Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 65 21.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 27.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 48 15.8%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 104 34.2%

  • Total voters
    304
From what you said on MATI, I gathered that the county has already agreed to give it to you. But now they're trying to renege on that agreement for whatever asinine reason.
I didn't really hear that. What he said appeared to be that he expected it to be released but was willing to go to court over it if not, which hardly suggests inevitability.
Remember the days when prosecutors never used to let criminals publicly cornhole them?
In Minnesota? Was there ever such a time? He wisely chose to be a completely degenerate criminal piece of shit whitebread-ass nigga in the right jurisdiction.
 
At 4:17pm today, the Kandiyohi County Attorney filed a motion asking the judge in Rekieta's criminal case 34-CR-24-341 to "correct Court records to properly reflect that the two body cams were never offered or received as exhibits at the Omnibus hearing", stating that "the import of this issue is significant as under Minn. Stat. 13.82, subd. 7, 'any investigative data presented as evidence in court' shall be public."
My interpretation would be that the DA wants to provide the county sheriff the legal pretext to refuse to release the bodycam footage.

Why would that interpretation be incorrect?

Edit:
Yes. The county is trying to withdraw the body cam as evidence. They don't have a right to.

So yeah. That seems to be exactly what is happening.
 
I didn't really hear that. What he said appeared to be that he expected it to be released but was willing to go to court over it if not, which hardly suggests inevitability.
My understanding was he was waiting for an update, which was either going to be they're releasing it to him, or he's going to sue. It looks like this was the update he was waiting for.
 
Yes. The county is trying to withdraw the body cam as evidence. They don't have a right to. Nick has been screaming, begging the prosecutor to help to get this result.

Lolcow will be entering an appearance as an intervener in his criminal case. This is a constitutional violation.
My slobbermutt!

Very proud of you!

:semperfidelis:
 
I think them denying the people the footage reflects poorly on Kandiyohi County and makes them seem complicit in either abetting a convicted criminal or trying to absolve themselves of percieved guilt. I believe the only way to show themselves in good faith is by releasing the footage, unless they have something very dark to hide.
They're basically proving Nick's theory that there's a conspiracy against him right

Why go through the effort IF they aren't to hide something?
 
What I don't understand is why the county is willing to help him? He has accused multiple people multiple times of planting evidence and improper behavior, but they can't actually have done this on the footage because then he would be releasing it himself regardless of how dirty it is, he wouldn't have even pleaded guilty.

I was fairly convinced that this guy had given the county plenty of motivation to spite him, now they're trying to deny an order to do so? There has to be something greater at play here.

Either that or Nick is extremely good at portraying himself as someone who needs protecting.

The only thing I can imagine is some mix of personal favors or some reason the county doesn't want the footage out in general unrelated to nicks desires.

Maybe they know it would immediately become prime internet video material and they don't want a drug addicted child neglecting sex freak ex lawyer to become their unofficial mascot. The drachenlord effect of having their town be known for his existence.
 
Yes. The county is trying to withdraw the body cam as evidence. They don't have a right to. Nick has been screaming, begging the prosecutor to help to get this result.

Lolcow will be entering an appearance as an intervener in his criminal case. This is a constitutional violation.
Fight tooth and nail for the bodycam footage, der Sneeder :semperfidelis: . The things we really need in life require our maximum effort to obtain, and we NEED that footage. Make Nick squirm, PUT THE PRESSURE ON HIM.
 
Lake wobegon is the fake Minnesota lake your looking for
🎶The shores of Lake Wakanda.🎵

Road to Perdition was lightning in a bottle. The final scene is beautiful. I still know nothing about American gangsters, but purely through the score, tone and cameraplay I *got* it.
Thomas Newman again.
 
It was the Barneswalker who cited the footage in his motion to dismiss and uploaded the footage as exhibits prior to the hearing.
I would kind of think that this is alone would be enough to satisfy the "presented as evidence in court" requirement as the statute doesn't say anything about what stage of the proceeding it has to be.
 
Yes. The county is trying to withdraw the body cam as evidence. They don't have a right to. Nick has been screaming, begging the prosecutor to help to get this result.

Lolcow will be entering an appearance as an intervener in his criminal case. This is a constitutional violation.
Would it be feasible to donate directly to the LLC for lawyers' fees? I've been waiting a long time for the bodycam footage.
 
By the prosecutors? What are they, cucks?
Kandiyohi was ordered by a judge to release the footage and now they're in damage control. The sheriff outright said he did not intend to comply with the judge's order until a local big law firm sent him a letter, and they have the clout in the state to actually intimidate.

We then asked the Department of Administration to rule and they also issued an opinion that the sheriff should comply. He said he would decide that to do on the 2nd.

Now, the prosecutor is jumping in to help. Seems like the county conspiracy does exist, but not to hurt that poor little crackhead.
 
Last edited:
Back