Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.5%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.8%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 154 33.3%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 112 24.2%

  • Total voters
    462
ECF 321 Screenshot 2025-05-28 184902.webp

Screenshot 2025-05-28 185143.webp

Screenshot 2025-05-28 185316.webp
 

Attachments

Damn. Russell is melting down. He's got to be worried that the whole thing is about to go tits up on him. I'm guessing he's worried that the whole thing might cost him a shed load of money now that is IFP status has been smashed through and Hardin is digging into his activities.

Alternatively, it may be an attempt to trick Hardin into acting unethically. While I can see how such a proposal might appear to a corrupt scam artist and extortionist like Greer, he clearly doesn't have any clue at all about what kind of man Matthew Hardin is.

What a fucking moron.

Also: I thought the line about being marked attorneys eyes only to foil Kiwifarms was a joke. I thought it was commentary by Useful Mistake. But it's not, it's right there at the bottom of Greer's settlement offer.

My mind is blown. This fool just can't stop himself, can he?
 
Last edited:
Back to the Russell classics I see — wielding information that might help in a police investigation, but not wanting to give it unless there’s something in it for him (like a tipster reward, or punishing KF for refusing to settle).

The crazy train may not have any brakes, but there’s got to be a wall somewhere down the line.
 
The tenth Circuit emphasized in Hammond v. Bales, 843 F.2d 1320, 1322 (10th Cir. 1988 ) that using criminal complaints as leverage to obtain a civil benefit is so egregious that it violates the Constitution.
10th Circuit sisters, not like this... :lossmanjack:
If you persist in your assertion that this email is “Attorneys Eyes Only,” we will file a formal motion to de-designate it, and will likely also seek sanctions against you for the frivolous and improper designation you made in the first instance.
The hooker fund is going to be decimated, holy fuck. :story:
 
Re-reading Hardin's filing with the court, he doesn't actually appear to be asking for anything, does he? He's just going on record as stating what happened, but he's not asking the court to do anything?

So will the court do anything here? Will they just wait out the seven days for Greer to either retract Attorney Eyes Only status or do nothing and let Hardin file the thing as it stands?
I have to say I wish Hardin had added, "P.S. I hope you've been working on producing those 2018 documents, which must be submitted to me by June 3rd, which is now less than a week away."

I suspect his inability to produce those documents is one of the factors in prompting this settlement offer.

I anticipate a rant in response about how Hardin is completely unethical for refusing to grab null by the ankles, turn him upside down and shake whatever coins he can out of his pocket and send them to Greer as a settlement.

Also: he should sneak behind null's back to the server and delete all mention of Greer's stalking and whoremongering. If he doesn't do this, he'll report him to the police for cybercrimes against humanity.
 
Last edited:
Back