Watermark Discussion. - NIGGER MARK N SHIEEET.

[NSJAP]

I'm very late on this, but here's my spited out by LLM take on audiomarking with ability to change volume of injected audio.

ffmpeg -i input_video.mp4 -stream_loop -1 -i audio_to_inject.mp3 -filter_complex "[0:a]volume=1[a1];[1:a]volume=0.1[a2];[a1][a2]amix=inputs=2:duration=first[aout]" -map 0:v -map "[aout]" -c:v copy -c:a aac -shortest output_video.mp4

Example:

 

[DefinitelyNotMe]

A $20K advertising campaign will always be 1000x more effective than a content creator slop dispenser shoutout/credit
This website grows as fast as Null wants it to, because It can certainly grow faster.

The NiggerMark should definitely be used, even if just to demonstrate how much power users hold over YouTubers because they, without a doubt, scrape from KF.

we have sorces for most of the clips with timestamps
this will just add 2 hours of work for these retards

 

[BONECRUSHER]

Stop trying to advertise and suck up to normalfaggots, you subhuman retards. Nigger watermark that shit to make trannies like Tom eat shit

 

[Nothing Is Written]

This would only invite more sock accounts to abuse the site. Worse than the 4chan refugee crisis.

It can be cropped and removed easily with editing, unless it's animated like some bouncing DVD logo.

If you want to draw attention to certain threads, and stage a cowtipcopalyse, that's a sure fire way to do it.

 

[Near]

Turkey Tom is reading this thread pretty often. He seems quite concerned. As if it is a business risk to him.

Boy it'd be a shame if something happened and all KF content was niggermarked

 

[Nitro!]

dude i want for more users on the site.
if you put NIGGER on every video that means you can't share it no one outside of your circle and stuff like 4 chan. you cant really put it on twitter on facebook etc.

Yes, that is exactly what I am advocating for. A mass influx of users is always a net negative as the existing userbase is swamped dealing with the worst of them and it's why the gates close when there's a threat of it. Why would you want to invite the userbases of these sites here en masse anyway? They are who we are ridiculing.

if you angry at yt slop people thats just means that they would do an extra legwork, which they will do because they get paid for it. they will read the farms, they will see our clip, they either will make their own or go to reddit or something and take it from there. not all of them will do it but if they need the clip and they absolutely cannot use our clip, they will.

This is why I am frustrated with this thread at all. YouTubers who are nabbing clips from the Bossman thread use them for gayops and to actively fuck with the content I'm enjoying. Advertising the cow or the site through normalfag channels brings posters who are here for the wrong reasons.

 

[canalCrab]

I definitely am in favor of the kiwimark over the niggermark. the evidence of shittery spreading is a good thing for us, as it allows us to point out the hyprocrisy easier when people are trying to claim we are the most evil site on the web.

 

[Tyrant_1]

we have sorces for most of the clips with timestamps
this will just add 2 hours of work for these retards

Yes, yes it will. 2 hours of actual labor means 2 less hours for them to goon.
Hold their hands to the fire. Make them suffah. ChatGPT will not assuage their struggles either

This would only invite more sock accounts to abuse the site. Worse than the 4chan refugee crisis.

You see sockpuppets. I see a doctor, a scientist, an astronaut

 

[BTS4Lyfe]

I am fond of the kiwifarms logo that switches into nigger at times.

 

[DefinitelyNotMe]

Yes, yes it will. 2 hours of actual labor means 2 less hours for them to goon.
Hold their hands to the fire. Make them suffah. ChatGPT will not assuage their struggles either

oh man im so drunk on power over sloptubers rn
i surely will have a hangover

 

[Marty Robbins]

The video essayers probably would be too afraid to use kiwifarm watermarked clips anyway. No matter how many times they would say disavow they would be admitting they went on the mass shooter Nazi site that makes trannies kill themselves. That means there is no point in trying to use the clips to advertise anyway. Niggermark Chads win.

 

[Brap God]

I have read the thread and to be clear it's the mostly-transparent, slow-scroll that does the job I am advocating for.

I'd be fine with slow scroll as well, couldn't care less tbh. Your initial post read like you didn't understand moving watermarks are harder to remove, which is why I responded the way I did.

 

[Nothing Is Written]

This is legitimately the stupidest idea I've heard from you retards.

You’re just putting a neon “KiwiFarms made this” sign on every frame like it’s an ARG for journos and clout goblins.

If the goal is to stop bottom-feeding YouTubers and content locusts, watermarking = playing yourself.

But if you insist...

1. Forensic Watermarking
Invisible data baked into video/audio. You can’t see it, but when some soyflavored YouTuber reposts it, you can match the signal and trace the leak. Hollywood uses this to track pre-release screeners. You can too.

2. Honeytokens
Make slight variations in clips (frame timing, artifacting, even one random frame of “NIGGER”). Distribute unique versions to known users/forums. When it leaks? You know who spilled the beans. It's like digital rat poison.

3. Cryptographic Hash Logging
Every file version or DL session gets a unique hash embedded (visibly or invisibly). Tie it to IP/session/user and keep logs. If a clip shows up on YouTube with hash X8291A? Boom, got the source. Bonus points if you automate this with a script.

4. DRM-lite Wrappers
Use embedded HTML5 video players with tokenised access to block easy downloading. Not bulletproof (screen recorders exist), but slows down the “steal and reupload” pipeline.

5. AI Scene Fingerprinting
Train a simple ML model or use existing services (Pex, Audiomagic, etc.) to detect copies - even if they’re cropped, flipped, or shit-tier filtered.

or...

Slip in a single frame QR code or noise-based hash image that appears for 1 frame at a low-opacity layer. Looks like compression noise unless you scrub and enhance. Tie that frame content to a user/session. If it leaks? You now have a forensic signature. Or if you don't care about tracing, use a redirect to whatever malware or meme site you want. "Huh? Enhance! Oh fuck, it's two old guys fucking on a couch - abort, abort!"

Watermarks are for attention whores. If you’re serious about control, go cold war spy tactics: invisible, trackable, undeniable.
Tag the rats, don’t advertise the cheese.

 

[Anonymous Against Foodism]

ts is too convoluded we should just lock all attachments behind a feralteen quiz like "what is feralteens favorite vocaloid?" and if you get it wrong your reddit farms account gets leaked and all the information with it like emails and ips

 

[Ruined by the Rain]

ts is too convoluded we should just lock all attachments behind a feralteen quiz like "what is feralteens favorite vocaloid?" and if you get it wrong your reddit farms account gets leaked and all the information with it like emails and ips

Sharty niggers should be shot

 

[Probably An Autist]

This is legitimately the stupidest idea I've heard from you retards.

You’re just putting a neon “KiwiFarms made this” sign on every frame like it’s an ARG for journos and clout goblins.

If the goal is to stop bottom-feeding YouTubers and content locusts, watermarking = playing yourself.

But if you insist:

this isnt fuckin CSI or the panama papers we just want to fuck with people. I'd like Null's opinion as its his site (MATI segment pls), but I highly doubt he will invest the time to do it server side, which is what most of your suggestions need. It may also change the definition of section 230 and "publishing"
putting a subtle spinning, flashing nigger in the middle of a juicy clip is a funny way of curbing the soytubers

 

[Tyrant_1]

oh man im so drunk on power over sloptubers rn
i surely will have a hangover

I really see no critical remonstration to the NiggerMark.
If people have power to fuck with YouTubers, why shouldn't they?

They're going to message users for clean sauce here if scrapes are not working.
All I'm saying is that you can have them pay the Troll's Toll. Nothing should be off the table.

 

[dumbledore]

I own niggermark.com which now redirects to this thread.

I'm still thinking what to do with the domain, would an automated niggermarking be useful than Information page with instructions?

 

[Ruined by the Rain]

I own niggermark.com which now redirects to this thread.

I'm still thinking what to do with the domain, would an automated niggermarking be useful than Information page with instructions?

Wouldn't that rack up your server cost

 

[dumbledore]

Wouldn't that rack up your server cost

Depends on how it could be done. Worst case scenario, there would be a queue being processed by some vps.
I'm yet to research it, but I think a modern browser could handle something simple like adding an overlay on top of the video, all on the client side.