Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.7%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 27.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 16.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 124 36.8%

  • Total voters
    337
Remember he had a kill list in Highschool. He talked about that. @AnOminous or @Himedall All-seeing Waifu know what I am talking about. He 1000% wishes he could pay someone to kill people for him.

Fucking deranged AIDS zombie.

it is in the OP. Also, it is odd that his legal arguments are becoming Greer-esque given that Russ ALSO had a kill-list.

His own Twitter didn't show up until the second page of Brave's search lol

But I am sure his e-daddy Dick Masterson (a.k.a. Juju the cow, the man who likes getting pegged in the arse while dressed as a cow) can fix that SEO right up!

I'm sure Nick thinks he is shadow banned on Locals as well. Which is why the wine mom cabal isn't around anymore and his chat is dead.

No, he blames the platform for not implementing the 'block' feature fast enough. His 'fans' were unable to deal with people signing up to troll and the public nature of the chat where they posted their lewds.

Is there an actuall trophy that gets sent to the winner of lolcow of the year? I am thinking no but would be hilarious if there was.

Before posting, do you ask yourself, 'Is this something that contributes to the topic? Is it relevant to the thread? Is this something a retard would post? Does this sound like a something I would start writing in the place that starts with "Dear diary..."?'

If the answer to the first 2 are 'no' or the answer to the last 2 is 'yes', then do not post. This is not your fucking blog. This is not a chat room to ask inane questions.

(it's also, more annoyingly, how we got a number of pages discussing proper water treatment)

Do not judge the 'tisms! Some like trains, others butter dishes, and still more tripods!


Keeping those new faces might be easier if they weren't chastised for not knowing how to archive posts or how to embed video or etc. Or chastise them and then explain how to do it. Otherwise you're just being a Delta Charlie. Is there even an FAQ somewhere that explains these things? I very rarely leave this board unless I'm unceremoniously booted out.

It is literally in the thread. Someone else gave you a screenshot. People need to learn the culture and assimilate or else bugger off.

Probation violation isn't a criminal charge that needs to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt unless it's filed as a separate charge (it is usually itself a crime to violate probation although jurisdictions vary on how they go about it).

Apparently, under the terms of his current probation, they can just decline to defer adjudication on the 28 days in jail he still owes and throw him in jail for any reason or no reason. They "may" defer.

After this early period, he still has the remainder of the five years of probation. Probation revocation is by a preponderance of the evidence, that is, more likely than not, the offender broke the terms of probation.

(To prove probation violation as an actual crime, of course, does require beyond a reasonable doubt, and I believe there may be some things that need what is called "clear and convincing," that is, more than a mere preponderance, that is, a 51% possibility, but less than beyond a reasonable doubt.

Generally, though, it's a preponderance like in a civil case which is why if you're on probation you'd best be a goddamn choirboy.)

In this case, in Minnesota, they don't need a general rule. Possessing inhalants with intent to use them is explicitly a crime under statute. Nick is a criminal

I am sure that Barnes would come up with some bullshite legal theory for Randazza to argue. It could be entertaining AND educational!

I’ve subscribed to this theory for a long time, a few years at least. Nick accidentally shared that whenever he hears the band, Metallica, it “reminds him of sucking dick in high school.” Those were his words, he phrased it that way almost verbatim. There’s a possibility that he simply misspoke, it’s known that Nick isn’t as deft with words as he likes to pretend. If someone really wanted to dig for the exact moment, it’s from the stream where he talks about music he liked from the 90’s etc, & talks about liking Metallica. And how it reminds him of sucking dick in high school. Nick probably fancied himself as gay or bi up through part of college. I’ve never yet met a straight guy that would go around publically saying he’s gay, for a long duration like Nick claims he did. There’s definitely more to the story, like a history of sucking dicks while listening to Metallica in high school.

I use filmot.com as a great tool to search YouTube transcripts, but I was unable to find a video with 'Metallica' and 'suck' in it that matched the description. You are welcome to search more, but there is a lot of lost Twitch media that might contain it.
 
Null should watermark it with the rainbow nick screaming
balldocaust.gif
balldocaust.gif
balldocaust.gif
balldocaust.gif
balldocaust.gif
 
It still blows my mind that April walks around Minnesota looking like a street-walking whore. These still photos can’t convey how out of place she must look. And how embarrassing for the kids to be seen with her.
What kids? She's not around anyone's kids now (afawk).

I've got no sympathy. April could see what she was getting into. She knew Nick was a married man with five kids. She assumed her less ruined body would win over familial ties. Her gamble didn't pay off.

Boo hoo hoo. Cry me a river.
Yes, she was stupid and dumb, and at a point* got greedy. But she didn't manufacture the fantasy on her own. And the man she stupidly hooked onto and foolishly believed in did not give one shit about her. Or his wife, except in the "habit" & "feature of his life" sense.

*recall that this all started with both Nick's and Kayla's consent. April was out of her depth and failed to comprehend the difference between "love" and family structure.
 
My understanding is that Null wants to attract new users and grow the site. He should do with the footage whatever will help to achieve that goal. I would think (hope) he is not focused on pissing people off at the expense of maximum benefit for the site. Strategic thinking is what’s needed here, not pettiness.
 
My understanding is that Null wants to attract new users and grow the site. He should do with the footage whatever will help to achieve that goal. I would think (hope) he is not focused on pissing people off at the expense of maximum benefit for the site. Strategic thinking is what’s needed here, not pettiness.
This site kind of exists to piss people off.
 
My understanding is that Null wants to attract new users and grow the site. He should do with the footage whatever will help to achieve that goal. I would think (hope) he is not focused on pissing people off at the expense of maximum benefit for the site. Strategic thinking is what’s needed here, not pettiness.
If people aren't crediting the site, then nothing is gained. If the initial burst of videos are only done by people brave enough to have a Kiwi logo on their video, then potential new site users will see the logo to know which site to go to. After that, release it into the wild for maximum hilarity.
 
My understanding is that Null wants to attract new users and grow the site. He should do with the footage whatever will help to achieve that goal. I would think (hope) he is not focused on pissing people off at the expense of maximum benefit for the site. Strategic thinking is what’s needed here, not pettiness.
Watermark it with a url like "for more visit rekietafoota.ge" or something and have it redirect to the page on this thread that has the footage on it

That way people are tricked into coming here and forced to watch it here
 
Last edited:
It doesn't matter how young or old you are. You never, ever, ever forget the trauma of finding your parent's corpse.
I got a call one night to hear my dad had died suddenly. When I got there mom asked if I wanted to go see him in the ambulance. I didn't have the strength for it and I don't think I would have gained anything by it. This way I get to remember him as the man he was. Probably part of why I see him in my dreams more often than the rest of the family.

Nick alive probably gives his kids fucking nightmares. I hope a wendigo skinwalks as a skinny crackwhore on the roadside the one night Nick is driving without his KEEEEEDZ, luring Nick out of the rustang and into the woods never to be seen again.
 
Last edited:
If you get between him and the object of his desire (cocaine, whisky, Minnesota mid-pussy, Aaron’s cum, Molly, or nitrous) then he’ll go nuts.

Yeah it's really strange and weird that Nick Rekieta keeps talking about Aaron's cum and the fact that he even tasted Aaron's cum.

Weird thing to willingly share Nick, that you imbibed Aaron's cum... and also... it's pretty gay.
 
F. Scott Fitzgerald had Nick dead to rights in The Great Gatsby:

“They were careless people, Tom and Daisy- they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made.”"

He destroys his house, his kids, his girlfriend, his car , Vic's case . . . and then back to the vast carelessness that unites him with his useless wife.
At least Tom and Daisy had the sense to keep that shit out of their actual home.
 
Yes, but I’d rather Null watermark it so the farms gets credit than have EWU and over other YouTube channel profiting off of the fruits of our collective labor and our collective crowdfunding.

You know the county isn't just going to release a single copy to a single person right? EWU has already requested it long ago, we saw that in the emails. If the county releases it, they will get their own copy.
 
Imagine being Nick, a seething cuck. Look how pissed off he is in every facial expression he has. He's so goddamn angry. It's hilarious. He literally can't not be in an incredible state of rage with every face he makes. He's so obviously pissed. It's awesome. It's impossible not to laugh your ass off at how angry he is.
It's pretty funny how gay and feminine he gets when he's raging it kind of reminds me of this old Mad TV sketch

 
Back