Casey Morris Hoerth / Len Gilbert / DissidentFurs.com / The Furred Reich / AltFurryDiscord / Telikonol / FurRightDiscord - Author of furry erotica involving Nazi war criminals (DOX INSIDE), pedo-zoo enabler

I've said it before and I'll say it again: Hitler was a furry or at the very least, a wolfaboo.

Obsessed with wolves and dogs. Called himself Herr Wolf when using a pseudonym. Was a failed artist who most likely would be doing commissions online if such a thing existed back then. (DeviantArt and Furaffinity could have stopped WWII.).

His biggest regret was probably killing himself before Disney's Robin Hood was made.

He probably would have been had he animation been around when he was a kid. Hitler would have only been into straight up wolf/dog beastiality given when he grew up, if his fixation went that far and given all the weird shit that swirls around Hitler's sex life (fucking his underage cousin as a 40 year old man, rumors of making money as a male prostitute while in art school, etc..) it isn't out of the question.

Fetishes tend to occur thanks to exposure to images/scenarios/events at a key time during childhood, usually ages 4-7. Before the TV age the common fetishes were shoe/feet, spanking, S&M, beastality, piss/shit, etc... which makes sense given kids usually see a lot of adults feet because they play on the floor, get spanked, raised around farm animals, etc...

But now that you have children spending hours with the wide world of TV, movies, animation and special effects, it creates an endless and terrifying opportunities for untold number of bizarre fetishes in the modern era. I was reading a "inflation" fetishist forum years ago, and to a tee, they all said the start of their fixation was seeing Violet Beauregarde blueberry scene in Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory as kids. All the "furry" shit had it's initial creation in the late 1970's, which matches up perfectly with the kids of the 1950's being raised on cartoons and fursuited characters on TV. Or look at the pokemon fetish shit which is very specific to a certain age range, just like old school Ninetendo shit is.

It really terrifies me to think what I should or shouldn't let my future child watch or be exposed to during that age in fear it will foster some disgusting, weird fetish in them years down the road. But then again I watched tons of cartoons and didn't become attracted to cartoon characters and not letting kids watch at least some cartoons or play video games seems pretty close to out and out child abuse nowadays.
 
You know what they always say, "Go too far down the rabbit hole, and you'll find the guys who want inside the rabbit's hole."
I'm pretty sure this is where our little tierfruend is going to end up:

http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/rabbits-case-gets-stranger-still/2005/11/24/1132703316795.html

The Herald understands it was because prosecutors are unable to prove he used his penis to penetrate the rabbits, a requirement of that charge.
 
Just to remind people. Most of his artwork is actually comissioned. There are some attempted artwork that he DID make but otherwise he is quite subpar.

Thats right. Hes burning money on a furry nazi story.

Just like Hitler he is trying to mimic the disney style and is failing. Miserably.

He's trying to sell it for money, so he's hoping to make back the investment. Unfortunately for him, the demand for neo Nazi furry porn isn't as big as he thinks.

I'm almost shocked that Lingrimm would even draw nazi stuff. Good catch, I didn't even notice it was their art.

Is this Lingrimm someone of actual notability, then?

He probably would have been had he animation been around when he was a kid. Hitler would have only been into straight up wolf/dog beastiality given when he grew up, if his fixation went that far and given all the weird shit that swirls around Hitler's sex life (fucking his underage cousin as a 40 year old man, rumors of making money as a male prostitute while in art school, etc..) it isn't out of the question.

Fetishes tend to occur thanks to exposure to images/scenarios/events at a key time during childhood, usually ages 4-7. Before the TV age the common fetishes were shoe/feet, spanking, S&M, beastality, piss/shit, etc... which makes sense given kids usually see a lot of adults feet because they play on the floor, get spanked, raised around farm animals, etc...

But now that you have children spending hours with the wide world of TV, movies, animation and special effects, it creates an endless and terrifying opportunities for untold number of bizarre fetishes in the modern era. I was reading a "inflation" fetishist forum years ago, and to a tee, they all said the start of their fixation was seeing Violet Beauregarde blueberry scene in Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory as kids. All the "furry" shit had it's initial creation in the late 1970's, which matches up perfectly with the kids of the 1950's being raised on cartoons and fursuited characters on TV. Or look at the pokemon fetish shit which is very specific to a certain age range, just like old school Ninetendo shit is.

It really terrifies me to think what I should or shouldn't let my future child watch or be exposed to during that age in fear it will foster some disgusting, weird fetish in them years down the road. But then again I watched tons of cartoons and didn't become attracted to cartoon characters and not letting kids watch at least some cartoons or play video games seems pretty close to out and out child abuse nowadays.

I don't think fetishes have got any worse since TV. From Wikipedia's article on the serial killer Albert Fish:

Wikipedia said:

He rammed needles into his crotch, raped children, and ate his own piss and shit.
 
I don't think fetishes have got any worse since TV. From Wikipedia's article on the serial killer Albert Fish:

He rammed needles into his crotch, raped children, and ate his own piss and shit.

I've read two books on Fish and know plenty about the sick fuck, but murder/serial killer shit is a entirely different subject from fantasy fetishes. There's a vast gulf between sexual fetish/fantasy stuff and actually going out and raping/murdering people to get sexual pleasure. (But Fish's sexual pleasure derived from harm and pain was that was rooted in his abuse in an orphanage from the ages of 4-8 where he was regularly beat, punished, tortured and brutally raped by other boys and staff.)

There are millions of fetishists in the world and very few of them are ever driven to become serial killers/rapists due to a specific fetish. Fetishists can be disturbing, gross or funny, but rarely are they violent or dangerous because of a fetish.
 
Last edited:
I've read two books on Fish and know plenty about the sick fuck, but murder/serial killer shit is a entirely different subject from fantasy fetishes. There's a vast gulf between sexual fetish/fantasy stuff and actually going out and raping/murdering people to get sexual pleasure. (But Fish's sexual pleasure derived from harm and pain was that was rooted in his abuse in an orphanage from the ages of 4-8 where he was regularly beat, punished, tortured and brutally raped by other boys and staff.)

There are millions of fetishists in the world and very few of them are ever driven to become serial killers/rapists due to a specific fetish. Fetishists can be disturbing, gross or funny, but rarely are they violent or dangerous because of a fetish.

Most fetishes aren't dangerous. Feet, bondage, watersports, scat, and even furry yiffing and age play can be done consensually. I think the proportion of offenders increases massively if you focus on innately abusive acts like cannibalism/vorarephilia, rape, and bestiality, though many will still restrain their impulses.

Obviously they can't help having the impulses that they have, but the few that do offend wouldn't do the things they do without said impulses.
 
Last edited:
Most fetishes aren't dangerous. Feet, bondage, watersports, scat, and even furry yiffing and age play can be done consensually. I think the proportion of offenders increases massively if you focus on innately abusive acts like cannibalism/vorarephilia, rape, and bestiality, though many will still restrain their impulses.

Obviously they can't help having the impulses that they have, but the few that do offend wouldn't do the things they do without said impulses.
Should of started this with "I'd like to preface this..."

Also lmao all those fetishes are sick and potentinally dangerous
 
He's trying to sell it for money, so he's hoping to make back the investment. Unfortunately for him, the demand for neo Nazi furry porn isn't as big as he thinks.

I'll bet it has more readers than you might think. The book is enrolled in Kindle Unlimited, Amazon's subscription service, and though the book is a bit extreme even by that standard, there's a LOT of weird stuff in the program, shit that once upon a time would have only found an outlet at places like Literotica. But in KU you get paid. Not much, but I guess that's better than nothing.

Which is also interesting, in the sense that Amazon demands tax information before you're allowed to participate. Meaning Gilbert had to give them his real name, address, telephone number and social security number (probably, though I guess there's a slight chance he set up an LLC or corporation to hold the book and to receive 1099 forms, if needed). I'm sure the information is locked down so that no haxor king will ever get at it, but the SJW infestation at Amazon is pretty bad (iirc Izzy Galvez works there), so he's potentially vulnerable to exposure from some blue-hair too stupid to realize the consequences of getting caught for such exposure.

There's also the issue of "click-farm" abuse in Kindle Unlimited. Apparently otherwise innocent authors are now getting sucked into it, and getting banned for life from Amazon. Dunno if anyone has ever used something like this to deliberately target an author, but it kind of looks like with the right connections and $200 you could get a lesser known author kicked off of Amazon forever.
 
I'll bet it has more readers than you might think. The book is enrolled in Kindle Unlimited, Amazon's subscription service, and though the book is a bit extreme even by that standard, there's a LOT of weird stuff in the program, shit that once upon a time would have only found an outlet at places like Literotica. But in KU you get paid. Not much, but I guess that's better than nothing.

Which is also interesting, in the sense that Amazon demands tax information before you're allowed to participate. Meaning Gilbert had to give them his real name, address, telephone number and social security number (probably, though I guess there's a slight chance he set up an LLC or corporation to hold the book and to receive 1099 forms, if needed). I'm sure the information is locked down so that no haxor king will ever get at it, but the SJW infestation at Amazon is pretty bad (iirc Izzy Galvez works there), so he's potentially vulnerable to exposure from some blue-hair too stupid to realize the consequences of getting caught for such exposure.

There's also the issue of "click-farm" abuse in Kindle Unlimited. Apparently otherwise innocent authors are now getting sucked into it, and getting banned for life from Amazon. Dunno if anyone has ever used something like this to deliberately target an author, but it kind of looks like with the right connections and $200 you could get a lesser known author kicked off of Amazon forever.

I'm wondering what proportion of the readership is serious and what proportion is kiwis/redditors reading it for a laugh.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: FataBataRang
Not entirely, I just went to his fA and saw Lingrimm made the cover and they're Russian. They're a pretty well known artist according to their stats. I just found it odd that a Russian hater would rant and rave about how much they love a Russian girl team's artwork?

I don't think a Nazi furry probably understands the concept of a consistent principle.
 
I don't really see how an obsession with feet is "potentinally dangerous", but I'm sure you can explain.
She said "sick and dangerous". Foot fetishes are sick. Bondage, watersports and scat are both sick and potentially dangerous, and probably what she was focusing on.
 
She said "sick and dangerous". Foot fetishes are sick. Bondage, watersports and scat are both sick and potentially dangerous, and probably what she was focusing on.

You're a dismal failure of a kiwi if you think foot fetishes are sick. Fluffies will destroy you.

On a more serious note, those other fetishes really aren't very dangerous either. Apart from all the serial killer ones like rape and cannibalism, autoerotic asphyxiation is the main one that actually causes serious damage.
 
Last edited:
You're a dismal failure of a kiwi if you think foot fetishes are sick. Fluffies will destroy you.

Qd73Lrm.png


those other fetishes really aren't very dangerous either

playing in piss and shit is hygienic and is totally a healthy thing to do

ok
 
Back