Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

Lmao, good job Essiedu, they really can't help themselves. This is going to make shoots real awkward, buddy. And you know she isn't afraid to dunk on your ass on social media.

It is impossible for these people to just keep their opinions to themselves in the workplace.

Archive. / Link.
Nobody wanted a black Severus Snape to begin with, so just fire him and hire someone worthy of the role.
 
Screenshot 2025-05-26 070525.webp

talk about rent free in the head.
 
I’m not sure on her stance on free speech, has she mentioned its importance in general terms? Has she said anything about Lucy Connolly, who went to prison for posting anti immigration thoughts on Xitter, for example? I don’t think Kiwi farmers agree on topics either, one of the reasons this site is interesting, but I’m just not convinced she’d be ok with the website as a whole. I hope I’m wrong, and maybe her views have changed from what they were.
I have no opinion regarding her thoughts on this site, but I remembered her saying something about free speech in regards to Trump, and apparently it's from a speech in 2016 PEN Literary Award Gala:

The tides of populism and nationalism currently sweeping many developed countries have been accompanied by demands that unwelcome or inconvenient voices be removed from public discourse. Mainstream media has become a term of abuse in some quarters. It seems that unless a commentator or television channel or newspaper reflects exactly the complainers’ worldview, it must be guilty of bias or corruption.

Intolerance of alternative viewpoints is spreading to places that make me, a moderate and a liberal, most uncomfortable. Only last year we saw an online petition to ban Donald Trump from entry into the UK. It garnered half a million signatures. Now, I find almost everything that Mr. Trump says objectionable. I consider him offensive and bigoted. But he has my full support to come to my country and be offensive and bigoted there.

His freedom to speak protects my freedom to call him a bigot. His freedom guarantees mine. Unless we take that absolute position without caveats or apologies, we have set foot upon a road with only one destination.

If my offended feelings can constitute a travel ban on Donald Trump, I have no moral grounds on which to argue that those offended by feminism or the right for transgender rights or universal suffrage should not oppress campaigners for those causes. If you seek the removal of freedoms from an opponent simply on the grounds that they have offended you, you have crossed a line to stand along tyrants who imprison, torture and kill on exactly the same justification.

You can also check out her tweets through the search function. Here's the search for "freedom of speech" too. Her stance seems pretty consistant: everyone should be allowed to say whatever they want, even if it offends people and herself, debate and opposing ideas are good, and forcing people to talk a certain way or only say certain things is bad.

I don't think she's gone to bat for Lucy Connolly, but her focus is on women's rights. There's a lot of things she hasn't weighed in on, or has only weighed in on after being prompted into it (like the Putin situation).
 
Last edited:
I can imagine her stance on free speech has changed during her whole TERF arc. She has supported plenty of less fortunate women that have been screwed over by trannies. If she didn't have fuckoff money herself, and the clout of being a lefty lady that wrote children books, she might've been crushed under the tranny tide as well. For a long time being pro tranny was in vogue. You can easily imagine a scenario in which a person would say "of course I care about free speech, but you cannot say transwomen aren't women". She is smart enough to extrapolate that and be pro free speech on things you disagree with.

She probably stays out of most internet slapfights like Lucy to keep her sanity. The tranny issue lays close to her heart, so she couldn't stay silent even if she knew she would get a lot of hate for it. I have the idea many kiwis also dislike how modern politics have diverted from their old cores. Like how leftleaning people feel they are no longer represented by the current left politicians that are talking about diversity and trannies, rather than more mundane things like cost of living and worker rights. Seeing how Rowling went through something similar with trannies and labour, she might feel at home here.

I don't think Rowling is a kiwifarmer, but I don't think she would be completely out of place either. Let her loose in the stinkditch for a week, I say.
 
Doesn't her friend use this site?
Caroline Farrow? She’s definitely on here, I don’t know if she was particularly active before the bobbies charged her with being @Real Mutha For You (apparently middle aged Catholic moms loooove Snakefinger) and I also don’t know if Rowling was really that close to her.
 
Caroline Farrow? She’s definitely on here, I don’t know if she was particularly active before the bobbies charged her with being @Real Mutha For You (apparently middle aged Catholic moms loooove Snakefinger) and I also don’t know if Rowling was really that close to her.
I don't want her to reply to confirm, but yes, that's who I was thinking of. With JK exposure to tranny, she def knows about this site, and has probably seen content from here. Beyond that who knows. It's just funny to say because imagine the outrage. (she should not use this site as a public figure obv)
 
I don't want her to reply to confirm, but yes, that's who I was thinking of. With JK exposure to tranny, she def knows about this site, and has probably seen content from here. Beyond that who knows. It's just funny to say because imagine the outrage. (she should not use this site as a public figure obv)
She (Caroline Farrow) has got a confirmed account with her actual name which makes the accusations that she’s RealMuthaForYa especially ridiculous
 
Last edited:
I don't think she's gone to bat for Lucy Connolly, but her focus is on women's rights.
She hasn't. Absent any comment on the matter, it's probably safe to assume that the only thing Rowling knows about Connolly is what she's been told by the media, which has painted an extremely distorted image of what actually happened, meaning her view will be negative. Gell-Mann amnesia will be in full effect.

I will say this, though: I think she's slowly waking up to the problem of immigration - she's already highly critical of Islam for its misogynist treatment of women - but she's not going to address it much in public, if at all. If she does, it will likely be within the frame of rape and abuse of women and girls, focused on the huge, male-favouring sex imbalance among immigrants the fact that, just like transgender men, they are protected when they rape and their crimes are minimised purely because of their status. This would make the campaign consistent in her mind. Islam's treatment of women is something she already highlights as a problem in places like Iran, where she sees continuity between women wanting to throw off islamic dress codes and her own campaign to protect women from abusive men.
 
Screenshot_20250526_084830_Instagram.webp
JK Rowling herself was an actual victim who got herself out of her situation as a single mother barely surviving on benefits and fleeing from domestic abuse before the success of Harry Potter. Rowling can see that many on the modern left are spoiled perpetual victims who have never gone through true hardship like she has. She's not naive or stupid. The clowns who send JK Rowling numerous death and rape threats, threaten her with violence, smear and make disgusting false lies about the author and her loved ones that border on libel will then cry crocodile tears when women misgender them or tell them "no". When you're dealing with this crap over and over again, of course your patience and tolerance would wear very thin. How do these crybullies expect Rowling to react to all of this?

"sorry i was wrong twaw i guess i am a silly TERF cunt who deserves to choke on girldick and die after all teehee"

Every time a deranged troon tells JK Rowling to "eat shit", she's only to become even unapologetically savage. :story:

They're not getting anywhere closer to convincing women like JK Rowling that trannies are totally 100% real women and their mob-like behaviour towards her only furthers her point that trans ideology is incompatible with women's wellbeing.
 
Hey the first quoted post there is lolcow Oliver "Abigail" Thorn aka Philosophy Tube.
View attachment 7413023
Waste hours of your life filling out a form that will be filtered by AI and literally never seen by another person to own the TERFs.
This feels like an end-of-season-clash on the Sopranos brewing.
“The Gender Recognition Act, whatever happened there.”
“Whatever happened there?!?!”
 
I’m not really sure why there’s so much speculation that she lurks or posts here. She would hate this site, from the right-wing stuff to the no-no words to laughing at idiots online. I love you all (no homo) but she is too good for this place.
She's also not actually an "online" type. She had to interview her children, IRL no less, to learn about modern fandoms like SU and Tumblr and other fujoshit. Despite being the right age, I doubt she was ever non-normie enough to have even heard of SA, ARRSE, or even fucking Digital Spy. She has a life, is the "vibe" I get from her.
"She's getting worse" she's getting better-looking. Who is her surgeon and do you think I could afford him.
 
Back