when they whip out the "You only care because you're a virgin" argument.
That's nothing new. "Incel" has always been the insult of choice for women and especially liberal women.

Elon gets called an incel 10,000 times a day despite having more legitimate and illegitimate children than a Detroit rapper.
 
A interesting question i've always had was how far left (or right) could human society reasonably tolerate for a long period of time before everything falls apart (by that, I mean "We're not going to enter a nuclear wasteland/Start WW3")

My personal theory says Social Democrats, is the farthest left one a society could go without devolving into anarchy/war, while I'd say a bukele style US government could be the farthest right.
How did people live their lives just fine under feudal monarchies for centuries? That's more to the right than a Bukele-style government, isn't it? I know some people have said before that left-wing and right-wing are meaningless terms, but I'm starting to realize that the concept of centrism is just as meaningless, perhaps even more so because it depends on an idea of "social/political progress" that doesn't exist in reality.
 
Last edited:
we simply cannot go without sperging about race
There's ten people in a room, all armed.

Nine of them remain standing with their guns drawn from the start, but one man decided to put his gun down.

He did this hoping the other nine would come to reason.

They didn't.

What do you think this tenth man's most rational action to take from here, is?
 
How did people get along just fine under feudal monarchies for centuries? That's more to the right than a Bukele-style government, isn't it? I know some people have said before that left-wing and right-wing are meaningless terms, but I'm starting to realize that the concept of centrism is just as meaningless, perhaps even more so because it depends on an idea of "social/political progress" that doesn't exist in reality.
People didn't get along. There was less fuckery for two reasons.

1 - Most pre modern societies were racially homogeneous. Diverse one's collapsed and didn't have USAID to artificially keep them afloat.

2 - In most pre modern nations virtually all crimes were punished by execution. In Victorian London for example even pickpockets and vagrants were hanged.
 
Vance calls out the reproducibility crisis:
View attachment 7407707
Source (Archive)
If I'm not ninja'd (which is admittedly likely based on how much later I'm reading this) iirc the reproducibility crisis is actually due to not as much funding and grants given to scientists to reproduce an experiment, since it's not as glamorous as being the one to make the groundbreaking experiment. This can also be a result of not as many scientists wanting to do the non-glamorous work of reproducing an experiment, resulting in a chicken-egg scenario. So there are a fair amount of experiments that are unlikely to attempt to be reproduced to verify results, due to the slight stigma attached.

Of course, I could be thinking of the wrong reproducibility crisis, this is just the one that I know of and am fairly familiar with. My knowledge is from 5 years ago though so things might have changed since then.
 
Back