Disaster Stunt Performer Sues Kevin Costner and ‘Horizon 2’ Over Unscripted Rape Scene - In a complaint filed Tuesday, Devyn LaBella claims that union and contractual rules were breached when she was allegedly subjected to perform an impromptu scene of sexual violence without an intimacy coordinator.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/m...t-horizon-2-unscripted-rape-scene-1236231181/
https://archive.is/AcExK
IMG_3413.webp
One day in May 2023, stunt performer Devyn LaBella showed up to the Utah set of Horizon: An American Saga – Chapter 2, the second part of the sprawling Western series from Kevin Costner, expecting to double for one of the film’s stars in some basic, fairly boring shots. Instead, she says, she was surprised by being subjected to an unscripted, brutal rape scene without proper notice, consent or the presence of a contractually mandated intimacy coordinator.

Now, LaBella is suing Costner and the film’s production companies for sexual discrimination, harassment and the creation of a hostile work environment. Moreover, the complaint alleges LaBella faced retaliation after she reported the incident by not being called back for subsequent work on the Horizon series and never being hired again by the film’s stunt coordinator, with whom she had worked previously.

“On that day, I was left exposed, unprotected, and deeply betrayed by a system that promised safety and professionalism,” LaBella said in a statement to The Hollywood Reporter. “What happened to me shattered my trust and forever changed how I move through this industry.”

In a statement, Costner’s attorney Marty Singer said his client “always wants to make sure that everyone is comfortable working on his films and takes safety on set very seriously.” He says, however, that the lawsuit has “absolutely no merit” and is “completely contradicted by [LaBella’s] own actions — and the facts.”

The suit represents the latest legal battle for Horizon, as Costner’s loan-out firm for the series was recently hit with an arbitration claim for allegedly breaching its co-financing agreement with New Line Cinema. This complaint was filed after settlement discussions with Costner and production company representatives broke down, says James Vagnini of Valli Kane & Vagnini, one of the attorneys representing LaBella, with support from the Time’s Up Legal Defense Fund.

The Horizon series is the product of decades of hustle from Costner, a veteran of the Western epic, from Dances With Wolves to Hatfields & McCoys to Yellowstone. With no major studio willing to fork over the cash he felt was needed, Costner invested $38 million of his own funds, with the series’ first film premiering to anemic box office in June 2024.

An ascendant stunt performer who had worked on Barbie and American Horror Stories, LaBella was hired on Horizon’s second installment as the lead stunt double for actress Ella Hunt, who plays one of the film’s main characters. Hunt’s role did involve sexual violence. As part of her contract, the lawsuit maintains, Hunt negotiated a mandatory intimacy coordinator on all nude or intimate scenes, which, as her stunt double, would apply to LaBella as well. Moreover, given that Hunt and LaBella are members of the performers union SAG-AFTRA, their intimate scenes would also be subject to the labor group’s regulations, which call for prior notice, consent and a closed set.

Everything went by the book for a scripted rape scene that shot on May 1, according to the suit: The scene — where LaBella performed the more physical, rough aspects of the action — was detailed on the day’s call sheet, rehearsed with a stunt coordinator and an intimacy coordinator, later monitored by that intimacy coordinator, took place on a closed set and was structured such that performers got breaks in between shots.

But rules were allegedly thrown out the window the next day, when LaBella showed up on set to double for two non-intimate sequences and was asked by Costner to stand in for Hunt for a shot. Unbeknownst to LaBella, the complaint claims, Hunt had just walked off of the set, “visibly upset,” after Costner told her he had just added an impromptu scene of sexual violence perpetuated by a different character than the previous day’s scene.

LaBella, instructed to lay down on a wagon, allegedly only found out that this was a rape scene after Costner called for actor Roger Ivens to simulate nonconsensual sex on top of her: “Mr. Ivens violently rustled Ms. LaBella’s skirt up as if trying to penetrate her against her will” while pinning her down per the director’s orders, the complaint states. No notice had been given, the scene had not been rehearsed, no intimacy coordinator was on set and all of the action was aired on monitors that could be viewed by the entire crew, according to the suit.

Costner’s attorney Singer maintains that this was a rehearsal without cameras rolling and not a filmed scene itself. The film’s stunt coordinators were present, he added. After this rehearsal, LaBella “gave her Stunt Coordinator supervisor a ‘thumbs up’ and indicated her willingness to then shoot the scene, if needed,” he states; the scene ended up being shot with a stand-in performer and not LaBella.

The lawsuit emphasizes that Costner did not consistently call “action” or “cut” during this process, leaving LaBella without time to fully comprehend what was happening as the action repeated. Meanwhile, “Mr. Ivens never separated from Ms. LaBella,” the suit says, consistently keeping his hand on her body. Moreover, the complaint claims the wardrobe department had not prepared LaBella for her undergarments to be exposed, as they were by the directions Costner was giving Ivens.

The complaint describes LaBella as shaken and “terrified” following this experience. Afterward, she raised concerns and made complaints to several stunt coordinators and to the film’s intimacy coordinator, later feeling that many in the production team were treating her with kid gloves, the suit states. She received some apologies from colleagues on the film, but was directed to stay in her trailer, fully costumed and not used on set for several days, the complaint claims.

Singer disputes that LaBella made a complaint to the film’s stunt coordinators, saying “she was in good spirits and made no complaints to them” at a dinner the night after the scene. He says that LaBella took stunt coordinator Wade Allen to a thank-you dinner following the production, and sent him a text stating, “Thank you for these wonderful weeks!”

Ultimately, LaBella was not called back for the third film in the series, and Allen did not hire her again, though he had hired her for projects before Horizon.

The lawsuit alleges that LaBella’s career came to an “abrupt halt” after the incident. Not only was Allen not hiring her again, but “the workplace, and stunt work in general, which was once a source of purpose and fulfillment, is now a place of heightened apprehension and the whole experience has left Ms. LaBella feeling ‘disposable’ and ‘worthless,’” the complaint states.

If the case goes to trial, LaBella and her attorneys are asking the jury to determine any potential punitive damages. Beyond compensation, the point of the suit is also to “address the continued failures at the highest levels of Hollywood production companies to comprehend and address the impacts of performing in sexually explicit and violent ‘scenes’ and the need for intimacy coordination,” the complaint reads.

The use of intimacy coordinators in Hollywood exploded after the #MeToo movement prompted a reappraisal of power dynamics on set. Choreographing scenes of an intimate nature, intimacy coordinators are intended to be watchdogs for performer safety and comfort. While some famous performers have embraced them (Rachel Zegler, Phoebe Dynevor), others have waved them off or said they didn’t feel they need them, like Mikey Madison and Sean Bean.

Per the lawsuit, in this case an intimacy coordinator was mandated by a performer contract, amplifying existing union protections. Says Jennifer Mondino, the senior director of the Time’s Up Legal Defense Fund, which supported the case, “The guidelines that are supposed to be followed on regular movie sets weren’t being followed.”

Adds LaBella’s lawyer Vagnini, “If it can happen on a size of a production worth $100 million or more, imagine what happens on smaller ones where you’re really trying to cut corners.”

As for Singer, he says, “The facts are clear and we are beyond confident that Kevin will prevail.”
IMG_3414.webp
Attached is the filing btw.
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
  1. Sexual Discrimination in Violation of
    FEHA (Cal. Gov. Code § 12940, et seq.)
  2. Sexual Harassment in Violation of FEHA
    (Cal Gov. Code § 12940, et seq.)
  3. Hostile Work Environment in Violation of
    FEHA (Cal. Gov. Code § 12940 et seq.
  4. Sexual Harassment in Violation of Cal. Civ.
    Code §§ 51.9 and 52
  5. Failure to Remedy/Prevent Discrimination and Harassment in Violation of FEHA (Cal.
    Gov. Code § 12940, et seq.)
  6. Retaliation in Violation of FEHA (Cal. Gov.
    Code § 12940, et seq.)
  7. Interference with the Exercise of Civil Rights in Violation of the Bane Act (Cal.
    Civ. Code § 52.1)
  8. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
  9. Breach of Contract

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
 

Attachments

Last edited:
It's very telling that at no point in this article are they specific about what an "intimacy coordinator" actually does.
Basically it’s the new hot thing from #MeToo where an ‘expert’ goes over every single instance of contact between people to ensure there are no consent accidents. They are very silly and entirely vestigial.
 
It sounds like her skirt just got uplifted, which probably while embarrassing and humiliating in any normal context, doesn't apply here. Besides not actually getting raped (far from it), she's already an accredited actress, not some extra who was paid to show up in the background.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Safir and Gutless
Here’s a Deadline article that breaks down the lawsuit as well as a copy of the complaint itself

Following a previous filing late last year with the California Civil Rights department, the plaintiff’s document in the the LA Superior Court docket Tuesdayclaims that “on may (sic) 2, 2023, plaintiff Devyn LaBella, a female stunt performer, was the victim of a violent unscripted, unscheduled rape scene directed by Kevin Costner (‘Mr. Costner’), owner, chief Executive officer and Secretary of Horizon Series, Inc.” Stressing a clear violation of SAG-AFTRA on set protocols, the sexual harassment, sexual discrimination and retaliation complaint goes on to say: “The impact of this impromptu work demand on Ms. Labella has been profound, not only upending a career Ms. Labella spent years building but leaving her with permanent trauma that she will be required to address for years to come.”

What the nine claim complaint also says is that Saturday Night cast member Hunt was thrown by Costner’s sudden addition of a rape scene. “Due to the ad hoc and violent nature of the sudden script change request, along with the failure to secure a contractually required intimacy coordinator for the scene, Ms. Hunt became visibly upset and walked off the set, refusing to do the scene,” the filing says, noting that LaBella knew nothing about this until much later.

Having had nothing but a professional and above board experience so far on the film, LaBella took to the task when she says Costner asked her to “stand in” for the departed Hunt to “line up [a] shot.” Then, on a far from closed set and with no intimacy coordinator, a modern underwear wearing LeBella was attacked by Roger Ivens’ Birke character “over and over as Defendant Costner experimented with different takes of the rape action,” the 28-page complaint alleges.

Not only did Costner seek different takes, but the Oscar winner seems to have wanted to increase the violence in the assault with little concern for LaBella, at least according to her filing:

As Defendant Costner directed Mr. Ivens to carry out the violent assault over and over and over again, Ms. LaBella felt the air pour over her intimate parts as her personal undergarments were exposed, even though to Ms. LaBella’s knowledge, costume underwear is typically worn in planned intimate shots. This exposure was especially humiliating to Ms. LaBella as she was menstruating at the time, compounded by the fact that between takes, Mr. Ivens’ hands rested on top of the bundled-up skirt above her vagina. Wardrobe immediately sewed up Ms. LaBella’s bloomers after the scene as she requested. It should have been done prior to the scene, but the departments were not prepared or informed that the scene would be happening.

There was no escaping the situation, and all Ms. LaBella could do was wait for the nightmare to end.
 

Attachments

Ms. LaBella felt the air pour over her intimate parts as her personal undergarments were exposed, even though to Ms. LaBella’s knowledge, costume underwear is typically worn in planned intimate shots.
I genuinely don't even know what this means. What the fuck is "costume underwear" and how is it different than actual underwear?

Is there magical on-screen clothing that's fundamentally different than real clothing? And if this was for setting up a shot, why would it matter at all?
 
I genuinely don't even know what this means. What the fuck is "costume underwear" and how is it different than actual underwear?

Is there magical on-screen clothing that's fundamentally different than real clothing? And if this was for setting up a shot, why would it matter at all?
I assume they are skin colored garments meant to simulate more nudity than there actually is. I think editors fuck with the film in post to make them blend in better and be unnoticeable
 
I genuinely don't even know what this means. What the fuck is "costume underwear" and how is it different than actual underwear?

Is there magical on-screen clothing that's fundamentally different than real clothing? And if this was for setting up a shot, why would it matter at all?
Have you watched "The Disaster Artist"? The scene where Lisa and Tommy are having sex, Tommy is wearing something on his crotch. I assume that's what they mean.
 
I assume they are skin colored garments meant to simulate more nudity than there actually is. I think editors fuck with the film in post to make them blend in better and be unnoticeable
Okay, that makes sense from a filmmaking perspective, but I don't understand how it changes anything from an "I WAS TRAUMATIZED" perspective. She wouldn't have been traumatized if it were "costume underwear" that had been exposed in a rape scene she agreed to do test footage for, but was traumatized because she was wearing presumably some kind of modern anachronistic underwear.

That's insane. This is a clear cash-grab.
 
  • Deviant
Reactions: Safir
Back