- Joined
- Oct 7, 2014
You need to hang onto your tax returns for 7-10 years. Russ is just a very poor record keeper
Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2022
How does he not get that protesting increasingly loudly that he had money and used it to pay for expenses in 2020 makes unsealing the IFP application essentially necessary?
Also, I'd like to point out, in the last few filings greer has consistently typed IFP (in forma pauperis) as IPF. what a fuckin dummy
Also, I'd like to point out, in the last few filings greer has consistently typed IFP (in forma pauperis) as IPF. what a fuckin dummy
and six goriilion others
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2023
Those are a lot of typos. That combined with it being 3 filings while it could've just been one, it really seems like he was shook and trying to get this out ASAP.
Honestly I'm kinda doubtful there was fraud on Greer's side, and more tardguarding from the court's side and them just granting IFP based on the true facts Greer gave.
Honestly I'm kinda doubtful there was fraud on Greer's side, and more tardguarding from the court's side and them just granting IFP based on the true facts Greer gave.
Unknown God
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2025
Hardin's argument that he didn't qualify for IFP based on his income alone assumed $14/hr. Greer now confirmed that he earned $16/hr.
I will also need some legal clarification: is going through a very temporary and mild financial hardship such as moving enough to qualify you as a pauper as far as courts are concerned? I'm going to guess no.
I will also need some legal clarification: is going through a very temporary and mild financial hardship such as moving enough to qualify you as a pauper as far as courts are concerned? I'm going to guess no.
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
My favorite part is where he has a screenshot of his book title now officially in the court records. I don't know if he has done that before, but it's ... chefs kiss...
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2022
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2022
318-320 are some of the weirdest filings yet! "Yuh honnah I waited too long to sue the creepy stalkers on kiwifarms so I had to do a fraud to get IPF (i pee freely?) status so I could file in time! It wasn't my fault I did the fraud it was the creepy statute of limitations!"
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2020
Luckily, if it becomes necessary the IRS will provide copies for at least 7 years.
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2021
My own favorite is where he included a screenshot of a Facebook post of a U-Haul truck as "proof" that he "was moving" and by implication that he must have paid some unspecified amount of fees to U-Haul in order to move. (The data retention policy is a red herring. He absolutely would have bank records from that time, or at the very least the bank would.)
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2022
seems like ifp status is a fluid designation so it seems like you can get it depending on your finances at the start of trial?
im not seeing a tax return which would prove his actual income. and he can go to a uhual center to get the contract or dig through his emails for a copy.he does one thing and called it quits when it doesn't work out
for all we know it was someone else's uhaul.
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2019
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
So Russ admits he had the money on hand and only filed In Forma Pauperis to save money for moving, which I'm pretty sure isn't an excuse to go years and years without ever paying the filing fee
...then admits he had other infusions of cash since then, could afford to spend it as he "had Ben [sic] done" moving, but spent it on trying out for and suing America's Got Talent instead of paying Utah's court fee
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2022
Disposable income.
Disposable income.
Disposable income.
Disposable income, for another lolsuit too!
Your research leaves a lot to be desired. For example, the insistence that you're entitled to IFP because you've earmarked your disposable income for luxuries such as filing other lolsuits and moving home is sadly incorrect.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2020
It is just me, or does this most recent tranche of Russhole filings (ECF 318-320) come across as desperate, if not crestfallen?
It's almost as if Russhole knows he screwed the pooch so badly that no amount of judicial tard guarding and incantations including but not limited to "bizarrely", "excusable neglect" and "10th Circuit" could possibly save him from having this lolsuit dismissed.
It's almost as if Russhole knows he screwed the pooch so badly that no amount of judicial tard guarding and incantations including but not limited to "bizarrely", "excusable neglect" and "10th Circuit" could possibly save him from having this lolsuit dismissed.
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 16, 2019
My favorite part of 318 is it isn't even an objection to the unsealing. He doesn't even ask for Hardin to be denied in his conclusion. He's just writing out what is (supposedly) contained in ECF 1. He could have just written "I don't object to unsealing because I will be vindicated", but he can't stop himself from plightsplaining.
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2022
Also, I'm not seeing how Hardin 'got my IFP status revoked.' Judge asked if he could afford to pay. Russell immediately insisted he was rolling in coin and could happily pay,
Surely that's just Greer finally being honest about his financial status? What does that have to do with Hardin -- other than his raising the question about how he can afford to be opening brothels while claiming to be a literal pauper?
Also: is it just me or does anybody else think it's weird that he hoards random photographs of U-haul vans, but his important court documents are just lost to the fucking wind? Despite Dropbox, Google Drive, etc. offering mountains of free space in the cloud.
Seems to me to be something the court would want to pay attention to.
Surely that's just Greer finally being honest about his financial status? What does that have to do with Hardin -- other than his raising the question about how he can afford to be opening brothels while claiming to be a literal pauper?
Also: is it just me or does anybody else think it's weird that he hoards random photographs of U-haul vans, but his important court documents are just lost to the fucking wind? Despite Dropbox, Google Drive, etc. offering mountains of free space in the cloud.
Seems to me to be something the court would want to pay attention to.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Mr. Hardin did motion for that, though
- Joined
- May 16, 2019
I don't know that he understands what's really going on. He thinks it's strictly a question of backing up his numbers in ECF 1, and that's it.
His sole "argument" in 318 comes closest to being a reasonable expectation of how things work:
"I told the Court I had the money but asked for IPF anyway, and they said OK." Considering the retard asking and the retards passing judgement over in the 10th, I consider this a plausible sequence of events. But it assumes Greer was telling the truth, both now and back then; and that's an assumption huge enough to drive a Uhaul truck through.
And because I can't get off my CITE SOMETHING bit, I'll note that Greer says he "was relying on case law" saying he didn't have to spend all his money on court... without citing the fucking case law.
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2022
The filings seem to help Hardin in his argument to be allowed to see ECF 1. Greer admits to having saved up at least $3700 which he then spent in December 2020. Not a stretch to assume that in order to accrue $3700 he would have at least ~$400 in September 2020. Does this mean Greer was close to the IFP threshold who know? It does throw mud into the water around the state of his fiances in 2020. Which was the point Hardin made in ECF 317 on why he would like to see ECF 1. Great to see Greer and Hardin working together.
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2014
They sure do make one hell of a team!