Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 21.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 28.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 43 14.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 100 34.1%

  • Total voters
    293
I'm betting that phone call was news of a new CPS investigation, triggered by his accusations against the nanny.

Very smart move to broadcast the claim that his kids made fresh accusations of abuse against a former caretaker without first notifying CPS.



View attachment 7421981

Girl, you need a shot of B12

Also some of the photos show his entire fingers are blue, which is a sign of peripheral cyanosis / peripheral vasoconstriction.

View attachment 7427837
Fingers look like they are dying

That looks really really severe.

How is that even possible?

1. Inhale lots of nitrous oxide, multiple times a day, which both causes peripheral vasoconstriction and depletes vitamin B12.

2. Combine the nitrous with Adderall (amphetamine), a very potent peripheral vasoconstrictor.

3. Lastly mix in Provigil (modafinil), which is also a peripheral vasoconstrictor.

Three (3) peripheral vasoconstrictors that work synergistically?

What could go wrong!

With the mighty power of these drugs combined , you too can have fingers that look like they're about to fall off!

This is big brained high IQ stuff guys. He's passing his drug tests isn't he?
I don't know why you are being such a Scandinavian Prude? I think he is on every legal high he can get his paws on, Nicolas Rekieta is mashing up experimental plant hormones bought en-mass from AliExpress with his cheerio's and almond milk. Nicolas Rekieta is a living legend among the Punjabi Gas Station community in Minnesota for his bulk purchases of packaged pills with space-rockets and tigers on the packaging. Nicolas Rekieta has probably put homeopathic sex stores into non-stock since his probation on amyl nitrates and party drugs.
 
What is Kandiyohi county trying to hide? Is it true that this was all a setup to get Nick? Did the cops rub cocaine residue into his daughter's hair to get a positive test and ruin Nick's reputation because he was speaking truth to power? Clearly the county, the cops, and the judges are trying to bury all their sins with Nick's career and hoping no one notices. Maybe Nick was right all along...
 
Then he gets killed for not being actually gay, which totally makes sense in 2025, much like how in American History X Danny ends up getting killed by a nigger
Even at the time that ending was hamhanded, the whole "homophobic Nazi turns out to be gay himself!" shit. Even Falling Down handled that one better and it was actually funny.
 
Nick has probably made faggy gay threats to them in his high pitched whiny fag voice
IT'S NOT TRUE!!
HE HAS A MANLY DEEP VOICE NOW FROM ALL THE WHIPPETS.
nitro nick.webp
 
It's possible they'll put up a serious fight and it might not be worth going at it.
It's always worth it because it will stress the fuck out of Rekieta. Remember, the cokestream happened because of a minor loss against Montegraph. Nick is in a no-win situation: either the footage is released or the situation drags on, attracting more eyes every day.
 
Even at the time that ending was hamhanded, the whole "homophobic Nazi turns out to be gay himself!" shit. Even Falling Down handled that one better and it was actually funny.
I kinda intentionally take things at face value when it subverts subversion, like how in the end of The Believer, the dude gets everyone out of the synagogue but goes to hell anyways because Jews don’t believe in Jesus
 
he has no money though. hed have to ask his dad for thousands just to avoid looking like an idiot.
His parents let the crack whore stay at their house, I wouldn’t put it past them funding a lolsuit
Therein lies the problem. The skelly faggot just so happens to be the deadbeat son of boomer oil barons, and that kind of money is what gets you the best lawyers.
 
His parents let the crack whore stay at their house, I wouldn’t put it past them funding a lolsuit
i would, passive enabling is easy " i need several thousand dollars minimum so the internet wont mock me or my already ruined reputation and josh null doesnt get a dubya" is a lot harder even if youre wealthy. also if josh makes good on his promise then they covered for a child abuser nick without even avoiding legal trouble anyway. and unlike nick null still actually has a platform and friends with platforms so theyd be better off having nick screaming his little helium fag voice out on his 2 view shithole.
Therein lies the problem. The skelly faggot just so happens to be the deadbeat son of boomer oil barons, and that kind of money is what gets you the best lawyers.
heres the thing, nicks parents are enablers, i cant imagine even they would spend ten grand minimum even if richest of rich to protect their son on this particular angle, its like if he sucked aaron's dick live but wanted to sue someone calling him a fag. theres no point wasting money on that even if youre a faggy enabler.
 
Because Jersh likely has more native american blood than Elizabeth Warren maybe he could wrangle a treaty with the Federal government as a sovereign Indian tribe and the Farms could be funded by legalized gambling.
I demand Candy Yoshi declare me a Lakota Sioux or else I'll Lakota Sue. I once knew a Lakota Sioux guy. That basically makes me one myself.
 
None of those records drops by MNPublicRecords were illegal. The records that person dropped were difficult to access. They were not on the internet and required physical presence at a court-house to access. But they were public records at the time.
This is why I put "illegally" in quotes since the faggot Rekieta was whining in his high pitched voice how MNPublic broke the law (lol) in releasing them
 
This is especially true since he's responding to a direct request "to detail what your exhibits are", since it's possible to interpret "get rid of" in the sense of detailing them quickly and moving on. This interpretation is aided by the fact that he then says they are "not particularly relevant" which is distinct from "irrelevant".
Yeah that seems to be the most obvious explanation as he follows that by saying they relate solely to a single issue which was just raised and discussed (i.e. "we've already covered/agreed on what the body cams would be used for ostensibly so we can just move on from any further discussion of them for now").
 
Therein lies the problem. The skelly faggot just so happens to be the deadbeat son of boomer oil barons, and that kind of money is what gets you the best lawyers.
Then if they insist, their generational wealth continues to pour out into the soil for useless love of their spoiled, retarded son. If they insist that's the best use of their money, that's what happens and karma does take its due in that way instead. What could have been a great family becomes an unremarkable one because Rackets is that retarded and egoistic and his parents are enablers who get exactly what they deserve from him.
 
Yeah that seems to be the most obvious explanation as a follows that by saying they relate solely to a single issue which was just raised (i.e. "we've already covered/agreed on what the body cams would be used for ostensibly so we can just move on from that any further discussion of them for now").
It sounds to me like Pierce was reserving the right to enter them as evidence, which is different from a formal listing of them in a disclosure of exhibits to be used at trial. This motion (if granted) may remove one ground for disclosure of the footage, but certainly doesn't foreclose other avenues for disclosure.
So this thread can stop blind guessing and infighting over the implications now
But we're so good at it!
 
Back